|
QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Reconstructionist Judaism | |
Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. counties on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population who are Reconstructionist Jews. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings. Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.
[ More information on the data source ]
Complete List
Ranking |
County [Download CSV] | Adherents | Percent |
27 |
Alameda County, California |
68 |
0 |
23 |
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania |
548 |
0.04 |
24 |
Atlantic County, New Jersey |
86 |
0.03 |
20 |
Baltimore city, Maryland |
408 |
0.07 |
1 |
Bennington County, Vermont |
292 |
0.79 |
25 |
Bergen County, New Jersey |
146 |
0.02 |
18 |
Berkshire County, Massachusetts |
119 |
0.09 |
26 |
Bexar County, Texas |
140 |
0.01 |
22 |
Bristol County, Massachusetts |
300 |
0.05 |
8 |
Bucks County, Pennsylvania |
1,482 |
0.24 |
22 |
Burlington County, New Jersey |
240 |
0.05 |
26 |
Butte County, California |
32 |
0.01 |
25 |
Charlotte County, Florida |
24 |
0.02 |
5 |
Cheshire County, New Hampshire |
275 |
0.36 |
26 |
Clark County, Nevada |
184 |
0.01 |
23 |
Cook County, Illinois |
2,330 |
0.04 |
3 |
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania |
940 |
0.4 |
25 |
Cuyahoga County, Ohio |
286 |
0.02 |
22 |
Dane County, Wisconsin |
238 |
0.05 |
19 |
DeKalb County, Georgia |
543 |
0.08 |
18 |
Delaware County, Pennsylvania |
518 |
0.09 |
13 |
Denver County, Colorado |
840 |
0.14 |
26 |
Duval County, Florida |
68 |
0.01 |
17 |
Erie County, New York |
932 |
0.1 |
26 |
Essex County, Massachusetts |
108 |
0.01 |
19 |
Essex County, New Jersey |
643 |
0.08 |
26 |
Fairfax County, Virginia |
100 |
0.01 |
26 |
Franklin County, Ohio |
135 |
0.01 |
2 |
Hampshire County, Massachusetts |
810 |
0.51 |
27 |
Harris County, Texas |
130 |
0 |
26 |
Hennepin County, Minnesota |
151 |
0.01 |
6 |
Howard County, Maryland |
880 |
0.31 |
14 |
Ingham County, Michigan |
378 |
0.13 |
19 |
Jefferson County, Colorado |
421 |
0.08 |
26 |
King County, Washington |
113 |
0.01 |
7 |
Lane County, Oregon |
986 |
0.28 |
23 |
Lehigh County, Pennsylvania |
151 |
0.04 |
23 |
Los Angeles County, California |
3,761 |
0.04 |
12 |
Marion County, Indiana |
1,370 |
0.15 |
16 |
Marion County, Oregon |
362 |
0.11 |
26 |
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina |
84 |
0.01 |
24 |
Mercer County, New Jersey |
113 |
0.03 |
25 |
Miami-Dade County, Florida |
381 |
0.02 |
23 |
Middlesex County, Massachusetts |
659 |
0.04 |
13 |
Montgomery County, Maryland |
1,312 |
0.14 |
20 |
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania |
594 |
0.07 |
15 |
Multnomah County, Oregon |
869 |
0.12 |
18 |
Nassau County, New York |
1,253 |
0.09 |
13 |
New Castle County, Delaware |
748 |
0.14 |
18 |
New York County, New York |
1,443 |
0.09 |
22 |
Northampton County, Pennsylvania |
151 |
0.05 |
26 |
Oakland County, Michigan |
100 |
0.01 |
21 |
Orange County, California |
1,671 |
0.06 |
4 |
Orange County, North Carolina |
505 |
0.38 |
6 |
Ozaukee County, Wisconsin |
270 |
0.31 |
26 |
Palm Beach County, Florida |
84 |
0.01 |
18 |
Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania |
1,342 |
0.09 |
24 |
Plymouth County, Massachusetts |
173 |
0.03 |
15 |
Prince George's County, Maryland |
1,075 |
0.12 |
26 |
Salt Lake County, Utah |
81 |
0.01 |
26 |
San Diego County, California |
464 |
0.01 |
24 |
San Francisco County, California |
270 |
0.03 |
25 |
Santa Clara County, California |
305 |
0.02 |
21 |
Sarasota County, Florida |
243 |
0.06 |
10 |
Somerset County, New Jersey |
610 |
0.19 |
23 |
Sonoma County, California |
200 |
0.04 |
15 |
St. Louis County, Minnesota |
238 |
0.12 |
27 |
St. Louis County, Missouri |
32 |
0 |
21 |
Suffolk County, Massachusetts |
459 |
0.06 |
24 |
Suffolk County, New York |
486 |
0.03 |
9 |
Thurston County, Washington |
572 |
0.23 |
26 |
Travis County, Texas |
86 |
0.01 |
10 |
Ulster County, New York |
348 |
0.19 |
21 |
Union County, New Jersey |
348 |
0.06 |
24 |
Warren County, Ohio |
68 |
0.03 |
23 |
Washtenaw County, Michigan |
127 |
0.04 |
27 |
Wayne County, Michigan |
57 |
0 |
17 |
Wayne County, Ohio |
116 |
0.1 |
11 |
Westchester County, New York |
1,529 |
0.16 |
5 |
Windham County, Connecticut |
432 |
0.36 |
*
In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.
However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.
Source
2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]
|