National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave I Public Use Contextual Database
Year: 1995 Cases: 6504 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave I In-Home, In-School, and Parent Questionnaire Data
Year: 1995 Cases: 6504 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave I Public Use Network Data
Year: 1995 Cases: 6504 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave I Grand Sample Weights
Year: 1995 Cases: 6504 Weight: GSWGT1 Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave II Public Use Contextual Database
Year: 1996 Cases: 4834 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave II In-Home Questionnaire Data
Year: 1996 Cases: 4834 Weight: CORE2_2 Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Wave II Grand Sample Weights
Year: 1996 Cases: 4834 Weight: GSWGT2 Frame: U.S. Youth Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Live Births Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 1357 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Children and Parenting Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 1323 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Completed Pregnancies Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 2163 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Current Pregnancies Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 180 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Education Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 3947 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Education Data Weights, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 3964 Weight: PTWGT3_2 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Graduation Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 4521 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use In-Home Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 4882 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Pregnancy Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 2348 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Relationships Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 13998 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Relationships in Detail Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 12680 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PVT) Score Data, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 4882 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use School Weights, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 132 Weight: SCHWT1 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Public Use Weights, Wave III
Year: 2002 Cases: 4882 Weight: GSWGT3_2 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Adults, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 773 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Survey of African-American Priests and Seminarians, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 159 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic priests and seminarians Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Unknown
Mode: Other
Survey of Aging and Longevity, 2013
Year: 2013 Cases: 4006 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
American Jewish Committee Religious Right Survey, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 1010 Weight: WEIGHT2 Frame: U.S. Adults Contains oversample of (aligners with the Religious Right) Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of All Adults, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1106 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Census of the Amish in Holmes County and the Surrounding Areas
Year: 2010 Cases: 48710 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Amish in Holmes County, OH Sample: Unknown Mode: Other Recorded from community directories
American Values Scale, 1985
Year: 1985 Cases: 97 Weight: NONE Frame: Other UNC undergraduates Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other CAT entry
American Values Scale, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 93 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) North Carolina Sample: Convenience Sample Mode: Other Questions answered at computer terminals on campus
American Values Scale, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 99 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) North Carolina Sample: Convenience Sample Mode: Other Answered questions at campus terminals
American Values Scale, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) North Carolina Sample: Convenience Sample Mode: Other Answered questions at campus terminals
Anabaptist Historical Social Network Data
Year: 2010 Cases: 47 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other
Sample: Unknown Mode: Other None
Anabaptist Historical Data on Beliefs and Practices
Year: 2010 Cases: 18 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other
Sample: Unknown Mode: Other
New Evangelical Movement Congregations, Anaheim, California, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 1402 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Vineyard Anaheim Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Self-administered surveys
Anti-Semitism in the United States, 1981
Year: 1981 Cases: 1215 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Anti-Semitism in the United States, 1964
Year: 1964 Cases: 1975 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Survey of Alumni/ae of Presbyterian Theological Schools, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 1505 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Alumni of Presbyterian theological schools Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Arab Barometer, 2006-2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 6902 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Sample: Other Mode: In-Person
Youth, Emotional Energy, and Political Violence: The Cases of Egypt and Saudi Arabia Survey, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 1882 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Youth 18-25 Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Saudi Arabia and Egypt Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Arts and Religion Survey, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 1530 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
American Time Use Survey, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 13038 Weight: TUFINWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other
American Time Use Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 12943 Weight: TUFINWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other
American Time Use Survey, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 12248 Weight: TUFINWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other
American Time Use Survey, 2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 12723 Weight: TUFINWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other
American Time Use Survey, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 13133 Weight: TUFINWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other
American Time Use Survey, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 13260 Weight: TUFINWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other
Post-Election American Values Survey, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 1410 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Pre-Election American Values Survey, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 3003 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Baylor Religion Survey, Wave II (2007)
Year: 2007 Cases: 1648 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode Phone survey followed by mailed survey.
Survey of Attenders: Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy Annual Meeting, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 191 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Attendees at conference Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Self-administered survey
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Bishops, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 133 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Brazil Religion Survey, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 5700 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Brazilian sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Religious Characteristics of States Dataset, Phase 1: Demographics (RCS)
Year: 2014 Cases: 32629 Weight: NONE Frame: Denominations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Countries Sample: Other Mode: Other
Baylor Religion Survey, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 1721 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode Short telephone survey, followed by mailed survey.
Baylor Religion Survey, Wave III (2010)
Year: 2010 Cases: 1714 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
Baylor Religion Survey, Wave II (2007) - Instructional Dataset
Year: 2007 Cases: 1648 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
Study of Mysticism in Chinese Buddhist Monks and Nuns
Year: 2011 Cases: 139 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Chinese Buddhist monasteries on Jiuhua Mountain, Anhui, China Sample: Convenience Sample Mode: In-Person
New Evangelical Movement Congregations, Downey, California, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1060 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Calvary Chapel, Downey, CA Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Self-administered surveys
Complementary and Alternative Medical (CAM) and Spirituality, Religiosity Survey
Year: 2009 Cases: 130 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adult patients at medical clinic Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other United Kingdom Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Carnegie Middle East Governance and Islam Dataset, 1988-2010
Year: 1988 - 2010 Cases: 54894 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other 12 Arab countries, Turey and Iran Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
American Catholic Laity Poll, 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1442 Weight: WEIGHT1 Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
Caucasus Barometer 2012, Armenia
Year: 2012 Cases: 2384 Weight: INDWT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other International Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Caucasus Barometer 2012, Azerbaijan
Year: 2012 Cases: 1829 Weight: INDWT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other International Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Caucasus Barometer 2012, Georgia
Year: 2012 Cases: 2502 Weight: INDWT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other International Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Caucasus Barometer, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 6977 Weight: WTHH Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Caucasus Barometer, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 5761 Weight: WWIND, WWHH Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Church and Community Project, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 5123 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Unknown
Mode: Mailed
Survey of Chicago Catholics, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 524 Weight: SMPWT Frame: Denominations Catholics Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Chicago area (Cook and Lake countries) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Attitudes of Cultural Progressive Activists, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 3956 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Members of "culturally progressive" groups Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Civic Involvement Survey, 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 1528 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Clergy Job Satisfaction Survey, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 2658 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Pastors in the United Church of Christ and Disciples of Christ Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Pulpit and Pew National Survey of Pastoral Leaders, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 883 Weight: MSHIPWT Frame: Other Pastors/Religious Leaders Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, Wave 2, 2008/2009, Random Sample Associate Leader Survey
Year: 1985 Cases: 99 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other CATI Questionnaires entered at on-campus location
Dimensions of Religiosity, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 95 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Dimensions of Religiosity, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 100 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Dimensions of Religiosity, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 97 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Diocesan Leaders, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 197 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Religion and Diversity Survey, 2002-2003
Year: 2002 - 2003 Cases: 2910 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Dimensions of Religious Commitment, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 86 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Dimensions of Religious Commitment, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 98 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Dimensions of Religious Commitment, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 99 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Typology of Dutch Catholic Parishes, 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 103 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Netherlands Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Young Adolescents and Their Parents: A National Study, 1984 - Father Component
Year: 1980 - 1984 Cases: 8114 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations African Methodist Episcopal Church, American Lutheran Church, Baptist General Conference, Churches of God-General Conference, Evangelical Covenant Church, 4-H Extension, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, National Associations of Homes for Children, National Catholic Educational Association, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A), Southern Baptist Convention, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church. Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Unknown - file summary simply says that survey "was administered"
Young Adolescents and Their Parents: A National Study, 1984 - Mother Component
Year: 1980 - 1984 Cases: 8117 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations African Methodist Episcopal Church, American Lutheran Church, Baptist General Conference, Churches of God-General Conference, Evangelical Covenant Church, 4-H Extension, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, National Associations of Homes for Children, National Catholic Educational Association, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A), Southern Baptist Convention, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person Assuming in-person based on description in file summary - "survey was administered."
Young Adolescents and Their Parents: A National Study, 1984 - Youth Component
Year: 1980 - 1984 Cases: 8165 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations African Methodist Episcopal Church, American Lutheran Church, Baptist General Conference, Churches of God-General Conference, Evangelical Covenant Church, 4-H Extension, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, National Associations of Homes for Children, National Catholic Educational Association, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A), Southern Baptist Convention, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church Frame: U.S. Youth Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person Assuming in-person based on statement in file summary that "surveys were administered"
Effective Christian Education: A National Study of Protestant Congregations, 1991 - Adult Component
Frame: Congregations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Other Survey booklets administered at congregation
Economic Values Survey, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 2013 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
ELCA-Episcopal Church Study, 1999-2000
Year: 1999 - 2000 Cases: 1551 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Members of ELCA or Episcopal church Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
ELCA-Episcopal Church Clergy Study, 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 2240 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other ECLA or Episcopal clergy Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
National Poll on Social Capital (ENCAS) 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 2167 Weight: PONIND Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Mexico Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Endtime Family (Children of God), 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 1025 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other English speaking members of the Endtime Family Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
ETS Entering Survey, 1994
Year: 1992 - 1994 Cases: 5109 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Students entering seminary Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other
The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Parishes of U.S. Orthodox Christian Churches
Year: 2011 Cases: 1900 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Unknown Mode: Mixed-mode
America's Evangelicals
Year: 2004 Cases: 1610 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other White Evangelicals Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Exceptional Experience Questionnaire
Year: 2009 Cases: 711 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Patients at medical facility Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other United Kingdom Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
ETS Exiting Survey, 1995-1996
Year: 1995 - 1996 Cases: 3661 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Exiting seminary students Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Exemplary Adults, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 333 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Faith Communities Today Survey (FACT) 2000, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA)
Year: 2000 Cases: 832 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Mailed
Faith Communities Today Survey (FACT) 2010, Assemblies of God
Year: 2010 Cases: 306 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
Faith Communities Today Survey (FACT) 2010, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA)
Year: 2010 Cases: 467 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other ELCA congregations Sample: Unknown Mode: Other Mailed and online
Faith Communities Today Survey (FACT) 2010, Church of the Nazarene
Year: 2010 Cases: 393 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Year: 2000 Cases: 14301 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Congregations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Other Stratified random samples of 26 different groups Mode: Mixed-mode Some surveys were mailed, some done in person
Year: 2000 Cases: 523 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Faith and Family in America, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 1131 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample A nationally representative sample of 801 families was supplemented with oversamples of 156 married respondents with children and 174 unmarried respondents with children Mode: Phone
Faith in Flux: Changes in Religious Affiliation in the U.S.
Year: 2008 Cases: 2867 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults New interviews were conducted with a sample of respondents who participated in the 2007 Religious Landscape Survey, which collected data from a representative group of more than 35,000 adults nationwide in the spring and summer of 2007. This callback sample was used to reinterview members of seven specific groups. Quotas were set for each of these groups so that there would be enough cases for analysis. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Inventory of Diocesan Family Ministry Services, 1995
Year: 1994 - 1995 Cases: 120 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic dioceses Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other
Mode: Mailed
Forgiveness Survey, 1999
Year: 1998 - 1999 Cases: 1379 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults involved in small groups Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Religious Attitude, Self-Consciousness, Self-Monitoring Scales -Respondents' Same-Sex Friends, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 96 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Survey completed via CATI system
Faith Matters Survey, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 4069 Weight: WEIGHT07 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Faith Matters Survey, 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 4069 Weight: WGTTOT11 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Faith Matters Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 3108 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Gallup Poll of Catholics, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 875 Weight: WGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Gallup Poll of Catholics, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 803 Weight: WT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Gallup Poll of Catholics, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 802 Weight: WEIGHTA Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Gallup Poll of Catholics, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 802 Weight: WT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Gallup Poll of Catholics, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 877 Weight: WTNEW Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Global Attitudes Project, Spring 2009, 25 Nation Survey
Year: 2009 Cases: 26397 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other National samples in 25 countries Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other In-person and telephone
Global Attitudes Project, Spring 2010, 22 Nation Survey
Year: 2010 Cases: 24790 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other National samples from 22 countries Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other In-person and telephone
Global Attitudes Project, Spring 2011, 23 Nation Survey
Year: 2011 Cases: 29100 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other National samples in 22 countries Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other In-person and telephone
Global Attitudes Project, Spring 2012, 21 Nation Survey
Year: 2012 Cases: 26210 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other 21 Countries Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other In-person and telephone
Global Attitudes Project, Spring 2013, 39 Nation Survey
Year: 2013 Cases: 37653 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Adults in 39 countries Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other In-person and telephone
Generation Next Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 1501 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults adults ages 18 and older, including an oversample of members of Generation Next (ages 18-25) Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Global Restrictions on Religion Data
Year: 2013 Cases: 1382 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other 198 Countries Sample: Other Mode: Other Coding of 21 primary sources
General Social Survey 2008 Cross-Section and Panel Combined
Year: 2008 Cases: 3559 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2010 Cross-Section and Panel Combined, (Inapplicable Responses Coded as Missing)
Year: 2010 Cases: 4901 Weight: WTCOMB Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2010 Cross-Section and Panel Combined
Year: 2010 Cases: 4901 Weight: WTCOMB Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2010 Cross-Section and Panel Combined
Year: 2010 Cases: 4901 Weight: WTCOMB Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2012 Cross-Section and Panel Combined - Instructional Dataset
Year: 2012 Cases: 4820 Weight: WTCOMBNR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2012 Cross-Section and Panel Combined, (Inapplicable Responses Coded as Missing)
Year: 2012 Cases: 4820 Weight: WTCOMBNR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2012 Cross-Section and Panel Combined
Year: 2012 Cases: 4820 Weight: WTCOMBNR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2014 Cross-Section and Panel Combined - Instructional Dataset
Year: 2014 Cases: 3842 Weight: WTCOMBNR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1976
Year: 1976 Cases: 1499 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1978
Year: 1978 Cases: 1532 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1980
Year: 1980 Cases: 1468 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 1481 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 1372 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1991
Year: 1991 Cases: 1517 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1606 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 2992 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 2904 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 2832 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 2817 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 2765 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 2812 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 4510 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
General Social Survey 2014 Cross-Section and Panel Combined
Year: 2014 Cases: 3842 Weight: WTCOMBNR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
A Study of the North American Hispanic Adventist Church - Adult Survey, 1994
Year: 1993 - 1994 Cases: 2143 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Seventh-Day Adventists Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Four-State Church Involvement Study, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 2620 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Ohio, Massachusetts, North Carolina and California Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Year: 1969 Cases: 592 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholics in Springfield, Massachusetts Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Harris 1969 New York City Racial and Religious Survey, No. 1925, Blacks
Year: 1969 Cases: 1041 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Non-Jewish, Black Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) New York City Sample: Non-Random Mode: In-Person
Harris 1969 New York City Racial and Religious Survey, No. 1925, Jewish
Year: 1969 Cases: 634 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Jews Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) New York City Sample: Non-Random Mode: In-Person
Harris 1969 New York City Racial and Religious Survey, No. 1925, Non-Jewish-White
Year: 1969 Cases: 511 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Non-Jewish, White Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) New York City Sample: Non-Random Mode: In-Person
Harris 1967 Survey on Catholics' View of their Church
Year: 1967 Cases: 998 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Catholic adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Unknown
New Evangelical Movement Congregations, Kaneohe, Hawaii, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 441 Weight: NONW Frame: Other Hope Chapel, Kaneohe, HI Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Self-administered surveys
New Evangelical Movement Congregations, Hermosa Beach, California, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 678 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Hope Chapel, Hermosa Beach Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Self-administered surveys
Houston Area Survey, 1982-2010
Year: 1982 - 2010 Cases: 18543 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Harris County, TX Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Year: 2007 Cases: 926 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other National probability sample of high school biology teachers Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed Survey consisted of 2 phases, the first mailed and the second online.
Houston Area Survey, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 750 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Harris County, TX Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
A Study of the North American Hispanic Adventist Church - Youth Survey
Year: 1993 - 1994 Cases: 1163 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Seventh-Day Adventists Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey: Arkansas Sample
Year: 2010 Cases: 402 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey: Ohio Sample
Year: 2010 Cases: 402 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey: National Sample
Year: 2010 Cases: 1201 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Catholics in Indiana: A Social and Religious Profile, 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 4554 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Indiana Mainline Churches, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 1388 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations Congregations in Indiana that were a part of Christian Church Disciples of Christ, the Episcopal Church, the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, the Presbyterian Church USA, the United Church of Christ, and the United Methodist Church Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Indiana Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Comparative Values Survey of Islamic Countries
Year: 1991 - 2006 Cases: 31127 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Other Islamic countries Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
International Social Survey Programme 2008: Religion III
Year: 2008 Cases: 59986 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Nations Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Other Varies by country
International Social Survey Program: Religion II, 1998
Year: 1998 - 2001 Cases: 39034 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Nations Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Other Varies by country
Pew Survey of U.S. Jews 2013 - Household Component
Year: 2013 Cases: 95503 Weight: HHWEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Pew Survey of U.S. Jews 2013 - Respondent Component
Year: 2013 Cases: 35929 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Jewish Values Survey 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 1004 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Other Compiled list of Kent County congregations Mode: Other In-Person or telephone
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Children Aged 10-11, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1552 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: U.S. Youth Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Children Aged 12-14, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1374 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: U.S. Youth Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Children Aged 15-18, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 970 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: U.S. Youth Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Changing Faiths: Latinos and the Transformation of American Religion
Year: 2006 Cases: 4016 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults U.S. Latinos only Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Lesbian Christian Identity
Year: 1994 Cases: 186 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Lesbian Christians Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Convenience Sample
Mode: Mailed
Life Choices, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 2174 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Other A sample of 2,174 adults was drawn from 300 scientifically selected localities across the nation using standard Gallup national probability sampling procedures. Mode: In-Person
Longitudinal Study of Generations, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 3496 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Unknown Mode: Mixed-mode
Longitudinal Study of Generations, 1971
Year: 1971 Cases: 3496 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Unknown Mode: Mixed-mode
Lilly Survey of Attitudes and Social Networks
Year: 1999 - 2000 Cases: 2561 Weight: WGTFINAL Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Factoral experimental design on whether respondents would buy a home in a hypothetical neighborhood. Also an oversample of African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asians Mode: Phone
Marital Instability over the Life Course: A Five-Wave Panel Study, Wave I (1980)
Year: 1980 Cases: 2033 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other The population sampled was all husbands and wives in households in the contiguous United States in which both spouses were present and under the age of 55 and who had access to a telephone. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Marital Instability Over the Life Course [United States]: A Five-Wave Panel Study, 1980, 1983, 1988, 1992-1994, 1997
Year: 1980 Cases: 2033 Weight: CASWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Middletown Area Study, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 621 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 412 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 600 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1978
Year: 1978 Cases: 353 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1979
Year: 1979 Cases: 496 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1980
Year: 1980 Cases: 315 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study (Spring), 1981
Year: 1981 Cases: 336 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study (Autumn), 1981
Year: 1981 Cases: 281 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Middletown Area Study, 1982
Year: 1982 Cases: 284 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1983
Year: 1983 Cases: 373 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1984
Year: 1984 Cases: 351 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA; Only includes those who intended to vote. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1985
Year: 1985 Cases: 379 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 381 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 400 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults 60 years of age or older in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 401 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA; Only those intending to vote Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1989
Year: 1989 Cases: 400 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 417 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1991
Year: 1991 Cases: 400 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults aged 60 or older in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 505 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA; Only those intending to vote Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 500 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 576 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 422 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only those age 60 or older in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 421 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA; Only those intending to vote Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 380 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 527 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA; Contains oversample of black residents Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Middletown Area Study, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 408 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Only adults in Delaware County, IN\Muncie, IN SMSA; Includes oversample of those age 60 and over Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Delaware County, IN; Muncie, IN SMSA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Mennonite Church Member Profile, 1989
Year: 1989 Cases: 3083 Weight: WTFACTOR Frame: Other Mennonite congregations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other U.S. and Canadian sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Other Administered in group setting
Mid-November Survey, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 1500 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Millennial Values and Voter Engagement Survey, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 1214 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
Millennial Values Survey, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 2013 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
Faith and Community Survey of Four Indianapolis Neighborhoods, 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 613 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Households in four neighborhoods in Indianapolis Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Four neighborhoods in Indianapolis Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Survey of Religion and Community Life in Indianapolis, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 806 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) Indianapolis, IN Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Survey of Clergy in Indianapolis, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 261 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Clergy in Indianapolis Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Measuring Morality Study, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 1519 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
Pew 2011 National Survey of Mormons
Year: 2011 Cases: 1019 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
American Mosaic Project: A National Survey on Diversity
Year: 2003 Cases: 2081 Weight: FINALWT Frame: U.S. Adults Contains oversamples of African-Americans and Hispanics. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Politics Survey Merged Data Set, 1994-1995
Year: 1994 - 1995 Cases: 9652 Weight: WEIGHT2 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Muslim American Survey, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 1050 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Denominations Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Catholic Pluralism Project, 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 1058 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Catholic adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
National Religious Attitudes Survey of Catholics, 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 1000 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
National Congregations Study, Cumulative Dataset (1998 and 2006-2007)
National Congregations Study, Cumulative Dataset (1998, 2006-2007, and 2012), Version 2
Year: 2012 Cases: 4071 Weight: WTA3CNGD Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
National Congregations Study, Cumulative Dataset (1998, 2006-2007, and 2012), Version 2 - Instructional Dataset
Year: 2012 Cases: 4071 Weight: WTA3CNGD Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
National Congregations Study, Panel Dataset (1998 and 2006-2007)
Year: 1998 - 2007 Cases: 262 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Congregations Study Switzerland, Cumulative Dataset (1998, 2006, and 2008)
Year: 2008 Cases: 3780 Weight: W3USATT Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Swiss sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life: Liturgical Observation, 1983
Year: 1983 Cases: 35 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life: Parishioners Sample, 1984
Year: 1983 - 1984 Cases: 2667 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life: the Pastors Sample, 1983
Year: 1983 Cases: 35 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life: Paid Professional Staff Sample, 1983
Year: 1983 Cases: 89 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life: Volunteer Leaders Sample, 1983
Year: 1983 Cases: 202 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
American National Election Studies, Panel Study, 2008-2009
Year: 2008 - 2009 Cases: 3049 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
American National Election Studies, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 1807 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode In-Person and Telephone interview components
American National Election Studies, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 1511 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
American National Election Studies, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 1212 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
American National Election Studies, Time Series Study, 2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 2323 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
American National Election Studies, Cumulative Data File, 1948-2004
Year: 1948 - 2004 Cases: 47438 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Some years contained oversamples of groups (e.g., African-Americans in 1974) Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Some years used telephone interviews, others used face-to-face interviews
Year: 1998 Cases: 2103 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Recently ordained Catholic priests Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other List of recently ordained Catholic priests Mode: Mailed
New Family Structures Survey (NFSS)
Year: 2012 Cases: 15057 Weight: WEIGHT1 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
Google Ngrams Data, 1800-2000
Year: 2015 Cases: 201 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Not applicable Sample: Unknown Mode: Other Not applicable
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), Demographic and Examination Data, 2007-2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 10149 Weight: WTINT2YR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Mixed-mode
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), Demographic and Laboratory Data, 2007-2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 10149 Weight: WTINT2YR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Mixed-mode
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), Demographic and Questionnaire Data, 2007-2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 10149 Weight: WTINT2YR Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random Mode: Mixed-mode
News Interest Index / Religion Overflow, July 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 1502 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
News Interest Index, March 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 1703 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
News Interest Index, October 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 1515 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey, 2004
Year: 2004 - 2005 Cases: 1800 Weight: WTFACTOR Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Northern Ireland Sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mixed-mode
Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey, 2008
Year: 2008 - 2009 Cases: 1215 Weight: WTFACTOR Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Northern Ireland Sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mixed-mode
Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey, 1998 - Religious Observance Module
Year: 1998 Cases: 812 Weight: WTFACTOR Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Northern Ireland Sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mixed-mode
Survey of Northern California Church Bodies, 1963
Year: 1963 Cases: 2875 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Four Northern California counties Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
New Parish Ministers Survey of Lay and Religious, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 378 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
New Parish Ministers Survey of Parishes, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 949 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
New Parish Ministers Survey of Parishioners, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 1368 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
New Parish Ministers Survey of Pastors, 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 371 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
National Survey of Family Growth - Wave 6 (2002) Female Respondent File
Year: 2002 Cases: 7643 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Survey of Family Growth - Wave 6 (2002) Male Respondent File
Year: 2002 Cases: 4928 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Survey of Family Growth - Wave 6 (2002) Pregnancy File
Year: 2002 Cases: 13593 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Survey of Family Growth - Wave 7 (2006-2008) Female Respondent File
National Survey of Family Growth - Wave 5 (1995) Pregnancy File
Year: 1995 Cases: 21332 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other National sample of women 15-44 Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
National Survey of Family Growth - Wave 5 (1995) Respondent File
Year: 1995 Cases: 10847 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other National sample of women 15-44 Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Carnegie Foundation National Survey of Higher Education, Faculty Sample (1975)
Year: 1975 Cases: 25262 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other U.S. college and university faculty Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Carnegie Foundation National Survey of Higher Education, Faculty Sample (1984)
Year: 1984 Cases: 5057 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other U.S. college and university faculty Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Carnegie Council National Surveys of Higher Education, Graduate Student Sample (1975)
Year: 1975 Cases: 21851 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other U.S. Graduate Students Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
The Henry Institute National Survey of Religion and Public Life, 2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 3002 Weight: WTPRE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
National Study of Youth and Religion, Wave 1 (2003)
Year: 2002 - 2003 Cases: 3370 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Youth Teenagers between 13 and 17 Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
National Study of Youth and Religion, Wave 2 (2005)
Year: 2005 Cases: 2604 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Respondents were between the ages of 16-21 Frame: U.S. Youth Geographic Scope: Other Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
National Study of Youth and Religion, Wave 3 (2007-2008)
Year: 2007 - 2008 Cases: 3370 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Respondents were between the ages of 18-24 Frame: U.S. Youth Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Orthodox Christian Fellowship in the United States: The Study of Orthodox Christian Clergy Serving as Chaplains in U.S. Colleges and Universities
Year: 2013 Cases: 143 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Unknown Mode: Online
The Orthodox Church Today: A National Study of Parishioners and the Realities of the Orthodox Parish Life in the USA
Year: 2006 - 2007 Cases: 934 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Members of Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America and Orthodox Church in America Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Orange & San Diego Catholic Priest Survey: Religion and Politics, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 252 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic priests active in San Diego and Orange, CA Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other List of Catholic priests active in San Diego and Orange, CA Mode: Mailed
Evolving Visions of the Orthodox Priesthood in America: A National Study of the Orthodox Parish Clergy in the USA
Year: 2006 Cases: 226 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Members of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America and Orthodox Church in America Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Portraits of American Life Study, 1st Wave, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 2610 Weight: PAWT2 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Portraits of American Life Study, 2nd Wave, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 1417 Weight: NWEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
Portraits of American Life Study, Merged Dataset, 2006-2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 1314 Weight: LOWEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mixed-mode
Ministries By and To Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod Men and Women, 1987
Year: 1998 Cases: 1012 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic pastors Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, Wave 2, 2011, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Associate or Assistant Leader Survey
Year: 2008 Cases: 752 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Assistant leaders Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Other Listing Mode: Other Self-administered
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, Wave 2, 2008/2009, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Leader Survey
Year: 2008 Cases: 490 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Presbyterian congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Self-administered
Project Canada 1975
Year: 1975 Cases: 1917 Weight: WT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Stratified Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1975-80 Panel Study
Year: 1975 - 1995 Cases: 1056 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1975-85 Panel Study
Year: 1975 - 1985 Cases: 561 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1975-90 Panel Study
Year: 1975 - 1990 Cases: 359 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1975-95 Panel Study
Year: 1975 - 1995 Cases: 400 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1980
Year: 1980 - 1981 Cases: 1482 Weight: WT2 Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1980-85 Panel Study
Year: 1980 - 1985 Cases: 716 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1980-90 Panel Study
Year: 1980 - 1990 Cases: 429 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1980-95 Panel Study
Year: 1980 - 1995 Cases: 277 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1985
Year: 1985 Cases: 1630 Weight: WT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1985-90 Panel Study
Year: 1985 - 1990 Cases: 752 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1985-95 Panel Study
Year: 1985 - 1995 Cases: 436 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1990
Year: 1990 - 1991 Cases: 1471 Weight: WT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1990-95 Panel Study
Year: 1990 - 1995 Cases: 652 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Project Canada 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 1765 Weight: WT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Canadian Sample Sample: Other Panel respondents & additional stratified random sample Mode: Mailed
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in Brazil
Year: 2006 Cases: 1000 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Brazil, urban areas Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in Chile
Year: 2006 Cases: 988 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Chile Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: A 10-Country Survey of Pentecostals
Year: 2006 Cases: 11028 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Pentecostals and Charismatics Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other United States; Brazil, Chile and Guatemala in Latin America; Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa in Africa; and India, the Philippines and South Korea in Asia. Sample: Unknown Unclear - file summary says that national samples were used, but it is unclear whether people were randomly called and asked if they are Pentecostal/Charismatic, or if Pentecostals were called specifically. Mode: Other Telephone interviews in the United States and in-person in other countries.
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in Guatemala
Year: 2006 Cases: 1305 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Guatemala Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in Kenya
Year: 2006 Cases: 1001 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Kenya Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in Nigeria
Year: 2006 Cases: 999 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Nigerian adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Nigeria Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in the Philippines
Year: 2006 Cases: 1300 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other The Philippines Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in Chosen Regions of India
Year: 2006 Cases: 1224 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Indian adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other India Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in South Africa
Year: 2006 Cases: 1137 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other South Africa Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in South Korea
Year: 2006 Cases: 1000 Weight: GPWGT Frame: Other Korean adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Korea Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Spirit and Power: Survey of Pentecostals in the United States
Year: 2006 Cases: 1074 Weight: GPWGT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Philanthropy Panel Study, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 7406 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Philanthropy Panel Study, 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 7822 Weight: FAMWGT01 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Philanthropy Panel Study, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 8002 Weight: FAMWGT01 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Politics of Character Survey, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 1203 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Profiles of Ministry I, 1989
Year: 1977 - 1989 Cases: 18510 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Divinity students Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 1890 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, 1997-1999 - Demographic Information, Members and Elders
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 2677 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1997 - Older Adult Ministries, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 1200 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1997 - Older Adult Ministries, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 835 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1997 - Older Adult Ministries, Members
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 764 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, February 1997 - Spirituality and Health, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 1425 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, February 1997 - Spirituality and Health, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 1034 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, February 1997 - Spirituality and Health, Members
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 900 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1997 - Nature and the Environment, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 1413 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1997 - Nature and the Environment, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 752 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1997 - Nature and the Environment, Members
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 893 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1997 - Social Justice and Welfare, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 1275 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1997 - Social Justice and Welfare, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 718 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1997 - Social Justice and Welfare, Members
Year: 1996 - 1997 Cases: 583 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Feb 1998 - Books, Reading, and Study Resources, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 1251 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Feb 1998 - Books, Reading, and Study Resources, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 792 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Feb 1998 - Books, Reading, and Study Resources, Members
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 703 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Specialized Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 390 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 680 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 605 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 -- Communications Across the Church, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 777 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1998 - Science, Technology, and Faith, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 1122 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1998 -- Science, Technology, and Faith, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 666 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1998 - Science, Technology, and Faith, Members
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 559 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1998 - World Mission, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 1050 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1998 - World Mission, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 634 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1998 - World Mission, Members
Year: 1996 - 1998 Cases: 540 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Feb 1999 - Language and God, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 1196 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Feb 1999 - Language and God, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 732 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Feb 1999 - Language and God, Member
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 620 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1999 -- Public Role of Presbyterians, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 1009 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1999 -- Public Role of Presbyterians, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 585 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1999 -- Public Role of Presbyterians, Member
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 468 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1999 - Sabbath-Keeping, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 1124 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1999 - Sabbath-Keeping, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 642 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1999 - Sabbath-Keeping, Members
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 535 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Nov 1999 -- Interpersonal Violence, Clergy
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 1016 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Nov 1999 -- Interpersonal Violence, Elders
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 662 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Panel Survey, Nov 1999 -- Interpersonal Violence, Member
Year: 1996 - 1999 Cases: 559 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterians Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Religious Attitude, Self-Consciousness, Self-Monitoring Scales -Paper and Pencil Version, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 173 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Paper and pencil survey administered at university
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 11178 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 11142 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 11097 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 11064 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 11019 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 10960 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 10905 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 10820 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Unknown Mode: Other
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 10753 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 10658 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 10562 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 10466 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Mailed
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Annual Congregational Statistical Report, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 10267 Weight: NONE Frame: Congregations Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Other Mode: Mailed
Survey of American Catholic Priests, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 1279 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic priests Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Survey of American Catholic Priests, 1985
Year: 1985 Cases: 1062 Weight: WT Frame: Other Catholic priests Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Survey of American Catholic Priests, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1186 Weight: WT Frame: Other Catholic priests Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Elementary School Principals, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 29 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, April 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1010 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI Religion & Politics Tracking Poll, August 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1006 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI-RNS Religion News Survey, December 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1012 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, June 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1006 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, July 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1012 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, March 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1008 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, May 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1007 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, November 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1002 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion & Politics Tracking Poll, October 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1019 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, August 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 1005 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, December 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 1015 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, February 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1015 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, January 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1006 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, November 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 1022 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, October 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 1010 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, September 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 1013 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey, September 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 1007 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Party Variation in Religiosity and Womens Leadership: Arab Countries Dataset
Year: 2008 - 2010 Cases: 163 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian members and elders Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Party Variation in Religiosity and Womens Leadership: Europe and Israel Dataset
Year: 2008 - 2010 Cases: 68 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian members and elders Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Party Variation in Religiosity and Womens Leadership: Lebanon Dataset
Year: 2008 - 2010 Cases: 18 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian members and elders Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Party Variation in Religiosity and Womens Leadership: Non-Arab Muslim Majority Countries Dataset
Year: 2008 - 2010 Cases: 98 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian members and elders Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Center on Philanthropy Panel Study, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 7406 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults U.S. families and households Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Center on Philanthropy Panel Study, 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 7822 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults U.S. families and households Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
God and Society in North America, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 6023 Weight: WT1 Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other U.S. and Canadian samples Sample: Other Stratified random sample Mode: Phone
Religion among Academic Scientists
Year: 2005 Cases: 1868 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Online
The 2000 American Rabbi Study
Year: 2000 Cases: 402 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Conservative, Orthodox, Reconstructionist and Reform rabbis Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Religion and State--Minorities
Year: 2008 Cases: 597 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other
Sample: Unknown Mode: Other
Race, Class, and Culture Survey 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 2501 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Readiness For Theological Studies: A Study of Faculty Perceptions On the Readiness of Seminarians, 1993
Year: 1992 Cases: 190 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Faculty members at Catholic seminaries Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Winthrop University Student Religion Survey, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 306 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Lower-division, general education classes Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other The target population for this survey was students at Winthrop University, a state university in South Carolina. Sample: Unknown The sample was drawn from students in lower-division General Education classes. Mode: Other Self-report questionnaire
Religious Attitude, Self-Consciousness, Self-Monitoring Scales, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 95 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Survey completed via CATI system.
Religious Attitude, Self-Consciousness, Self-Monitoring Scales, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 96 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Survey completed via CATI system
Religious Behaviors Questionnaire, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 96 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals.
Religious Behaviors Questionnaire, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 88 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Religious Behaviors Questionnaire, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 93 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Religion and Deviance at Four American Universities
Year: 2005 - 2006 Cases: 1753 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduate students at four universities Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Convenience Sample
Mode: Other Administered in class
National Survey on Discrimination in Mexico, Elderly Population
Year: 2004 - 2005 Cases: 761 Weight: FACTOR Frame: Other Adults and oversample of "vulnerable" populations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Mexican sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Religious Freedom in the Courts, 1981-1997
Year: 1998 Cases: 2109 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other
Sample: Other Mode: Other
Religious Fundamentalism Scale, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 96 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Religious Fundamentalism Scale, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 90 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Religious Fundamentalism Scale, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 96 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Undergraduates at University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Respondents answered questions via computer terminals
Religious Coping in Iran
Year: 2006 Cases: 185 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Students in class at University of Shiraz Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Iranian sample Sample: Convenience Sample
Mode: Other Administered in class
Exploring Religious America, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 2002 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Religion in Italy
Year: 1994 Cases: 4500 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Italian sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
U.S. Religious Knowledge Study, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 3412 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
U.S. Religious Landscape Survey - Continental Dataset
Year: 2007 Cases: 35556 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
U.S. Religious Landscape Survey - Alaska and Hawaii Dataset
Year: 2008 Cases: 401 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Alaska and Hawaii Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
National Survey on Discrimination in Mexico, Religious Minorities
Year: 2004 - 2005 Cases: 789 Weight: FACTOR Frame: Other Adults and oversample of "vulnerable" populations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Mexican sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Religion and Politics Survey, November 2011
Year: 2011 Cases: 2001 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Religion and Politics Survey, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 5603 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 2041 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 2002 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 1512 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 2000 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 2003 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2007
Year: 2007 Cases: 3002 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 2905 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 4013 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 3003 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 3484 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and Public Life Survey, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 2002 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religion and America's Role in the World
Year: 2008 Cases: 1400 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Clergy and Retirement: An Exploratory Study on Housing and Financial Preparedness
Year: 2008 Cases: 214 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Church of Christ congregations in Texas Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Other List of Church of Christ congregations in Texas Mode: Mailed
Religious Influence and Identity Survey, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 2590 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Ritual Abuse Survivors in the United States, 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 50 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Individuals claiming to have experienced "ritual abuse" Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Religious Life Inventory, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 93 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religious Life Inventory, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 95 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other CATI Questionnaire completed on campus of University of North Carolian
Religious Life Inventory, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 93 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Survey completed via CATI system
Rural Ministry Project, Clergy, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 220 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Rural Ministry Project, Lay Leaders, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 202 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
National Survey of the Religious Life Futures Project, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 6359 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations Survey was based on random sample within religious orders. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
The Right to Die II, November 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 1500 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Spirituality and the Elderly: Survey of Staff and Residents From Long-Term Care Facilities, 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 592 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Staff (N=299) and residents (N=266) from long-term care facilities completed one of eight forms. Facilities included skilled nursing facilities, continuing-care residential communities (CCRCs), retirement apartment complexes and assisted living facilities located in California, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, Oklahoma, Utah and Virginia. Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other California, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, Oklahoma, Utah. Sample: Non-Random Mode: Mailed
Survey On the Beliefs and Moral Values of America's Children, 1989
Year: 1989 Cases: 5012 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Girls and boys from 4th to 12th grade Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Non-Random The sample was drawn from a list of 110,000 schools in the country maintained by Scholastic, Inc. The universe was divided into cells stratified by type and size of school, region and size of municipality. Mode: In-Person Administered by teachers in classrooms
Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 29233 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Contains a national probability with oversamples of African-Americans and Hispanics. There are also 41 surveys of specific communities. Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Social Capital Community Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 12100 Weight: FWEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample This survey contains a national random sample of the continental U.S., as well as targeted surveys of specific communities. Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Religious Attitude, Self-Consciousness, Self-Monitoring Scales, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 94 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other University of North Carolina undergraduates Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other University of North Carolina Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Survey completed via CATI system
Seminarians in the Nineties: A National Study of Seminarians in Theology, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 901 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic seminarians Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Unknown
Mode: Mailed
Salt Lake City and San Francisco Surveys of Mormons, 1967-1969 (San Francisco Sample)
Year: 1967 - 1969 Cases: 296 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations LDS Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.) San Francisco, CA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Southern Focus Poll, Combined Sample, Spring 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 1404 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Combined Sample, Spring 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 1257 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Fall 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 800 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Fall 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 402 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 408 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 413 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Fall 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 470 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Fall 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 446 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 447 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Fall 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 462 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 419 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Fall 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 483 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-south Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Fall 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 422 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-Southern States (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 429 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 405 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-Southern States (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Oversample Survey, Fall 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 58 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Oversample Survey, Spring 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 349 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Oversample Survey, Spring 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 167 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 466 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Non-Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 1013 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Fall 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 795 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1992
Year: 1992 Cases: 819 Weight: WTVAR Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Fall 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 892 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 864 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Fall 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 938 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 817 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults
Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Fall 1995
Year: 1995 Cases: 803 Weight: NONE Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample South Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 850 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 996 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1998
Year: 1998 Cases: 844 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Combined Sample, Spring 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 1369 Weight: TOTWT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Fall 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 847 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, Southern Sample, Spring 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 829 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 852 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Southern states (states not specified in file summary) Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
SGI-USA Membership Survey, 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 401 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Members of Sokko Gakkai International Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Salt Lake City and San Francisco Surveys of Mormons, 1967-1969 (Salt Lake City Sample)
Year: 1967 - 1969 Cases: 958 Weight: No Weight Frame: Denominations LDS Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Regional samples of Mormons in Salt Lake City, UT and San Francisco, CA Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Small Groups Survey, 1991 (Groups Sample)
Year: 1991 Cases: 1021 Weight: WEIGHT2 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Small Groups Survey, 1991 (Individuals Not in Groups Sample)
Year: 1991 Cases: 962 Weight: WEIGHT2 Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Survey of Presbyterian Students in Non-Presbyterian Theological Schools, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 349 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian students in non-Presbyterian theological schools Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
State of the First Amendment, 2000
Year: 2000 Cases: 1015 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 2001
Year: 2002 Cases: 1012 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 2002
Year: 2002 Cases: 1000 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 2003
Year: 2003 Cases: 1000 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 1002 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 1003 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 2006
Year: 2006 Cases: 1002 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey 1997
Year: 1997 Cases: 1025 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
State of the First Amendment Survey, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 1001 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Spiritual Life Study of Chinese Residents
Year: 2007 Cases: 7021 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Chinese sample Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Survey of Students in Presbyterian Theological Schools, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 1538 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian theological students Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
State of Disunion Survey, 1996
Year: 1996 Cases: 2047 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Sub-Saharan Africa Religion Survey, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 25091 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other sub-Saharan Africa (Botswana, Cameroon, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania) Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Survey of Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Pastors, 2008
Year: 2008 Cases: 725 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Presbyterian pastors Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Spiritual Well-Being in the United States and Sweden, 1979
Year: 1979 Cases: 1054 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Respondents in group settings Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other US and Swedish samples Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Completed in group setting
Toward Shaping the Agenda: A National Survey of Catholic Religious Education, Survey of Religion Teachers/catechists, 1993
Year: 1993 Cases: 1025 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic parishes Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS101 Lee, Cultural Affinities, Regime Type, and Foreign Policy Opinion Formation
Year: 2008 Cases: 1162 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS16 Glazier, Providential Religious Beliefs and U.S. Foreign Policy
Year: 2008 Cases: 473 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS2028 Johns, Civilian Casualties and Support for War
Year: 2010 Cases: 2072 Weight: POST Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with quasi-experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS2042 Creighton, Perceptions of Islam, Migration, and Citizenship in the United States
Year: 2010 Cases: 3290 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS2047 Thornton, Understanding the Role of Religious Appeals in Political Communication
Year: 2010 Cases: 562 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS2095 Piazza, Terrorism Suspect Religious Identity and Support for Controversial Practices
Year: 2012 Cases: 1135 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS2104 Singer, The Effect of Question Wording on Preferences for Genetic Testing and Abortion
Year: 2012 Cases: 1570 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences, TESS73 Djupe, The Political Impact of Message Attributes from Religious Elites
Year: 2006 Cases: 948 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Online survey with experimental design
Survey of Texas Adults, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 1504 Weight: STDWGT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Regional Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
A Survey of Graduate Ministry Programs, 1992-1993
Year: 1992 Cases: 42 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Ministry graduate schools Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Non-Random Mode: Other Self-administered
Taiwan Social Change Survey, 2004
Year: 2004 Cases: 1881 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Taiwan Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Taiwan Social Change Survey, 2009
Year: 2009 Cases: 1927 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Taiwanese adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Taiwan Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Taiwan Social Change Survey, 1985
Year: 1984 - 1985 Cases: 4199 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Taiwan Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Taiwan Social Change Survey, 1994
Year: 1994 Cases: 1862 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Taiwan Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Taiwan Social Change Survey, 1999
Year: 1999 Cases: 1925 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Taiwan Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
Tulsa Oklahoma Area Science and Technology Survey, 1981
Year: 1981 Cases: 308 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Tulsa, Oklahoma Sample: Random Sample Used random numbers drawn from telephone listings. Mode: Phone
Tulsa, Oklahoma Area Survey, 1985
Year: 1985 Cases: 300 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Tulsa, Oklahoma Sample: Random Sample Random selection of numbers from phonebook. Mode: Phone
Tulsa, Oklahoma Area Survey, 1986
Year: 1986 Cases: 300 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Regional Sample Tulsa, Oklahoma area Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Campaign 2000 Typology Survey
Year: 2000 Cases: 2799 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
UFO Abductees in the United States, 1990
Year: 1990 Cases: 55 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other UFO abductees Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
Survey of Attenders: International UFO Congress Convention and Film Festival, 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 156 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Attendees at conference Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Single Unit (State, County, etc.)
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Other Self-administered questionnaire
Survey of Congregations in Metropolitan Chicago, 1994
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Random Attenders
Year: 2001 Cases: 122404 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Random sample of people attending services on April 29, 2001 Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Self-administered surveys handed out at congregations
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Random Profile
Year: 2001 Cases: 424 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other Self-administered surveys of congregational leaders
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Racial Ethnic Presbyterian Attenders
Year: 2001 Cases: 13124 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Racial Ethnic Presbyterian Leaders
Year: 2001 Cases: 168 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Racial Ethnic Presbyterian, Profile
Year: 2001 Cases: 172 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Seventh-Day Adventist, Attenders
Year: 2001 Cases: 5596 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Seventh-Day Adventist, Leaders
Year: 2001 Cases: 89 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, Seventh-Day Adventist, Profile
Year: 2001 Cases: 93 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, United Church of Christ, Attenders
Year: 2001 Cases: 20811 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, United Church of Christ, Leaders
Year: 2001 Cases: 224 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
U.S. Congregational Life Survey, 2001, United Church of Christ, Profile
Year: 2001 Cases: 231 Weight: No Weight Frame: Congregations
Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Mailed
Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes, 1987-2009
Year: 1987 - 2009 Cases: 32570 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Other In-person surveys from 1987-1990, telephone surveys after.
Values Survey Combined Dataset, 1987-2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 35578 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
July 2003 Values Update Survey
Year: 2003 Cases: 2528 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
December 2006 Values Update Survey
Year: 2006 - 2007 Cases: 2007 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Question Verification For Religion and Public Life Survey, 2001
Year: 2001 Cases: 1220 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample Mode: Mailed
Vineyard Christian Fellowship Study, 1988
Year: 1988 Cases: 1009 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other 14 Vineyard Christian Fellowship congregations in Southern California and Washington State Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Non-Random
Mode: Mailed
World's Muslims Data Set, 2012
Year: 2012 Cases: 32604 Weight: WEIGHT Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other International Sample: Other Mode: In-Person
Williamsburg Charter Survey On Religion and Public Life, 1987
Year: 1987 Cases: 3363 Weight: No Weight Frame: U.S. Adults Frame: Other Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample Sample: Random Sample Mode: Phone
Women of the Cloth, 1983
Year: 1980 - 1981 Cases: 1360 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Clergywomen from nine denominations Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Sample: Random Sample
Mode: Other Telephone interviews and self-administered surveys
World Religion Dataset: National Religion Dataset
Year: 2012 Cases: 1995 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Sample: Unknown Mode: Other
World Religion Dataset: Regional Religion Dataset
Year: 2012 Cases: 70 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other Sample: Unknown Mode: Other
World Values Survey, 2005
Year: 2005 Cases: 60579 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Adults Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: Other Nations Sample: Random Sample
Mode: In-Person
World Values Survey 2010
Year: 2010 Cases: 74042 Weight: NONE Frame: Other Frame: U.S. Adults Geographic Scope: Other International Sample: Random Sample Mode: In-Person
Ministry With Young Adults - A National Catholic Initiative, 1995
Year: 1975 Cases: 2879 Weight: No Weight Frame: Other Catholic youth Frame: NONE Geographic Scope: U.S. Sample
Browse 114 concepts used in the study of religion, review how survey researchers measured them in the past, and quickly compare the results of more than 7,600 survey questions.
The archive is a collection of surveys, polls, and other data submitted by the foremost scholars and research centers in the world. Review and analyze data online, or download free of charge.
Examine the religious composition, religious freedoms, demographics, constitutional clauses, survey findings and multiple social and political measures for 250 nations.
View maps of the United States and individual states for hundreds of variables, including congregational membership, census data, crime statistics and many others.
Generate congregational membership reports for any county, state and urban area in the United States using data collected by the Religious Congregations & Membership Study.
The profiles chart schisms and mergers, document membership trends, offer basic descriptions, and link to additional resources for more than 400 past and present American religious groups.
Browse dozens of topics from a major national survey of religious congregations. See how the responses vary by the size, religious family and region of the congregation.
Browse dozens of topics covered by major national surveys. See how the responses vary by demographic categories and, when available, how they change over time.
View maps of the United States and individual states for hundreds of variables, including congregational membership, census data, crime statistics and many others.
Measures one's position on abortion. This is often done using agreement with its use in different scenarios.
Below are 440 questions from surveys in the ARDA that attempt to measure this concept. The ARDA staff further categorized these questions into 20 types:
Which comes closer to your view? Abortion should be generally available to those who want it; Abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now; Abortion should be against the law except in cases of rape, incest, and to save the womans life; Abortion should not be permitted at all. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Imagine someone like yourself in the following situation and tell us what would most likely happen - An unmarried friend of yours just found out that she is pregnant. She doesnt know what to do for sure. She asks you for advice about what she should do. In this situation, would you advise her to have an abortion, advise her to have the baby but give it up for adoption, or advise her to have the baby and keep it? (Not asked of elementary school students.) (D9ABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Advise her to have an abortion
401
11.7
2) Advise her to have the baby but give it up for adoption
There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) NA
3
0.2
1) BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.
215
11.9
2) THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMANS LIFE IS IN DANGER
525
29.1
3) THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMANS LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED
265
14.7
4) BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE
There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? (P ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) NA; INAP
251
13.9
1) BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED
172
9.5
2) PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, LIFE DANGER
458
25.4
3) PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASON OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER
277
15.3
4) A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION
There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? (ABRTFEEL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.
139
13.0
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the womans life is in danger.
332
31.1
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the womans life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established.
185
17.4
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice
Which comes closer to your view? Abortion should be generally available to those who want it; Abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now; Abortion should be against the law except in cases of rape, incest and to save the womans life; Abortion should not be permitted at all. [Answered only if FORM = 1.] (ABGEN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Which comes closer to your view? Abortion should be generally available to those who want it; Abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now; Abortion should be against the law except in cases of rape, incest and to save the womans life; Abortion should not be permitted at all. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[ASK FORM 1 ONLY:] Which comes closer to your view? Abortion should be generally available to those who want it; Abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now; Abortion should be against the law except in cases of rape, incest and to save the womans life; Abortion should not be permitted at all. (ABORAVL1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[ASK FORM 2 ONLY:] Which comes closer to your view? Abortion should not be permitted at all; Abortion should be against the law except in cases of rape, incest and to save the womans life; Abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now; Abortion should be generally available to those who want it. (ABORAVL2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Regardless of whether or not you think abortion should be legal, do you think it would be a good thing to reduce the number of abortions performed in the United States, or dont you feel this way? (ABORREDU) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Still on the subject of womens rights, there has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (VCF0837) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) NA; no Post IW
609
6.9
1) Abortion should never be permitted.
871
9.8
2) Abortion should be permitted only if the life and health of the woman is in danger.
3,646
41.1
3) Abortion should be permitted if, due to personal reasons, the woman would have difficulty in caring for the child.
1,364
15.4
4) Abortion should never be forbidden, since one should not require a woman to have a child she doesnt want.
There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (see ARDA summary page for previous question wordings) (VCF0838) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) NA; no Post IW
311
1.4
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.
2,597
11.9
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the womans life is in danger.
6,430
29.5
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the womans life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established.
3,550
16.3
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice.
There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (V085086) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-9) Refused
4
0.2
-8) Dont know
2
0.1
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, R selected for VERSION NEW
1,059
45.6
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.
160
6.9
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the womans life is in danger.
296
12.7
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the womans life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established.
160
6.9
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice.
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: b. in cases where the woman is more than five months pregnant, requiring a test to see if the fetus might survive outside of the womb before allowing the abortion. (LVIABLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. A. All human life, including that of the unborn, should be protected. (RPROTECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. B. Human life begins at conception, therefore, abortion is murder. (RMURDER) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. C. Every unborn child has a basic right to life. (RRTLIFE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. D. Abortion hurts women by enabling men to take advantage of them, knowing that abortion is a way out of their responsibility to care for the mother and child. (RADVANTG) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. E. Abortion promotes a general disregard for the value of human life. (RDISREG) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. F. Abortion leaves women with a burden of guilt and emotional scars that are very difficult to heal. (RGUILT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. G. Adoption would be a less emotionally painful option for most women than abortion. (RLESPAIN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. H. A pregnancys significance is devalued by societys casual, permissive outlook on abortion. (RDEVALUE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. I. While abortion is sometimes necessary, it is used too frequently as an easy way out. (REASYWAY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. J. It is wrong to use abortion as a form of birth control or sex selection. (RBIRTCON) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you several reasons that people have given for limiting legal access to abortion. For each of these reasons I want you to tell me whether it is very convincing, fairly convincing, not very convincing, or not at all convincing, as a reason for limiting access to abortion. K. Some limitations on abortion are justified because there has to be a compromise between a womens right to choose and the rights of her unborn child. (RCOMPROM) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Very convincing
549
26.8
2) Fairly convincing
769
37.6
3) Not very convincing
432
21.1
4) Not at all convincing
295
14.4
TOTAL
2,045
100.0
Catholic TeachingsThis question type asks Catholic respondents how important the Catholic church teachings that oppose abortion are to them, and/or if they agree with those teachings.
ASKED OF THOSE WHOSE SAID THEIR RELIGION WAS PROTESTANT, JEWISH, OTHER, NONE, OR NOT SURE: Do you feel strongly opposed to the Catholic Churchs opposition to abortion for everyone, only somewhat opposed, or not opposed at all? (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
All in all, do you feel positive or negative about Archbishop John J. OConnor urging Catholics to vote against candidates who are opposed to banning abortions? (VTBNABRT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you support or oppose the Catholic church denying communion to Catholic politicians who are in favor of legal abortion? (DENYCOMM) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you support or oppose the Catholic church denying communion to Catholic politicians who are in favor of legal abortion? (Note: asked of Catholics only.) (C_CMMUN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
As a Catholic, how important is each of the following to you? Would you say the following is or are very important, somewhat important, or not important at all? L. The Catholic Churchs teachings that oppose abortion (NOABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you feel that a priests word is morally binding; that it is a moral obligation to do what he says or isnt it, when he talks about abortion laws? (Q12E1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(See q19a) Why do you feel this way? Any other reason? (OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE) Church is not handling problem correctly/many cases abortions should have been allowed, church said no (Q19B9) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(See q19a) Why do you feel this way? Any other reason? (OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE) Women should not have children they dont want/I believe in abortion (Q19B10) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(See q19a) Why do you feel this way? Any other reason? (OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE) Abortion is murder/Thou shall not kill one of the commandments (Q19B13) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(See q19a) Why do you feel this way? Any other reason? (OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE) Abortions are against religion and God and the Pope (Q19B15) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(See q19a) Why do you feel this way? Any other reason? (OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE) Abortions would just increase and legalize prostitution (Q19B16) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(See q19a) Why do you feel this way? Any other reason? (OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE) Abstinence is the answer/state and church should work towards other means to prevent causes of abortion (Q19B25) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me how important each aspect of Catholicism is to your Catholic identity? Is it very important, somewhat important, not too important, or not important at all? How important is . . .? Rejection of abortion (REJECTAB) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-2) Dont know/Undecided
5
1.3
-1) Refused
2
0.5
1) Very important
153
38.5
2) Somewhat important
99
24.9
3) Not too important
69
17.4
4) Not important at all
69
17.4
TOTAL
397
100.0
Circumstance: Any ReasonThis question type asks respondents if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if she wants it for any reason
For the next set of issues, I would like you to indicate your position by telling me how much you agree or disagree with each of the following statements. -- A pregnant woman should be able to obtain a legal abortion for any reason if she so chooses. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . the woman wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . G. If the woman wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . G. If the woman wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the woman wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the women wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Different words and images generate different feelings in people, both positive and negative. On a scale from plus 5 all the way down to minus 5, where plus 5 indicates a very positive feeling, minus 5 indicates a very negative feeling, and 0 indicates a neutral feeling, please rate your initial response to each of the following phrases. Does it give you a good feeling, a bad feeling, or neither? R. Abortion on demand (FABRTDEM) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the woman wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
A pregnant woman should be able to obtain a legal abortion for any reason whatsoever, if she chooses not to have the baby- do you agree or disagree? (ABCHOOSE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Agree/Disagree: It should be legal for a woman to obtain an abortion if she wants to have one for any reason. (88, 90, 93, 96, 98, 00, 02, 04, 06, 08, 10) (ONDEMAND) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . G. If the woman wants it for any reason? (ABANY) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) Inapplicable
0
0.0
1) Yes
1,290
40.1
2) No
1,812
56.3
8) Dont know
75
2.3
9) No answer
41
1.3
TOTAL
3,218
100.0
Circumstance: Cannot AffordThis question type asks respondents if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if the family cannot afford the child.
Now to change the subject a bit, I would like to ask a couple of brief questions about your opinion of abortion. -- Would you favor or oppose a legal abortion for a low-income woman if the money for that abortion didnt come from the government? (ABORT2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally think it is wrong or not wrong for a woman to have an abortion... If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children. (ABPOORW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think the law should or should not allow a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion. . . If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children. (ABPOOR1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally think it is wrong or not wrong for a woman to have an abortion. . .If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children. (ABPOORW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . D. If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally think it is wrong or not wrong for a woman to have an abortion if the family has a very low income and cannot afford more children? (ABPOORW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . D. If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if having the child would be extremely difficult for the woman financially? (W10R14) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R14=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if having the child would be extremely difficult for the woman financially (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R15_F) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R14=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal if having the child would be extremely difficult for the woman financially (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R15_O) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: having the child would be extremely difficult for the woman financially? (V085097) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION IN CASES OF FINANCIAL HARDSHIP: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085097C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-9) Refused
1
0.0
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085097; R selected for VERSION OLD
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. G. If the family has a very low income and another child would create a heavy financial burden - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WLOWINC1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if having the child would be extremely difficult for the woman financially? (W2N14) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . D. If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children? (ABPOOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) Inapplicable
0
0.0
1) Yes
1,358
42.2
2) No
1,740
54.1
8) Dont know
84
2.6
9) No answer
36
1.1
TOTAL
3,218
100.0
Circumstance: IncestThis question type asks respondents are asked if they favor or oppose abortion in cases of incest.
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by sex the woman chose to have with a blood relative? (W10R6) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R6=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by sex the woman chose to have with a blood relative (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R7_FA) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R6=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by sex the woman chose to have with a blood relative (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R7_OP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: the pregnancy was caused by sex the woman chose to have with a blood relative? (V085094) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION IN CASES OF INCEST: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085094C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-8) Dont know
1
0.0
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085094; R selected for VERSION OLD
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. D. If the pregnancy was the result of incest - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WINCEST1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by sex the woman chose to have with a blood relative? (W2N6) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-7) No answer
8
0.3
-6) Not asked, unit non-response
1,492
48.9
-2) Missing, see documentation
70
2.3
1) Favor abortion being legal
621
20.4
2) Oppose abortion being legal
530
17.4
3) Neither favor nor oppose
328
10.8
TOTAL
3,049
100.0
Circumstance: No More ChildrenRespondent if asked if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if she is married and does not want any more children.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statements. If unsure, all things considered, do you tend to agree or disagree with -- A married woman who doesnt want any more children should be able to obtain a legal abortion. (ABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
ID LIKE TO READ YOU A STATEMENT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MADE ABOUT LIFE TODAY. AS I READ IT, PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU STRONGLY AGREE WITH IT, AGREE, DISAGREE, OR STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH IT. -- It should be legal for a woman to obtain an abortion if she is married and does not want any more children. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
ID LIKE TO READ YOU A STATEMENT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MADE ABOUT LIFE TODAY. AS I READ IT, PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU STRONGLY AGREE WITH IT, AGREE, DISAGREE, OR STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH IT. -- It should be legal for a woman to obtain an abortion if she is married and does not want any more children. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . B. If she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . B. If she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. J. If a couple is using abortion as a repeated means of birth control - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WBIRCON1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Agree/Disagree: It should be legal for a woman to obtain an abortion if she is married and does not want any more children. (82, 84, 86) (FAMPLAN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . B. If she is married and does not want any more children? (ABNOMORE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) Inapplicable
0
0.0
1) Yes
1,395
43.3
2) No
1,695
52.7
8) Dont know
84
2.6
9) No answer
44
1.4
TOTAL
3,218
100.0
Circumstance: Not MarriedIn this question respondents were asked if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if she is not married and doesn't want to marry the man.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain legal abortion . . . F. If she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . F. If she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. I. If a woman has been abandoned by her partner, the father of the unborn child - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WABAND1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you be for or against allowing abortion in the case of an unwed girl who had gotten into trouble visiting family friends near an army camp? (Q19C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Legal abortion: If she is not married and does not want to marry the man? (ABSINGLE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Yes
923
46.2
2) No
1,015
50.9
8) Dont know
52
2.6
9) No answer
6
0.3
TOTAL
1,996
100.0
Circumstance: OtherThis question type asks about the acceptability of abortion in circumstances less often included on surveys, including the possibility of the child being born homosexual, or if the child will have a poor quality of life.
Please tell us if you agree or disagree with the following statement - Abortion is all right, if having a baby will change your life plans in a way you will find hard to live with. (Not asked of elementary school students.) (J5ABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose there was a genetic test that revealed a babys likelihood of becoming a homosexual. If you/your partner were 2 months pregnant and this test revealed that your baby would probably become a homosexual, how likely would you be to favor an abortion? Do you think you would definitely favor an abortion, probably favor an abortion, probably oppose an abortion, or definitely oppose an abortion? (ABRTHOMO) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. F. If the pregnancy would require a teenager to drop out of school - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WTEENSC1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. H. If the pregnancy is unplanned and would interrupt a professional womans career - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WWOPROF1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. A. Abortion is usually a better option than giving a child up for adoption (ABADOPT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. B. Abortion is usually a better option than bringing a child into a home where it is not wanted. (ABNOWANT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. D. The quality of life a child will have after it is born is an important thing to consider when deciding on an abortion. (ABQOL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Strongly agree
329
15.8
2) Agree
764
36.7
3) Disagree
586
28.2
4) Strongly disagree
400
19.2
TOTAL
2,079
100.0
Circumstance: RapeThis question type asks if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if the pregnancy was the result of rape.
ID LIKE TO READ YOU A STATEMENT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MADE ABOUT LIFE TODAY. AS I READ IT, PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU STRONGLY AGREE WITH IT, AGREE, DISAGREE, OR STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH IT. -- It should be legal for a woman to obtain an abortion if the pregnancy is caused by rape. (RAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
ID LIKE TO READ YOU A STATEMENT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MADE ABOUT LIFE TODAY. AS I READ IT, PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU STRONGLY AGREE WITH IT, AGREE, DISAGREE, OR STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH IT. -- It should be legal for a woman to obtain an abortion if the pregnancy is caused by rape. (RAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . E. If she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . E. If she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by the woman being raped? (W10R8) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R8=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by the woman being raped (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R9_FA) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R8=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by the woman being raped (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R9_OP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: the pregnancy was caused by the woman being raped? (V085095) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION IN CASES OF RAPE: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085095C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085095; R selected for VERSION OLD
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. C. If the pregnancy was the result of rape - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WRAPE1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . b. if the woman became pregnant as a result of rape. (GSSRAPEV) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the pregnancy was caused by the woman being raped? (W2N8) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . E. If she became pregnant as a result of rape? (ABRAPE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) Inapplicable
0
0.0
1) Yes
2,428
75.4
2) No
664
20.6
8) Dont know
93
2.9
9) No answer
34
1.1
TOTAL
3,219
100.0
Circumstance: Serious DefectIn this question respondents were asked if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if there is a chance of a serious defect in the baby.
Do you personally think it is wrong or not wrong for a woman to have an abortion... If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby. (ABDEFCTW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose a test shows the baby has a serious genetic defect. Would you (yourself want to/want your partner to) have an abortion if a test shows the baby has a serious genetic defect? (GENEABRT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think the law should or should not allow a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion. . . If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby. (ABDEFCT1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally think it is wrong or not wrong for a woman to have an abortion. . .If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby. (ABDEFCTW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . A. If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally think it is wrong or not wrong for a woman to have an abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFCTW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . A. If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the fetus will be born with a serious birth defect? (W10R10) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R10=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if the fetus will be born with a serious birth defect (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R11_F) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R10=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal if the fetus will be born with a serious birth defect (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R11_O) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose a test shows the baby has a serious genetic defect. Would you (yourself want to/want your partner to) have an abortion if a test shows the baby has a serious genetic defect? (GENEABRT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose a test shows the baby has a serious genetic defect. Would you (yourself want to/want your partner to) have an abortion if a test shows the baby has a serious genetic defect? (GENEABRT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: the fetus will be born with a serious birth defect? (V085096) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION IN CASES OF SERIOUS BIRTH DEFECT: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085096C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-8) Dont know
1
0.0
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085096; R selected for VERSION OLD
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. E. If there is a strong chance of serious deformity in the baby - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WDEFORM1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. C. A woman who gives birth to a handicapped child rather than having an abortion is doing the right thing. (ABDEFORM) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose a test shows the baby has a serious deformity. Would you [yourself want to / want your partner to] have an abortion if a test show the baby has a serious deformity? (ABORTEST) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . b. the baby will have a genetic tendency toward obesity -- being overweight. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (TOBESE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
36
1.7
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
61
2.9
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
84
4.0
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . c. the baby will be mentally retarded. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (TRETARD) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
262
13.0
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
382
18.9
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
525
26.0
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . d. the baby will be born with a terminal illness that ends its life within six years. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (TTERMILL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
508
25.1
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
408
20.2
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
332
16.4
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . e. the baby will be born blind. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (TBLIND) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
184
9.0
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
289
14.2
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
360
17.6
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . f. the baby will be missing an arm or a leg. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (TMISSLEG) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
214
10.6
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
300
14.8
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
365
18.0
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . g. the baby will have a serious heart defect. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (THARTDEF) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
249
12.3
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
358
17.7
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
416
20.6
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . a. if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby. (GSSDEFRM) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the fetus will be born with a serious birth defect? (W2N10) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (ABDEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think it should be legally possible for a pregnant woman to obtain an abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby? (82) (DEFECT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-1) RF/DK
13
3.2
0) No
58
14.1
1) Yes
341
82.8
TOTAL
412
100.0
Circumstance: Woman's HeatlhThis question type asks respondents if it should be possible for a woman to obtain an abortion if the woman's own health is in danger by the pregnancy.
(CATHOLIC OVERSAMPLE) For each item I name, please tell me if you personally find it morally acceptable or morally unacceptable.- Abortion when the mothers life is not in danger (MORAL2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if . . . the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . C. If the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . C. If the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Next, wed like to ask you about some situations in which a woman might want to have an abortion. For each one, please say whether you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose it being legal for the woman to have an abortion in that situation. [First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if staying pregnant would hurt the womans health but is very unlikely to cause her to die? (W10R2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if staying pregnant could cause the woman to die? (W10R4) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R2=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if staying pregnant would hurt the womans health but is very unlikely to cause her to die (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R3_FA) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R4=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if staying pregnant could cause the woman to die (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R5_FA) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R2=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal if staying pregnant would hurt the womans health but is very unlikely to cause her to die (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R3_OP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R4=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal if staying pregnant could cause the woman to die (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R5_OP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Should it be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion: If the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: staying pregnant would hurt the womans health but is very unlikely to cause her to die? (V085092) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION FOR NONFATAL HEALTH RISK: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085092C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085092; R selected for VERSION OLD
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: staying pregnant could cause the woman to die? (V085093) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION FOR FATAL HEALTH RISK: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085093C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-9) Refused
2
0.1
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085093; R selected for VERSION OLD
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. First. . . A. If the womans life is endangered by the pregnancy - would abortion be acceptable or unacceptable during the first 3 months of pregnancy? (WWOLIFE1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. B. If the womans mental or emotional health might be damaged by the pregnancy - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WWOHLTH1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Next, wed like to ask you about some situations in which a woman might want to have an abortion. For each one, please say whether you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose it being legal for the woman to have an abortion in that situation. [First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if staying pregnant would hurt the womans health but is very unlikely to cause her to die? (W2N2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if staying pregnant could cause the woman to die? (W2N4) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you be for or against allowing abortion in the case of a mother with seven young children whom doctors thought would die if she gave birth again? (Q19D) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think it should be legally possible for a pregnant woman to obtain an abortion if the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (82) (HEALTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion . . . C. If the womans own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy? (ABHLTH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
0) Inapplicable
0
0.0
1) Yes
2,696
83.8
2) No
380
11.8
8) Dont know
99
3.1
9) No answer
42
1.3
TOTAL
3,217
100.0
Circumstance: Wrong GenderThis question type asks if the respondent favors or opposes abortion when the sex of the child is not what the woman wants.
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the child will not be the sex the woman wants it to be? (W10R12) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R12=1] Do you favor abortion being legal if the child will not be the sex the woman wants it to be (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R13_F) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[IF W10R12=2] Do you oppose abortion being legal the child will not be the sex the woman wants it to be (a great deal, moderately, or a little / a little, moderately, or a great deal)? (W10R13_O) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Does Barack Obama favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the child will not be the sex the woman wants it to be? (W10RA3) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO/NOT FIRST ABORTION SCENARIO: [First,/Next,] do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if: the child will not be the sex the woman wants it to be? (V085098) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF NEITHER FAVORS NOR OPPOSES ABORTION WHEN THE CHILD IS THE WRONG GENDER: Do you lean toward favoring it, lean toward opposing it, or do you not lean either way? (V085098C) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-2) No Post-election IW
221
9.5
-1) INAP, 1,5,-8,-9 in V085098; R selected for VERSION OLD
I am going to read you some situations where a woman might consider having an abortion. For each situation, I want you to tell me whether you, personally, feel an abortion would be acceptable or unacceptable. K. If a couple wants a boy and a test has revealed that the baby will be a girl - is it acceptable or not during the first 3 months? (WOTHSEX1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
New technologies make it possible to discover many things about the unborn early in the pregnancy. For each of the following test results I read, please tell me which statement on this card best describes your feelings. Just call off the letter. A test reveals . . . a. the baby will be the opposite sex of what the parents had wanted. (See note 4 on the ARDA summary page) (TOPPSEX) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Serious enough to have an abortion
37
1.8
2) Serious enough to strongly consider an abortion
62
2.9
3) Serious enough to give a little consideration to an abortion
75
3.6
4) Not a consideration, you would definitely not consider an abortion
[First/Next], do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose abortion being legal if the child will not be the sex the woman wants it to be? (W2N12) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(mbrrchse_06) Would the following types of people be permitted to be full-fledged members of your congregation: Someone who publicly supported a womans right to choose with regard to abortion? (MBRRCH06) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(mbrrlife_06) Would the following types of people be permitted to be full-fledged members of your congregation: Someone who publicly supported a right-to-life position on abortion? (MBRRLF06) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(ldrrchse_06) Regarding leadership, if they were otherwise qualified, would the following types of people be permitted to hold all of the volunteer leadership positions open to other members: Someone who publicly supported a womans right to choose with regard to abortion? (LDRRCH06) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
(ldrrlife_06) Regarding leadership, if they were otherwise qualified, would the following types of people be permitted to hold all of the volunteer leadership positions open to other members: Someone who publicly supported a right-to-life position on abortion? (LDRRLF06) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF RESPONDENT ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES AT ALL (from QN23): On another subject, does the clergy at your place of worship ever speak out on the issue of abortion? (QN49_A) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Yes
2,074
58.9
2) No
1,234
35.0
8) Dont know
197
5.6
9) Refused
16
0.5
TOTAL
3,521
100.0
Government and the CourtsThis question type asks the respondent the degree of involvement the government and legal system should have in the abortion decision/process
How much do you agree or disagree with this statement? Decisions about divorce and abortion are private matters, and we should not pass laws which regulated these matters. (PRIVMAT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parents permission before she could obtain an abortion? (ABORT PRNT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF R FAVORS ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS PARENTAL PERMISSION/IF R OPPOSES ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS PARENTAL PERMISSION: Strongly or not strongly? (ABORT SPRN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBIRTH SUP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF R FAVORS BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS/IF R OPPOSES BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBIRTH STR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you FAVOR or OPPOSE a law in your state that would allow the use of government funds to help pay for the costs of abortion for women who cannot afford them? (ABORT_S) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
There has been discussion recently about a law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE a law that makes these types of abortions illegal? (PB_ABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Referring to the PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION issue in previous question: Do you STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY [favor/oppose] a law that makes these types of abortions illegal? (PBABORT2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Now I would like to ask your opinion about a specific abortion procedure known as late-term abortion or partial birth abortion, which is sometimes performed on women during the last few months of pregnancy. Do you think that this procedure should be legal or illegal? (ABLATE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Id like to read you a list of some programs and proposals that are being discussed in this country today. For each one, please tell me whether you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose it. : Changing the laws to make it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion (PRGRMS2) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think the question of whether abortion should be legally permitted is something that should be decided at the national level, or is it something that each state should decide for itself? [Answered only if FORM = 1.] (ABSTANAT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you favor or oppose requiring that women under the age of 18 get the consent of at least one parent before they are allowed to have an abortion? (VIEWABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or completely disagree with the following statements: the government should not interfere with a womans ability to have an abortion. (GOV_ABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
As I read some programs and proposals that are being discussed in the country today, please tell me whether you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose each. Making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion. (DIFFABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
United States policy currently states that no federal funding may be given to any foreign organization that performs abortions in other countries except in cases of rape or when the womans life is in danger, provides counseling and referrals for abortions, or promotes abortion-rights legislation in other countries, even if the money is used for other aspects of womens reproductive health. Based on this statement, do you support or oppose this policy? (follow-up) Do you STRONGLY (support/oppose) this policy or SOMEWHAT (support/oppose) this policy? (GAGRULE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. I. The law, the courts, and the judge (IPLAW) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. J. The state government (IPSTAGOV) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. K. The federal government (IPFEDGOV) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: a. requiring that women under 18 years of age get parental consent before they are allowed to have an abortion. (LPARCONS) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: d. requiring women to get the consent of the babys biological father before having an abortion. (LFACONS) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: e. requiring women to receive information about fetal development and alternatives to abortion before going ahead with the procedure. (LINFCONS) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: f. the passage of a law prohibiting the use of fetal tissue and organs for medical research. (LLICCLIN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: g. the passage of a law requiring health and safety standards for private abortion clinics. (LRESERCH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: h. in states that restrict abortions, require doctors who perform an illegal abortion to pay a large fine. (LMDFINES) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: i. not allowing abortions after the third month of pregnancy, unless it is required to save a womans life. (LAFTER3) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
For/Against: What about a law requiring parental consent before a female under the age of 18 can have an abortion? (91, 97, 99, 04) (CONSENT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose requiring that women under the age of 18 get the consent of at least one parent before they are allowed to have an abortion? (Q145C) [Note: CONSNT_A was read immediately before DIFFAB_A for random respondents.] (CONSNT_A) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Strongly favor
3,985
45.1
2) Favor
2,696
30.5
3) Oppose
1,000
11.3
4) Strongly oppose
693
7.9
9) Dont know/Refused (VOL.)
454
5.1
TOTAL
8,828
100.0
ImportanceThis question type asks respondents to identify how important the abortion issue is to them.
We are asking about church issues, in your case, Catholic church issues. For each, please tell me whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly. -- Catholics can, in good conscience, vote for political candidates who support legal abortion. (ABORTVOT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Which statement best expresses your concern about abortion? (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) I have thought very little about the abortion issue
99
25.6
2) I feel abortion is one of several issues I am concerned about
153
39.6
3) I am so concerned about abortion that, for instance, whether or not I vote for a political candidate would greatly depend on his or her position on abortion
The following are 8 possible concerns of people in America today. Please indicate how important each is to you. -- Eliminating or reducing abortion (PROBABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
REFERRING TO THE ABORTION ISSUE: How important is this issue to you personally? EXTREMELY important, VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, NOT TOO important or NOT AT ALL important? (ABORTIMP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When you decide who to vote for in an election, you have several issues that may concern you. On a scale from 1 to 5 - with 1 being not important, 3 being moderately important, and 5 being extremely important - please rank the importance of each of the following issues in determining how you vote: Abortion (ABORTIMP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
[ASK FORM 2 ONLY:] As I read some issues the Supreme Court may rule on over the coming years, please tell me how important each issue is to you personally. Are court decisions on abortion very important, fairly important, not too important, or not at all important to you? (SUPABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
I am going to read you a list of social and political issues that are being discussed today. For each, please tell me how concerned you are personally -- very concerned, fairly concerned, not too concerned, or not concerned at all? A. Abortion (CABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Would you say that you and your friends think about the following item very often, sometimes, or almost never: Laws about abortion (SALABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose that there was a candidate running for the Legislature whose views you mostly agreed with but who took a position on abortion rights that you disagreed with completely. Would you certainly not vote for that candidate, probably not, or could you still vote for that candidate? (92, 96, 00, 04, 08) (VOTING) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-1) RF/DK
216
6.5
1) Certainly not
649
19.7
2) Probably not
915
27.7
3) Could still vote
1,520
46.1
TOTAL
3,300
100.0
LegalityThis question type asks the respondent if he/she is for/against criminalizing abortion
Here are a series of statements about issues facing the United States. For each, please tell me whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or disagree strongly. -- There has also been much discussion about the legality of abortion. Do you believe that abortion should be... (ABORTLEG) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Now to change the subject a bit, I would like to ask a couple of brief questions about your opinion of abortion. -- Do you think abortion should be legal under any circumstances, or not legal at all? (ABORT1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
On another subject, do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases or illegal in all cases? (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
On another subject, do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases or illegal in all cases? (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think that abortion should be legal in all cases, in most cases only a few cases, or illegal in all cases? (DO NOT READ) (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Which comes closer to your view about the abortion issue: the country needs to find a middle ground on abortion laws, or theres no room for compromise when it comes to abortion laws? [Answered only if FORM = 1.] (ABCOMPRO) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) The country needs to find a middle ground on abortion laws, (OR)
653
65.6
2) Theres no room for compromise when it comes to abortion laws
In 1973 the Roe versus Wade decision established a womans constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not? (ROEWADE) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
On another subject, do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases, or illegal in all cases? (QN20) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here is some legislation on abortion that is being considered in some states. Please indicate whether you mostly favor or mostly oppose the following proposals: c. not allowing abortions in cases where they are being used as a method of birth control. (LBIRCONT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Now thinking about the abortion issue... Do you think abortion should be... [Choices read in reverse order for random half of sample] (Q125) (ABORTN_A) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion? (Q145B) [Note: DIFFAB_A was read immediately after CONSNT_A for random respondents.] (DIFFAB_A) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
On another subject... Do you think abortion should be... [Choices were read in reverse order for random half of the sample] (Q240) (ABORTN_B) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
If ABORTN_B = 1-2: And do you think the view that abortion should be against the law is a respectable opinion for someone to hold, or not? (Q243) (ABRSP1_B) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
If ABORTN_B = 3-4: And do you think the view that abortion should be legal is a respectable opinion for someone to hold, or not? (Q244) (ABRSP2_B) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you think abortion should be... [Choices were read in reverse order for random half of the sample] (Combination of ABORTN_A and ABORTN_B) (ABORTN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Here are a series of statements about issues facing the United States. For each, please tell me whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or disagree strongly. -- Thinking about the morality of abortion, do you believe abortion can be a morally acceptable choice... (ABORTMOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Alice, who is 15, didnt think she would get pregnant, but the doctor said she was. She decided she did not want to have the baby, so she went to another doctor and had an abortion. How right or wrong was it for her to have this abortion? (FRTABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Alice, who is 15, didnt think she would get pregnant, but the doctor said she was. She decided she did not want to have the baby, so she went to another doctor and had an abortion. How right or wrong was it for her to have this abortion? (MRTABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Alice, who is 15, didnt think she would get pregnant, but the doctor said she was. She decided she did not want to have the baby, so she went to another doctor and had an abortion. How right or wrong was it for her to have this abortion? (YABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
IF GEORGE W. BUSHS POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DONT KNOW/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bushs position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSH ABP) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Q85H [NEXT, IM GOING TO READ SOME BEHAVIORS. FOR EACH, PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT IT IS MORALLY ACCEPTABLE, MORALLY WRONG, OR IS IT NOT A MORAL ISSUE?] Having an abortion (Q85H) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Moral values can mean different things to different people. I am going to read to you a list of phrases, and please tell me which of the following choices best describes what moral values means to you. (MORALV) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Compassion and concern for the sick or needy
91
8.0
2) Personal values, such as honesty and responsibility
421
37.2
3) Social issues, such as abortion or gay marriage
97
8.6
4) Family values, such as trying to protect children from sex and violence on TV and the Internet
297
26.3
5) Social justice, such as preventing human rights abuses or discrimination
Regardless of whether or not you think abortion should be legal, do you personally believe that having an abortion is morally wrong in nearly all circumstances, morally wrong in some circumstances, or is it not a moral issue? [Answered only if FORM = 1.] (ABMORAL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Regardless of whether or not you think abortion should be legal, do you personally believe that having an abortion is morally wrong in nearly all circumstances, morally wrong in some circumstances, or is it not a moral issue? (ABORWRNG) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me for each of the following items whether you think it can always be justified, sometimes be justified, or never be justified: abortion. (ABORTION) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Now I am going to read a list of things that some people consider to be morally wrong. For each item, please select the response that best indicates how wrong you, personally, think it is when people engage in that behavior. I. Abortion during the first three months of pregnancy (see note 1 on the ARDA summary page) (WABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Wrong for all, and should not be legally tolerated
Now I am going to read a list of things that some people consider to be morally wrong. For each item, please select the number that best indicates how wrong you, personally, think it is when people engage in that behavior. T. Abortion during the first three months of pregnancy (W20ABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
1) Wrong for all, and should not be legally tolerated
Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. E. Abortion is alright, if having a baby will change your life plans in a way you will find hard to live with. (ABCHPLAN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally believe that abortion is morally wrong or is it morally acceptable? (90, 93, 95, 97, 99, 01, 03, 05, 07, 09) (IMMORAL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you personally believe that having an abortion is morally acceptable, morally wrong, or is it not a moral issue? (Q180A) [Note: MORAB_A through MORAL_A were read together as a block, but were read in a random order within the block.] (MORAB_A) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Do you believe that each of the following is morally wrong or not a moral issue? Having an abortion when the fetus is old enough to survive on its own outside the mothers womb. Would you say that is always morally wrong, usually morally wrong, sometimes morally wrong, never morally wrong, or not a moral issue? (MA_1) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
TOTAL
%
-7) Refused
21
0.8
-4) Dont know
27
1.0
1) Always morally wrong
1,474
56.6
2) Usually morally wrong
448
17.2
3) Sometimes morally wrong
368
14.1
4) Never morally wrong
37
1.4
5) Not a moral issue
175
6.7
6) Decide on case-by-case basis (Vol.)
56
2.1
TOTAL
2,606
100.0
Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?This question type asks respondents if they consider themselves pro-choice or pro-life and how they feel about pro-life/pro-life people or groups.
Whats had the most influence on your opinion on the issue of abortion - (the opinions of your family and friends), (things youve seen or read in the news), (your education), (your personal experience), (your religious beliefs), your personal non-religious beliefs, or something else? (OPINABOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Now, Id like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. You can use any number from zero to one hundred, the higher the number the more favorable your feelings are toward that person or organization. If you have no opinion or never heard of that person or organization, please say so. Give Pro-life, anti-abortion groups a rating, with 100 meaning a very warm, favorable feeling; zero meaning a very cold, unfavorable feeling; and 50 meaning not particularly warm or cold. (IF DONT KNOW:) Would you say you are unable to give an opinion of pro-life, anti-abortion groups, or have you never heard of Pro-life, anti-abortion groups? (THERM4) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Now, Id like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a very warm, favorable feeling; zero meaning a very cold, unfavorable feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. You can use any number from zero to one hundred, the higher the number the more favorable your feelings are toward that person or organization. If you have no opinion or never heard of that person or organization, please say so: pro-life, anti-abortion groups (split B- half sample). (FEELPROL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. F. A womans right to choose whether to have an abortion is more important than the human fetus right to life. (ARTCRTL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
In recent years pro-life and pro-choice groups have formed on opposite sides of the abortion issue. How much would you say you have heard about groups that are pro-life . . . a great deal, a moderate amount, a small amount, or nothing at all? (HEARPL) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Which of the following would you say best describes your general outlook on the abortion issue -- strongly pro-life, moderately pro-life, neutral, moderately pro-choice, or strongly pro-choice? (SELFID) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
Suppose a teenage girl gets pregnant. She wants to have an abortion and so has sought the medical advice of her doctor. She has discussed this at great length with her parents, but they are opposed to it. Who should have the final say in this situation? (Not asked of elementary school students.) (DECABORT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. A. The pregnant woman (IPWOMAN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. B. The unborn babys father (IPFATHER) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. C. The pregnant womans personal or family physician (IPMDPERS) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. D. A doctor at an abortion clinic (IPMDABRT) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. E. A counselor at an abortion clinic (IPCOUNAB) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. F. A counselor at an adoption agency (IPCOUNAD) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. G. The womans church or religious community (IPCHURCH) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. H. Her pastor, priest, or rabbi (IPPASTOR) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
When decisions are being made about abortions, a variety of people or groups may want to have some input. For each of the following, I want you to tell me how much of a voice, if any, you think they should have in the abortion decision. L. The parents of a pregnant girl who is under 18 years of age (IPPATEEN) EXPAND/COLLAPSE
