Evolution/Creationism, Teaching of - Measurement Concept

Our current "human origins" question asks the respondent theory of human origins. There are many questions that ask whether creationism should be taught in public schools, whether evolution and creationism should be given equal time, etc.
24 Questions match selected parameters.

Survey Questions

CREATION from Baylor Religion Survey, Wave II (2007)
Q41e. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about science: Creationism should be taught in public schools BROADCON from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach evolution (including answering student questions), I emphasize the broad consensus that evolution is fact even as scientists disagree about the specific mechanisms through which evolution occurred. [ARDA Note - 2 cases coded as 2.5 set to missing] ENCDISC from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please tell us whether you have ever done the following: I have encouraged discussions of creationism in order to firmly explain why creationism is not science. NERVOUS from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
In preparing this questionnaire, we talked to a large number of teachers and other science educators. They have told us about many strategies that teachers use in teaching their high school biology classes and they share many experiences they have had. Some of these appear below. Please tell us whether you have ever done the following: I have been nervous about an open house event or a meeting with parents because I believed that I would receive complaints about the teaching of evolution. NODARWIN from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). I believe it is possible to offer an excellent general biology course for high school students that includes no mention of Darwin or evolutionary theory. PRVWRONG from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach evolution (including answering student questions), I emphasize the possibility that portions of evolutionary theory may be proven wrong. REPUTSCI from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach creationism or intelligent design (including answering student questions), I emphasize that many reputable scientists view these as valid alternatives to Darwinian theory. SCIREJCT from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach creationism or intelligent design (including answering student questions), I emphasize that almost all scientists reject these as valid accounts of the origin of species. STATESCI from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach evolution, I focus heavily on what students need to know to meet state science standards. UNIFYING from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). Evolution serves as the unifying theme for the content of the course. [ARDA Note: 1 case coded as 1.5 set to missing] VALIDALT from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach about creationism or intelligent design (including answering student questions), I emphasize that this is a valid, scientific alternative to Darwinian explanations for the origin of species. VALIDREL from National Survey of High School Biology Teachers
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements if they apply to your classes in biology or life sciences (otherwise select 'Not applicable'). When I do teach creationism or intelligent design (including answering student questions), I acknowledge them as valid religious perspectives, but which are not appropriate for a science class. CREATEVO from Religion and Public Life Survey, 2005
And what's your view: would you generally favor or oppose teaching creationism along with evolution in public schools? CREATION from Religion and Public Life Survey, 2005
Would you generally favor or oppose teaching creationism instead of evolution in public schools? EVOLRESP from Religion and Public Life Survey, 2005
And who should have the primary responsibility for deciding how evolution is taught in public schools? Should it be scientists and science teachers, parents, or school boards? EVOLSCI from Religion and Public Life Survey, 2005
I'd like to get your views on who should and who should not have a say on how evolution is taught in public schools. In your opinion, should scientists and science teachers have a say in how evolution is addressed, or should they not have a say? TEACHPUB from Religion and Public Life Survey, 2006
Would you generally favor or oppose teaching creationism along with evolution in public schools? [Answered only if FORM = 1.] TCHCREAT from Southern Focus Poll, South Survey, Spring 1998
Public schools now teach the scientific theory of evolution, which explains how life developed on Earth. Would you favor or oppose requiring public schools to also teach the Biblical version of how life on Earth was created by God? TCHCREAT from Southern Focus Poll, Non-South Survey, Spring 1998
Public schools now teach the scientific theory of evolution, which explains how life developed on Earth. Would you favor or oppose requiring public schools to also teach the Biblical version of how life on Earth was created by God? TEACHEVL from Winthrop University Student Religion Survey, 1996
There is controversy about whether the biological theory of evolution, or the biblical view of creation (called 'creationism'), should be taught in public schools. Which do you think should be taught? TEACHSCI from Religious Identity and Influence Survey, 1996
Do you think public school instruction should include Christian views of science and history, or not? CREATION from Williamsburg Charter Survey On Religion and Public Life, 1987
Do you think public schools should only teach the Bible's account of the creation of life on Earth, or should they only teach evolution, or should they teach both? TCHCREAT from Southern Focus Poll, Combined Sample, Spring 1998
Public schools now teach the scientific theory of evolution, which explains how life developed on Earth. Would you favor or oppose requiring public schools to also teach the Biblical version of how life on Earth was created by God? CREATION from Tulsa, Oklahoma Area Survey, 1986
Please choose the response that best fits your belief regarding the Creationism Controversy. Public schools should teach: