American National Election Studies, 2000 - Codebook

All frequencies are raw numbers (no weights used).

1) Version number (VERSION)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.00

2) NES dataset number (DSETNO)
3) ICPSR archive number 3131 (ICPSRNO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3,131.00	0.00

4) NES 2000 Case ID (CASEID)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	905.67	522.90

5) Post ID: There are gaps in the numbering. 0001-1557 Post interviews 2001-2254 Post non-interviews (POSTID)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	966.53	626.96

6) 2000 Sample weight: This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. A post stratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: less than high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more (SWEIGHT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.49

7) Sample weight for post variables. This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places (0 = No post election interview) (PWEIGHT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.86	0.59

8) Pre only or pre-and-post (PREPOST)

	TOTAL	%
0) Pre-election and post-election interviews	1555	86.1
1) Pre-election interview only	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

9) Pre: Mode of pre interview (MODE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Personal (FTF)	1006	55.7
5) Telephone	801	44.3
Total	1807	100.0

10) Pre: Form - E section administered questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in pre section e or post section H (FORM_E)

	TOTAL	%
0) Section E not administered in pre	880	48.7
1) Section E administered in pre	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

11) Pre: Form - half sample. The series of questions concerning 'most important problem' was administered to a randomly selected half sample in the pre. (FORM_F)

	TOTAL	%
0) R not selected	902	49.9
1) R selected	905	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

12) Pre: Form - Clinton retrospective or Clinton affects/traits. RS were randomly selected to be administered either the Clinton retrospective or the Clinton traits and affects questions in the pre. The questions for which R was not selected for pre administration were administered in the post (FORM_Q)

	TOTAL	%
1) Asked in pre [Clinton retrospective]	891	49.3
2) Asked in pre [Clinton affects and traits]	916	50.7
Total	1807	100.0

13) Pre: Form - lib/con format. Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard 7-point scale format for liberal/conservative placements, or to an experimental branching format. Self placement (LOBCONF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format (FTF/phone)	868	48.0
2) Experimental format (FTF and phone)	939	52.0
Total	1807	100.0

14) Pre: Form - economy retrospective format (ECONF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	908	50.2
2) Experimental format	899	49.8
Total	1807	100.0

15) Pre: Form - employment retrospective format (EMPRETF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	901	49.9
2) Experimental format	906	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

16) Pre: Form - economy prospective format (ECONPF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	911	50.4
2) Experimental format	896	49.6
Total	1807	100.0

17) Pre: Form - imports format (IMPORTF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	910	50.4
2) Experimental format	897	49.6
Total	1807	100.0

18) Pre: Form - isolationism format (ISOLATF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	891	49.3
2) Experimental format	916	50.7
Total	1807	100.0

19) Pre: Form - medical insurance format. FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for gov't/private health insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format. Phone (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 (MEDINSF)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard/phone version	891	49.3
2) FTF experimental/phone version	916	50.7
Total	1807	100.0

20) Pre: Form - affirmative action format (AFFACTF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	880	48.7
2) Experimental format	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

21) Pre: Form - environment vs. jobs format (ENVJOBF)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard	875	48.4
2) FTF experimental	932	51.6
Total	1807	100.0

22) Pre: Form - school voucher format (SCHVCHF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	882	48.8
2) Experimental format	925	51.2
Total	1807	100.0

23) Pre: Form - women equal role format (WOMROLEF)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard	902	49.9
2) FTF experimental	905	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

24) Pre: Month of interview (MONTHINT)

	TOTAL	%
9) September	831	46.0
10) October	714	39.5
11) November	262	14.5
Total	1807	100.0

25) Pre: Day of interview (DAYINT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.67	8.99

26) Pre: Month and day (MMDD) of interview (MMDDINT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	983.18	67.70

27) Pre: Number of days before election (Election Day was November 7, 2000) (NDPELECT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	32.63	19.42

28) Pre: Interview length. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; INAP, Partial IW (IWLENGTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	72.47	66.15

29) Pre: Interview number (IWNUMBER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	12.19	9.06

30) Pre: Date of beginning VQ file (VQBEGIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) VQ dated 8/15	6	0.3
1) VQ dated 8/30	45	2.5
2) VQ dated 9/5	41	2.3
3) VQ dated 9/6	183	10.1
4) VQ dated 9/8	430	23.8
5) VQ dated 9/25	103	5.7
6) VQ dated 9/28	26	1.4
7) VQ dated 9/29	191	10.6
8) VQ dated 10/5	338	18.7
9) VQ dated 10/19	444	24.6
Total	1807	100.0

31) Pre: Date of ending VQ file (VQEND)

	TOTAL	%
0) VQ dated 8/15	5	0.3
1) VQ dated 8/30	31	1.7
2) VQ dated 9/5	34	1.9
3) VQ dated 9/6	171	9.5
4) VQ dated 9/8	426	23.6
5) VQ dated 9/25	101	5.6
6) VQ dated 9/28	24	1.3
7) VQ dated 9/29	196	10.8
8) VQ dated 10/5	342	18.9
9) VQ dated 10/19	471	26.1
99) INAP	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

32) Pre: Flag- change in VQ (VQFLAG)

	TOTAL	%
0) No change	1694	93.7
1) Change in VQ	107	5.9
9) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

33) Pre: Advance letter sent? (ADVLETTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) No advance letter sent	335	18.5
1) Advance letter sent	1467	81.2
9) NA	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

34) Pre: Payment amount (PAYAMNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) R requested no payment	8	0.4
20) Twenty dollars	1396	77.3
40) Forty dollars	389	21.5
99) NA	14	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

35) Pre: Payment mode (PAYMODE)

	TOTAL	%
0) R requested no payment	8	0.4
1) Check	1615	89.4
2) Cash	169	9.4
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

36) Pre: Payment date (MMDD) [9999. NA; R requested no payment] (PAYDATE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1,118.62	988.58

37) Pre: Tape recorded? (RECORDED)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	161	8.9
5) No	1646	91.1
Total	1807	100.0

38) Pre: Verification (VERIFY)

	TOTAL	%
0) Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification	1509	83.5
1) Flagged for verification	15	0.8
2) Verified OK	246	13.6
3) Verified with some discrepancies	22	1.2
4) Not verified - attempts to verify halted	3	0.2
5) Unable to verify	10	0.6
6) Verification limit met	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

39) Pre: Evaluation (EVALUATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not evaluated	1694	93.7
1) Flagged	1	0.1
2) Evaluated	102	5.6
4) Cannot evaluate	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

40) Pre: Refusal conversion indicator (CONVINDC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not a refusal conversion situation	1534	84.9
1) Refusal conversion situation indicated	273	15.1
Total	1807	100.0

41) Pre: Persuasion letter - flag (PERSLTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) No persuasion letter sent	1716	95.0
1) Persuasion letter sent	90	5.0
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

42) Pre: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) [9999. No persuasion letter requested] (DPLREQST)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9,546.13	1,967.15

43) Pre: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD) [9999. NA; INAP, No persuasion letter requested (9999 In pre-admin] (DPSENT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9,551.32	1,955.94

44) Pre: Type of persuasion letter (PLTYPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1717	95.0
1) Too busy	33	1.8
2) Too personal	4	0.2
3) Not interested	23	1.3
4) Too old	4	0.2
6) Gatekeeper	3	0.2
7) Not at home	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

45) Pre: Number of telephone calls (TELCALLS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.60	5.50

46) Pre: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls (FTFCALLS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.32	3.02

47) Pre: Final result (FINRESLT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Interview, complete	1801	99.7
5) Interview, partial	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

48) Sample release (all 1). All cases coded 1 there was a single release of the entire sample. (SMPLREL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.00

49) Pre: Language of interview (all English) all interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1) (LANGUAGE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.00

50) Pre - coversheet: Flag - missing coversheet (FLAGMCS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Coversheet not missing	1783	98.7
1) Missing coversheet	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

51) Pre - coversheet: Color of coversheet (CVSCOLOR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Blue	984	54.5
2) Yellow	794	43.9
4) Green - FTF type II updating	5	0.3
9) Missing coversheet	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

52) If telephone RDD: Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business, a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence. (Which is it?) (PHONTYPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned FTF mode	1006	55.7
1) Business	2	0.1
2) Home	735	40.7
3) Both	4	0.2
5) Cell phone	44	2.4
9) NA; phone mode and coversheet missing	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

53) If telephone RDD: If business phone number: Does anyone live there on the premises? (PHBUSRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1805	99.9
1) Yes	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

54) If telephone RDD: If business phone number: If someone lives on the premises: Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside (their/your) residence that is for personal use? (PHBUSRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1805	99.9
2) Use this	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

55) If face-to-face mode: Household listing obtained from: (HHLIST)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned phone mode	801	44.3
1) HU member	980	54.2
2) Neighbor	3	0.2
3) Apt. manager	1	0.1
4) Landlord	1	0.1
7) Other (specify)	4	0.2
9) NA; FTF and coversheet missing	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

56) Household listing: Selection table (HHTABLE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Selection table A	274	15.2
2) Table B1	152	8.4
3) Table B2	135	7.5
4) Table C	304	16.8
5) Table D	299	16.5
6) Table E1	161	8.9
7) Table E2	149	8.2
8) Table F	309	17.1
9) Missing coversheet	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

57) Household listing: Number of eligible adults (9 NA) (NELIGADL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.81	0.73

58) Household listing: Number ineligible adults (9 NA) (NINELADL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.08	0.67

59) Household listing: Household composition (HHCOMPOS)

	TOTAL	%
10) 1 Adult male HHR	216	12.0
11) 1 Adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative	25	1.4
12) 1 Adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives	7	0.4
20) 1 Adult female HHR	347	19.2
21) 1 Adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative	15	0.8
22) 1 Adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives	3	0.2
30) 1 Married couple: No children/or children at home under 18	879	48.6
40) 1 Married couple plus 1 other relative	135	7.5
50) 1 Married couple plus 2 or more other relatives	44	2.4
51) 1 Married couple plus 1 other non-relative	6	0.3
55) 1 Married couple plus relatives and non-relatives	2	0.1
60) 1 Male HHR plus 1 other relative	32	1.8
65) 1 Male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives	1	0.1
70) 1 Male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives	7	0.4
80) 1 Female HHR plus 1 other relative	50	2.8
85) 1 Female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives	1	0.1
90) 1 Female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives	19	1.1
95) Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR	6	0.3
99) NA	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

60) Household listing: R person number (9 NA) (RESPNMBR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.46	0.74

61) Contact description: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent lives (STRUCTYP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned phone mode	801	44.3
1) Mobile home	38	2.1
2) Detached single family	658	36.4
3) Multi-family	47	2.6
4) Apartment house	166	9.2
5) Condo complex	35	1.9
7) Other (specify)	32	1.8
9) NA; missing coversheet	30	1.7
Total	1807	100.0

62) If face-to-face mode: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? (FTFGTKEE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned phone mode	801	44.3
1) Yes	36	2.0
2) No, but building is locked/subdivision is gated and locked	33	1.8
5) No	876	48.5
9) NA; missing coversheet	61	3.4
Total	1807	100.0

63) If face-to-face mode: If gatekeeper/guard/manager/locked access: Check the box below which best describes the situation [1 Building manager or other gatekeeper must let you in the building (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU; 2 Building manager/other gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household; 7 Other (specify); 9 NA; 0 INAP] (FTFTGKEE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.22	1.21

64) Contact description: Was there resistance from any contact person? (CNTCTRS1)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	458	25.3
5) No	1322	73.2
9) NA	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

65) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (CNTCTRS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	10	0.6
5) Not marked	342	18.9
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

66) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - content too personal (CNTCTRS3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	20	1.1
5) Not marked	332	18.4
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

67) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - confidentiality (CNTCTRS4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	40	2.2
5) Not marked	312	17.3
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

68) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - not interested in politics (CNTCTRS5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	81	4.5
5) Not marked	271	15.0
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

69) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - too busy (CNTCTRS6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	125	6.9
5) Not marked	227	12.6
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

70) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - poor health (CNTCTRS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	15	0.8
5) Not marked	337	18.6
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

71) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - other (specify) (CNTCTRS8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	163	9.0
5) Not marked	189	10.5
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

72) Contact description: Did R refuse initially? (RREFUSED)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	222	12.3
5) No	1530	84.7
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

73) Contact description: Did respondent break any appointments (RBRKAPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	1522	84.2
1) One	200	11.1
2) Two or more	67	3.7
9) NA	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

74) Contact description: If contact persons resisted, was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? (RCNTCRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Yes	281	15.6
5) No	97	5.4
9) NA	80	4.4
Total	1807	100.0

75) Summary: Resistance (RRESIST1)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes, some resistance identified	330	18.3
5) No resistance identified	1450	80.2
9) NA	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

76) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (RRESIST2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	1	0.1
5) Not marked	176	9.7
Total	1807	100.0

77) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - content too personal (RRESIST3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	7	0.4
5) Not marked	170	9.4
Total	1807	100.0

78) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - confidentiality (RRESIST4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	9	0.5
5) Not marked	168	9.3
Total	1807	100.0

79) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - not interested in politics (RRESIST5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	12	0.7
5) Not marked	165	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

80) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - too busy (RRESIST6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	21	1.2
5) Not marked	156	8.6
Total	1807	100.0

81) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - poor health (RRESIST7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	3	0.2
5) Not marked	174	9.6
Total	1807	100.0

82) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - other (specify) (RRESIST8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	15	0.8
5) Not marked	162	9.0
Total	1807	100.0

83) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: What is the estimated income of R's household? (ESTINCOM)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	801	44.3
1) Under $10,000	98	5.4
2) $10,000-25,000	202	11.2
3) $25,000-50,000	264	14.6
4) $50,000-105,000	249	13.8
5) $105,000 and above	72	4.0
8) DK	49	2.7
9) NA	72	4.0
Total	1807	100.0

84) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: What is the race of R's household? (ESTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	801	44.3
1) White	764	42.3
2) Black	131	7.2
3) American Indian	4	0.2
4) Asian	17	0.9
7) Other	36	2.0
8) DK	2	0.1
9) NA	52	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

85) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified race of household: Is this definite or probable? (CERTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	855	47.3
1) Definite	915	50.6
5) Probable	31	1.7
9) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

86) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is R or R's household of Hispanic origin? (HISPHH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	801	44.3
1) Yes	84	4.6
5) No	863	47.8
8) DK	7	0.4
9) NA	52	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

87) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified Hispanic status of R/R's household: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is this definite or probable? (CERTHISP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	860	47.6
1) Definite	911	50.4
5) Probable	33	1.8
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

88) Pre: Interviewer of record ID (4-digit ID) (INTVREC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,115.75	2,426.03

89) Pre: Supervisor ID (4-digit ID) (SPVSR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,943.49	1,525.30

90) Pre: Interviewer gender (INTVGEND)

	TOTAL	%
1) Male	226	12.5
2) Female	1581	87.5
Total	1807	100.0

91) Pre: Interviewer education (INTVEDUC)

	TOTAL	%
3) High school graduate	333	18.4
4) Some college	574	31.8
5) College degree	572	31.7
6) Master's degree	294	16.3
9) NA	34	1.9
Total	1807	100.0

92) Pre: Interviewer race (INTVRACE)

	TOTAL	%
1) White	1684	93.2
2) Black	100	5.5
7) Other	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

93) Pre: Interviewer ethnicity (INTVETHN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No ethnic identity coded	1561	86.4
1) Hispanic	61	3.4
7) Other	185	10.2
Total	1807	100.0

94) Pre: Interviewer languages--this variable is not available in 2000. (INTVLANG)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.00	0.00

95) Pre: Years interviewer experience (99 NA) (INTEXPNC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.59	4.11

96) Pre: Interviewer age (INTAGE)

	TOTAL	%
1) 18-34 Years	113	6.3
2) 35-40 Years	179	9.9
3) 41-45 Years	273	15.1
4) 46-50 Years	314	17.4
5) 51-55 Years	255	14.1
6) 56-60 Years	287	15.9
7) 51-64 Years	133	7.4
8) 65-79 Years	253	14.0
Total	1807	100.0

97) ICPSR state code (STATECOD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	39.77	20.75

98) FIPS state code - interview location [NOTE: 3 Cases were misidentified in the preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96] (FIPS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	28.91	17.00

99) 2000 State abbreviation and congressional district number - interview location (STATE)
100) 2000 FIPS state code and congressional district number -interview location FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. [9996 Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C.] (VAR00082)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2,897.74	1,705.90

101) Congressional district number - interview location [96 Misidentified location 99. NA 00. Washington D.C.] (CDISTNO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.81	9.79

102) ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview location ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. [9996 Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C.] (STATECD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3,974.11	2,085.10

103) Did R vote in state and CD of interview? (VOTEOUTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) R voted in state and CD of interview	1131	62.6
1) R did not vote in state and CD of interview	22	1.2
8) NA	28	1.5
9) INAP	626	34.6
Total	1807	100.0

104) State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview [9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview 0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-sample.] (WHVOTED)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	192.67	1,287.81

105) Primary area name (PSU Interview location) (INTLOCAT)
106) Primary area code - Interview location - 110. Boston, MA 230. Milwaukee, WI 120. New York, NY 239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH 121 Philadelphia, PA-NJ 240. Des Moines, IA 122 Nassau-Suffolk, NY 250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA 130. Chicago, IL 255 Columbus, GA-AL 131 Detroit, MI 257 Jacksonville, FL 132 Cleveland, OH 258 Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL 141 St Louis, MO-IL 260. Knoxville, TN 150. Washington, DC-MD-VA 262 Birmingham, AL 152 Baltimore, MD 273 Waco, TX 154 Miami-Hialeh, FL 274 McAllen, TX 170. Houston, TX 280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT 171 Dallas-FT Worth, TX 292 Fresno, CA 181 Denver, CO 293 Eugene-Springfld, OR 190. Los Angeles, CA 434 Saginaw, MI 191 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 464 Gardner, MA 194 Anaheim, CA 466 Decatur CO., IN 196 San Francisco, CA 470. Mower CO., MN 211 New Haven, CT 474 DeSoto Parish, LA 213 Manchester-Nashua NH 477 Chicot CO., AR 220. Buffalo, NY 480. Montgomery CO., VA 226 Atlantic City, NJ 482 EL Dorado CO., CA 000. Telephone Sample (RDD) (AREACODE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	156.17	167.88

107) Number of household unit [Codes 1-5 and: 9 NA, 0. Phone IW] (NUMHHUNI)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.64	0.97

108) Census region - interview location: 1 Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT; 2 North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI; 3 South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV; 4 WEST (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY (CENSUSRE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Northeast	316	17.5
2) North Central	450	24.9
3) South	657	36.4
4) West	384	21.3
Total	1807	100.0

109) Belt code - interview location: [1 Central Cities of the six largest (population over 4,500,000) consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas; 2 Central Cities of CMSAS and MSAS with fewer than 2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21); 3 Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAS; 4 Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAS; 5 Adjacent areas: Includes all territory beyond the outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50; 6 Outlying area: includes all territory more than 50 miles from the central business district of a central city 0. Telephone sample (RDD)] (BELTCODE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Telephone sample	801	44.3
1) Central City	99	5.5
2) City less than 2 Million	185	10.2
3) Large Suburbs	168	9.3
4) Suburbs	241	13.3
5) Adjacent	264	14.6
6) Outlying	49	2.7
Total	1807	100.0

110) Population in 1000S - interview location. (POPULATI)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4,593.99	4,889.09

111) Census size of place - interview location (SIZE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	19.29	19.48

112) Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked) (TRACT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.00	0.00

113) 2000 Sampling error code (SECODE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	299.49	176.18

114) 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location [See note 9 in summary] (NECMASMS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6,279.06	3,983.05

115) 2000 CMSA - interview location [07 Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH 10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY 14 Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI** 28 Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 31 Dallas-FT Worth TX (since Dallas and Ft Worth were made separate PMSAS in 1990, this new CMSA was added 34 Denver-Boulder CO) (since Denver and Boulder were made separate PMSAS in 1990, this new CMSA was added in) 35 Detroit-Ann Arbor MI** 42 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX 49 Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA** 56 Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 63 Milwaukee-Racine WI 70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT** 77 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD** 78 Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 84 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA** 91 Seattle-Tacoma WA 96 Telephone Sample (RDD 00. INAP, location not in CMSA.) This includes old code 32 (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are combined in a single MSA in 1990] (CMSA)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	51.96	44.28

116) Pre section timing - Section A (SECTATIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9.78	57.27

117) Pre section timing - Section B (SECTBTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.63	57.47

118) Pre section timing - section C (SECTCTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.55	57.37

119) Pre section timing - section D (SECTDTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.77	57.42

120) Pre section timing - section E (SECTETIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.80	57.52

121) Pre section timing - section F (SECTFTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.12	57.48

122) Pre section timing - section G (SECTGTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.50	57.43

123) Pre section timing - section H (SECTHTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.56	57.42

124) Pre section timing - section K (SECTKTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.88	57.36

125) Pre section timing - section L (SECTLTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.78	57.38

126) Pre section timing - section M (SECTMTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.45	57.29

127) Pre section timing - section N (SECTNTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.38	57.44

128) Pre section timing - section P (SECTPTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.68	57.33

129) Pre section timing - section Q (SECTQTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.99	57.41

130) Pre section timing - section R (SECTRTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.71	57.47

131) Pre section timing - section S (SECTSTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.71	57.47

132) Pre section timing - section X (SECTXTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.61	57.48

133) Pre section timing - section Y (SECTYTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	10.48	57.23

134) Pre section timing - section Z (SECTZTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.48	77.71

135) Post: mode of interview (PAINTMOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post IW	252	13.9
1) Personal	693	38.4
5) Telephone	857	47.4
7) Administered wrong mode: FTF re-assigned to telephone but administered as personal interview	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

136) Post - mode switch (PAFLAGS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Assigned FTF, not switched to phone mode	805	44.5
2) Assigned phone	802	44.4
3) Assigned FTF, switched to phone mode	200	11.1
Total	1807	100.0

137) Post: Form - section H administered in post (PAFORMDS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Section H not administered in post	790	43.7
1) Section H administered in post	765	42.3
9) No post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

138) Post: Form - K2 format (PAFDSCFM)

	TOTAL	%
0) Administered without probes	1025	56.7
1) Administered with probes	530	29.3
9) No post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

139) Post: Month of interview (PAIWMNTH)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post IW	252	13.9
11) November	1147	63.5
12) December	408	22.6
Total	1807	100.0

140) Post: Day of interview - coded 1-31 and 0 No post interview (PAIWDAY)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.00	9.20

141) Post: Month and day (MMDD) (PAMNTHDA)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	983.18	397.62

142) Post: Number of days after election (96 INAP, No post IW; 99 NA) (DAYSPELE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	28.14	29.02

143) Post: Interview taken before or after Gore concession: December 13, 2000 (IWGORECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) Before	1462	80.9
1) Day of concession (Dec. 13)	16	0.9
2) After	77	4.3
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

144) Post: Interview length (999.99 NA; partial IW 000.00 No post IW) (PAIWLNGT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	57.97	61.17

145) Post: Interview number (99. NA; 00. INAP; no post interview) (PAIWNO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9.80	8.62

146) Post: Date of beginning VQ file (PAVQBEGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post IW	252	13.9
1) 11/7	140	7.7
2) 11/10	351	19.4
3) 11/16 (1)	13	0.7
4) 11/16 (2)	201	11.1
5) 11/18	282	15.6
6) 11/27	568	31.4
Total	1807	100.0

147) Post: Date of ending VQ file (PAVQEND)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, partial IW; no post IW	256	14.2
1) 11/7	105	5.8
2) 11/10	352	19.5
3) 11/16	13	0.7
4) 11/16	158	8.7
5) 11/18	318	17.6
6) 11/27	605	33.5
Total	1807	100.0

148) Post: Flag - change in VQ (PAFLGVQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) No change	1429	79.1
1) Change in VQ	122	6.8
9) INAP, partial IW; no post IW	256	14.2
Total	1807	100.0

149) POST: RELEASE (PARELEAS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Release 1 - November 7	1147	63.5
2) Release 2 - November 15	319	17.7
3) Release 3 - November 21	340	18.8
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

150) Post: Payment to R - amount (PAPAYAMN)

	TOTAL	%
0) R requested no payment	4	0.2
20) Twenty dollars	1525	84.4
96) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
99) NA	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

151) Interviewer incentive - beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each completed interview. (PAINTVIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) Post interview date not in incentive period	1236	68.4
1) Post interview date in incentive period.	319	17.7
9) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

152) Post: Payment to R - mode (PAPAYMOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) R Requested no payment	4	0.2
1) Check	1511	83.6
2) Cash	14	0.8
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	278	15.4
Total	1807	100.0

153) Post: Payment to R - date (MMDD - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA.) (PAPAYDAY)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1,068.85	1,168.47

154) Post: Tape recorded? (PARECORD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
1) Yes	78	4.3
5) No	1477	81.7
Total	1807	100.0

155) Post: Verification (PAVERIFY)

	TOTAL	%
0) Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification	1332	73.7
1) Flagged for verification	55	3.0
2) Verified OK	142	7.9
3) Verified with some discrepancies	18	1.0
5) Unable to verify	4	0.2
6) Verification limit met	2	0.1
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	254	14.1
Total	1807	100.0

156) Post: Evaluation (PAEVALU)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not evaluated	1477	81.7
1) Flagged	1	0.1
2) Evaluated	77	4.3
9) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

157) Post: Refusal conversion indicator (PACONIND)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not a refusal conversion situation	1529	84.6
1) Refusal conversion situation indicated	26	1.4
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

158) Post: Persuasion letter - flag (PAPERSLT)

	TOTAL	%
0) No persuasion letter sent	1517	84.0
1) Persuasion letter sent	95	5.3
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	195	10.8
Total	1807	100.0

159) Post: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or no letter requested;'9999' indicates NA.) (PADATERE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	339.88	1,751.70

160) Post: Date persuasion letter sent - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or no letter requested;'9999' indicates NA. (PADATSN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	339.97	1,751.75

161) Post: Type of persuasion letter (PALTRTYP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, no post IW	1712	94.7
1) Too busy	9	0.5
3) Not interested	28	1.5
5) Evasive	51	2.8
9) NA	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

162) Post: Number of telephone calls (99 NA; INAP, no post IW) (PATELCAL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	17.58	33.02

163) Post: Number of face-to-face calls (99 NA; INAP, no post IW) (PAFTFCAL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.42	34.07

164) Post: Final result code (PAFINRES)

	TOTAL	%
1) IW complete	1551	85.8
5) IW partial	4	0.2
51) Refusal by R	99	5.5
52) Refusal by person other than R	5	0.3
54) Initial refusal, not reached for conversion	20	1.1
61) No contact	23	1.3
63) Noninterview, permanent reason	5	0.3
66) Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete	1	0.1
67) Noninterview, other reason	79	4.4
68) Could not locate R	20	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

165) Post: Result date (post non-interviews '0000' is used for cases with post IW; '9999' indicates NA.) (PARESDAT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	174.31	479.77

166) Post: Flag - pre/post mode switch (PAFLGMS)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
1) Pre FTF and post FTF	698	38.6
2) Pre phone and post phone	693	38.4
3) Pre FTF and post phone	164	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

167) Post: Language of interview (All interviews were conducted entirely in English) (PAINTLAN)

	TOTAL	%
1) English	1807	100.0
Total	1807	100.0

168) Flag- missing CS (POFLAGMC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Coversheet not missing	1780	98.5
1) Coversheet missing	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

169) Color of coversheet (POCCSHEE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Blue	936	51.8
2) Yellow	831	46.0
3) Pink	13	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

170) Does (name still live here? - R still live at sample address) (RESATADD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Yes	1512	83.7
5) No	41	2.3
9) NA	227	12.6
Total	1807	100.0

171) If phone mode: If R does not still live at sample address: New phone number available (NEWPHONE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1793	99.2
1) Available	8	0.4
2) Not available	2	0.1
9) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

172) If face-to-face mode: If R does not still live at sample address: Address is: Status of new address (ADDRSTAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1780	98.5
1) Out of range	1	0.1
3) Within range	17	0.9
5) Can't find	7	0.4
9) NA	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

173) If face-to-face mode: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent lives (PSTRUCTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	926	51.2
1) Mobile home	26	1.4
2) Detached single family	501	27.7
3) Multi-family	31	1.7
4) Apartment house	106	5.9
5) Condo complex	35	1.9
7) Other (specify)	24	1.3
9) NA	158	8.7
Total	1807	100.0

174) If face-to-face mode: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? (PFTFGTKE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	898	49.7
1) Yes	58	3.2
2) No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked	21	1.2
5) No	637	35.3
9) NA	193	10.7
Total	1807	100.0

175) If face-to-face mode: If gatekeeper/guard/manager/locked access: Check the box below which best describes the situation [1 Building manager or other gatekeeper must let you in the building (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2 Building manager/other gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7 Other (specify 9 NA 0. INAP,] (PFTFTGKE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.30	1.52

176) Contact description was there resistance from any contact person? (PCNTCTR1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Yes	222	12.3
5) No	1454	80.5
9) NA	104	5.8
Total	1807	100.0

177) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (PCNTCTR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	10	0.6
5) Not marked	202	11.2
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

178) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - content too personal (PCNTCTR3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	2	0.1
5) Not marked	210	11.6
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

179) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - confidentiality (PCNTCTR4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	1	0.1
5) Not marked	211	11.7
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

180) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - not interested in politics (PCNTCTR5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	20	1.1
5) Not marked	192	10.6
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

181) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - too busy (PCNTCTR6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	91	5.0
5) Not marked	122	6.8
9) NA	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

182) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - poor health (PCNTCTR7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	16	0.9
5) Not marked	196	10.8
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

183) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - other (specify) (PCNTCTR8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	111	6.1
5) Not marked	107	5.9
9) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

184) Post - coversheet did R refuse initially? (PRREFUSD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Yes	98	5.4
5) No	1573	87.1
9) NA	109	6.0
Total	1807	100.0

185) Post - coversheet did respondent break any appointments (PRBRKAPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	1444	79.9
1) One	273	15.1
2) Two or more	90	5.0
Total	1807	100.0

186) Post - coversheet if contact persons resisted, was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? (PRCNTCR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Yes	152	8.4
5) No	15	0.8
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

187) Summary: Did R resist (PRRESIS1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	131	7.2
1) Yes, some resistance identified	152	8.4
5) No resistance identified	1454	80.5
9) NA	70	3.9
Total	1807	100.0

188) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (PRRESIS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

189) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description item resistance from R - too personal (PRRESIS3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

190) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description item resistance from R - confidentiality (PRRESIS4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

191) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description resistance from R - not interested in politics (PRRESIS5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

192) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - too busy (PRRESIS6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

193) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - poor health (PRRESIS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

194) If R was not the contact person contact description item: Resistance from R - other (PRRESIS8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

195) Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this housing unit? (PEVCNTCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	12	0.7
1) Yes	1760	97.4
5) No	35	1.9
Total	1807	100.0

196) Did you ever have any contact with the respondent? (PEVCNTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	12	0.7
1) Yes	1722	95.3
5) No	70	3.9
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

197) What was the reason for no contact? [1 Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be obtained; 2 All occupants away during entire study period (i.e., long vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc.; 3 Nobody answered door but think someone in household unit [FTF: When visits made]; 4 Could not obtain access to HU; 7 Other (specify; 9 NA; 0. INAP) (NCREASON)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.10	0.80

198) If FTF mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation what is the estimated income of R's household? (PESTINC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, phone mode	801	44.3
1) Under $10,000	98	5.4
2) $10,000-25,000	201	11.1
3) $25,000-50,000	263	14.6
4) $50,000-105,000	247	13.7
5) $105,000 and above	72	4.0
8) DK	49	2.7
9) NA	76	4.2
Total	1807	100.0

199) If FTF mode: CSMS Interviewer evaluation what is the race of R's household? (PESTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, phone mode	801	44.3
1) White	759	42.0
2) Black	133	7.4
3) American Indian	4	0.2
4) Asian	17	0.9
7) Other	36	2.0
8) DK	2	0.1
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

200) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified race of household: CSMS interviewer evaluation is this definite or probable? (PCRTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	858	47.5
1) Definite	912	50.5
5) Probable	31	1.7
9) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

201) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: is R or R's household of Hispanic origin? (PHISPHH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, phone mode	801	44.3
1) Yes	85	4.7
5) No	860	47.6
8) DK	6	0.3
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

202) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified Hispanic status of R/R's household: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is this definite or probable? (PCERTHHH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	862	47.7
1) Definite	908	50.2
5) Probable	33	1.8
9) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

203) Post: Interviewer of record ID 9999 NA (PINTVREC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,209.41	2,218.62

204) Post: Supervisor ID 9999. NA (PSPVSR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,944.96	1,527.92

205) Post: Interviewer gender (PINTGEND)

	TOTAL	%
1) Male	200	11.1
2) Female	1606	88.9
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

206) Post: Interviewer education (PINTVEDU)

	TOTAL	%
3) High school graduate	385	21.3
4) Some college	596	33.0
5) College degree	533	29.5
6) Master's degree	254	14.1
9) NA	39	2.2
Total	1807	100.0

207) Post: Interviewer race (PINTVRAC)

	TOTAL	%
1) White	1733	95.9
2) Black	46	2.5
7) Other	28	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

208) Post: Interviewer ethnicity (PINTVETH)

	TOTAL	%
0) No ethnic identity coded	1577	87.3
1) Hispanic	67	3.7
7) Other	163	9.0
Total	1807	100.0

209) Post: Interviewer languages this variable is not available in 2000. (PINTVLAN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.00	0.00

210) Post: Years interviewer experience interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA; INAP, no post IW (PINTEXPN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.47	4.47

211) Post: Interviewer age (PINTAGE)

	TOTAL	%
1) 18-34 Years	114	6.3
2) 35-40 Years	187	10.3
3) 41-45 Years	260	14.4
4) 46-50 Years	297	16.4
5) 51-55 Years	255	14.1
6) 56-60 Years	311	17.2
7) 51-64 Years	142	7.9
8) 65-79 Years	240	13.3
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

212) House race type: [Democratic incumbent running 12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers Republican incumbent running 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers other incumbent running 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands 57 DEM incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed 63 Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands 96 1 in post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases 99 NA; 00 Washington DC) (PCHRTYPE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	21.97	14.98

213) Retiring House representative name (RETRNAME)
214) Retiring House representative code [41 Democratic representative--retiring (district with open race; 42 Republican representative--retiring (district with open race; 96 1 in post-summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases); 99. NA; 00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC] (RETRCODE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.31	13.19

215) Retiring House representative gender (RETRGNDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) No retiring House representative; Washington DC	1626	90.0
1) Male	141	7.8
2) Female	36	2.0
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

216) Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of interview (HEWINNER)

	TOTAL	%
0) Washington, D.C.	4	0.2
31) Democratic candidate in open race	42	2.3
32) Republican candidate in open race	135	7.5
33) Democratic incumbent	753	41.7
34) Republican incumbent	823	45.5
35) Democratic challenger	37	2.0
36) Republican challenger	5	0.3
39) Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate	4	0.2
99) NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-sample. 1)	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

217) Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of interview - [09 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -incumbent; 10 Third party or Independent Senate candidate - nonincumbent; 08 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -- 2nd nonincumbent; 11 Democratic candidate in open Senate race; 12 Republican candidate in open Senate race; 13 Democratic Senate incumbent; 14 Republican Senate incumbent; 15 Democratic Senate challenger; 16 Republican Senate challenger; 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-sample); 00. No race in state; Washington CD] (SENWINN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	11.02	8.02

218) Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's district 1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning margin of the elected candidate. (CDCOMPET)

	TOTAL	%
1) Least competitive	375	20.8
2) 2	300	16.6
3) 3	361	20.0
4) 4	362	20.0
5) Most competitive	401	22.2
9) NA	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

219) Open seat in R's district in 1998? (SEATOP98)

	TOTAL	%
0) No	1697	93.9
1) Yes	102	5.6
9) NA	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

220) House Democratic candidate name (HDCANNAM)
221) House Democratic candidate code (HDCANCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Democratic candidate; Washington DC	140	7.7
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	180	10.0
33) Democratic House incumbent	758	41.9
35) Democratic House challenger	725	40.1
96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

222) House Democratic candidate gender (HDCANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC	140	7.7
1) Male	1367	75.7
2) Female	296	16.4
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

223) House Republican candidate name (HRCANNAM)
224) House Republican candidate code (HRCANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Republican House candidate; Washington DC	121	6.7
32) Republican candidate in open House race	178	9.9
34) Republican House incumbent	860	47.6
36) Republican House challenger	644	35.6
96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

225) House Republican candidate gender (HRCANGND)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Republican House candidate; Washington DC	121	6.7
1) Male	1574	87.1
2) Female	108	6.0
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

226) House Independent/third party candidate name (HICANNA)
227) House Independent/third party candidate code (HICANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC	1767	97.8
30) Third party or Independent House candidate--nonincumbent	32	1.8
39) Third party or Independent House candidate--incumbent	4	0.2
96) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

228) House Independent/third party candidate party (HICANPR)
229) House Independent/third party candidate gender (HICANGND)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC	1767	97.8
1) Male	36	2.0
8) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

230) Senate race type: [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican CANDS; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands no race in state; 81 Democratic incumbents, no race in state; 82 Republican incumbents, no race in state; 85 Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state; 96 code 1 in post-summary; 99 NA; 00 Washington DC (SENRACT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	39.37	28.23

231) Senate Democratic candidate name (SDCANNAM)
232) Senate Democratic candidate code (SDCANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington	452	25.0
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race	256	14.2
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	511	28.3
15) Democratic Senate challenger	584	32.3
96) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

233) Senate Democratic candidate gender (SDCANGD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington	452	25.0
1) Male	924	51.1
2) Female	427	23.6
8) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

234) Senate Republican candidate name (SRCANNAM)
235) Senate Republican candidate code (SRCANCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington	417	23.1
12) Republican candidate in open Senate race	256	14.2
14) Republican Senate incumbent	619	34.3
16) Republican Senate challenger	511	28.3
96) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

236) Senate Republican candidate gender (SRCANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington	417	23.1
1) Male	1245	68.9
2) Female	141	7.8
8) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

237) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate name (SICANNAM)
238) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate code (SICANCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1443	79.9
10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent	360	19.9
96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

239) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate party (SICANPRT)
240) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate gender (SICANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1443	79.9
1) Male	109	6.0
2) Female	251	13.9
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

241) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate name (SI2CANN)
242) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate code (SI2CANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1612	89.2
8) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent	191	10.6
96) 1 In post-summary	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

243) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate party (SI2CANPR)
244) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate gender (SI2CANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1612	89.2
2) Female	191	10.6
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

245) House Democratic candidate name - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMNAM)
246) House Democratic candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0,8,9 In presample (VOTEOUTC)	1785	98.8
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	3	0.2
33) Democratic House incumbent	9	0.5
35) Democratic House challenger	2	0.1
99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

247) House Democratic candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMGND)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
1) Male	11	0.6
2) Female	3	0.2
9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

248) House Republican candidate name - vote outside CD of IW (OHREPNAM)
249) House Republican candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHREPCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0,8,9 In presample 7.(VOTEOUTC)	1785	98.8
32) Republican candidate in open House race	3	0.2
34) Republican House incumbent	2	0.1
36) Republican House challenger	9	0.5
99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

250) House Republican candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHRPGNDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
1) Male	11	0.6
2) Female	3	0.2
9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

251) House Independent/third party candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHINDCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
96) NO Independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD	14	0.8
99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

252) House Independent/third party candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHINDGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
8) No Independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD	14	0.8
9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

253) House race type - vote outside state of IW [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not RUNNING -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 96 Washington DC; 99. Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state. 00. INAP)] (OHRACET)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.62	7.11

254) Senate race type - vote outside state of IW [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- Other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other Challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem Incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not RUNNING -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, Other cands; 81 Democratic incumbents, no race in state; 82 Republican incumbents, no race in state; 85 Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state; 96 Washington DC; 99. R vote in another district but not another state; 00. INAP] (OSRACET)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.90	8.95

255) Senate Democratic candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSDNME)
256) Senate Democratic candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSDEMCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC	1785	98.8
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race	1	0.1
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	3	0.2
15) Democratic Senate challenger	3	0.2
96) No race in state; no Democratic candidate	3	0.2
99) R voted in another district but not another state	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

257) Senate Democratic candidate gender - vote outside state of IW (OSDEMGR)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district	1797	99.4
1) Male	4	0.2
2) Female	3	0.2
9) No race in state; no Democratic candidate	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

258) Senate Republican candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSREPNM)
259) Senate Republican candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSREPCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC	1785	98.8
12) Republican candidate in open Senate race	1	0.1
14) Republican Senate incumbent	3	0.2
16) Republican Senate challenger	3	0.2
96) No race in state; no Republican candidate	3	0.2
99) R voted in another district but not another state	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

260) Senate Republican candidate gender - vote outside state of IW (OSREPGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district	1797	99.4
1) Male	7	0.4
9) No race in state; no Democratic candidate	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

261) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSINM1)
262) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSINDCD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC	1785	98.8
10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent	2	0.1
96) No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate	8	0.4
99) R voted in another district but not another state	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

263) Senate independent/third party 1 - candidate gender - vote outside state of IW [9 - No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate. 0 - R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC] (OSINDGD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1797	99.4
1) Male	1	0.1
2) Female	1	0.1
9) No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

264) Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSINM2)
265) Senate Independent/third party 2 - Candidate code - vote outside state of IW - 08 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -- 2nd nonincumbent; 96 No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate; no second Independent/3rd party candidate; 99. R voted in another district but not another state; 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC (OSINDCD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.14	10.48

266) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate gender - vote outside state of IW [9 - No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate; no second Independent/3rd party candidate. 0 - R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC] (OSINDG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0	1797	99.4
2) Female	1	0.1
9) 9	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

267) Post section timing - section A - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSATIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.45	46.96

268) Post section timing - section B - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSBTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.59	46.92

269) Post section timing - section C - 999.99 NA - 000.00 No post IW (PSCTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.81	46.97

270) Post section timing - section D - 999.99 NA - 000.00 No post IW (PSDTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.77	46.92

271) Post section timing - section E - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSETIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.83	46.99

272) Post section timing - section F - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSFTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.47	46.96

273) Post section timing - section G - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSGTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.15	46.96

274) Post section timing - section H - 999.99 NA; 000.00 Administered in pre; no post IW (PSHTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.71	47.00

275) Post section timing - section J - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSJTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.61	46.89

276) Post section timing - section K - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSKTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	10.51	47.39

277) Post section timing - section L - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSLTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.83	46.95

278) Post section timing - section M - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSMTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.44	46.96

279) Post section timing - section N - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSNTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.77	46.95

280) Post section timing - section P - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSPTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.48	46.96

281) Post section timing - section Q - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSQTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.05	46.91

282) Post section timing - section R - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSRTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.45	46.88

283) Post section timing - section S - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSSTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.33	46.93

284) Post section timing - section T - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSTTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.59	46.96

285) Post section timing - section V - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSVTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.03	46.98

286) Post section timing - section Y - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSYTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.49	46.96

287) Post section timing - section Z - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSZTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.03	57.45

288) Post: Wrong CD administered (preloaded) (PSWRNGCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No misidentification of CD	1553	85.9
1) Wrong CD identified	3	0.2
9) No post IW	251	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

289) Post: Type of error in preload (TEPRLOAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No error in preload	1550	85.8
1) Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases)	3	0.2
2) Wrong CD	3	0.2
9) No post IW	251	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

290) Post: Flag - randomization failure in post admin (FPRNFAIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post randomization failure	1051	58.2
1) Post randomization failure in at least a portion of the interview	504	27.9
9) No post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

291) Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been very much interested, somewhat interested or not much interested in the political campaigns so far this year? (ATTNCAMP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Very much interested	525	29.1
3) Somewhat interested	886	49.0
5) Not much interested	396	21.9
Total	1807	100.0

292) Generally speaking, would you say that you personally care a good deal who wins the presidential election this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins? (CAREPLEC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Care a good deal	1402	77.6
3) Don't care very much	397	22.0
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

293) In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as an Independent candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? (VOTEN96)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes, voted	1264	70.0
5) No, didn't vote	530	29.3
8) Don't know	12	0.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

294) (If voted in 1996) Which one did you vote for? (WHOIN96)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	543	30.0
1) Bill Clinton	665	36.8
3) Bob Dole	408	22.6
5) Ross Perot	138	7.6
7) Other (specify)	27	1.5
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

295) Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (LIKEGORE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	912	50.5
5) No	878	48.6
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

296) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 1 - Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	384.52	841.52

297) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 2- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	228.14	369.25

298) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 3- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	152.34	324.14

299) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 4- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	84.65	252.81

300) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 5- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	47.40	194.99

301) Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (DLIKGORE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	860	47.6
5) No	934	51.7
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

302) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 1 - Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	367.89	989.14

303) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 2- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	183.58	322.34

304) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 3- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	101.30	260.43

305) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 4- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	53.06	200.50

306) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 5- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	24.96	137.23

307) Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (LIKEBUSH)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	822	45.5
5) No	970	53.7
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

308) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 1 - Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	342.14	789.58

309) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 2- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	198.86	342.68

310) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 3- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	116.29	285.42

311) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 4- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	65.37	220.95

312) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 5- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	38.41	174.81

313) Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (DLIKBUSH)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	885	49.0
5) No	899	49.8
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

314) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 1 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	354.86	782.64

315) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 2 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	209.68	365.43

316) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 3 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	125.93	306.14

317) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 4 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	67.53	236.16

318) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 5 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	33.97	165.77

319) How many days in the past week did you watch the national network news on TV? (DAYSNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	483	26.7
1) One day	165	9.1
2) Two days	201	11.1
3) Three days	179	9.9
4) Four days	99	5.5
5) Five days	135	7.5
6) Six days	27	1.5
7) Every day	515	28.5
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

320) How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President - a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTNNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	486	26.9
1) A great deal	235	13.0
2) Quite a bit	364	20.1
3) Some	513	28.4
4) Very little	190	10.5
5) None	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

321) How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows such as Eyewitness News or Action News in the late afternoon or early-evening? (EARLNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	562	31.1
1) One day	110	6.1
2) Two days	176	9.7
3) Three days	140	7.7
4) Four days	115	6.4
5) Five days	163	9.0
6) Six days	22	1.2
7) Every day	519	28.7
Total	1807	100.0

322) How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows in the late evening? (LATENEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	727	40.2
1) One day	130	7.2
2) Two days	182	10.1
3) Three days	157	8.7
4) Four days	106	5.9
5) Five days	127	7.0
6) Six days	39	2.2
7) Every day	338	18.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

323) How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTLNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	327	18.1
1) A great deal	192	10.6
2) Quite a bit	316	17.5
3) Some	558	30.9
4) Very little	347	19.2
5) None	67	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

324) Do you have either cable or satellite television? (CABSATLL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1418	78.5
5) No	389	21.5
Total	1807	100.0

325) How many days in the past week did you read a daily newspaper? (READPAPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	468	25.9
1) One day	216	12.0
2) Two days	181	10.0
3) Three days	130	7.2
4) Four days	74	4.1
5) Five days	92	5.1
6) Six days	36	2.0
7) Every day	610	33.8
Total	1807	100.0

326) Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper? (READCAMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	468	25.9
1) Yes	790	43.7
5) No	548	30.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

327) How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President - a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTNEWSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1017	56.3
1) A great deal	121	6.7
2) Quite a bit	202	11.2
3) Some	352	19.5
4) Very little	107	5.9
5) None	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

328) Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates on television this fall? (TVADS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1377	76.2
5) No	427	23.6
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

329) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President? (CLINAP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1177	65.1
5) Disapprove	565	31.3
8) Don't know	55	3.0
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

330) Strength of R's approval/disapproval for the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President (CLINTST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	65	3.6
1) Strongly	1145	63.4
5) Not strongly	587	32.5
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

331) Summary approval/disapproval for the way Bill Clinton is handling his job (CLINTSD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	745	41.2
2) Approve not strongly	425	23.5
4) Disapprove not strongly	162	9.0
5) Disapprove strongly	400	22.1
8) Don't know	63	3.5
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

332) As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all? (HSECARE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Very much	501	27.7
2) Pretty much	669	37.0
3) Not very much	475	26.3
4) Not at all	155	8.6
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

333) Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? (HSECAN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	526	29.1
5) No	1277	70.7
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

334) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 1st Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34 Republican incumbent; 35 Democratic challenger; 36 Republican challenger; 97 Name not on candidate list.] (HCNAME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	18.52	33.59

335) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of first recalled candidate (HCPARTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1281	70.9
1) Democrat	245	13.6
2) Republican	238	13.2
7) Other party	20	1.1
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

336) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? Actual party - 1st recalled candidate (HCPARTYA)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1281	70.9
1) Democrat	118	6.5
2) Republican	159	8.8
7) Other party	234	12.9
8) Don't know	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

337) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1st recall accuracy; [0 INAP; 1 Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5. Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6. No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7. No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HCPARAC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1281	70.9
1) +NM, +PTY	241	13.3
2) +NM, -PTY	25	1.4
3) +NM, Don't know PT	11	0.6
4) -NM, PTY	222	12.3
5) -NM, Don't know PT	12	0.7
6) No candidate	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

338) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 2nd Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34. Republican incumbent; 35. Democratic challenger; 36. Republican challenger; 97. Name not on candidate list.] (HSECAN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	12.70	31.32

339) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of second recalled candidate (HCPARTY2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1521	84.2
1) Democrat	121	6.7
2) Republican	120	6.6
7) Other party	35	1.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

340) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? Actual party - 2nd recalled candidate (HCPARR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1520	84.1
1) Democrat	45	2.5
2) Republican	34	1.9
7) Other party	141	7.8
8) Don't know	67	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

341) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2nd Recall accuracy; [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5. Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6. No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7. No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9. No answer] (HCPARAC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1520	84.1
1) +NM, +PTY	68	3.8
2) +NM, -PTY	9	0.5
3) +NM, Don't know PT	2	0.1
4) -NM, PTY	132	7.3
5) -NM, Don't know PT	9	0.5
6) No candidate	67	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

342) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 3rd Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34. Republican incumbent; 35. Democratic challenger; 36. Republican challenger; 97. Name not on candidate list.] (HSECAN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.98	19.04

343) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of third recalled candidate (HCPART3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1732	95.8
1) Democrat	28	1.5
2) Republican	14	0.8
7) Other party	31	1.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

344) IF R recalls names of House candidates: who were they? Actual party - 3rd recalled candidate (HCPARTR3)

	TOTAL	%
0) Know name and DK/NA party; NA/RF	1728	95.6
1) Democratic candidate	2	0.1
2) Republican candidate	6	0.3
7) Name given not on candidate list	38	2.1
8) Don't know name but know party	33	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

345) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3rd Recall accuracy; [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4 Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5 Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6 No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7 No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HCPARTC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1728	95.6
1) +NM, +PTY	7	0.4
2) +NM, -PTY	1	0.1
4) -NM, PTY	32	1.8
5) -NM, Don't know PT	6	0.3
6) No candidate	33	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

346) Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? (CONGJAPP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	933	51.6
5) Disapprove	617	34.1
8) Don't know	246	13.6
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

347) R's strength of approval/disapproval of the way Congress has been handling its job (CONGJSAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	257	14.2
1) Strongly	603	33.4
5) Not strongly	947	52.4
Total	1807	100.0

348) Summary of R's approval/disapproval of the way Congress has been handling its job (CONGAPSU)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	285	15.8
2) Approve not strongly	648	35.9
4) Disapprove not strongly	299	16.5
5) Disapprove not strongly	318	17.6
8) Don't know	246	13.6
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

349) Thermometer rating: Bill Clinton [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (CLINTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	62.26	85.01

350) Thermometer rating: Al Gore [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (GORETHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	74.74	128.49

351) Thermometer rating: George W. Bush [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BUSHTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	80.12	150.41

352) Thermometer rating: Pat Buchanan [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BUCHTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	209.63	366.93

353) Thermometer rating: Ralph Nader [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (NADRTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	306.75	419.56

354) Thermometer rating: John McCain [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (MCCNTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	256.56	382.87

355) Thermometer rating: Bill Bradley [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BRDLTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	318.15	422.95

356) Thermometer rating: Joseph Lieberman [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't Know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (LBRMTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	312.36	418.44

357) Thermometer rating: Dick Cheney [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (CHNYTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	282.44	402.61

358) Thermometer rating: Hillary Clinton [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (HLRYTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	66.77	122.74

359) Thermometer rating: Democratic Party [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (DEMSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	89.59	168.75

360) Thermometer rating: Republican Party[997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (REPTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	88.16	178.70

361) Thermometer rating: Reform Party[997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (REFTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	288.65	417.91

362) Thermometer rating: Political parties in general [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (PRTYTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	107.94	221.89

363) Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic Party? (DEMLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1018	56.3
5) No	766	42.4
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

364) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 1 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	505.55	717.16

365) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 2 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	309.47	467.97

366) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 3 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	166.41	367.59

367) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 4 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	85.90	279.13

368) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 5 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	38.16	191.85

369) Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic Party? (DEMDLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	782	43.3
5) No	996	55.1
8) Don't know	25	1.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

370) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 1 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	330.16	693.50

371) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 2 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	195.67	375.67

372) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 3 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	97.34	287.46

373) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 4 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	40.44	185.01

374) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 5 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	23.47	148.28

375) Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican Party? (REPLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	808	44.7
5) No	975	54.0
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

376) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 1 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	393.02	807.65

377) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 2 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	235.14	450.29

378) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 3 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	127.92	320.20

379) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 4 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	67.21	329.08

380) (What is that?) if R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 5 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	27.94	160.30

381) Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican Party? (REPDLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	915	50.6
5) No	867	48.0
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

382) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 1 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	454.47	775.08

383) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 2 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	270.60	452.19

384) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 3 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	135.86	346.20

385) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 4 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	69.83	259.35

386) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 5 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	30.16	171.15

387) Do you think it is better when one party controls both the presidency and Congress, better when control is split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't it matter? (DIVGOVPR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Better when one party controls both	420	23.2
3) Better when control is split	926	51.2
5) It doesn't matter	420	23.2
8) Don't know	38	2.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

388) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (LYRHOW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Better	312	17.3
3) Worse	130	7.2
5) The same	482	26.7
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

389) (Much better or somewhat better?) If R says R is better off financially now than a year ago (LYRBTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1495	82.7
1) Much better	117	6.5
5) Somewhat better	194	10.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

390) (Much worse or somewhat worse?) If R says R is worse off financially now than a year ago (LYRWRSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1677	92.8
1) Much worse	41	2.3
5) Somewhat worse	89	4.9
Total	1807	100.0

391) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (ECONSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	880	48.7
1) Much better	117	6.5
2) Somewhat better	194	10.7
3) Same	482	26.7
4) Somewhat worse	89	4.9
5) Much worse	41	2.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

392) In the past year did you (or anyone in your family) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? (MEDDELAY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Yes	278	15.4
5) No	649	35.9
Total	1807	100.0

393) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (EXPECT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Better	369	20.4
3) Worse	53	2.9
5) The same	479	26.5
8) Don't know	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

394) (Much better or somewhat better?) If R says R expects to be better off financially one year from now (HOWBTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1438	79.6
1) Much better	117	6.5
5) Somewhat better	251	13.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

395) (Much worse or somewhat worse?) If R says R expects to be worse off financially one year FROM NOW (HOWWORSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1754	97.1
1) Much worse	18	1.0
5) Somewhat worse	33	1.8
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

396) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (ECONNYR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	906	50.1
1) Much better	117	6.5
2) Somewhat better	251	13.9
3) Same	479	26.5
4) Somewhat worse	33	1.8
5) Much worse	18	1.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

397) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (GOREANG)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	524	29.0
5) No	1272	70.4
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

398) (If yes, Gore has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREANG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1283	71.0
1) Very often	94	5.2
2) Fairly often	102	5.6
3) Occasionally	221	12.2
4) Rarely	107	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

399) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (GOREHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	853	47.2
5) No	934	51.7
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) REFUSED	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

400) (If yes, Gore has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREHOP2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	954	52.8
1) Very often	141	7.8
2) Fairly often	254	14.1
3) Occasionally	379	21.0
4) Rarely	77	4.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

401) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (GOREAFR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	333	18.4
5) No	1462	80.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

402) (If yes, Gore has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREAFR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1474	81.6
1) Very often	73	4.0
2) Fairly often	74	4.1
3) Occasionally	134	7.4
4) Rarely	52	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

403) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (GOREPRD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	608	33.6
5) No	1174	65.0
8) Don't know	23	1.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

404) (If yes, Gore has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREPRD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1199	66.4
1) Very often	111	6.1
2) Fairly often	198	11.0
3) Occasionally	250	13.8
4) Rarely	48	2.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

405) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (BUSHANG)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	487	27.0
5) No	1303	72.1
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

406) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHANG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1320	73.0
1) Very often	79	4.4
2) Fairly often	97	5.4
3) Occasionally	209	11.6
4) Rarely	101	5.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

407) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (BUSHHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	774	42.8
5) No	1014	56.1
8) Don't know	17	0.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

408) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHHOP2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1033	57.2
1) Very often	124	6.9
2) Fairly often	227	12.6
3) Occasionally	348	19.3
4) Rarely	74	4.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

409) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (BUSHAFR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	418	23.1
5) No	1374	76.0
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

410) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHAFR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1389	76.9
1) Very often	73	4.0
2) Fairly often	93	5.1
3) Occasionally	176	9.7
4) Rarely	75	4.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

411) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (BUSHPRD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	542	30.0
5) No	1239	68.6
8) Don't know	24	1.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

412) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHPRD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1265	70.0
1) Very often	96	5.3
2) Fairly often	148	8.2
3) Occasionally	250	13.8
4) Rarely	46	2.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

413) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (BUCHANG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	197	10.9
5) No	505	27.9
8) Don't know	67	3.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

414) (If yes, Buchanan has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHANG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1610	89.1
1) Very often	53	2.9
2) Fairly often	40	2.2
3) Occasionally	82	4.5
4) Rarely	22	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

415) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (BUCHHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	114	6.3
5) No	588	32.5
8) Don't know	67	3.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

416) (If yes, Buchanan has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHHPE2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1693	93.7
1) Very often	10	0.6
2) Fairly often	17	0.9
3) Occasionally	61	3.4
4) Rarely	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

417) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (BUCHAFR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	153	8.5
5) No	551	30.5
8) Don't know	65	3.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

418) (If yes, Buchanan has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHAFR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1654	91.5
1) Very often	46	2.5
2) Fairly often	34	1.9
3) Occasionally	51	2.8
4) Rarely	22	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

419) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (BUCHPRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	78	4.3
5) No	623	34.5
8) Don't know	68	3.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

420) (If yes, Buchanan has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHPRD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1729	95.7
1) Very often	8	0.4
2) Fairly often	23	1.3
3) Occasionally	33	1.8
4) Rarely	14	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

421) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 1 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	146.77	244.48

422) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 2 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	106.26	203.20

423) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 3 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	83.47	190.79

424) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 4 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary ] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	54.48	158.02

425) Interviewer checkpoint: Number of important problems mentioned by R [if unsure whether one problem or more than one problem code more than 1] (MNTCHECK)

	TOTAL	%
0) R has not mentioned any problems	31	1.7
1) R has mentioned only one problem	167	9.2
2) R has mentioned 2or more problems	707	39.1
9) Refused	902	49.9
Total	1807	100.0

426) (If R has mentioned 2 or more problems) Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the single most important problem the country faces? (MIPCHOIC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	134.82	223.45

427) (If R has mentioned any problem) How good a job is the government in Washington doing in dealing with this problem - a good job, only fair, or a poor job? (MIPGVTPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	944	52.2
1) A good job	84	4.6
3) Only fair	358	19.8
5) A poor job	411	22.7
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

428) (If R has mentioned any problem) Which political party do you think would be most likely to get the government to do a better job in dealing with this problem - the Republicans, the Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? (MIPPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	944	52.2
1) Republicans	201	11.1
3) Democrats	237	13.1
5) There wouldn't be much difference between them	382	21.1
7) Neither party	26	1.4
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

429) We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [Interview self placement on liberal conservative scale] (POLVIEW)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	107	5.9
1) Extremely liberal	9	0.5
2) Liberal	29	1.6
3) Slightly liberal	48	2.7
4) Moderate; middle of the road	125	6.9
5) Slightly conservative	65	3.6
6) Conservative	68	3.8
7) Extremely conservative	11	0.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused, NA, INAP	1341	74.2
Total	1807	100.0

430) When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? (POLVWPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	77	4.3
1) Extremely liberal	8	0.4
2) Liberal	48	2.7
3) Slightly liberal	37	2.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	90	5.0
5) Slightly conservative	48	2.7
6) Conservative	72	4.0
7) Extremely conservative	15	0.8
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused, NA, INAP	1407	77.9
Total	1807	100.0

431) Liberal/conservative self placement summary [combines both telephone and face to face interview variables] (POLVWTO)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	184	10.2
1) Extremely liberal	17	0.9
2) Liberal	77	4.3
3) Slightly liberal	85	4.7
4) Moderate; middle of the road	215	11.9
5) Slightly conservative	113	6.3
6) Conservative	140	7.7
7) Extremely conservative	26	1.4
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused, NA, INAP	941	52.1
Total	1807	100.0

432) (If R is moderate, don't know or haven't thought on the liberal-conservative self-placement scale) If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? (POLVWHC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1399	77.4
1) Liberal	123	6.8
3) Conservative	174	9.6
5) Moderate	51	2.8
7) R refuses to choose	52	2.9
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

433) Liberal/conservative self placement summary [combines both telephone and face to face interview variables and collapses 7pt lib/con scale into a 3category self-placement scale] (POLVWCO)

	TOTAL	%
1) Liberal	302	16.7
3) Moderate	51	2.8
5) Conservative	453	25.1
7) Refused to choose	52	2.9
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) NA/Refused	941	52.1
Total	1807	100.0

434) Self-placement on liberal-conservative branching [R selected for branching version of lib-con series] (LIBCONBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	314	17.4
1) A Liberal	146	8.1
3) A conservative	229	12.7
5) A moderate	216	12.0
7) Neither	29	1.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	869	48.1
Total	1807	100.0

435) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is don't know/neither/moderate/no thought (LIBCOBR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1244	68.8
1) Liberal	143	7.9
3) Conservative	241	13.3
5) Moderate	58	3.2
7) Refuses to choose	111	6.1
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

436) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is liberal (LIBERAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1661	91.9
1) Strong liberal	65	3.6
5) Not very strong liberal	79	4.4
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

437) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is conservative (CONSERV)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1578	87.3
1) Strong conservative	119	6.6
5) Not very strong conservative	105	5.8
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

438) Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (SPLIBCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1	0.1
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	82	4.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal	158	8.7
3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: had to choose liberal	351	19.4
4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: had to choose moderate	109	6.0
5) Scale 5 had to choose conserv/branching: had to choose conservative	528	29.2
6) Scale 6 branching: not strong conservative	250	13.8
7) Scale 7 branching: strong conservative	145	8.0
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) Refuses to choose	165	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

439) If FTF mode: Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCNFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	801	44.3
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	51	2.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal	77	4.3
3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: Had to choose liberal	212	11.7
4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: Had to choose moderate	57	3.2
5) Scale 5 had to choose conservative/branching: Had to choose conservative	314	17.4
6) Scale 6 branching: Not strong conservative	129	7.1
7) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative	77	4.3
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refuses to choose	80	4.4
Total	1807	100.0

440) If in phone mode: Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCONPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1007	55.7
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	31	1.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal	81	4.5
3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: Had to choose liberal	139	7.7
4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: Had to choose moderate	52	2.9
5) Scale 5 had to choose conserv/branching: Had to choose conservative	214	11.8
6) Scale 6 branching: Not strong conservative	121	6.7
7) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative	68	3.8
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refuses to choose	85	4.7
Total	1807	100.0

441) Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCONSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1	0.1
1) Liberal	591	32.7
3) Moderate	109	6.0
5) Conservative	923	51.1
7) Refused to choose	165	9.1
8) Don't know	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

442) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: FTF interview] WHERE WOULD you Place Bill Clinton on this scale? (CLINSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	78	4.3
2) Liberal	120	6.6
3) Slightly liberal	91	5.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	85	4.7
5) Slightly conservative	30	1.7
6) Conservative	31	1.7
7) Extremely conservative	4	0.2
8) Don't know	29	1.6
Total	1807	100.0

443) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: Telephone interview] What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? (CLINSC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	76	4.2
2) Liberal	106	5.9
3) Slightly liberal	55	3.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	85	4.7
5) Slightly conservative	10	0.6
6) Conservative	24	1.3
7) Extremely conservative	4	0.2
8) Don't know	38	2.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

444) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: Combined FTF/telephone interview] where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? (CLINSC3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.59	2.15

445) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series] IS Bill Clinton a liberal, conservative, or a moderate? (CLINLCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	434	24.0
2) Conservative	78	4.3
3) Moderate	285	15.8
8) Don't know	139	7.7
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

446) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series and if R says Clinton is a liberal] would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or not a very strong liberal? (CLINLIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1373	76.0
1) Strong liberal	280	15.5
5) Not very strong liberal	150	8.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

447) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series and if R says Clinton is a conservative] would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a not VERY strong conservative? (CLINCON)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1729	95.7
1) Strong conservative	45	2.5
5) Not very strong conservative	32	1.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

448) [If R is selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series: summary] (CLINSUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	280	15.5
2) Not very strong liberal	154	8.5
3) Moderate	285	15.8
4) Not very strong conservative	33	1.8
5) Strong conservative	45	2.5
8) Don't know	139	7.7
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

449) [Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series: Summary] 7-point scale FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? 7-Point scale phone: What bout Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? Branching (FTF and phone): What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? (CLINSUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	434	24.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	380	21.0
3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate	641	35.5
4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative	88	4.9
5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative	53	2.9
8) Don't know	206	11.4
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

450) IF R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? (GORESC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA, INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	40	2.2
2) Liberal	131	7.2
3) Slightly liberal	98	5.4
4) Moderate; middle of the road	94	5.2
5) Slightly conservative	40	2.2
6) Conservative	25	1.4
7) Extremely conservative	8	0.4
8) Don't know	32	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

451) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: telephone: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (GORESC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	35	1.9
2) Liberal	98	5.4
3) Slightly liberal	68	3.8
4) Moderate; middle of the road	86	4.8
5) Slightly conservative	19	1.1
6) Conservative	32	1.8
7) Extremely conservative	5	0.3
8) Don't know	54	3.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

452) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con Gore placement (GORESC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA, INAP	939	52.0
1) Extremely liberal	75	4.2
2) Liberal	229	12.7
3) Slightly liberal	166	9.2
4) Moderate; middle of the road	180	10.0
5) Slightly conservative	59	3.3
6) Conservative	57	3.2
7) Extremely conservative	13	0.7
8) Don't know	86	4.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

453) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1371	75.9
1) Very certain	92	5.1
3) Pretty certain	210	11.6
5) Not very certain	134	7.4
Total	1807	100.0

454) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1464	81.0
1) Very certain	90	5.0
3) Pretty certain	190	10.5
5) Not very certain	63	3.5
Total	1807	100.0

455) Combined FTF/telephone 7pt scale certainty-Gore placement (GORELCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA, INAP	1028	56.9
1) Very certain	182	10.1
3) Pretty certain	400	22.1
5) Not very certain	197	10.9
Total	1807	100.0

456) If R: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (GOREBRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	386	21.4
2) Conservative	150	8.3
3) Moderate	254	14.1
8) Don't know	149	8.2
Total	1807	100.0

457) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is liberal: Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (GORELIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1421	78.6
1) Strong liberal	250	13.8
5) Not very strong liberal	130	7.2
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

458) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is conservative: Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (GORECONS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1657	91.7
1) Strong conservative	89	4.9
5) Not very strong conservative	58	3.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

459) Summary: 5pt lib-con Gore placement from branching series (GORESUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	250	13.8
2) Not very strong liberal	136	7.5
3) Moderate	254	14.1
4) Not very strong conservative	61	3.4
5) Strong conservative	89	4.9
8) Don't know	149	8.2
Total	1807	100.0

460) Combined 5-point lib-con Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GORESUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	325	18.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	365	20.2
3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate	659	36.5
4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative	118	6.5
5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative	102	5.6
8) Don't know	235	13.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

461) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1026	56.8
1) Very certain	224	12.4
3) Pretty certain	373	20.6
5) Not very certain	183	10.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

462) Combined lib-con certainty - Gore placement from 7pt/branching (GOREBS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	247	13.7
1) Very certain	406	22.5
3) Pretty certain	773	42.8
5) Not very certain	380	21.0
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

463) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? (BUSHSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	8	0.4
2) Liberal	23	1.3
3) Slightly liberal	37	2.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	58	3.2
5) Slightly conservative	105	5.8
6) Conservative	164	9.1
7) Extremely conservative	36	2.0
8) Don't know	35	1.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

464) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: Telephone: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (BUSHSC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	6	0.3
2) Liberal	32	1.8
3) Slightly liberal	18	1.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	49	2.7
5) Slightly conservative	61	3.4
6) Conservative	146	8.1
7) Extremely conservative	35	1.9
8) Don't know	51	2.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

465) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con GW Bush placement (BUSHSC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	939	52.0
1) Extremely liberal	14	0.8
2) Liberal	55	3.0
3) Slightly liberal	55	3.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	107	5.9
5) Slightly conservative	166	9.2
6) Conservative	310	17.2
7) Extremely conservative	71	3.9
8) Don't know	86	4.8
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

466) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1376	76.1
1) Very certain	93	5.1
3) Pretty certain	208	11.5
5) Not very certain	129	7.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

467) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1460	80.8
1) Very certain	101	5.6
3) Pretty certain	175	9.7
5) Not very certain	71	3.9
Total	1807	100.0

468) Combined FTF/phone 7pt scale certainty - GW Bush placement (BUSHLCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1029	56.9
1) Very certain	194	10.7
3) Pretty certain	383	21.2
5) Not very certain	200	11.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

469) IF R selected for branching version of lib-con series: What about George W. Bush?(Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (BUSHBRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	113	6.3
2) Conservative	464	25.7
3) Moderate	209	11.6
8) Don't know	151	8.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

470) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is liberal: Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (BUSHLIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1694	93.7
1) STRONG LIBERAL	70	3.9
5) NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

471) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is conservative: Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (BUSHCONS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1343	74.3
1) Strong conservative	287	15.9
5) Not very strong conservative	162	9.0
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

472) Summary: 5pt lib-con GW Bush placement from branching series (BUSHSUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	70	3.9
2) Not very strong liberal	43	2.4
3) Moderate	209	11.6
4) Not very strong conservative	177	9.8
5) Strong conservative	287	15.9
8) Don't know	151	8.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

473) Combined 5-point lib-con GW Bush placement from 7pt scale /branch (BUSHSUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	84	4.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	98	5.4
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Moderate	537	29.7
4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative	487	27.0
5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative	358	19.8
8) Don't know	237	13.1
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

474) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1036	57.3
1) Very certain	198	11.0
3) Pretty certain	376	20.8
5) Not very certain	196	10.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

475) Combined lib-con certainty - GW Bush placement from 7pt/branching (BUSHBS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	258	14.3
1) Very certain	392	21.7
3) Pretty certain	759	42.0
5) Not very certain	396	21.9
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

476) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? (BUCHSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	14	0.8
2) Liberal	15	0.8
3) Slightly liberal	26	1.4
4) Moderate; middle of the road	57	3.2
5) Slightly conservative	38	2.1
6) Conservative	55	3.0
7) Extremely conservative	115	6.4
8) Don't know	145	8.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

477) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: Telephone: What about Pat Buchanan?(Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (BUCHSC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	3	0.2
2) Liberal	17	0.9
3) Slightly liberal	8	0.4
4) Moderate; middle of the road	35	1.9
5) Slightly conservative	10	0.6
6) Conservative	61	3.4
7) Extremely conservative	108	6.0
8) Don't know	154	8.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

478) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con Buchanan placement (BUCHSC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	939	52.0
1) Extremely liberal	17	0.9
2) Liberal	32	1.8
3) Slightly liberal	34	1.9
4) Moderate; middle of the road	92	5.1
5) Slightly conservative	48	2.7
6) Conservative	116	6.4
7) Extremely conservative	223	12.3
8) Don't know	299	16.5
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

479) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1487	82.3
1) Very certain	100	5.5
3) Pretty certain	113	6.3
5) Not very certain	107	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

480) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1565	86.6
1) Very certain	93	5.1
3) Pretty certain	89	4.9
5) Not very certain	60	3.3
Total	1807	100.0

481) Combined FTF/phone 7pt scale certainty - Buchanan placement (BUCHLCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1245	68.9
1) Very certain	193	10.7
3) Pretty certain	202	11.2
5) Not very certain	167	9.2
Total	1807	100.0

482) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: What about Pat Buchanan?(Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (BUCHBRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	65	3.6
2) Conservative	389	21.5
3) Moderate	107	5.9
8) Don't know	372	20.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

483) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is liberal: would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (BUCHLIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1742	96.4
1) Strong liberal	38	2.1
5) Not very strong liberal	24	1.3
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

484) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is conservative: would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (BUCHCONS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1418	78.5
1) Strong conservative	325	18.0
5) Not very strong conservative	61	3.4
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

485) Summary: 5pt lib-con Buchanan placement from branching series (BUCHSUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	38	2.1
2) Not very strong liberal	27	1.5
3) Moderate	107	5.9
4) Not very strong conservative	64	3.5
5) Strong conservative	325	18.0
8) Don't know	372	20.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

486) Combined 5pt lib-con Buchanan placement from 7pt scale /branch (BUCHSUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	55	3.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	59	3.3
3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate	281	15.6
4) Scale 6 branching: Not very strong conservative	180	10.0
5) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative	548	30.3
8) Don't know	671	37.1
9) Refused	13	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

487) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1252	69.3
1) Very certain	225	12.5
3) Pretty certain	181	10.0
5) Not very certain	149	8.2
Total	1807	100.0

488) Combined lib-con certainty - Buchanan placement from 7pt/branching (BUCHBS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	690	38.2
1) Very certain	418	23.1
3) Pretty certain	383	21.2
5) Not very certain	316	17.5
Total	1807	100.0

489) Who do you think will be elected President in November? (THNKELEC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Al Gore	848	46.9
2) George W. Bush	783	43.3
3) Pat Buchanan	5	0.3
4) Ralph Nader	3	0.2
7) Other	39	2.2
8) Don't know	126	7.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

490) [If R gives name of who they think will win the election] Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will [NAME GIVEN] win by quite a bit? (CLELEC1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	129	7.1
1) Will be close	1449	80.2
5) Win by quite a bit	213	11.8
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

491) If R says he/she doesn't know who will win the Pres. Election: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will one candidate win by quite a bit? (CLELEC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1678	92.9
1) Will be close	108	6.0
5) Win by quite a bit	8	0.4
8) Don't know	13	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

492) If R selected for standard version: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (ECONCND1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	899	49.8
1) Gotten better	369	20.4
3) Stayed about the same	380	21.0
5) Gotten worse	147	8.1
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

493) If R selected for experimental version: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? (ECONCND2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	908	50.2
1) Gotten worse	155	8.6
3) Stayed about the same	405	22.4
5) Gotten better	331	18.3
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

494) If R thinks economy will be better in the next year: Much better or somewhat better? (ECONCND3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1107	61.3
1) Much better	251	13.9
5) Somewhat better	448	24.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

495) If R thinks economy will be worse in the next year: Much worse or somewhat worse? (ECONCND4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1505	83.3
1) SOMEWHAT WORSE	232	12.8
5) MUCH WORSE	70	3.9
Total	1807	100.0

496) Combined version summary: Economy in next year (ECONCND5)

	TOTAL	%
1) Much better	251	13.9
2) Somewhat better	448	24.8
3) Stayed about the same	785	43.4
4) Somewhat worse	70	3.9
5) Much worse	232	12.8
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

497) If R selected for standard version: would you say that over the past year, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? (EMPCON1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	906	50.1
1) Gotten harder	125	6.9
3) Stayed the same	313	17.3
5) Gotten easier	447	24.7
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

498) If R selected for experimental version: would you say that over the past year, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? (EMPCON2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	901	49.9
1) Gotten easier	454	25.1
3) About the same	300	16.6
5) Gotten harder	129	7.1
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

499) If R says it has gotten harder to find work in the last year: Much harder or a little harder? (EMPCON3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1553	85.9
1) Much harder	123	6.8
5) A little harder	131	7.2
Total	1807	100.0

500) If R says it has gotten easier to find work in the last year: Much easier or a little easier? (EMPCON4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	906	50.1
1) Much easier	493	27.3
5) A little easier	404	22.4
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

501) Combined version summary: Employment opportunities in last year (EMPCON5)

	TOTAL	%
1) Much harder	123	6.8
2) Somewhat harder	131	7.2
3) Stayed about the same	613	33.9
4) Somewhat easier	404	22.4
5) Much easier	493	27.3
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

502) If R selected for standard version: what about the next 12months? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? (ECNCOND1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	896	49.6
1) Get better	181	10.0
3) Stay about the same	535	29.6
5) Get worse	163	9.0
8) Don't know	29	1.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

503) If R selected for experimental version: what about the next 12 months? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? (ECNCOND2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	911	50.4
1) Get worse	166	9.2
3) About the same	499	27.6
5) Better	196	10.8
8) Don't know	34	1.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

504) If R expects economy to get better in the next 12 months: Much better or somewhat better? (ECNCOND3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1430	79.1
1) Much better	113	6.3
5) Somewhat better	264	14.6
Total	1807	100.0

505) If R expects economy to get worse in the next 12 months: Much worse or somewhat worse? (ECNCOND4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1478	81.8
1) Much worse	69	3.8
5) Somewhat worse	260	14.4
Total	1807	100.0

506) Summary: Economy in next 12 months (ECNCOND5)

	TOTAL	%
1) Much better	113	6.3
2) Somewhat better	264	14.6
3) Stayed about the same	1034	57.2
4) Somewhat worse	260	14.4
5) Much worse	69	3.8
8) Don't know	63	3.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

507) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? (CLINECON)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1304	72.2
5) Disapprove	387	21.4
8) Don't know	106	5.9
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

508) If R approves of Clinton's handling of economy: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (CLINECNA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	503	27.8
1) Strongly	783	43.3
5) Not strongly	516	28.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

509) If R disapproves of Clinton's handling of economy: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (CLINECND)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1420	78.6
1) Strongly	237	13.1
5) Not strongly	150	8.3
Total	1807	100.0

510) Summary: Approval of Clinton's handling of the economy (CLINECNS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	783	43.3
2) Approve not strongly	516	28.6
4) Disapprove not strongly	150	8.3
5) Disapprove strongly	237	13.1
8) Don't know	110	6.1
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

511) Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now --either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? (OWNSTOCK)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1004	55.6
5) No	780	43.2
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

512) Which party do you think would do a better job of handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? (ECONPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrats	527	29.2
3) Republicans	406	22.5
5) Wouldn't be much difference between them/no difference	794	43.9
7) Neither party [Vol]	28	1.5
8) Don't know	50	2.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

513) Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by both? (PEACPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrats	373	20.6
3) Republicans	324	17.9
5) About the same by both	1043	57.7
7) Neither party [Vol]	24	1.3
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

514) Turning to some other types of issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger? (USGLOBAL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Weaker	500	27.7
3) Stayed about the same	874	48.4
5) Stronger	403	22.3
8) Don't know	28	1.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

515) Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? (IMMIGRT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	172	9.5
3) Decreased	785	43.4
5) Left the same as it is now	785	43.4
8) Don't know	60	3.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

516) If R Thinks number of immigrants should be increased/If R thinks number of immigrants should be decreased: A little or a lot? (IMMIGRT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	850	47.0
1) A little	360	19.9
5) A lot	588	32.5
8) Don't know	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

517) SUmmary: Immigration level (IMMIGRT3)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased a lot	68	3.8
2) Increased a little	100	5.5
3) Left the same	785	43.4
4) Decreased a little	260	14.4
5) Decreased a lot	520	28.8
8) Don't know	69	3.8
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

518) If R selected for standard version: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? (IMPORTSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	897	49.6
1) Favor	245	13.6
5) Oppose	263	14.6
7) Haven't thought much about this	385	21.3
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

519) If R selected for experimental version: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? (IMPORTSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	910	50.4
1) Favor	390	21.6
5) Oppose	408	22.6
8) Don't know	95	5.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

520) Combined version summary: Import limits (IMPORTSC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Favor	635	35.1
5) Oppose	671	37.1
7) Haven't thought much	385	21.3
8) Don't know	112	6.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

521) If R selected for standard version: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. (ISOLATS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	916	50.7
1) Agree	235	13.0
5) Disagree	640	35.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

522) If R selected for experimental version: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? (ISOLATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Better off if we just stayed home	267	14.8
5) Better off trying to solve some problems	601	33.3
8) Don't know	44	2.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

523) Combined version summary: Isolationism (ISOLATC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Agree/better off to stay home	502	27.8
5) Disagree/better off trying to solve problems	1241	68.7
8) Don't know	59	3.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

524) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? (CLINTFRN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1161	64.3
5) Disapprove	534	29.6
8) Don't know	102	5.6
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

525) If R approves Clinton's handling of foreign relations: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (CLINTFN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	646	35.7
1) Strongly	605	33.5
5) Not strongly	553	30.6
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

526) If R disapproves Clinton's handling of foreign relations: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (CLINT_FN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1273	70.4
1) Strongly	328	18.2
5) Not strongly	202	11.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

527) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? Summary: Clinton handling of foreign affairs (CLINTFNS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	605	33.5
2) Approve not strongly	553	30.6
4) Disapprove not strongly	202	11.2
5) Disapprove strongly	328	18.2
8) Don't know	108	6.0
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

528) Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? (PARTAFIL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrat	620	34.3
2) Republican	451	25.0
3) Independent	496	27.4
4) Party [specify]	27	1.5
5) No preference	204	11.3
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

529) If R considers self a Democrat: Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat? (STDEMO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1187	65.7
1) Strong	346	19.1
5) Not very strong	273	15.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

530) If R considers self a Republican: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? (STREPUB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1356	75.0
1) Strong	236	13.1
5) Not very strong	214	11.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

531) If R's party preference is Independent, no preference, other, don't know: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic Party? (PRTYCLSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1075	59.5
1) Closer to Republican	230	12.7
3) Neither [Vol]	224	12.4
5) Closer to Democratic	269	14.9
8) Don't know	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

532) Summary: Party ID (PARTIDSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) Strong Democrat	346	19.1
1) Weak Democrat	274	15.2
2) Independent-Democrat	269	14.9
3) Independent-Independent	206	11.4
4) Independent-Republican	230	12.7
5) Weak Republican	215	11.9
6) Strong Republican	236	13.1
7) Other; minor party; Refuses to say	9	0.5
8) Apolitical	17	0.9
9) NA	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

533) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (GOREMORL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	423	23.4
2) Quite well	820	45.4
3) Not too well	287	15.9
4) Not well at all	133	7.4
8) Don't know	143	7.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

534) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (GORECARS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	277	15.3
2) Quite well	713	39.5
3) Not too well	464	25.7
4) Not well at all	232	12.8
8) Don't know	119	6.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

535) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (GOREKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	461	25.5
2) Quite well	997	55.2
3) Not too well	212	11.7
4) Not well at all	59	3.3
8) Don't know	77	4.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

536) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (GORELEAD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	258	14.3
2) Quite well	728	40.3
3) Not too well	522	28.9
4) Not well at all	185	10.2
8) Don't know	113	6.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

537) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (GORELIAR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	133	7.4
2) Quite well	312	17.3
3) Not too well	629	34.8
4) Not well at all	557	30.8
8) Don't know	173	9.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

538) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ....... 'describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (GORESMRT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	494	27.3
2) Quite well	995	55.1
3) Not too well	182	10.1
4) Not well at all	65	3.6
8) Don't know	69	3.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

539) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (GORENOCL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	136	7.5
2) Quite well	495	27.4
3) Not too well	641	35.5
4) Not well at all	419	23.2
8) Don't know	113	6.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

540) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .....' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (BUSHMORL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	340	18.8
2) Quite well	841	46.5
3) Not too well	330	18.3
4) Not well at all	98	5.4
8) Don't know	196	10.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

541) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (BUSHCARS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	155	8.6
2) Quite well	625	34.6
3) Not too well	562	31.1
4) Not well at all	342	18.9
8) Don't know	122	6.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

542) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (BUSHKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	274	15.2
2) Quite well	933	51.6
3) Not too well	379	21.0
4) Not well at all	133	7.4
8) Don't know	87	4.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

543) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (BUSHLEAD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	266	14.7
2) Quite well	842	46.6
3) Not too well	407	22.5
4) Not well at all	166	9.2
8) Don't know	125	6.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

544) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (BUSHLIAR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	70	3.9
2) Quite well	288	15.9
3) Not too well	653	36.1
4) Not well at all	574	31.8
8) Don't know	220	12.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

545) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (BUSHSMRT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	329	18.2
2) Quite well	967	53.5
3) Not too well	306	16.9
4) Not well at all	110	6.1
8) Don't know	94	5.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

546) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (BUSHNOCL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	207	11.5
2) Quite well	495	27.4
3) Not too well	638	35.3
4) Not well at all	348	19.3
8) Don't know	118	6.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

547) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .....' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (BUCHMORL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	94	5.2
2) Quite well	240	13.3
3) Not too well	120	6.6
4) Not well at all	47	2.6
8) Don't know	268	14.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

548) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (BUCHCARS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	31	1.7
2) Quite well	137	7.6
3) Not too well	197	10.9
4) Not well at all	150	8.3
8) Don't know	254	14.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

549) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (BUCHKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	50	2.8
2) Quite well	304	16.8
3) Not too well	139	7.7
4) Not well at all	41	2.3
8) Don't know	235	13.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

550) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (BUCHLEAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	23	1.3
2) Quite well	136	7.5
3) Not too well	227	12.6
4) Not well at all	138	7.6
8) Don't know	245	13.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

551) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (BUCHLIAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	17	0.9
2) Quite well	65	3.6
3) Not too well	224	12.4
4) Not well at all	175	9.7
8) Don't know	287	15.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

552) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (BUCHSMRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	82	4.5
2) Quite well	323	17.9
3) Not too well	98	5.4
4) Not well at all	37	2.0
8) Don't know	229	12.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

553) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (BUCHNOCL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	85	4.7
2) Quite well	183	10.1
3) Not too well	177	9.8
4) Not well at all	79	4.4
8) Don't know	244	13.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

554) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (GOVTSRVF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	142	7.9
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	46	2.5
2) 2	60	3.3
3) 3	102	5.6
4) 4	251	13.9
5) 5	184	10.2
6) 6	115	6.4
7) Gov't should provide many more services	98	5.4
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused	802	44.4
Total	1807	100.0

555) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R Self-placement on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOVTSRVP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	141	7.8
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	179	9.9
5) More services; increase spending	378	20.9
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	93	5.1
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1009	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

556) If R thinks the government should reduce services and spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (RDUCAMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1628	90.1
1) A great deal	74	4.1
5) Only some	105	5.8
Total	1807	100.0

557) If R thinks the government should increase services and spending: Telephone: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (INCSAMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1429	79.1
1) A great deal	141	7.8
5) Only some	233	12.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

558) Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? [Summary: 5pt serv/spend self-placement from branching series] (SPSUM5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	74	4.1
2) Reduce spending and services only some	105	5.8
3) Stay same as now	93	5.1
4) Increase spending and services only some	233	12.9
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	141	7.8
7) Haven't thought much	141	7.8
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

559) Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? [Combined 5pt serv/spend self-placement from 7pt scale /branch] (SPSUM7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	283	15.7
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	120	6.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	165	9.1
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	630	34.9
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	348	19.3
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	239	13.2
8) Don't know	17	0.9
9) Refused; NA; INAP	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

560) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? [R placement of Clinton on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (CLINTGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	20	1.1
2) 2	23	1.3
3) 3	73	4.0
4) 4	149	8.2
5) 5	255	14.1
6) 6	240	13.3
7) Gov't should provide many more services	152	8.4
8) Don't know	92	5.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

561) What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Clinton on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (CLINTGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	108	6.0
5) More services; increase spending	522	28.9
7) Should stay the same as it is now	59	3.3
8) Don't know	109	6.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

562) If R thinks Clinton would like to reduce services and spending: telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (CLINRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1699	94.0
1) A great deal	33	1.8
5) Only some	74	4.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

563) If R thinks Clinton would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (CLINIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1285	71.1
1) A great deal	246	13.6
5) Only some	275	15.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

564) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Clinton placement from branching series (CLING5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	33	1.8
2) Reduce spending and services only some	74	4.1
3) Stay same as now	59	3.3
4) Increase spending and services only some	275	15.2
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	246	13.6
8) Don't know	111	6.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

565) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Clinton placement from 7pt scale/branch (CLING7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	53	2.9
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	97	5.4
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	536	29.7
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	515	28.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	398	22.0
8) Don't know	203	11.2
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

566) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (GOREGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	9	0.5
2) 2	27	1.5
3) 3	62	3.4
4) 4	154	8.5
5) 5	262	14.5
6) 6	251	13.9
7) Gov't should provide many more services	129	7.1
8) Don't know	111	6.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

567) What about Al Gore? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Gore on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOREGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	91	5.0
5) More services; increase spending	553	30.6
7) Should stay the same as it is now	41	2.3
8) Don't know	114	6.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

568) If R thinks Gore would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (GORERGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1716	95.0
1) A great deal	35	1.9
5) Only some	56	3.1
Total	1807	100.0

569) If R thinks Gore would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (GOREIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1254	69.4
1) A great deal	264	14.6
5) Only some	286	15.8
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

570) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Gore placement from branching series (GOREG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	35	1.9
2) Reduce spending and services only some	56	3.1
3) Stay same as now	41	2.3
4) Increase spending and services only some	286	15.8
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	264	14.6
8) Don't know	117	6.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

571) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	44	2.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	83	4.6
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	519	28.7
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	537	29.7
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	393	21.7
8) Don't know	228	12.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

572) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (BUSHGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	58	3.2
2) 2	145	8.0
3) 3	253	14.0
4) 4	213	11.8
5) 5	115	6.4
6) 6	73	4.0
7) Gov't should provide many more services	23	1.3
8) Don't know	124	6.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

573) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Bush on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	410	22.7
5) More services; increase spending	223	12.3
7) Should stay the same as it is now	38	2.1
8) Don't know	128	7.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

574) If R thinks Bush would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (BUSHRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1397	77.3
1) A great deal	208	11.5
5) Only some	200	11.1
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

575) If R thinks Bush would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (BUSHIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1584	87.7
1) A great deal	69	3.8
5) Only some	153	8.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

576) Summary: 5 pt serv/spend Bush placement from branching series (BUSHG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	208	11.5
2) Reduce spending and services only some	200	11.1
3) Stay same as now	38	2.1
4) Increase spending and services only some	153	8.5
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	69	3.8
8) Don't know	131	7.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

577) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	266	14.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	345	19.1
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	619	34.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	226	12.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	92	5.1
8) Don't know	255	14.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

578) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democrats on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (DEMSGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	15	0.8
2) 2	14	0.8
3) 3	51	2.8
4) 4	143	7.9
5) 5	267	14.8
6) 6	266	14.7
7) Gov't should provide many more services	142	7.9
8) Don't know	106	5.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

579) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Democrats on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	84	4.6
5) More services; increase spending	556	30.8
7) Should stay the same as it is now	46	2.5
8) Don't know	115	6.4
Total	1807	100.0

580) If R thinks the Democrats would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (DEMSRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1723	95.4
1) A great deal	31	1.7
5) Only some	53	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

581) If R thinks the Democrats would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (DEMSIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1251	69.2
1) A great deal	291	16.1
5) Only some	264	14.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

582) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Democrats placement from branching series (DEMSG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	31	1.7
2) Reduce spending and services only some	53	2.9
3) Stay same as now	46	2.5
4) Increase spending and services only some	264	14.6
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	291	16.1
8) Don't know	116	6.4
Total	1807	100.0

583) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Democrats placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	46	2.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	67	3.7
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	507	28.1
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	530	29.3
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	433	24.0
8) Don't know	222	12.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

584) Where would you place the Republicans on this issue? [R placement of Republicans on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (REPSGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	86	4.8
2) 2	182	10.1
3) 3	226	12.5
4) 4	208	11.5
5) 5	110	6.1
6) 6	52	2.9
7) Gov't should provide many more services	20	1.1
8) Don't know	121	6.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

585) What about the Republicans? Do you think THEY would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Republicans on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (REPSGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	451	25.0
5) More services; increase spending	185	10.2
7) Should stay the same as it is now	37	2.0
8) Don't know	128	7.1
Total	1807	100.0

586) If R thinks the Republicans would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (REPSRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1356	75.0
1) A Great deal	229	12.7
5) Only some	221	12.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

587) If R thinks the Republicans would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (REPSIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1622	89.8
1) A great deal	54	3.0
5) Only some	131	7.2
Total	1807	100.0

588) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Republicans placement from branching series (REPSG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	229	12.7
2) Reduce spending and services only some	221	12.2
3) Stay same as now	37	2.0
4) Increase spending and services only some	131	7.2
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	54	3.0
8) Don't know	129	7.1
Total	1807	100.0

589) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Republicans placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	315	17.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	403	22.3
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	581	32.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	183	10.1
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	74	4.1
8) Don't know	250	13.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

590) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (DFNSFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	161	8.9
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	35	1.9
2) 2	33	1.8
3) 3	72	4.0
4) 4	238	13.2
5) 5	229	12.7
6) 6	144	8.0
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	85	4.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	802	44.4
Total	1807	100.0

591) Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? (DFNSPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Yes, have an opinion	589	32.6
5) No, no opinion (haven't thought much)	207	11.5
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

592) If R does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: Telephone: Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? (DFNSAMTP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1213	67.1
1) Decrease defense spending	110	6.1
3) Increase defense spending	331	18.3
5) About the right amount	146	8.1
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

593) If R says does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: If R says the government should reduce defense spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce defense spending a lot or a little? (DFNSRP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1697	93.9
1) A lot	54	3.0
5) A little	56	3.1
Total	1807	100.0

594) If R says does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: If R says the government should increase defense spending: Telephone: Should the government increase defense spending a lot or a little? (DFNSIP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1476	81.7
1) A lot	188	10.4
5) A little	141	7.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

595) Summary: 5pt defense spending self-placement from branching series (DFNS5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	54	3.0
2) Decrease defense spending a little	56	3.1
3) About the right amount	146	8.1
4) Increase defense spending a little	141	7.8
5) Increase defense spending a lot	188	10.4
7) Haven't thought much	207	11.5
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

596) Summary: 5pt defense spending self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (DFNS7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	368	20.4
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	89	4.9
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	89	4.9
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	685	37.9
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	285	15.8
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	273	15.1
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

597) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (GOREDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	29	1.6
2) 2	72	4.0
3) 3	169	9.4
4) 4	239	13.2
5) 5	186	10.3
6) 6	83	4.6
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	32	1.8
8) Don't know	195	10.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

598) What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of Gore on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOREDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	157	8.7
3) Increase defense spending	167	9.2
5) About the right amount	273	15.1
8) Don't know	203	11.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

599) If R says Gore wants to reduce defense spending/if R says Gore wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (GOREDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1483	82.1
1) A lot	137	7.6
5) A little	183	10.1
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

600) Summary: 5pt defense spending Gore placement from branching series (GOREDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	78	4.3
2) Decrease defense spending a little	76	4.2
3) About the right amount	273	15.1
4) Increase defense spending a little	107	5.9
5) Increase defense spending a lot	59	3.3
8) Don't know	207	11.5
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

601) Summary: 5pt defense spending Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	107	5.9
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	148	8.2
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	867	48.0
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	190	10.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	91	5.0
8) Don't know	402	22.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

602) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (BUSHDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	12	0.7
2) 2	26	1.4
3) 3	60	3.3
4) 4	164	9.1
5) 5	247	13.7
6) 6	221	12.2
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	97	5.4
8) Don't know	179	9.9
Total	1807	100.0

603) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of Bush on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	48	2.7
3) Increase defense spending	452	25.0
5) About the right amount	111	6.1
8) Don't know	189	10.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

604) If R says Bush wants to reduce defense spending/if R says Bush wants to increase defense spending: telephone: A lot or a little? (BUSHDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1307	72.3
1) A lot	304	16.8
5) A little	186	10.3
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

605) Summary: 5pt defense spending Bush placement from branching series (BUSHDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	29	1.6
2) Decrease defense spending a little	18	1.0
3) About the right amount	111	6.1
4) Increase defense spending a little	168	9.3
5) Increase defense spending a lot	275	15.2
8) Don't know	199	11.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

606) Summary: 5pt defense spending Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	41	2.3
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	44	2.4
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	582	32.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	389	21.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	372	20.6
8) Don't know	378	20.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

607) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of the Democratic Party on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (DEMSDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	26	1.4
2) 2	107	5.9
3) 3	180	10.0
4) 4	240	13.3
5) 5	168	9.3
6) 6	85	4.7
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	39	2.2
8) Don't know	160	8.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

608) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of the Democratic Party on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	197	10.9
3) Increase defense spending	171	9.5
5) About the right amount	248	13.7
8) Don't know	185	10.2
Total	1807	100.0

609) If R says the Democratic Party wants to reduce defense spending/If R says the Democratic Party wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (DEMSDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1439	79.6
1) A lot	151	8.4
5) A little	212	11.7
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

610) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	90	5.0
2) Decrease defense spending a little	103	5.7
3) About the right amount	248	13.7
4) Increase defense spending a little	109	6.0
5) Increase defense spending a lot	61	3.4
8) Don't know	190	10.5
Total	1807	100.0

611) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	116	6.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	210	11.6
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	836	46.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	194	10.7
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	100	5.5
8) Don't know	350	19.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

612) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of the Republican Party on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (REPSDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	12	0.7
2) 2	25	1.4
3) 3	77	4.3
4) 4	169	9.4
5) 5	238	13.2
6) 6	234	12.9
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	86	4.8
8) Don't know	165	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

613) What about the Republican Party? Do you think THEY believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of the Republican Party on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (REPSDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	68	3.8
3) Increase defense spending	441	24.4
5) About the right amount	106	5.9
8) Don't know	186	10.3
Total	1807	100.0

614) If R says the Republican Party wants to reduce defense spending/If R says the Republican Party wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (REPSDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1298	71.8
1) A lot	288	15.9
5) A little	217	12.0
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

615) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	36	2.0
2) Decrease defense spending a little	32	1.8
3) About the right amount	106	5.9
4) Increase defense spending a little	185	10.2
5) Increase defense spending a lot	252	13.9
8) Don't know	190	10.5
Total	1807	100.0

616) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	48	2.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	57	3.2
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	590	32.7
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	419	23.2
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	338	18.7
8) Don't know	355	19.6
Total	1807	100.0

617) Checkpoint: Mode and version for gov't/private medical insurance self-placement (MINSRGXP)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard version	515	28.5
2) FTF experimental version	491	27.2
3) Phone version 1	376	20.8
4) Phone version 2	425	23.5
Total	1807	100.0

618) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for standard version: FTF] (MINSSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	25	1.4
1) Gov't insurance plan	74	4.1
2) 2	42	2.3
3) 3	83	4.6
4) 4	105	5.8
5) 5	72	4.0
6) 6	46	2.5
7) Private insurance plan	59	3.3
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1292	71.5
Total	1807	100.0

619) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for experimental version: FTF (MINSSPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	35	1.9
1) Private insurance plan	41	2.3
2) 2	48	2.7
3) 3	62	3.4
4) 4	89	4.9
5) 5	74	4.1
6) 6	57	3.2
7) Gov't insurance plan	83	4.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1316	72.8
Total	1807	100.0

620) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? Combined FTF: Standard/experimental 7pt medical insurance (MINSSPS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	60	3.3
1) Gov't insurance plan	157	8.7
2) 2	99	5.5
3) 3	157	8.7
4) 4	194	10.7
5) 5	134	7.4
6) 6	94	5.2
7) Private insurance plan	100	5.5
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	801	44.3
Total	1807	100.0

621) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for version 1: Telephone: (MINSSPPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	44	2.4
1) Should be a gov't insurance plan	149	8.2
5) Individuals should pay medical expenses through private insurance	155	8.6
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	20	1.1
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1431	79.2
Total	1807	100.0

622) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for version 2: Telephone: (MINSPEPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	47	2.6
1) Should be a gov't insurance plan	146	8.1
5) Individuals should pay medical expenses through private insurance	188	10.4
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	30	1.7
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1382	76.5
Total	1807	100.0

623) Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Combined phone version 1/version 2- medical insurance (MINSCOMB)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	91	5.0
1) Should be a gov't insurance plan	337	18.6
5) INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSU	301	16.7
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	50	2.8
8) Don't know	22	1.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1006	55.7
Total	1807	100.0

624) Both telephone versions: If R feels there should be government insurance plan/if R feels individuals should pay through private insurance plan: (MINSFEEL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1169	64.7
1) Strongly	507	28.1
5) Not strongly	127	7.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

625) Summary: 5pt medical insurance self-placement from branching series (MINSFEE5)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	91	5.0
1) Strongly - government insurance plan	282	15.6
2) Not strongly - government insurance plan	54	3.0
3) Stay the same as it is now	50	2.8
4) Not strongly - individual insurance	73	4.0
5) Strongly - individual insurance	225	12.5
8) Don't know	25	1.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1007	55.7
Total	1807	100.0

626) Summary: 5pt medical insurance self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (MINSFEE7)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	151	8.4
1) Scale: 1 branching: Strongly - gov't insurance plan	439	24.3
2) Scale: 2 Branching: Not strongly - gov't insurance plan	153	8.5
3) Scale: 3,4,5; branching: Stay the same as it is now	535	29.6
4) Scale: 6 Branching: Not strongly - individual insurance	167	9.2
5) Scale: 7 Branching: Strongly - Individual insurance	325	18.0
8) Don't know	36	2.0
9) Refused; NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

627) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview (SRELYFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	93	5.1
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	74	4.1
2) 2	48	2.7
3) 3	93	5.1
4) 4	173	9.6
5) 5	189	10.5
6) 6	195	10.8
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	137	7.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	801	44.3
Total	1807	100.0

628) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview (SRELYPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	108	6.0
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	193	10.7
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	439	24.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	55	3.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1009	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

629) If R thinks government should see to jobs and standard of living: Telephone: Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? (GOVINTJO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1614	89.3
1) Strongly	152	8.4
5) Not strongly	40	2.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

630) If R thinks government should let each get ahead on their own: Telephone: Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? (GOVNIJO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1368	75.7
1) Strongly	346	19.1
5) Not strongly	93	5.1
Total	1807	100.0

631) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs self-placement from branching series (GOVGJS5)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	108	6.0
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & std living	152	8.4
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & std living	40	2.2
3) Other/depends/neither	55	3.0
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	93	5.1
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	346	19.1
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1009	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

632) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOVGJS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	201	11.1
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	226	12.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	88	4.9
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	510	28.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	288	15.9
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	483	26.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

633) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (GOREJSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	74	4.1
2) 2	128	7.1
3) 3	206	11.4
4) 4	208	11.5
5) 5	110	6.1
6) 6	58	3.2
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	38	2.1
8) Don't know	182	10.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

634) What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Gore on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (GOREJBSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	434	24.0
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	180	10.0
7) Other/it depends/neither	20	1.1
8) Don't know	165	9.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

635) If R says Gore thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Gore thinks gov't should let each on own: telephone (GOREJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1193	66.0
1) Strongly	444	24.6
5) Not strongly	162	9.0
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

636) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Gore placement from branching series (GOREJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	338	18.7
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	94	5.2
3) Other/depends/neither	20	1.1
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	68	3.8
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	106	5.9
8) Don't know	173	9.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

637) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	412	22.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	222	12.3
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	544	30.1
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	126	7.0
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	144	8.0
8) Don't know	355	19.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

638) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (BUSHJBSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	23	1.3
2) 2	22	1.2
3) 3	80	4.4
4) 4	169	9.4
5) 5	205	11.3
6) 6	220	12.2
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	98	5.4
8) Don't know	187	10.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

639) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Bush on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHJOP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	122	6.8
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	494	27.3
7) Other/it depends/neither	15	0.8
8) Don't know	168	9.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

640) If R says Bush thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/if R says Bush thinks gov't should let each on own: telephone (BUSHJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1191	65.9
1) Strongly	463	25.6
5) Not strongly	143	7.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

641) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Bush placement from branching series (BUSHJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	80	4.4
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	40	2.2
3) Other/depends/neither	15	0.8
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	103	5.7
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	383	21.2
8) Don't know	178	9.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

642) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	103	5.7
2) Scale 2 branching: not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	62	3.4
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither	469	26.0
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	323	17.9
5) Scale 7 branching: strongly - gov't leave people on own	481	26.6
8) Don't know	365	20.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

643) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democratic Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (DEMSJBSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	82	4.5
2) 2	163	9.0
3) 3	217	12.0
4) 4	180	10.0
5) 5	108	6.0
6) 6	51	2.8
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	43	2.4
8) Don't know	161	8.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

644) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Democratic Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSJBSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	450	24.9
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	161	8.9
7) Other/it depends/neither	22	1.2
8) Don't know	167	9.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

645) If R says Democratic Party thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Democratic Party thinks gov't should let each on own: Telephone (DEMSJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1196	66.2
1) Strongly	436	24.1
5) Not strongly	173	9.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

646) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard living	347	19.2
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard living	101	5.6
3) Other/depends/neither	22	1.2
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	72	4.0
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	89	4.9
8) Don't know	169	9.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

647) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	429	23.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	264	14.6
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	527	29.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	123	6.8
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	132	7.3
8) Don't know	330	18.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

648) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of Republican Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (REPSJBSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	13	0.7
2) 2	24	1.3
3) 3	65	3.6
4) 4	167	9.2
5) 5	204	11.3
6) 6	228	12.6
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	130	7.2
8) Don't know	174	9.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

649) What about the Republican Party? Do you think THEY feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Republican Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (REPSJBSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	96	5.3
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	502	27.8
7) Other/it depends/neither	21	1.2
8) Don't know	181	10.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

650) If R says Republican Party thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Republican Party thinks gov't should let each on own: Telephone (REPSJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1209	66.9
1) Strongly	427	23.6
5) Not strongly	167	9.2
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

651) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	66	3.7
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	30	1.7
3) Other/depends/neither	21	1.2
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	137	7.6
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	361	20.0
8) Don't know	185	10.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

652) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	79	4.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	54	3.0
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	457	25.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	365	20.2
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	491	27.2
8) Don't know	359	19.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

653) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (BLKADFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	69	3.8
1) Gov't should help blacks	52	2.9
2) 2	40	2.2
3) 3	79	4.4
4) 4	250	13.8
5) 5	150	8.3
6) 6	160	8.9
7) Blacks should help themselves	193	10.7
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	810	44.8
Total	1807	100.0

654) Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (BLKADPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	151	8.4
1) Gov't should help blacks	196	10.8
5) Blacks should help themselves	339	18.8
7) It depends, neither	104	5.8
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1015	56.2
Total	1807	100.0

655) If R thinks government should help blacks/If R thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone: (BLKASTS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1272	70.4
1) Great extent	342	18.9
5) Only some	191	10.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

656) Summary: 5pt aid blacks self-placement from branching series (BLKA5DPS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	151	8.4
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	86	4.8
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	110	6.1
3) Other/neither/depends	104	5.8
4) Should help themselves to some extent	81	4.5
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	256	14.2
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1015	56.2
Total	1807	100.0

657) Summary: 5pt aid blacks self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (BLKAD7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	220	12.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	138	7.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	150	8.3
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	583	32.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	241	13.3
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	449	24.8
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

658) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? [R placement of Clinton on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (CLINBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	108	6.0
2) 2	153	8.5
3) 3	205	11.3
4) 4	202	11.2
5) 5	88	4.9
6) 6	46	2.5
7) Blacks should help themselves	31	1.7
8) Don't know	168	9.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

659) What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Clinton on aid to blacks scale: telephone interview] (CLINBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	446	24.7
5) Blacks should help themselves	111	6.1
7) Other/it depends/neither	46	2.5
8) Don't know	192	10.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

660) If R says Clinton thinks government should help blacks/If R says Clinton thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (CLINBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1250	69.2
1) Great extent	317	17.5
5) Only some	237	13.1
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

661) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Clinton placement from branching series (CLINBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	267	14.8
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	176	9.7
3) Other/neither/depends	46	2.5
4) Should help themselves to some extent	61	3.4
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	50	2.8
8) Don't know	195	10.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

662) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Clinton placement from 7pt scale/branching (CLINBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	375	20.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	329	18.2
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	541	29.9
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	107	5.9
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	81	4.5
8) Don't know	363	20.1
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

663) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on aid to blacks scale: FTF INTERVIEW] (GOREBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	96	5.3
2) 2	135	7.5
3) 3	189	10.5
4) 4	224	12.4
5) 5	68	3.8
6) 6	58	3.2
7) Blacks should help themselves	27	1.5
8) Don't know	204	11.3
9) REFUSED	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

664) What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Gore on aid to blacks scale: telephone interview] (GOREBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	420	23.2
5) Blacks should help themselves	110	6.1
7) Other/it depends/neither	33	1.8
8) Don't know	232	12.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

665) If R says Gore thinks government should help blacks/If R says Gore thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (GOREBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1277	70.7
1) Great extent	284	15.7
5) Only some	245	13.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

666) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Gore placement from branching series (GOREBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	234	12.9
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	185	10.2
3) Other/neither/depends	33	1.8
4) Should help themselves to some extent	60	3.3
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	50	2.8
8) Don't know	233	12.9
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

667) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	330	18.3
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	320	17.7
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	514	28.4
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	118	6.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	77	4.3
8) Don't know	437	24.2
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

668) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (BUSHBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	19	1.1
2) 2	22	1.2
3) 3	69	3.8
4) 4	209	11.6
5) 5	226	12.5
6) 6	143	7.9
7) Blacks should help themselves	102	5.6
8) Don't know	212	11.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

669) What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Bush on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	151	8.4
5) Blacks should help themselves	351	19.4
7) Other/it depends/neither	44	2.4
8) Don't know	247	13.7
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

670) If R says Bush thinks government should help blacks/If R says Bush thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (BUSHBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.2
1) Great extent	255	14.1
5) Only some	245	13.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

671) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Bush placement from branching series (BUSHBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	45	2.5
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	106	5.9
3) Other/neither/depends	44	2.4
4) Should help themselves to some extent	139	7.7
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	210	11.6
8) Don't know	249	13.8
9) REFUSED	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

672) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	64	3.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	128	7.1
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	548	30.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	282	15.6
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	312	17.3
8) Don't know	461	25.5
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

673) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democratic Party on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (DEMSBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	106	5.9
2) 2	164	9.1
3) 3	214	11.8
4) 4	198	11.0
5) 5	70	3.9
6) 6	45	2.5
7) Blacks should help themselves	29	1.6
8) Don't know	176	9.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

674) What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think THEY feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Democratic Party on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	437	24.2
5) Blacks should help themselves	112	6.2
7) Other/it depends/neither	26	1.4
8) Don't know	220	12.2
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

675) If R says Democratic Party thinks government should help blacks/if R says Democratic Party thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (DEMSBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1258	69.6
1) Great extent	301	16.7
5) Only some	247	13.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

676) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	256	14.2
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	181	10.0
3) Other/neither/depends	26	1.4
4) Should help themselves to some extent	66	3.7
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	45	2.5
8) Don't know	221	12.2
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

677) Summary: 5pt Aid blacks Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branching (DEMSBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	362	20.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	345	19.1
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	508	28.1
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	111	6.1
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	74	4.1
8) Don't know	397	22.0
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

678) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of Republican Party on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (REPSBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	15	0.8
2) 2	19	1.1
3) 3	66	3.7
4) 4	186	10.3
5) 5	218	12.1
6) 6	196	10.8
7) Blacks should help themselves	116	6.4
8) Don't know	186	10.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

679) What about the Republican Party? (Do you think THEY feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Republican Party on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (REPSBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	151	8.4
5) Blacks should help themselves	369	20.4
7) Other/it depends/neither	43	2.4
8) Don't know	232	12.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

680) If R says Republican Party thinks government should help blacks/If R says Republican Party thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (REPSBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1287	71.2
1) Great extent	271	15.0
5) Only some	249	13.8
Total	1807	100.0

681) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	44	2.4
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	107	5.9
3) Other/neither/depends	43	2.4
4) Should help themselves to some extent	142	7.9
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	227	12.6
8) Don't know	232	12.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

682) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branching (REPSBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	59	3.3
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	126	7.0
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	513	28.4
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	338	18.7
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	343	19.0
8) Don't know	418	23.1
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

683) If R selected for standard version: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? (AFFIRMS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	927	51.3
1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action	431	23.9
5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action	338	18.7
7) Other (specify)	59	3.3
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

684) If R selected for experimental version: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? (AFFIRME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action	397	22.0
5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action	429	23.7
7) Other (specify)	50	2.8
8) Don't know	43	2.4
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

685) If R says companies should have to have affirmative action: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should have to have affirmative action)? (AFFIRMSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	979	54.2
1) Strongly	601	33.3
5) Not strongly	221	12.2
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

686) If R says companies should not have to have affirmative action: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? (AFFIRMOP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1040	57.6
1) Strongly	560	31.0
5) Not strongly	204	11.3
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

687) Combined affirmative action (standard/experimental) (AFFIRMSM)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action	828	45.8
5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action	767	42.4
7) Other	109	6.0
8) Don't know	85	4.7
9) Refused	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

688) Summary - affirmative action (standard/experimental) (AFFIRMAL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Strongly - should have to have affirmative action	601	33.3
2) Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action	221	12.2
4) Not strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action	204	11.3
5) Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action	560	31.0
7) Other	109	6.0
8) Don't know	93	5.1
9) Refused	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

689) Building and repairing highways (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on building and repairing highways be increased decreased or kept about the same?) (HIGHWAY)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	677	37.5
3) Decreased	135	7.5
5) Kept about the same	969	53.6
7) Cut out entirely	6	0.3
8) Don't know	20	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

690) What about welfare programs? (Should federal spending on welfare programs be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (WELFARE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	302	16.7
3) Decreased	669	37.0
5) Kept about the same	782	43.3
7) Cut out entirely	22	1.2
8) Don't know	30	1.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

691) What about spending on aids research? (Should federal spending on spending on aids research be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (AIDS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	911	50.4
3) Decreased	151	8.4
5) Kept about the same	697	38.6
7) Cut out entirely	11	0.6
8) Don't know	37	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

692) What about foreign aid? (Should federal spending on foreign aid be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (FOREIGN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	162	9.0
3) Decreased	787	43.6
5) Kept about the same	792	43.8
7) Cut out entirely	22	1.2
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

693) What about food stamps? (Should federal spending on food stamps be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (FOODSTMP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	285	15.8
3) Decreased	549	30.4
5) Kept about the same	890	49.3
7) Cut out entirely	32	1.8
8) Don't know	49	2.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

694) What about aid to poor people? (Should federal spending on aid to poor people be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (AIDPOOR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	916	50.7
3) Decreased	154	8.5
5) Kept about the same	693	38.4
7) Cut out entirely	9	0.5
8) Don't know	29	1.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

695) What about social security? (Should federal spending on social security be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (SOCSEC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1120	62.0
3) Decreased	66	3.7
5) Kept about the same	572	31.7
7) Cut out entirely	11	0.6
8) Don't know	38	2.1
Total	1807	100.0

696) What about environmental protection? (Should federal spending on environmental protection be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (ENVIRON)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	913	50.5
3) Decreased	164	9.1
5) Kept about the same	694	38.4
7) Cut out entirely	2	0.1
8) Don't know	33	1.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

697) What about public schools? (Should federal spending on public schools be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (SCHOOLS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1368	75.7
3) Decreased	87	4.8
5) Kept about the same	330	18.3
7) Cut out entirely	13	0.7
8) Don't know	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

698) What about dealing with crime? (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (CRIME)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1180	65.3
3) Decreased	89	4.9
5) Kept about the same	514	28.4
7) Cut out entirely	7	0.4
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

699) What about child care? (Should federal spending on child care be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (CHILDCAR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1108	61.3
3) Decreased	128	7.1
5) Kept about the same	515	28.5
7) Cut out entirely	16	0.9
8) Don't know	39	2.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

700) What about tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration? (Should federal spending on tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (IMMIGRAT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	931	51.5
3) Decreased	173	9.6
5) Kept about the same	641	35.5
7) Cut out entirely	11	0.6
8) Don't know	47	2.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

701) What about aid to blacks? (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (BLACKS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	293	16.2
3) Decreased	415	23.0
5) Kept about the same	971	53.7
7) Cut out entirely	39	2.2
8) Don't know	75	4.2
9) Refused	14	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

702) Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to spend the extra money the federal government is likely to have in the near future. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? (TAXCUTS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1111	61.5
5) Disapprove	637	35.3
8) Don't know	56	3.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

703) If R approves using federal budget surplus to cut taxes/If R disapproves using federal budget surplus to cut taxes: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? (TAXCUTAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	59	3.3
1) Strongly	1216	67.3
5) Not strongly	529	29.3
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

704) Summary: Tax cut from surplus (TAXCUTSP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	811	44.9
2) Approve not strongly	298	16.5
4) Disapprove not strongly	231	12.8
5) Disapprove strongly	405	22.4
8) Don't know	59	3.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

705) Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? (SOCSECSP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1453	80.4
5) Disapprove	312	17.3
8) Don't know	39	2.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

706) If R approves using surplus for social security & medicare/If R disapproves using surplus for social security & medicare: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? (SOCSCSSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	42	2.3
1) Strongly	1309	72.4
5) Not strongly	454	25.1
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

707) Summary: Use surplus to protect social security (SOCSECSM)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	1153	63.8
2) Approve not strongly	298	16.5
4) Disapprove not strongly	156	8.6
5) Disapprove strongly	156	8.6
8) Don't know	41	2.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

708) There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (ABORTION)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.	215	11.9
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	525	29.1
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established	265	14.7
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	753	41.7
7) Other (specify)	28	1.5
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

709) All abortion respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (ABORTIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Not at all important	76	4.2
2) Not too important	193	10.7
3) Somewhat important	499	27.6
4) Very important	640	35.4
5) Extremely important	389	21.5
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

710) Where would you place Al Gore on abortion? (GOREABTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.	84	4.6
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	228	12.6
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established	253	14.0
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	762	42.2
7) Other (specify)	21	1.2
8) Don't know	450	24.9
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

711) If Gore's position on abortion is not DON'T KNOW/REF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GOREABP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	459	25.4
1) Very certain	426	23.6
3) Pretty certain	540	29.9
5) Not very certain	380	21.0
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

712) Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)? (BUSHABTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.	285	15.8
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	655	36.2
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established	227	12.6
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	119	6.6
7) Other (specify)	23	1.3
8) Don't know	488	27.0
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

713) If George W. Bush's position on abortion is not DON'T KNOW/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHABP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	498	27.6
1) Very certain	315	17.4
3) Pretty certain	560	31.0
5) Not very certain	433	24.0
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

714) Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? (ABRTPRNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1395	77.2
5) Oppose	353	19.5
8) Don't know	44	2.4
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

715) If R favors abortion law requiring minors' parental permission/If R opposes abortion law requiring minors' parental permission: Strongly or not strongly? (ABRTSPRN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	59	3.3
1) Strongly	1461	80.9
5) Not strongly	286	15.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

716) Summary: Parental consent for abortions (ABRTSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor strongly	1233	68.2
2) Favor not strongly	162	9.0
4) Oppose not strongly	124	6.9
5) Oppose strongly	228	12.6
8) Don't know	45	2.5
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

717) There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBRTHSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1236	68.4
5) Oppose	444	24.6
8) Don't know	108	6.0
9) Refused	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

718) If R favors ban on late-term abortions/If R opposes ban on late-term abortions: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBRTHSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	127	7.0
1) Strongly	1386	76.7
5) Not strongly	289	16.0
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

719) Summary: Ban on late-term abortions (PBRTHSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor strongly	1097	60.7
2) Favor not strongly	137	7.6
4) Oppose not strongly	152	8.4
5) Oppose strongly	289	16.0
8) Don't know	113	6.3
9) REFUSED	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

720) Checkpoint: Mode and version for environment versus jobs self-placement [FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without haven't thought much about it option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the 'haven't thought much about it' option.] (CKPTEJSP)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard version	502	27.8
2) FTF experimental version	504	27.9
3) Phone version 1	373	20.6
4) Phone version 2	428	23.7
Total	1807	100.0

721) [Environment versus jobs scale self placement] If R selected for standard version: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (JOBENVF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	66	3.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	66	3.7
2) 2	66	3.7
3) 3	70	3.9
4) 4	131	7.2
5) 5	60	3.3
6) 6	26	1.4
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	16	0.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1305	72.2
Total	1807	100.0

722) If R selected for experimental version: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? (JOBENVE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.2
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	44	2.4
2) 2	62	3.4
3) 3	92	5.1
4) 4	160	8.9
5) 5	70	3.9
6) 6	41	2.3
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	18	1.0
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

723) Combined FTF standard/experimental - 7pt jobs vs. environment (JOBNVC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	66	3.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	110	6.1
2) 2	128	7.1
3) 3	162	9.0
4) 4	291	16.1
5) 5	130	7.2
6) 6	67	3.7
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	34	1.9
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	805	44.5
Total	1807	100.0

724) If R selected for version 1: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (JOBENVP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	110	6.1
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	177	9.8
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	52	2.9
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	29	1.6
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1434	79.4
Total	1807	100.0

725) If R selected for version 2: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel? (JOBENVPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1380	76.4
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	245	13.6
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	102	5.6
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	46	2.5
8) Don't know	28	1.5
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

726) Combined telephone versions - environment vs. jobs (JOBENVC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	110	6.1
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	422	23.4
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	154	8.5
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	75	4.2
8) Don't know	33	1.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1013	56.1
Total	1807	100.0

727) Both telephone versions: If protecting environment is more important/If maintaining jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (JOBVSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1231	68.1
1) Much more important	336	18.6
5) Only somewhat more important	240	13.3
Total	1807	100.0

728) Summary: 5pt env/jobs self-placement from branching series (JOBENV5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	110	6.1
1) Environment much more important	270	14.9
2) Environment somewhat more important	152	8.4
3) Other/depends/neither	75	4.2
4) Jobs somewhat more important	88	4.9
5) Jobs much more important	66	3.7
8) Don't know	33	1.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1013	56.1
Total	1807	100.0

729) Summary: 5pt env/jobs self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (JOBENV7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	176	9.7
1) Scale 1 branching: Environment much more important	380	21.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Environment somewhat more important	280	15.5
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	658	36.4
4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important	155	8.6
5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important	100	5.5
8) Don't know	47	2.6
9) Refused; NA	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

730) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue (jobs/environment scale)? [FTF interview] (GOREJEF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	132	7.3
2) 2	161	8.9
3) 3	171	9.5
4) 4	178	9.9
5) 5	79	4.4
6) 6	45	2.5
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	22	1.2
8) Don't know	213	11.8
9) REFUSED	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

731) What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? [Telephone interview] (GOREJEP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	461	25.5
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	101	5.6
7) Other, it depends, neither	21	1.2
8) Don't know	215	11.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

732) If R says Gore thinks protecting environment is more important/If R says Gore thinks jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (GORESJE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1245	68.9
1) Much more important	324	17.9
5) Somewhat more important	234	12.9
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

733) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Gore placement from branching series (GOREJE5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Environment much more important	298	16.5
2) Environment somewhat more important	161	8.9
3) Other/depends/neither	21	1.2
4) Jobs somewhat more important	73	4.0
5) Jobs much more important	26	1.4
8) Don't know	219	12.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

734) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREJE7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Environment much more important	430	23.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Environment somewhat more important	322	17.8
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	449	24.8
4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important	118	6.5
5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important	48	2.7
8) Don't know	432	23.9
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

735) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue (jobs/environment scale)? [FTF interview] (BUSHJEF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	23	1.3
2) 2	18	1.0
3) 3	73	4.0
4) 4	199	11.0
5) 5	209	11.6
6) 6	168	9.3
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	63	3.5
8) Don't know	249	13.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

736) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? [Telephone interview] (BUSHJEP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	194	10.7
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	327	18.1
7) Other, it depends, neither	39	2.2
8) Don't know	237	13.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

737) If R says Bush thinks protecting environment is more important/If R says Bush thinks jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (BUSHSJE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1286	71.2
1) Much more important	242	13.4
5) Somewhat more important	273	15.1
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

738) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Bush placement from branching series (BUSHJE5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Environment much more important	78	4.3
2) Environment somewhat more important	114	6.3
3) Other/depends/neither	39	2.2
4) Jobs somewhat more important	159	8.8
5) Jobs much more important	164	9.1
8) Don't know	243	13.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

739) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHJE7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: environment much more important	101	5.6
2) Scale 2 branching: environment somewhat more important	132	7.3
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	520	28.8
4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important	327	18.1
5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important	227	12.6
8) Don't know	492	27.2
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

740) Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? (GAYMLSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Homosexuals should be allowed to serve	1285	71.1
5) Homosexuals should not be allowed to serve	414	22.9
8) Don't know	86	4.8
9) Refused	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

741) If R says allow homosexuals to serve in armed forces: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? (GAYMLFAV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	522	28.9
1) Strongly	871	48.2
5) Not strongly	410	22.7
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

742) If R says do not allow homosexuals to serve in armed forces: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? (GAYMLOPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1393	77.1
1) Strongly	322	17.8
5) Not strongly	89	4.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

743) Summary: Homosexuals in armed forces (GAYMLSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Strongly - Should be allowed to serve	871	48.2
2) Not strongly - Should be allowed to serve	410	22.7
4) Not strongly - Should not be allowed to serve	89	4.9
5) Strongly - Should not be allowed to serve	322	17.8
8) Don't know	93	5.1
9) Refused	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

744) Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (GUNSSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) More difficult	1060	58.7
3) Make it easier	75	4.2
5) Keep these rules about the same	659	36.5
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

745) If R says gov't should make it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (GUNSCRTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	747	41.3
1) A lot more difficult	861	47.6
5) Somewhat more difficult	199	11.0
Total	1807	100.0

746) If R says Gov't should make it easier to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier? (GUNFREE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.8
1) A lot easier	39	2.2
5) Somewhat easier	36	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

747) Summary: R position on gun restrictions (GUNSSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) A lot more difficult	861	47.6
2) Somewhat more difficult	199	11.0
3) Keep rules about the same	659	36.5
4) Somewhat easier	36	2.0
5) A lot easier	39	2.2
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

748) All gun restriction respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (GUNSIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Not at all important	37	2.0
2) Not too important	139	7.7
3) Somewhat important	461	25.5
4) Very important	716	39.6
5) Extremely important	448	24.8
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

749) Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (GOREGUNS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) More difficult	1139	63.0
3) Make it easier	19	1.1
5) Keep these rules about the same	350	19.4
8) Don't know	294	16.3
9) REFUSED	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

750) If R thinks Gore would like it easier to buy a gun/If R thinks Gore would like it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier?/A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (GOREGCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	649	35.9
1) A lot	718	39.7
5) Somewhat	437	24.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

751) Summary: Gore position on gun restrictions (GOREGCTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) A lot more difficult	709	39.2
2) Somewhat more difficult	427	23.6
3) Keep rules about the same	350	19.4
4) Somewhat easier	10	0.6
5) A lot easier	9	0.5
8) Don't know	297	16.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

752) If R says Gore wants more difficult/easier to buy gun: If strength of Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GOREGCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	652	36.1
1) Very certain	393	21.7
3) Pretty certain	542	30.0
5) Not very certain	219	12.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

753) Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (BUSHGUNS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) More difficult	375	20.8
3) Make it easier	315	17.4
5) Keep these rules about the same	806	44.6
8) Don't know	306	16.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

754) If R thinks G.W. Bush would like it easier to buy a gun/If R thinks G.W. Bush would like it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier? A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (BUSHGCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1117	61.8
1) A lot	318	17.6
5) Somewhat	370	20.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

755) Summary: GW Bush position on gun restrictions (BUSHGCTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) A lot more difficult	182	10.1
2) Somewhat more difficult	193	10.7
3) Keep rules about the same	806	44.6
4) Somewhat easier	177	9.8
5) A lot easier	136	7.5
8) Don't know	308	17.0
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

756) If R says GW Bush wants more difficult/easier to buy gun: If strength of GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHGCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1119	61.9
1) Very certain	190	10.5
3) Pretty certain	318	17.6
5) Not very certain	180	10.0
Total	1807	100.0

757) If R selected for standard version: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? (SCHVCHRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	925	51.2
1) Favor school voucher program	424	23.5
5) Oppose school voucher program	394	21.8
8) Don't know	62	3.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

758) If R selected for experimental version: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? (SCHVCHRE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	317	17.5
1) Favor school voucher program	332	18.4
5) Oppose school voucher program	259	14.3
8) Don't know	12	0.7
9) Refused; NA; INAP	887	49.1
Total	1807	100.0

759) Combined versions - school vouchers (SCHVCHRC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	317	17.5
1) Favor school voucher program	756	41.8
5) Oppose school voucher program	653	36.1
8) Don't know	74	4.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

760) If R favors school voucher program/If R opposes school voucher program: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? (SCHVCHRH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1216	67.3
1) Strongly	439	24.3
5) Not strongly	152	8.4
Total	1807	100.0

761) Summary: R position on school vouchers (SCHVCHRU)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	317	17.5
1) Favor strongly	245	13.6
2) Favor not strongly	87	4.8
4) Oppose not strongly	65	3.6
5) Oppose strongly	194	10.7
8) Don't know	12	0.7
9) Refused; NA; INAP	887	49.1
Total	1807	100.0

762) Do you favor a law making English the official language of the United States, meaning government business would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose such a law? (ENGLOFFC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1202	66.5
3) Neither favor nor oppose [Vol]	130	7.2
5) Oppose	446	24.7
8) Don't know	24	1.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

763) Some people say that the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools. Others claim that this is not the government's business. Have you been interested enough in this question to favor one side over the other? (SCHLINTG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes	1195	66.1
5) No	580	32.1
8) Don't know	27	1.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

764) If R has opinion whether gov't see to black/white kids in same schools: Do you think the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools or stay out of this area as it is not the government's business? (SCHLINTO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	612	33.9
1) See to it that white and black children go to the same school	596	33.0
5) Stay out of this area as it is not the government's business	531	29.4
7) Other; depends	56	3.1
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

765) Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words, homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt children? (GAYADOPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes	747	41.3
5) No	909	50.3
8) Don't know	126	7.0
9) Refused	22	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

766) Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? (DTHPSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1240	68.6
5) Oppose	462	25.6
8) Don't know	87	4.8
9) Refused	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

767) If R favors death penalty for persons convicted of murder:(Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? (DTHPSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	567	31.4
1) Strongly	925	51.2
5) Not strongly	314	17.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

768) If R opposes death penalty for persons convicted of murder:(Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? (DTHOPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1345	74.4
1) Strongly	283	15.7
5) Not strongly	177	9.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

769) Summary: R position on death penalty (DTHPSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor strongly	925	51.2
2) Favor not strongly	314	17.4
4) Oppose not strongly	177	9.8
5) Oppose strongly	283	15.7
8) Don't know	89	4.9
9) Refused	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

770) Checkpoint: Mode and version for women's equal role self-placement (CKPTWOM)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard	520	28.8
2) FTF experimental	486	26.9
3) Phone version 1	382	21.1
4) Phone version 2	419	23.2
Total	1807	100.0

771) [If R selected for standard version: FTF: R self placement on equal role scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (FMQLFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	18	1.0
1) Women and men should have equal roles	296	16.4
2) 2	80	4.4
3) 3	31	1.7
4) 4	44	2.4
5) 5	20	1.1
6) 6	14	0.8
7) A woman's place is in the home	16	0.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1287	71.2
Total	1807	100.0

772) [If R selected for experimental version: FTF: R self placement on equal role scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale? (FMQLFTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1323	73.2
1) Women and men should have equal roles	276	15.3
2) 2	62	3.4
3) 3	39	2.2
4) 4	60	3.3
5) 5	18	1.0
6) 6	9	0.5
7) A woman's place is in the home	13	0.7
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

773) Combined FTF standard/experimental versions - women's role (FMQLFTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	18	1.0
1) Women and men should have equal roles	572	31.7
2) 2	142	7.9
3) 3	70	3.9
4) 4	104	5.8
5) 5	38	2.1
6) 6	23	1.3
7) A woman's place is in the home	29	1.6
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	804	44.5
Total	1807	100.0

774) Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. If R selected for version 1:Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (FMQLST)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	19	1.1
1) Women and men should have equal roles	328	18.2
5) A woman's place is in the home	18	1.0
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	14	0.8
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1425	78.9
Total	1807	100.0

775) Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. If R selected for version 2: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel? (FMQLBRE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1389	76.9
1) Women and men should have equal roles	367	20.3
5) A woman's place is in the home	23	1.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	24	1.3
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

776) Combined telephone versions - women's role (FMQLCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	19	1.1
1) Women and men should have equal roles	695	38.5
5) A woman's place is in the home	41	2.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	38	2.1
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1008	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

777) Both telephone versions: If R says men and women should have equal roles/If R says a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (FMQLSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1071	59.3
1) Strongly	680	37.6
5) Not strongly	55	3.0
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

778) Summary: 5pt womens role self-placement from branching series (FMQL5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	19	1.1
1) Strongly - women equal role	652	36.1
2) Not strongly - equal role	42	2.3
3) Other/depends/neither	38	2.1
4) Not strongly - place is in the home	13	0.7
5) Strongly - place is in the home	28	1.5
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1008	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

779) Summary: 5pt womens role self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (FMQL7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	37	2.0
1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - women equal role	1224	67.7
2) Scale 2 branching: not strongly - equal role	184	10.2
3) Scale 3 branching: other/depends/neither	250	13.8
4) Scale 4 branching: not strongly - place is in the home	36	2.0
5) Scale 5 branching: strongly - place is in the home	57	3.2
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

780) Gore-equal role scale FTF Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? (GOREFEQF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Women and men should have equal roles	273	15.1
2) 2	185	10.2
3) 3	145	8.0
4) 4	127	7.0
5) 5	36	2.0
6) 6	24	1.3
7) A woman's place is in the home	19	1.1
8) Don't know	193	10.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

781) Telephone: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, or that a woman's place is in the home? (GOREFEQP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Women and men should have equal roles	552	30.5
5) A woman's place is in the home	40	2.2
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	19	1.1
8) Don't know	187	10.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

782) If R thinks Gore feels men and women should have equal roles/If R thinks Gore feels that a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role?/Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (GOREFEQS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1215	67.2
1) Strongly	506	28.0
5) Not strongly	78	4.3
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

783) Summary: 5pt womens role Gore placement from branching series (GORE5FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Strongly - women equal role	480	26.6
2) Not strongly - equal role	64	3.5
3) Other/depends/neither	19	1.1
4) Not strongly - place is in the home	14	0.8
5) Strongly - place is in the home	26	1.4
8) Don't know	195	10.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

784) Summary: 5pt womens role Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GORE7FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - women equal role	753	41.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - equal role	249	13.8
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	327	18.1
4) Scale 4 branching: Not strongly - place is in the home	38	2.1
5) Scale 5 branching: strongly - place is in the home	45	2.5
8) Don't know	388	21.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

785) Bush-equal role scale FTF Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? (BUSHFEQF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Women and men should have equal roles	154	8.5
2) 2	99	5.5
3) 3	153	8.5
4) 4	172	9.5
5) 5	114	6.3
6) 6	60	3.3
7) A woman's place is in the home	30	1.7
8) Don't know	220	12.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

786) Telephone: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? (BUSHFEQP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Women and men should have equal roles	440	24.3
5) A woman's place is in the home	112	6.2
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	30	1.7
8) Don't know	216	12.0
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

787) If R thinks GW Bush feels men and women should have equal roles/If R thinks GW Bush feels that a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (BUSHFEQS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1255	69.5
1) Strongly	412	22.8
5) Not strongly	133	7.4
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

788) Summary: 5pt womens role Bush placement from branching series (BUSH5FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; FTF mode	1007	55.7
1) Strongly - women equal role	344	19.0
2) Not strongly - equal role	90	5.0
3) Other/depends/neither	30	1.7
4) Not strongly - place is in the home	43	2.4
5) Strongly - place is in the home	68	3.8
8) Don't know	223	12.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

789) Summary: 5pt womens role Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSH7FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - women equal role	498	27.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - equal role	189	10.5
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	469	26.0
4) Scale 4 branching: Not strongly - place is in the home	103	5.7
5) Scale 5 branching: Strongly - place is in the home	98	5.4
8) Don't know	443	24.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

790) [FTF interview: R self placement on environmental regulation scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (ENVREGSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	192	10.6
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	172	9.5
2) 2	149	8.2
3) 3	159	8.8
4) 4	167	9.2
5) 5	76	4.2
6) 6	48	2.7
7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	36	2.0
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	803	44.4
Total	1807	100.0

791) Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. Telephone interview: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (ENVRGBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	243	13.4
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	337	18.6
5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	132	7.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	73	4.0
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1011	55.9
Total	1807	100.0

792) If R thinks tougher regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (ENVRGINC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1470	81.4
1) A lot	217	12.0
5) Somewhat	120	6.6
Total	1807	100.0

793) If R thinks regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (ENVRGBRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1675	92.7
1) Way too much	58	3.2
5) Somewhat	74	4.1
Total	1807	100.0

794) Summary: 5pt environment regulation self-placement from branching series (ENVRG5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	243	13.4
1) Toughen regulations a lot	217	12.0
2) Toughen regulations a little	120	6.6
3) Other/depends/neither	73	4.0
4) Regulations somewhat of a burden	74	4.1
5) Regulations way too much burden	58	3.2
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1011	55.9
Total	1807	100.0

795) Summary: 5pt environment regulation self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (ENVRG7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	435	24.1
1) Scale 1 branching: toughen regulations a lot	389	21.5
2) Scale 2 branching: toughen regulations a little	269	14.9
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither	475	26.3
4) Scale 6 branching: regulations somewhat of a burden	122	6.8
5) Scale 7 branching: regulations way too much burden	94	5.2
8) Don't know	16	0.9
9) Refused; NA	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

796) All environmental regulation respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (ENVRGIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Not at all important	129	7.1
2) Not too important	223	12.3
3) Somewhat important	648	35.9
4) Very important	563	31.2
5) Extremely important	219	12.1
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

797) [Gore placement-environmental regulation scale] Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? (GOREENV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	153	8.5
2) 2	232	12.8
3) 3	178	9.9
4) 4	138	7.6
5) 5	45	2.5
6) 6	24	1.3
7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	10	0.6
8) Don't know	223	12.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

798) Telephone: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? (GOREENVB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	483	26.7
5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	71	3.9
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	19	1.1
8) Don't know	225	12.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

799) If R thinks Gore feels tougher environmental regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (GOREERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1324	73.3
1) A lot	331	18.3
5) Somewhat	151	8.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

800) If R thinks Gore feels environment regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (GOREERB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1736	96.1
1) Way too much	7	0.4
5) Somewhat	64	3.5
Total	1807	100.0

801) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Gore placement from branching series (GOREE5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Toughen regulations a lot	331	18.3
2) Toughen regulations a little	151	8.4
3) Other/depends/neither	19	1.1
4) Regulations somewhat of a burden	64	3.5
5) Regulations way too much burden	7	0.4
8) Don't know	226	12.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

802) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREE7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Toughen regulations a lot	484	26.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Toughen regulations a little	383	21.2
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither	380	21.0
4) Scale 6 branching: regulations somewhat of a burden	88	4.9
5) Scale 7 branching: regulations way too much burden	17	0.9
8) Don't know	449	24.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

803) If R's placement of Gore is not DON'T KNOW or OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GORECRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	473	26.2
1) Very certain	420	23.2
3) Pretty certain	548	30.3
5) Not very certain	364	20.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

804) (Bush placement-environmental regulation scale) FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? (BUSHENV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	26	1.4
2) 2	40	2.2
3) 3	93	5.1
4) 4	203	11.2
5) 5	182	10.1
6) 6	148	8.2
7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	63	3.5
8) Don't know	248	13.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

805) Telephone: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, or that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? (BUSHENVB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	159	8.8
5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	355	19.6
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	43	2.4
8) Don't know	241	13.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

806) If R thinks GW Bush feels tougher environment regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (BUSHERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1648	91.2
1) A lot	68	3.8
5) Somewhat	91	5.0
Total	1807	100.0

807) If R thinks GW Bush feels environment regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (BUSHERB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1452	80.4
1) Way too much	136	7.5
5) Somewhat	216	12.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

808) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Bush placement from branching series (BUSHE5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Toughen regulations a lot	68	3.8
2) Toughen regulations a little	91	5.0
3) Other/depends/neither	43	2.4
4) Regulations somewhat of a burden	216	12.0
5) Regulations way too much burden	136	7.5
8) Don't know	244	13.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

809) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHE7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Toughen regulations a lot	94	5.2
2) Scale 2 branching: Toughen regulations a little	131	7.2
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	521	28.8
4) Scale 6 branching: Regulations somewhat of a burden	364	20.1
5) Scale 7 branching: Regulations way too much burden	199	11.0
8) Don't know	492	27.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

810) If R's placement of GW Bush is not DON'T KNOW or OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHECRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	541	29.9
1) Very certain	255	14.1
3) Pretty certain	570	31.5
5) Not very certain	440	24.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

811) So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the national elections this coming November or not? (WILLVOTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes	1547	85.6
5) No	230	12.7
8) Don't know	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

812) If R expects to vote in November election: Who do you think you will vote for in the election for President? (WHOVOTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	260	14.4
1) Al Gore	740	41.0
2) George W. Bush	604	33.4
3) Pat Buchanan	5	0.3
4) Ralph Nader	41	2.3
5) None (if voter, will not vote for President)	3	0.2
7) Other	70	3.9
8) Don't know	63	3.5
9) Refused	21	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

813) If R expects to vote in November election: If intended presidential vote is not NONE or DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: Would you say that your preference for [Gore/Bush/Buchanan/other] is strong or not strong? (CANDPREF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	347	19.2
1) Strong	1114	61.6
5) Not strong	339	18.8
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

814) If Turnout intent is will not/don't know if will vote in November/if vote intent is to vote but not for President: If you were going to vote, who do you think you would vote for in the election for President? (WHOVOTEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1547	85.6
1) Al Gore	89	4.9
2) George W. Bush	104	5.8
3) Pat Buchanan	2	0.1
4) Ralph Nader	4	0.2
5) None (if voter, will not vote for President) [Vol]	33	1.8
7) Other	6	0.3
8) Don't know	19	1.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

815) If turnout intent is WILL NOT/DON'T KNOW if will vote in November/if vote intent is to vote but not for President: If R names presidential candidate he would vote for if voting: Would you say that your preference for [CANDIDATE NAMED] is strong or not strong? (CANDPRFN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1602	88.7
1) Strong	105	5.8
5) Not strong	97	5.4
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

816) After the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. House of Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats? (PARTYHSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Republicans	815	45.1
5) Democrats	604	33.4
8) Don't know	384	21.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

817) Again, after the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate, -- the Republicans or the Democrats? (PARTYSEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Republicans	814	45.0
5) Democrats	557	30.8
8) Don't know	430	23.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

818) Some people feel that if black people are not getting fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington ought to see to it that they do. Others feel that this is not the federal government's business. Have you had enough interest in this question to favor one side over the other? (JOBINTST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes, have interest in question	1192	66.0
5) No, haven't had interest	585	32.4
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) Refused	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

819) If R has had interest in issue of fair treatment in jobs: How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs or is this not the federal government's business? (BLEQUAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	615	34.0
1) Government in Washington should see to it that black people	625	34.6
5) This is not the federal government's business	519	28.7
7) Other	46	2.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

820) If R has had interest in issue of fair treatment in jobs: If R's position is to see to fair treatment/if R's position is not the federal government's business: Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? (BLFEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	663	36.7
1) Strongly	951	52.6
5) Not strongly	192	10.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

821) Summary: R position on fair treatment in jobs (BLFEMPS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	588	32.5
1) Strongly - Gov't should see to fair treatment	524	29.0
2) Not strongly - Gov't should see to fair treatment	100	5.5
4) Not strongly - Not the government's business	92	5.1
5) Strongly - Not the government's business	427	23.6
7) Other	46	2.5
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

822) Some people say that because of past discrimination, blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks advantages they haven't earned. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? (BLAFFIRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	4	0.2
1) For preferential hiring and promotion of blacks	262	14.5
5) Against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks	1366	75.6
7) Other	94	5.2
8) Don't know	66	3.7
9) Refused	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

823) If R favors preference in hiring and promotion of blacks: Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? (BLAFFRMS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1545	85.5
1) Strongly	174	9.6
5) Not strongly	87	4.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

824) If R opposes preference in hiring and promotion of blacks: Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? (BLAFFRMA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	441	24.4
1) Strongly	1021	56.5
5) Not strongly	342	18.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

825) Summary: R position on affirmative action in jobs (BLAFFRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	4	0.2
1) Favor strongly	174	9.6
2) Favor not strongly	87	4.8
4) Oppose not strongly	342	18.9
5) Oppose strongly	1021	56.5
7) Other	94	5.2
8) Don't know	70	3.9
9) Refused	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

826) As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (DEFICT92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Gotten smaller	496	27.4
3) Gotten larger	126	7.0
5) Stayed about the same	203	11.2
8) Don't know	61	3.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

827) If R says the budget deficit is smaller than in 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (DEFICTSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1311	72.6
1) Much smaller	240	13.3
5) Somewhat smaller	248	13.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

828) If R says the budget deficit is larger than in 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? (DEFICTLG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1681	93.0
1) Much larger	44	2.4
5) Somewhat larger	78	4.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

829) Summary: Budget deficit since 1992 (DEFICSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much smaller	240	13.3
2) Somewhat smaller	248	13.7
3) About the same	203	11.2
4) Somewhat larger	78	4.3
5) Much larger	44	2.4
8) Don't know	73	4.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

830) Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? (POOR92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Increased	339	18.8
3) Decreased	158	8.7
5) Stayed about the same	275	15.2
8) Don't know	114	6.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

831) If R says spending on poor has decreased since 1992/If R says spending on poor has increased since 1992: A lot or somewhat? (POORSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1310	72.5
1) A lot	130	7.2
5) Somewhat	362	20.0
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

832) Summary: Federal assistance to the poor (POORSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Increases a lot	81	4.5
2) Increased somewhat	256	14.2
3) Stayed about the same	275	15.2
4) Decreased somewhat	106	5.9
5) Decreased a lot	49	2.7
8) Don't know	119	6.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

833) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (ECON92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	633	35.0
3) Worse	59	3.3
5) The same	185	10.2
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

834) If R says nation's economy is better since 1992:(Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (ECONBTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1174	65.0
1) Much better	372	20.6
5) Somewhat better	261	14.4
Total	1807	100.0

835) If R says nation's economy is worse since 1992:(Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (ECONWRSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.7
1) Much worse	22	1.2
5) Somewhat worse	37	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

836) Summary: Economy since 1992 (ECONSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	372	20.6
2) Somewhat better	261	14.4
3) About the same	185	10.2
4) Somewhat worse	37	2.0
5) Much worse	22	1.2
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

837) Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? (CLINECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Made the economy better	502	27.8
3) Made the economy worse	41	2.3
5) No effect	321	17.8
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

838) If R says Clinton has made economy better since 1992: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINECO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.2
1) Much better	242	13.4
5) Somewhat better	260	14.4
Total	1807	100.0

839) If R says Clinton has made economy worse since 1992: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1766	97.7
1) Much worse	15	0.8
5) Somewhat worse	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

840) Summary: Clinton effect on economy (CLINECSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	242	13.4
2) Somewhat better	260	14.4
3) No effect	321	17.8
4) Somewhat worse	26	1.4
5) Much worse	15	0.8
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

841) Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? (CLINPERS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Helped	189	10.5
3) Hurt	75	4.2
5) Not affected	608	33.6
8) Don't know	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

842) Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (SECURE92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) More secure	215	11.9
3) Less secure	261	14.4
5) No change	379	21.0
8) Don't know	32	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

843) If R says U.S. more secure from enemies since 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? (SECURP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1592	88.1
1) Much more secure	71	3.9
5) Somewhat more secure	144	8.0
Total	1807	100.0

844) If R says U.S. less secure from enemies since 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? (SECURN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1546	85.6
1) Much less secure	107	5.9
5) Somewhat less secure	153	8.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

845) Summary: U.S. security from foreign enemies (SECURSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much more secure	71	3.9
2) Somewhat more secure	144	8.0
3) Not changed very much	379	21.0
4) Somewhat less secure	153	8.5
5) Much less secure	107	5.9
8) Don't know	33	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

846) Would you say that Clinton Administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) More secure	192	10.6
3) Less secure	218	12.1
5) No change	449	24.8
8) Don't know	28	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

847) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. more secure: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? (CLINPSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1615	89.4
1) Much more secure	73	4.0
5) Somewhat more secure	119	6.6
Total	1807	100.0

848) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. less secure: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? (CLINNSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1589	87.9
1) Much less secure	99	5.5
5) Somewhat less secure	119	6.6
Total	1807	100.0

849) Summary: Clinton Administration effect on U.S. security (CLINSCSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much more secure	73	4.0
2) Somewhat more secure	119	6.6
3) Hasn't made much difference	449	24.8
4) Somewhat less secure	119	6.6
5) Much less secure	99	5.5
8) Don't know	28	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

850) Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (CRIMRATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	327	18.1
3) Worse	276	15.3
5) The same	260	14.4
8) Don't know	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

851) If R says U.S. crime rate has gotten better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (CRIMEP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1480	81.9
1) Much better	82	4.5
5) Somewhat better	244	13.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

852) If R says U.S. crime rate has gotten worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (CRIMEN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1531	84.7
1) Much worse	138	7.6
5) Somewhat worse	138	7.6
Total	1807	100.0

853) Summary: U.S. crime rate since 1992 (CRIMSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	82	4.5
2) Somewhat better	244	13.5
3) Stayed about the same	260	14.4
4) Somewhat worse	138	7.6
5) Much worse	138	7.6
8) Don't know	25	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

854) Would you say that Clinton Administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINCRIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	234	12.9
3) Worse	72	4.0
5) No difference	543	30.0
8) Don't know	38	2.1
Total	1807	100.0

855) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate better: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINPCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1573	87.1
1) Much better	72	4.0
5) Somewhat better	161	8.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

856) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINNCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1735	96.0
1) Much worse	36	2.0
5) Somewhat worse	36	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

857) Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on crime rate (CLINCRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	72	4.0
2) Somewhat better	161	8.9
3) Hasn't made much difference	543	30.0
4) Somewhat worse	36	2.0
5) Much worse	36	2.0
8) Don't know	39	2.2
Total	1807	100.0

858) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (MORLCLIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	87	4.8
3) Worse	470	26.0
5) The same	314	17.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

859) If R says moral climate is better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (MORALP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1720	95.2
1) Much better	28	1.5
5) Somewhat better	59	3.3
Total	1807	100.0

860) If R says moral climate is worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (MORALN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1337	74.0
1) Much worse	260	14.4
5) Somewhat worse	209	11.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

861) Summary: U.S. moral climate since 1992 (MORALSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	28	1.5
2) Somewhat better	59	3.3
3) Stayed about the same	314	17.4
4) Somewhat worse	209	11.6
5) Much worse	260	14.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

862) Has the Clinton Administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINMORL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	65	3.6
3) Worse	373	20.6
5) No difference	425	23.5
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

863) If R says Clinton Administration made moral climate better: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINPMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1742	96.4
1) Much better	23	1.3
5) Somewhat better	42	2.3
Total	1807	100.0

864) If R says Clinton Administration made moral climate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINNMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1434	79.4
1) Much worse	214	11.8
5) Somewhat worse	159	8.8
Total	1807	100.0

865) Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on moral climate (CLINMORU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	23	1.3
2) Somewhat better	42	2.3
3) Hasn't made much difference	425	23.5
4) Somewhat worse	159	8.8
5) Much worse	214	11.8
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

866) Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel: Angry (CLINANGY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	617	34.1
5) No	297	16.4
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

867) If R says Clinton has made R angry: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINANGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1190	65.9
1) Very often	138	7.6
2) Fairly often	143	7.9
3) Occasionally	263	14.6
4) Rarely	73	4.0
Total	1807	100.0

868) Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel: Hopeful (CLINHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	469	26.0
5) No	444	24.6
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

869) If R says Clinton has made R hopeful: How often would you say you've felt hopeful - very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINHOPF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1338	74.0
1) Very often	90	5.0
2) Fairly often	135	7.5
3) Occasionally	203	11.2
4) Rarely	41	2.3
Total	1807	100.0

870) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Afraid (CLINFEAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	232	12.8
5) No	682	37.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

871) If R says Clinton has made R afraid: How often would you say you've felt afraid - very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINFERO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1575	87.2
1) Very often	40	2.2
2) Fairly often	55	3.0
3) Occasionally	96	5.3
4) Rarely	41	2.3
Total	1807	100.0

872) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Proud (CLINPRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	367	20.3
5) No	544	30.1
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

873) If R says Clinton has made R afraid: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINPRDF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1440	79.7
1) Very often	80	4.4
2) Fairly often	101	5.6
3) Occasionally	150	8.3
4) Rarely	35	1.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

874) (What about [TRAIT] [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) moral (CLINTMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	34	1.9
2) Quite well	111	6.1
3) Not too well	293	16.2
4) Not well at all	456	25.2
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

875) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Really cares about people like you (CLINCARS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	128	7.1
2) Quite well	316	17.5
3) Not too well	280	15.5
4) Not well at all	165	9.1
8) Don't know	26	1.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

876) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Knowledgeable (CLINKNLG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	330	18.3
2) Quite well	462	25.6
3) Not too well	90	5.0
4) Not well at all	18	1.0
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

877) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Provides strong leadership (CLINLEAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	207	11.5
2) Quite well	374	20.7
3) Not too well	213	11.8
4) Not well at all	106	5.9
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

878) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Dishonest (CLINLIAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	284	15.7
2) Quite well	304	16.8
3) Not too well	223	12.3
4) Not well at all	76	4.2
8) Don't know	26	1.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

879) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Intelligent (CLINSMRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	376	20.8
2) Quite well	412	22.8
3) Not too well	88	4.9
4) Not well at all	30	1.7
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

880) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Out of touch with ordinary people (CLINNOCL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	107	5.9
2) Quite well	245	13.6
3) Not too well	351	19.4
4) Not well at all	183	10.1
8) Don't know	29	1.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

881) Some people have opinions about almost everything; other people have opinions about just some things; and still other people have very few opinions. What about you? Would you say you have opinions about almost everything, about many things, about some things, or about very few things? (OPINTED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Almost everything	348	19.3
2) Many things	633	35.0
3) Some things	693	38.4
4) Very few things	124	6.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

882) Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? (OPINAVG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Fewer opinions	244	13.5
3) About the same number of opinions	969	53.6
5) More opinions	558	30.9
8) Don't know	27	1.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

883) If R says he/she has more opinions than the average person: Would you say that you have a lot more opinions or just somewhat more opinions? (OPINPAVG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1249	69.1
1) A lot more opinions	255	14.1
5) Somewhat more opinions	303	16.8
Total	1807	100.0

884) If R says he/she has fewer opinions than the average person: Would you say that you have a lot fewer opinions or just somewhat fewer opinions? (OPINNAVG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1563	86.5
1) A lot fewer opinions	58	3.2
5) Somewhat fewer opinions	186	10.3
Total	1807	100.0

885) Summary: Degree R opinionated (OPINSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) A lot fewer	58	3.2
2) Somewhat fewer	186	10.3
3) About the same	969	53.6
4) Somewhat more	303	16.8
5) A lot more	255	14.1
8) Don't know	27	1.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

886) Some people like to have responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, and other people don't like to have responsibility for situations like that. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? (THNKRESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Like	1068	59.1
3) Dislike	243	13.4
5) Neither like or dislike	485	26.8
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

887) If R says R likes situations requiring a lot of thinking: Do you like it a lot or just somewhat? (THNKPRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	739	40.9
1) A lot	707	39.1
5) Somewhat	360	19.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

888) If R says R dislikes situations requiring a lot of thinking: Do you dislike it a lot or just somewhat? (THNKNRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1564	86.6
1) Dislike it a lot	74	4.1
5) Dislike it somewhat	169	9.4
Total	1807	100.0

889) Summary: R like/dislike for intensive thought (THNKSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Like it a lot	707	39.1
2) Like it somewhat	360	19.9
3) Neither like it nor dislike it	485	26.8
4) Dislike it somewhat	169	9.4
5) Dislike it a lot	74	4.1
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

890) Some people prefer to solve simple problems instead of complex ones, whereas other people prefer to solve more complex problems. Which type of problem do you prefer to solve: simple or complex? (PROBSOLV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Simple	889	49.2
5) Complex	872	48.3
8) Don't know	34	1.9
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

891) Do you consider religion to be an important part of your life, or not? (RELGIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Important	1373	76.0
5) Not important	426	23.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

892) If R says that religion is important: Would you say your religion provides some guidance in your day-to-day living, quite a bit of guidance, or a great deal of guidance in your day-to-day life? (RELGGUID)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	434	24.0
1) Some	292	16.2
3) Quite a bit	395	21.9
5) A great deal	685	37.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

893) People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? (PRAYOFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Several times a day	567	31.4
2) Once a day	402	22.2
3) A few times a week	312	17.3
4) Once a week or less	284	15.7
5) Never	192	10.6
7) Other	27	1.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

894) Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? (BIBLREAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Several times a day	64	3.5
2) Once a day	187	10.3
3) A few times a week	245	13.6
4) Once a week or less	556	30.8
5) Never	690	38.2
7) Other	48	2.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

895) I am going to read you a short list of statements. Please tell me which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of the statement you choose. (BIBLLIT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) The Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally	600	33.2
2) The Bible is the word of God but not everything in it should taken literally	869	48.1
3) The Bible is a book written by men and is not the word of god	247	13.7
7) Other (specify)	44	2.4
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	21	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

896) Lots of things come up that keep people from attending religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms or funerals? (CHRCHATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Yes	1249	69.1
5) No	545	30.2
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

897) If R does not attend religious services: Regardless of whether you now attend any religious services do you ever think of yourself as part of a particular church or denomination? (CHRCHMBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1262	69.8
1) Yes	294	16.3
5) No	251	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

898) If R attends religious services: Do you go to religious services every week, almost every week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or never? (ATTNDFRQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	558	30.9
1) Every week	479	26.5
2) Almost every week	205	11.3
3) Once or twice a month	270	14.9
4) A few times a year	282	15.6
5) Never	8	0.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

899) If R says attends religious services 'every week': Would you say you go to religious services once a week or more often than once a week? (CHRCHWK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1328	73.5
1) Once a week	270	14.9
2) More often than once a week	209	11.6
Total	1807	100.0

900) If R attends church/If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination: Checkpoint: Church attendance (CKPTCHCH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	5	0.3
1) Yes	1240	68.6
5) No	554	30.7
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

901) If R attends religious services: Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? (RELAFATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	567	31.4
1) Protestant	543	30.0
2) Catholic	359	19.9
3) Jewish	28	1.5
7) Other	303	16.8
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

902) If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination: Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? (RELAFFIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1504	83.2
1) Protestant	123	6.8
2) Catholic	100	5.5
3) Jewish	15	0.8
7) Other	62	3.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

903) If R attends church and attends as Protestant or 'other'/If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination and considers self Protestant or 'other': What church or denomination is that? 90 Other, 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused (OTHDENOM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.18	19.42

904) If R attends church and attends as Protestant or 'other'/If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination and considers self Protestant or 'other': If R denomination is Baptist: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an Independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? (BAPTIST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1500	83.0
1) Baptist Convention	160	8.9
2) American Baptist Churches in USA	19	1.1
3) American Baptist Association	18	1.0
4) Independent Baptist	49	2.7
7) Other (specify)	44	2.4
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

905) If R Denomination is Baptist: If R's church is Independent Baptist: Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? (INDBAPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1758	97.3
1) Larger Baptist group [specify]	3	0.2
2) Local	46	2.5
Total	1807	100.0

906) If R denomination is Lutheran: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? (LUTHERAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1706	94.4
1) Evangelical Lutheran Church	52	2.9
2) Missouri Synod	27	1.5
7) Other [specify]	15	0.8
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

907) If R denomination is Methodist: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? (METHODST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1696	93.9
1) United Methodist Church	96	5.3
2) African Methodist Episcopal	8	0.4
7) Other [specify]	5	0.3
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

908) If R denomination is Presbyterian: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? (PRESBYT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.8
1) Presbyterian Church USA (formerly United Presbyterian Church)	63	3.5
7) Other [specify]	10	0.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

909) If R denomination is reformed: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? (REFORMED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
1) Christian Reformed Church	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

910) If R denomination is Brethren: Is this the Church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what? (BRETHREN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1806	99.9
2) The Plymouth Brethren	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

911) If R says denomination is 'Christian': When you say Christian does that mean the denomination called the Christian Church Disciples of Christ, or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say I am just a Christian? (CHRISTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1744	96.5
1) Disciples of Christ	12	0.7
2) I am just a Christian	37	2.0
7) Other [specify]	12	0.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

912) If R Denomination is Church of Christ: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? (COFCHRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1790	99.1
1) Church of Christ	16	0.9
2) United Church of Christ	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

913) If R denomination is Church of God: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? (COFGOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1795	99.3
1) Anderson, Indiana	4	0.2
2) Cleveland, Tennessee	3	0.2
3) Church of God in Christ	1	0.1
7) Other [specify]	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

914) If R denomination 'other': Is that group Christian? (OTHCHRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1722	95.3
1) Yes	77	4.3
5) No	7	0.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

915) If R attends Religious services and is Jewish: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what? (JEWSHGRP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1779	98.5
1) Orthodox	6	0.3
2) Conservative	11	0.6
3) Reform	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

916) If R does not attend religious services but thinks of self as part of church or denomination and considers self Jewish: Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? (JEWSHDEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1792	99.2
2) Conservative	2	0.1
3) Reform	9	0.5
7) Other [specify]	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

917) If R attends religious services/If R does not attend religious services but thinks of self as part of church or denomination: Are you officially a member of a parish, congregation, temple or other place of worship? (MBRWPLAC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	264	14.6
1) Yes	1030	57.0
5) No	509	28.2
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

918) If R attends religious services/If R does not attend religious services but thinks of self as part of a church or denomination: If R identifies a Christian religion: Would you call yourself a born-again Christian, that is, have you personally had a conversion experience related to Jesus Christ? (BRNAGAIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	336	18.6
1) Yes	594	32.9
5) No	865	47.9
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

919) Religion summary: [See note 4] Codes 010-990 and: 995 NA 998 Don't know 999 Refused 000 INAP, no religious identification or preference (and R does not attend religious services) (RELGSUMM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	238.21	188.15

920) Month of birth (BRTHMNTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.16	12.67

921) Year of birth (BRTHYEAR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2,058.75	946.46

922) Summary - respondent age (AGE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	46.97	17.24

923) Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife)-- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never married? (MARITAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Married	935	51.7
2) Widowed	168	9.3
3) Divorced	238	13.2
4) Separated	55	3.0
5) Never married	348	19.3
6) Partnered, not married [Vol]	49	2.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

924) What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? 17 17+ Years; 98 Don't Know; 99 Refused; NA (EDUCTION)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.04	6.54

925) If highest grade of education is 0-12 Years or Don't know: Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? (DIPLOMA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1107	61.3
1) Yes	519	28.7
5) No	180	10.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

926) If highest grade of education is 13+ years: What is the highest degree that you have earned? (DEGREE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	705	39.0
1) Bachelor's degree	373	20.6
2) Master's degree	139	7.7
3) PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD	27	1.5
4) LLB, JD	7	0.4
5) MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO	8	0.4
6) JDC, STD, THD	2	0.1
7) Associate degree (AA)	168	9.3
96) No degree earned	377	20.9
99) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

927) Summary: R education (EDUCSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
1) 8 Grades or less and no diploma or equivalency	64	3.5
2) 9-11 Grades, no further schooling (Incl. 12 years without Diploma or equivalency)	116	6.4
3) High school diploma or equivalency test	519	28.7
4) More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree	377	20.9
5) Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees)	168	9.3
6) BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree	373	20.6
7) Advanced degree, including LLB	183	10.1
9) NA	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

928) If married or partnered: What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? 17 17+ Years; 98 Don't know; 99 Refused, NA INAP (SPEDUC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	53.00	42.54

929) If highest grade of spouse/partner is 0-12 Years or Don't know: Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? (SPDIPLOM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1421	78.6
1) Yes	297	16.4
5) No	82	4.5
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

930) If highest grade of spouse/partner education is 13+ years: What is the highest degree that (he/she) has earned? 96 No degree earned, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused (SPDEGREE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1209	66.9
1) Bachelor's degree	218	12.1
2) Master's degree	88	4.9
3) PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD	17	0.9
4) LLB, JD	1	0.1
5) MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO	10	0.6
6) JDC, STD, THD	1	0.1
7) Associate degree (AA)	85	4.7
96) No degree earned	174	9.6
98) Don't know	2	0.1
99) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

931) Summary: Spouse/partner education (SPEDUCSM)

	TOTAL	%
1) 8 Grades or less and no diploma or equivalency	29	1.6
2) 9-11 Grades, no further schooling (Incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency)	56	3.1
3) High school diploma or equivalency test	297	16.4
4) More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree	174	9.6
5) Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees)	85	4.7
6) BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree	218	12.1
7) Advanced degree, including LLB	117	6.5
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) NA	825	45.7
Total	1807	100.0

932) We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? (EMPSTAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) Assigned working now series - working now	1035	57.3
2) Assigned working now series - temporarily laid off	17	0.9
3) Assigned unemployed series	59	3.3
4) Assigned retired series	336	18.6
5) Assigned permanently disabled series	74	4.1
6) Assigned homemaker series	183	10.1
7) Assigned student series	96	5.3
Total	1807	100.0

933) We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Employment status 2 digit summary (EMPSTAT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
10) Working now only	1035	57.3
15) Working now and retired (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week	18	1.0
16) Working now and permanently disabled, currently working 20 or more hours per week	2	0.1
17) Working now and homemaker (R volunteers), currently working	55	3.0
18) Working now and student (R volunteers), currently working 20	51	2.8
20) Temporarily laid off	17	0.9
40) Unemployed	59	3.3
50) Retired, no other occupation	300	16.6
51) Retired and working now (R volunteers), currently working Fewer than 20 hours per week	18	1.0
60) Permanently disabled, not working	72	4.0
70) Homemaker, no other occupation	114	6.3
71) Homemaker and working now (R volunteers), currently working	14	0.8
75) Homemaker and student (R volunteers), no other occupation	2	0.1
80) Student, no other occupation	25	1.4
81) Student and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewerthan 20 hours per week	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

934) We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Employment status 1 digit summary (SMPSTAT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) R Working now (working now or working 20 hours or more per week)	1161	64.3
2) R temporarily laid off	17	0.9
4) R unemployed	59	3.3
5) R retired, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	318	17.6
6) R permanently disabled, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	72	4.0
7) R homemaker, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	130	7.2
8) R Student, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

935) (If unemployed is highest Y6CATEGORY) [See note 5 in summary ] Have you ever done any work for pay? (UNEMPWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.7
1) Yes	58	3.2
5) No	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

936) [R unemployed: 2 Digit occupation code] [See note 5 in summary] if unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? 95 NA; 98 Don't know; 99 Refused; 00 INAP (UNEMPWK2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.94	6.32

937) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? Unemployed: Collapsed census occupation code 95 NA; 98 Don't know; 99 Refused (UNEMPWK4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1749	96.8
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	9	0.5
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	7	0.4
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	10	0.6
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	7	0.4
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	2	0.1
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	9	0.5
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	3	0.2
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	2	0.1
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	5	0.3
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	2	0.1
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

938) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of business or industry was that? [See note 5 in summary] R occupation - CENSUS INDUSTRY See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995 NA 998 Don't know 999 Refused 000 INAP (UNEMPPND)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	19.19	115.83

939) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (UNEMPSMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1749	96.8
1) Someone else	48	2.7
3) Both self and someone else	4	0.2
5) Self-employed	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

940) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: If was not self-employed only: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? (UNEMPGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1755	97.1
1) Yes	5	0.3
5) No	47	2.6
Total	1807	100.0

941) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: Have you had a job in the last six months? (UNEMP6MO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1749	96.8
1) Yes	28	1.5
5) No	30	1.7
Total	1807	100.0

942) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: If has had a job in the last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (UNEMPH6M)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	981.20	118.02

943) If unemployed is highest category: Are you looking for work at the present time? (UNEMPSCH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.7
1) Yes	36	2.0
5) No	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

944) If unemployed is highest category: If looking for work at present: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (UNEMPWRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1771	98.0
1) A lot	8	0.4
3) Somewhat	11	0.6
5) Not much at all	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

945) If retired: When did you retire (month)? 96 INAP, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 NA (RETIRMN)

	TOTAL	%
1) January	53	2.9
2) February	15	0.8
3) March	22	1.2
4) April	47	2.6
5) May	16	0.9
6) June	42	2.3
7) July	27	1.5
8) August	25	1.4
9) September	19	1.1
10) October	17	0.9
11) November	6	0.3
12) December	30	1.7
96) INAP	1471	81.4
98) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

946) If retired: When did you retire (year)? 9996 INAP, 9998 Don't know, 9999 Refused, 0000 NA (RETIRYR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	369.52	773.40

947) R retired: 2 Digit occupation code [See note 5 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (RETIRD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.07	14.30

948) R retired: Collapsed census occupation code (OCCPSUM1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1471	81.4
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	59	3.3
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	58	3.2
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	9	0.5
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	27	1.5
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	54	3.0
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	3	0.2
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	8	0.4
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	34	1.9
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	4	0.2
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	31	1.7
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	24	1.3
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	14	0.8
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	5	0.3
14) Member of armed forces (Census category 903-905)	2	0.1
95) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

949) If retired: What kind of business or industry was that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (RETINDCD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	109.08	259.07

950) If retired: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (RETSELFM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1471	81.4
1) Someone else	281	15.6
3) Both self and someone else	9	0.5
5) Self-employed	45	2.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

951) If retired: If was not self-employed only: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (RETGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1517	84.0
1) Yes	87	4.8
5) No	202	11.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

952) If retired: Have you had a job in the last six months? (RETWK6MO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1471	81.4
1) Yes	46	2.5
5) No	290	16.0
Total	1807	100.0

953) If retired: If has had a job in last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP,998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (RETHW6MO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	971.52	151.56

954) IF RETIRED: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? (RETWRKM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1471	81.4
1) Yes	36	2.0
5) No	300	16.6
Total	1807	100.0

955) If retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: Are you looking for work at the present time? (RETJSRCH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1507	83.4
1) Yes	8	0.4
5) No	292	16.2
Total	1807	100.0

956) If retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R is looking for work: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (RETJBWRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1799	99.6
5) Not much at all	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

957) If disabled and not also retired: Have you ever done any work for pay? (DISBWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1733	95.9
1) Yes	68	3.8
5) No	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

958) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (DISAB2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.38	8.09

959) If disabled: And not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R disabled: Collapsed census occupation code [See note 6 in summary] (DISAB1)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0	1739	96.2
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	7	0.4
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	5	0.3
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	5	0.3
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	7	0.4
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	1	0.1
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	1	0.1
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	21	1.2
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	1	0.1
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	6	0.3
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	3	0.2
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	5	0.3
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	5	0.3
95) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

960) If disabled: And not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of business or industry was that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (DISINDCD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	20.84	120.31

961) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (DISSELFM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1739	96.2
1) Someone else	57	3.2
3) Both self and someone else	3	0.2
5) Self-employed	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

962) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: If was not self-employed only: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? (DISGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1747	96.7
1) Yes	11	0.6
5) No	47	2.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

963) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: Have you had a job in the last six months? (DISWRK6M)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1739	96.2
1) Yes	6	0.3
5) No	62	3.4
Total	1807	100.0

964) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: If has had a job in the last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (DISHW6M)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	992.78	55.90

965) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: If has had a job in the last 6 months: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? (DISWRKM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1801	99.7
1) Yes	2	0.1
5) No	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

966) If disabled and not also retired: If R has never worked for pay/If R has ever worked for pay but not in last 6 months./If R has worked in last 6 months but is not working now: Are you looking for work at the present time? (DISJBSR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1735	96.0
1) Yes	6	0.3
5) No	66	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

967) If disabled and not also retired: If R has never worked for pay/If R has ever worked for pay but not in last 6 months./If R has worked in last 6 months but is not working now: If looking for work at present: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (DISJBWRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1801	99.7
1) A lot	4	0.2
3) Somewhat	1	0.1
5) Not much at all	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

968) If homemaker/student and not also retired: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? (HMSTDEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1528	84.6
1) Yes	138	7.6
5) No	141	7.8
Total	1807	100.0

969) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: In the last six months, did you do any work for pay? (HMSTDW6)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1666	92.2
1) Yes	35	1.9
5) No	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

970) If homemaker/student not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 mos.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R homemaker/student: 2 Digit occupation code [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (HMSTD2A)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.61	5.20

971) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R homemaker/student: Collapsed census occupation code (HMSTD1A)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1772	98.1
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	2	0.1
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	5	0.3
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	1	0.1
4) Sales occupation (census categories 236-285)	5	0.3
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	7	0.4
6) Private household (census categories 403-407)	1	0.1
7) Protective service (census categories 408-427)	2	0.1
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	7	0.4
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	2	0.1
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	2	0.1
95) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

972) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: What kind of business or industry was that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (HMSTDIND)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	13.75	101.34

973) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (HMSTSEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1772	98.1
1) Someone else	33	1.8
5) Self-employed	1	0.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

974) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: If R was not self-employed only: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? (HMSTGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
1) Yes	7	0.4
5) No	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

975) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP,998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (HMSTDW6M)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	977.88	130.88

976) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: Are you looking for work at the present time? (HMSTJBSR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1666	92.2
1) Yes	19	1.1
5) No	122	6.8
Total	1807	100.0

977) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R is looking for work: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (HMSTJWRR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1788	98.9
1) A lot	8	0.4
3) Somewhat	7	0.4
5) Not much at all	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

978) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R working now/TLO: 2 Digit occupation code [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (HMSTD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	16.62	20.16

979) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R working now/TLO: Collapsed census occupation code (HMSTD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	579	32.0
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	172	9.5
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	295	16.3
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	57	3.2
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	146	8.1
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	169	9.4
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	4	0.2
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	21	1.2
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	117	6.5
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	15	0.8
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	114	6.3
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	38	2.1
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	40	2.2
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	29	1.6
14) Member of armed forces (Census category 903-905)	5	0.3
95) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

980) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: What kind of (business/industry) is that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (WKINDCD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	420.03	362.52

981) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/Student but also working: Do you work for someone else, are you self-employed or what? (WKSEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	579	32.0
1) Someone else	1041	57.6
3) Both self and someone else	28	1.5
5) Self-employed	158	8.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

982) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: If not self-employed only: Are you employed by a federal, state or local government? (WKGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	738	40.8
1) Yes	211	11.7
5) No	853	47.2
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

983) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: About how many hours do you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (WKHOURS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	351.41	446.86

984) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: If number of hours worked is not DON'T KNOW/REF: Is that more hours than you want to work, fewer hours than you want to work, or generally about right? (WKHRSRG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	586	32.4
1) More	363	20.1
3) Fewer	86	4.8
5) About right	772	42.7
Total	1807	100.0

985) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: How worried are you about losing your job in the near future: a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (WKWORRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	579	32.0
1) A lot	78	4.3
3) Somewhat	153	8.5
5) Not much at all	995	55.1
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

986) If working now if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: Were you out of work or laid off at any time during the last six months? (WKUE6M)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	597	33.0
1) Yes	108	6.0
5) No	1102	61.0
Total	1807	100.0

987) If working now if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: During the last six months, have you had a reduction in your work hours or had to take a cut in pay at any time for reasons other than illness or personal choice? (WKPAYRED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	597	33.0
1) Yes	97	5.4
5) No	1113	61.6
Total	1807	100.0

988) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? Stacked - 2digit occupation code [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (STACKED2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	23.54	21.18

989) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? Stacked - collapsed census occupation code (STACKED1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	155	8.6
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	239	13.2
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	357	19.8
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	65	3.6
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	185	10.2
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	231	12.8
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	8	0.4
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	31	1.7
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	178	9.9
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	22	1.2
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	148	8.2
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	69	3.8
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	60	3.3
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	41	2.3
14) Member of armed forces (Census category 903-905)	7	0.4
95) NA	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

990) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: What do/did they make or do where you work/ed? What kind of a business or industry is/was that? Stacked - occupation industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (STACKIND)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	555.53	310.95

991) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: Do/did you work for someone else, are/were you self- employed, or what? Stacked - work for self (STACKSMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	155	8.6
1) Someone else	1403	77.6
3) Both self and someone else	44	2.4
5) Self-employed	203	11.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

992) If R worked not exclusively for self and: If R is working now or TLO/ :If R Is retired: /If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: Are/were you employed by a federal, state or local government? Stacked - employed by government (STACKGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	360	19.9
1) Yes	312	17.3
5) No	1127	62.4
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

993) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired but has worked in past 6months: /If R is unemployed but has worked in past 6months: /If R is disabled but has worked in past 6months: About how many hours do/did you work on your job in the average week? Stacked - hours working/worked per week 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000NA (STACKHRS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	329.38	437.80

994) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired and not currently working: /If R is unemployed:/If R is disabled and not currently working: How worried are you about losing your job/ not being able to find a job in the near future: A lot, somewhat, or not much at all? Stacked - worried about losing/finding job (STCKJLOS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	529	29.3
1) A lot	90	5.0
3) Somewhat	165	9.1
5) Not much at all	1021	56.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

995) If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay/If R is retired/If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: Have you had a job in the past 6 months? Stacked - job in past 6months (STCKJ6MO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1345	74.4
1) Yes	80	4.4
5) No	382	21.1
Total	1807	100.0

996) If R is retired and not currently working:/If R is unemployed:/If R is disabled and not working now: Are you looking for work at the present time? Stacked - looking for work (STCKJSRC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1376	76.1
1) Yes	50	2.8
5) No	381	21.1
Total	1807	100.0

997) If R is unemployed:/If R is disabled: Have you ever done any work for pay? Stacked - ever work for pay (STACKWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1674	92.6
1) Yes	126	7.0
5) No	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

998) Do you or anyone else in this household belong to a labor union? (UNION)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	250	13.8
5) No	1545	85.5
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

999) If someone in household belongs to labor union: Who is it that belongs? Mention 1 (WHOUNIN1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1557	86.2
1) Respondent	150	8.3
2) R's wife or female partner	30	1.7
3) R's husband or male partner	49	2.7
4) Someone else	19	1.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1000) If someone in household belongs to labor union: Who is it that belongs? Mention 2 (WHOUNIN2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1789	99.0
2) R's wife or female partner	6	0.3
3) R's husband or male partner	8	0.4
4) Someone else	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1001) If someone in household belongs to labor union: Who is it that belongs? Mention 3 (WHOUNIN3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1806	99.9
4) Someone else	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1002) Interviewer checkpoint: is R the only household member age 14 or older? (CKPTAG14)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	6	0.3
1) Yes, R is only HH member 14+	491	27.2
5) No, there are other HH members 14+	1310	72.5
Total	1807	100.0

1003) If no, R is not only member age 14+: HH income (HHINC14)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	39.82	43.25

1004) If yes, R is only household member age 14+: Summary: Household income (HHINCOME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	17.63	30.33

1005) If no, R is not only household member age 14+: Self (R's) income (INCOME)

	TOTAL	%
1) A. None or less than $4,999	140	7.7
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	101	5.6
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	116	6.4
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	175	9.7
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	210	11.6
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	169	9.4
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	94	5.2
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	43	2.4
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	37	2.0
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	21	1.2
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	15	0.8
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	5	0.3
13) P. $115,000-$124,999	10	0.6
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	1	0.1
15) R. $135,000-$144,999	4	0.2
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	5	0.3
17) T. $155,000-$164,999	4	0.2
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	1	0.1
21) X. $195,000-$199,999	2	0.1
22) Y. $200,000 and over	7	0.4
96) INAP	497	27.5
98) Don't know	37	2.0
99) Refused	113	6.3
Total	1807	100.0

1006) If yes, R is only household member age 14+: Self (R's) income (INCOME14)

	TOTAL	%
1) A. None or less than $4,999	38	2.1
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	55	3.0
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	54	3.0
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	74	4.1
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	65	3.6
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	71	3.9
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	36	2.0
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	13	0.7
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	4	0.2
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	5	0.3
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	7	0.4
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	1	0.1
13) P. $115,000-$124,999	1	0.1
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	4	0.2
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	1	0.1
17) T. $155,000-$164,999	2	0.1
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	1	0.1
22) Y. $200,000and over	3	0.2
96) INAP	1316	72.8
98) Don't know	13	0.7
99) Refused	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

1007) Summary: All households self (R's) income (TOTINCME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) A. None or less than $4,999	178	9.9
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	156	8.6
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	170	9.4
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	249	13.8
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	275	15.2
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	240	13.3
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	130	7.2
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	56	3.1
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	41	2.3
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	26	1.4
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	22	1.2
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	6	0.3
13) P. $115,000-$124,999	11	0.6
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	5	0.3
15) R. $135,000-$144,999	4	0.2
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	6	0.3
17) T. $155,000-$164,999	6	0.3
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	2	0.1
21) X. $195,000-$199,999	2	0.1
22) Y. $200,000and over	10	0.6
98) Don't know	50	2.8
99) Refused	156	8.6
Total	1807	100.0

1008) There's been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? (CLASS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	1230	68.1
5) No	557	30.8
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1009) If R considers self member of middle or working class: Which one? (CLASS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	577	31.9
1) Middle class	710	39.3
5) Working class	497	27.5
7) Other (specify)	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

1010) If R doesn't consider self middle or working class: Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call yourself middle class or working class? (CHCLASS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1213	67.1
1) Middle class	218	12.1
5) Working class	286	15.8
7) Other (specify)	57	3.2
8) Don't know	22	1.2
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1011) If R considers self middle class: Would you say that you are about average middle class or that you are in the upper part of the middle class? (MDLCLASS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	879	48.6
1) Average middle	660	36.5
5) Upper middle	256	14.2
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1012) If R considers self middle class: Would you say you feel pretty close to middle class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? (MDLCLSS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	879	48.6
1) Close	585	32.4
5) Not close	322	17.8
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1013) If R considers self working class: Would you say that you are about average working class or that you are in the upper part of the working class? (WKCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1024	56.7
1) Average working	624	34.5
5) Upper working	145	8.0
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1014) If R considers self working class: Would you say you feel pretty close to working class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? (WKCLSS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1024	56.7
1) Close	508	28.1
5) Not close	250	13.8
8) Don't know	24	1.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1015) Summary: R social class (SOCCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Average working class	624	34.5
2) Working class -- NA if average or upper	14	0.8
3) Upper working class	145	8.0
4) Average middle class	660	36.5
5) Middle class - NA if average or upper	12	0.7
6) Upper middle class	256	14.2
7) Other	57	3.2
8) Don't know	22	1.2
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1016) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 1 - racial/ethnic group (RACE1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
10) Black	208	11.5
20) Asian	32	1.8
30) Native American	20	1.1
40) Hispanic or Latino	93	5.1
50) White	1393	77.1
60) Other specify - Misc.	9	0.5
75) Other specify - East Indian	4	0.2
76) Other specify - Pacific Islander	4	0.2
79) Other specify - more than 3 major groups	3	0.2
80) Other specify - 'American'	14	0.8
90) Other specify - 'None'; 'Doesn't matter etc.	8	0.4
98) Don't know	3	0.2
99) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1017) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 2- racial/ethnic group (RACE2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1757	97.2
10) Black	6	0.3
20) Asian	2	0.1
30) Native American	11	0.6
40) Hispanic or Latino	4	0.2
50) White	24	1.3
60) Other specify - Misc.	2	0.1
80) Other specify - 'American'	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1018) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 3- racial/ethnic group (RACE3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1799	99.6
20) Asian	2	0.1
30) Native American	1	0.1
40) Hispanic or Latino	2	0.1
60) Other specify - Misc.	1	0.1
76) Other specify - Pacific Islander	1	0.1
80) Other specify - 'American'	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1019) Were both of your parents born in this country? (PARNTCTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	1528	84.6
5) No	269	14.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1020) In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? Mention 1 - ethnic or nationality group [See note 7 in summary] 90 None/96 'American'/97 Other group/ 98 Don't know/ 99 Refused/00 NA (ETHNIC1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	50.17	31.18

1021) In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? Mention 2 - ethnic or nationality group [See note 7 in summary] 90 None/96 'American'/97 Other group/98 Don't know/99 Refused/00 NA (ETHNIC2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.83	16.37

1022) Interviewer checkpoint: Number of nationality or ethnic groups (CKPTETH2)

	TOTAL	%
0) No nationality/group mentioned	124	6.9
1) One nationality or ethnic group mentioned	1230	68.1
2) Two or more nationality/groups mentioned	397	22.0
9) Respondent Refused or Don't know/NA answer to nationality or	56	3.1
Total	1807	100.0

1023) Number of nationality or ethnic groups mentioned by R 96 Ethnicity question NA/98 R responded DON'T KNOW to ethnicity question/99 R refused ethnicity question (NUMETHNC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.23	16.76

1024) If more than 1 nationality/ethnic group identified: With which of these groups do you most closely identify? Choice - ethnic or nationality group [See note 7 in summary ] 90 None; neither/95 Both/all of them/96 'American'/97 Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere/98 Don't know/99 Refused/00 NA (ETHCHOIC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	44.04	33.24

1025) Interviewer checkpoint: Is Spanish or Hispanic group mentioned as main group? (HISPANIC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	132	7.3
5) No	1659	91.8
8) Don't Know	7	0.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1026) If R mentioned Spanish or Hispanic group if R says he/she has Spanish or Hispanic descent: Would you describe your Hispanic origin as Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Latin American, Central American, or Spanish? (HISPCAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1675	92.7
1) Mexican	52	2.9
2) Puerto Rican	16	0.9
3) Cuban	6	0.3
4) Latin American	12	0.7
5) Central American	11	0.6
6) Spanish	27	1.5
7) Other (specify)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

1027) Where was it that you grew up? (If United States: Which state or states?) 998 Don't know/999 Refused/000 NA (LOCRAISD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	149.44	87.77

1028) FTF interview: Looking at this list, please tell me where you were mostly brought up? (GRURBANF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Refused; NA	804	44.5
1) On a farm	123	6.8
2) In the country, not on a farm	114	6.3
3) In a small city or town (under 50,000 people)	282	15.6
4) In a medium-sized city (50,000-100,000)	134	7.4
5) In a large city (100,000-500,000)	147	8.1
6) In a suburb of a large city	98	5.4
7) In a very large city (over 500,000)	71	3.9
8) In a suburb of a very large city	33	1.8
9) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1029) Telephone: I am going to read you a list of categories. Please tell me which category best describes where you were mostly brought up? (LRAISED1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1009	55.8
1) On a farm	119	6.6
3) In the country, not on a farm	136	7.5
5) In a city	299	16.5
7) Or, in a suburb of a city	240	13.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1030) If R brought up in a city: Telephone: Were you mostly brought up in... (LRAISED2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1508	83.5
1) In a small city or town under 50,000 people	104	5.8
3) In a medium-sized city 50,000-100,000	62	3.4
5) In a large city, 100,000-500,000	73	4.0
7) Or, in a very large city, over 500,000	57	3.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1031) If R brought up in a suburb of a city: Telephone: Were you mostly brought up in. (LRAISED3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1567	86.7
1) In a suburb of a large city (100,000 to 500,000 people)	172	9.5
5) Or in a suburb of a very large city (over 500,000 people)	62	3.4
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

1032) Summary: Size of place where R grew up (LRAISSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	9	0.5
1) On a farm	242	13.4
2) In the country, not on a farm	250	13.8
3) In a small city or town (under 50,000 people)	386	21.4
4) In a medium-sized city (50,000- 100,000)	196	10.8
5) In a large city (100,000- 500,000)	220	12.2
6) In a suburb of a large city	270	14.9
7) In a very large city (over 500,000)	128	7.1
8) In a suburb of a very large city	105	5.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1033) How long have you lived in your present (city/town/township/county)?--Months 96 All my life/97 NA/98 Don't know/99 Refused (LIVEMNTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	11.18	29.87