American National Election Studies, 2000 - Codebook

All frequencies are raw numbers (no weights used).

1) Version number (VERSION)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.00

2) NES dataset number (DSETNO)
3) ICPSR archive number 3131 (ICPSRNO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3,131.00	0.00

4) NES 2000 Case ID (CASEID)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	905.67	522.90

5) Post ID: There are gaps in the numbering. 0001-1557 Post interviews 2001-2254 Post non-interviews (POSTID)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	966.53	626.96

6) 2000 Sample weight: This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. A post stratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: less than high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more (SWEIGHT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.49

7) Sample weight for post variables. This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places (0 = No post election interview) (PWEIGHT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.86	0.59

8) Pre only or pre-and-post (PREPOST)

	TOTAL	%
0) Pre-election and post-election interviews	1555	86.1
1) Pre-election interview only	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

9) Pre: Mode of pre interview (MODE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Personal (FTF)	1006	55.7
5) Telephone	801	44.3
Total	1807	100.0

10) Pre: Form - E section administered questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in pre section e or post section H (FORM_E)

	TOTAL	%
0) Section E not administered in pre	880	48.7
1) Section E administered in pre	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

11) Pre: Form - half sample. The series of questions concerning 'most important problem' was administered to a randomly selected half sample in the pre. (FORM_F)

	TOTAL	%
0) R not selected	902	49.9
1) R selected	905	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

12) Pre: Form - Clinton retrospective or Clinton affects/traits. RS were randomly selected to be administered either the Clinton retrospective or the Clinton traits and affects questions in the pre. The questions for which R was not selected for pre administration were administered in the post (FORM_Q)

	TOTAL	%
1) Asked in pre [Clinton retrospective]	891	49.3
2) Asked in pre [Clinton affects and traits]	916	50.7
Total	1807	100.0

13) Pre: Form - lib/con format. Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard 7-point scale format for liberal/conservative placements, or to an experimental branching format. Self placement (LOBCONF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format (FTF/phone)	868	48.0
2) Experimental format (FTF and phone)	939	52.0
Total	1807	100.0

14) Pre: Form - economy retrospective format (ECONF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	908	50.2
2) Experimental format	899	49.8
Total	1807	100.0

15) Pre: Form - employment retrospective format (EMPRETF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	901	49.9
2) Experimental format	906	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

16) Pre: Form - economy prospective format (ECONPF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	911	50.4
2) Experimental format	896	49.6
Total	1807	100.0

17) Pre: Form - imports format (IMPORTF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	910	50.4
2) Experimental format	897	49.6
Total	1807	100.0

18) Pre: Form - isolationism format (ISOLATF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	891	49.3
2) Experimental format	916	50.7
Total	1807	100.0

19) Pre: Form - medical insurance format. FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for gov't/private health insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format. Phone (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 (MEDINSF)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard/phone version	891	49.3
2) FTF experimental/phone version	916	50.7
Total	1807	100.0

20) Pre: Form - affirmative action format (AFFACTF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	880	48.7
2) Experimental format	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

21) Pre: Form - environment vs. jobs format (ENVJOBF)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard	875	48.4
2) FTF experimental	932	51.6
Total	1807	100.0

22) Pre: Form - school voucher format (SCHVCHF)

	TOTAL	%
1) Standard format	882	48.8
2) Experimental format	925	51.2
Total	1807	100.0

23) Pre: Form - women equal role format (WOMROLEF)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard	902	49.9
2) FTF experimental	905	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

24) Pre: Month of interview (MONTHINT)

	TOTAL	%
9) September	831	46.0
10) October	714	39.5
11) November	262	14.5
Total	1807	100.0

25) Pre: Day of interview (DAYINT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.67	8.99

26) Pre: Month and day (MMDD) of interview (MMDDINT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	983.18	67.70

27) Pre: Number of days before election (Election Day was November 7, 2000) (NDPELECT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	32.63	19.42

28) Pre: Interview length. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; INAP, Partial IW (IWLENGTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	72.47	66.15

29) Pre: Interview number (IWNUMBER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	12.19	9.06

30) Pre: Date of beginning VQ file (VQBEGIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) VQ dated 8/15	6	0.3
1) VQ dated 8/30	45	2.5
2) VQ dated 9/5	41	2.3
3) VQ dated 9/6	183	10.1
4) VQ dated 9/8	430	23.8
5) VQ dated 9/25	103	5.7
6) VQ dated 9/28	26	1.4
7) VQ dated 9/29	191	10.6
8) VQ dated 10/5	338	18.7
9) VQ dated 10/19	444	24.6
Total	1807	100.0

31) Pre: Date of ending VQ file (VQEND)

	TOTAL	%
0) VQ dated 8/15	5	0.3
1) VQ dated 8/30	31	1.7
2) VQ dated 9/5	34	1.9
3) VQ dated 9/6	171	9.5
4) VQ dated 9/8	426	23.6
5) VQ dated 9/25	101	5.6
6) VQ dated 9/28	24	1.3
7) VQ dated 9/29	196	10.8
8) VQ dated 10/5	342	18.9
9) VQ dated 10/19	471	26.1
99) INAP	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

32) Pre: Flag- change in VQ (VQFLAG)

	TOTAL	%
0) No change	1694	93.7
1) Change in VQ	107	5.9
9) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

33) Pre: Advance letter sent? (ADVLETTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) No advance letter sent	335	18.5
1) Advance letter sent	1467	81.2
9) NA	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

34) Pre: Payment amount (PAYAMNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) R requested no payment	8	0.4
20) Twenty dollars	1396	77.3
40) Forty dollars	389	21.5
99) NA	14	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

35) Pre: Payment mode (PAYMODE)

	TOTAL	%
0) R requested no payment	8	0.4
1) Check	1615	89.4
2) Cash	169	9.4
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

36) Pre: Payment date (MMDD) [9999. NA; R requested no payment] (PAYDATE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1,118.62	988.58

37) Pre: Tape recorded? (RECORDED)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	161	8.9
5) No	1646	91.1
Total	1807	100.0

38) Pre: Verification (VERIFY)

	TOTAL	%
0) Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification	1509	83.5
1) Flagged for verification	15	0.8
2) Verified OK	246	13.6
3) Verified with some discrepancies	22	1.2
4) Not verified - attempts to verify halted	3	0.2
5) Unable to verify	10	0.6
6) Verification limit met	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

39) Pre: Evaluation (EVALUATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not evaluated	1694	93.7
1) Flagged	1	0.1
2) Evaluated	102	5.6
4) Cannot evaluate	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

40) Pre: Refusal conversion indicator (CONVINDC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not a refusal conversion situation	1534	84.9
1) Refusal conversion situation indicated	273	15.1
Total	1807	100.0

41) Pre: Persuasion letter - flag (PERSLTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) No persuasion letter sent	1716	95.0
1) Persuasion letter sent	90	5.0
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

42) Pre: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) [9999. No persuasion letter requested] (DPLREQST)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9,546.13	1,967.15

43) Pre: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD) [9999. NA; INAP, No persuasion letter requested (9999 In pre-admin] (DPSENT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9,551.32	1,955.94

44) Pre: Type of persuasion letter (PLTYPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1717	95.0
1) Too busy	33	1.8
2) Too personal	4	0.2
3) Not interested	23	1.3
4) Too old	4	0.2
6) Gatekeeper	3	0.2
7) Not at home	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

45) Pre: Number of telephone calls (TELCALLS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.60	5.50

46) Pre: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls (FTFCALLS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.32	3.02

47) Pre: Final result (FINRESLT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Interview, complete	1801	99.7
5) Interview, partial	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

48) Sample release (all 1). All cases coded 1 there was a single release of the entire sample. (SMPLREL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.00

49) Pre: Language of interview (all English) all interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1) (LANGUAGE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.00	0.00

50) Pre - coversheet: Flag - missing coversheet (FLAGMCS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Coversheet not missing	1783	98.7
1) Missing coversheet	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

51) Pre - coversheet: Color of coversheet (CVSCOLOR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Blue	984	54.5
2) Yellow	794	43.9
4) Green - FTF type II updating	5	0.3
9) Missing coversheet	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

52) If telephone RDD: Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business, a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence. (Which is it?) (PHONTYPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned FTF mode	1006	55.7
1) Business	2	0.1
2) Home	735	40.7
3) Both	4	0.2
5) Cell phone	44	2.4
9) NA; phone mode and coversheet missing	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

53) If telephone RDD: If business phone number: Does anyone live there on the premises? (PHBUSRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1805	99.9
1) Yes	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

54) If telephone RDD: If business phone number: If someone lives on the premises: Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside (their/your) residence that is for personal use? (PHBUSRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1805	99.9
2) Use this	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

55) If face-to-face mode: Household listing obtained from: (HHLIST)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned phone mode	801	44.3
1) HU member	980	54.2
2) Neighbor	3	0.2
3) Apt. manager	1	0.1
4) Landlord	1	0.1
7) Other (specify)	4	0.2
9) NA; FTF and coversheet missing	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

56) Household listing: Selection table (HHTABLE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Selection table A	274	15.2
2) Table B1	152	8.4
3) Table B2	135	7.5
4) Table C	304	16.8
5) Table D	299	16.5
6) Table E1	161	8.9
7) Table E2	149	8.2
8) Table F	309	17.1
9) Missing coversheet	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

57) Household listing: Number of eligible adults (9 NA) (NELIGADL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.81	0.73

58) Household listing: Number ineligible adults (9 NA) (NINELADL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.08	0.67

59) Household listing: Household composition (HHCOMPOS)

	TOTAL	%
10) 1 Adult male HHR	216	12.0
11) 1 Adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative	25	1.4
12) 1 Adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives	7	0.4
20) 1 Adult female HHR	347	19.2
21) 1 Adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative	15	0.8
22) 1 Adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives	3	0.2
30) 1 Married couple: No children/or children at home under 18	879	48.6
40) 1 Married couple plus 1 other relative	135	7.5
50) 1 Married couple plus 2 or more other relatives	44	2.4
51) 1 Married couple plus 1 other non-relative	6	0.3
55) 1 Married couple plus relatives and non-relatives	2	0.1
60) 1 Male HHR plus 1 other relative	32	1.8
65) 1 Male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives	1	0.1
70) 1 Male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives	7	0.4
80) 1 Female HHR plus 1 other relative	50	2.8
85) 1 Female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives	1	0.1
90) 1 Female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives	19	1.1
95) Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR	6	0.3
99) NA	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

60) Household listing: R person number (9 NA) (RESPNMBR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.46	0.74

61) Contact description: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent lives (STRUCTYP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned phone mode	801	44.3
1) Mobile home	38	2.1
2) Detached single family	658	36.4
3) Multi-family	47	2.6
4) Apartment house	166	9.2
5) Condo complex	35	1.9
7) Other (specify)	32	1.8
9) NA; missing coversheet	30	1.7
Total	1807	100.0

62) If face-to-face mode: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? (FTFGTKEE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, assigned phone mode	801	44.3
1) Yes	36	2.0
2) No, but building is locked/subdivision is gated and locked	33	1.8
5) No	876	48.5
9) NA; missing coversheet	61	3.4
Total	1807	100.0

63) If face-to-face mode: If gatekeeper/guard/manager/locked access: Check the box below which best describes the situation [1 Building manager or other gatekeeper must let you in the building (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU; 2 Building manager/other gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household; 7 Other (specify); 9 NA; 0 INAP] (FTFTGKEE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.22	1.21

64) Contact description: Was there resistance from any contact person? (CNTCTRS1)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	458	25.3
5) No	1322	73.2
9) NA	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

65) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (CNTCTRS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	10	0.6
5) Not marked	342	18.9
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

66) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - content too personal (CNTCTRS3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	20	1.1
5) Not marked	332	18.4
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

67) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - confidentiality (CNTCTRS4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	40	2.2
5) Not marked	312	17.3
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

68) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - not interested in politics (CNTCTRS5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	81	4.5
5) Not marked	271	15.0
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

69) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - too busy (CNTCTRS6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	125	6.9
5) Not marked	227	12.6
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

70) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - poor health (CNTCTRS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	15	0.8
5) Not marked	337	18.6
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

71) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - other (specify) (CNTCTRS8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Marked	163	9.0
5) Not marked	189	10.5
9) NA	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

72) Contact description: Did R refuse initially? (RREFUSED)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	222	12.3
5) No	1530	84.7
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

73) Contact description: Did respondent break any appointments (RBRKAPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	1522	84.2
1) One	200	11.1
2) Two or more	67	3.7
9) NA	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

74) Contact description: If contact persons resisted, was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? (RCNTCRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1349	74.7
1) Yes	281	15.6
5) No	97	5.4
9) NA	80	4.4
Total	1807	100.0

75) Summary: Resistance (RRESIST1)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes, some resistance identified	330	18.3
5) No resistance identified	1450	80.2
9) NA	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

76) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (RRESIST2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	1	0.1
5) Not marked	176	9.7
Total	1807	100.0

77) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - content too personal (RRESIST3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	7	0.4
5) Not marked	170	9.4
Total	1807	100.0

78) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - confidentiality (RRESIST4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	9	0.5
5) Not marked	168	9.3
Total	1807	100.0

79) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - not interested in politics (RRESIST5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	12	0.7
5) Not marked	165	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

80) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - too busy (RRESIST6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	21	1.2
5) Not marked	156	8.6
Total	1807	100.0

81) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - poor health (RRESIST7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	3	0.2
5) Not marked	174	9.6
Total	1807	100.0

82) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - other (specify) (RRESIST8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1630	90.2
1) Marked	15	0.8
5) Not marked	162	9.0
Total	1807	100.0

83) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: What is the estimated income of R's household? (ESTINCOM)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	801	44.3
1) Under $10,000	98	5.4
2) $10,000-25,000	202	11.2
3) $25,000-50,000	264	14.6
4) $50,000-105,000	249	13.8
5) $105,000 and above	72	4.0
8) DK	49	2.7
9) NA	72	4.0
Total	1807	100.0

84) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: What is the race of R's household? (ESTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	801	44.3
1) White	764	42.3
2) Black	131	7.2
3) American Indian	4	0.2
4) Asian	17	0.9
7) Other	36	2.0
8) DK	2	0.1
9) NA	52	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

85) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified race of household: Is this definite or probable? (CERTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	855	47.3
1) Definite	915	50.6
5) Probable	31	1.7
9) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

86) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is R or R's household of Hispanic origin? (HISPHH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	801	44.3
1) Yes	84	4.6
5) No	863	47.8
8) DK	7	0.4
9) NA	52	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

87) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified Hispanic status of R/R's household: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is this definite or probable? (CERTHISP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	860	47.6
1) Definite	911	50.4
5) Probable	33	1.8
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

88) Pre: Interviewer of record ID (4-digit ID) (INTVREC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,115.75	2,426.03

89) Pre: Supervisor ID (4-digit ID) (SPVSR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,943.49	1,525.30

90) Pre: Interviewer gender (INTVGEND)

	TOTAL	%
1) Male	226	12.5
2) Female	1581	87.5
Total	1807	100.0

91) Pre: Interviewer education (INTVEDUC)

	TOTAL	%
3) High school graduate	333	18.4
4) Some college	574	31.8
5) College degree	572	31.7
6) Master's degree	294	16.3
9) NA	34	1.9
Total	1807	100.0

92) Pre: Interviewer race (INTVRACE)

	TOTAL	%
1) White	1684	93.2
2) Black	100	5.5
7) Other	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

93) Pre: Interviewer ethnicity (INTVETHN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No ethnic identity coded	1561	86.4
1) Hispanic	61	3.4
7) Other	185	10.2
Total	1807	100.0

94) Pre: Interviewer languages--this variable is not available in 2000. (INTVLANG)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.00	0.00

95) Pre: Years interviewer experience (99 NA) (INTEXPNC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.59	4.11

96) Pre: Interviewer age (INTAGE)

	TOTAL	%
1) 18-34 Years	113	6.3
2) 35-40 Years	179	9.9
3) 41-45 Years	273	15.1
4) 46-50 Years	314	17.4
5) 51-55 Years	255	14.1
6) 56-60 Years	287	15.9
7) 51-64 Years	133	7.4
8) 65-79 Years	253	14.0
Total	1807	100.0

97) ICPSR state code (STATECOD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	39.77	20.75

98) FIPS state code - interview location [NOTE: 3 Cases were misidentified in the preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96] (FIPS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	28.91	17.00

99) 2000 State abbreviation and congressional district number - interview location (STATE)
100) 2000 FIPS state code and congressional district number -interview location FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. [9996 Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C.] (VAR00082)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2,897.74	1,705.90

101) Congressional district number - interview location [96 Misidentified location 99. NA 00. Washington D.C.] (CDISTNO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.81	9.79

102) ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview location ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. [9996 Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C.] (STATECD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3,974.11	2,085.10

103) Did R vote in state and CD of interview? (VOTEOUTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) R voted in state and CD of interview	1131	62.6
1) R did not vote in state and CD of interview	22	1.2
8) NA	28	1.5
9) INAP	626	34.6
Total	1807	100.0

104) State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview [9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview 0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-sample.] (WHVOTED)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	192.67	1,287.81

105) Primary area name (PSU Interview location) (INTLOCAT)
106) Primary area code - Interview location - 110. Boston, MA 230. Milwaukee, WI 120. New York, NY 239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH 121 Philadelphia, PA-NJ 240. Des Moines, IA 122 Nassau-Suffolk, NY 250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA 130. Chicago, IL 255 Columbus, GA-AL 131 Detroit, MI 257 Jacksonville, FL 132 Cleveland, OH 258 Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL 141 St Louis, MO-IL 260. Knoxville, TN 150. Washington, DC-MD-VA 262 Birmingham, AL 152 Baltimore, MD 273 Waco, TX 154 Miami-Hialeh, FL 274 McAllen, TX 170. Houston, TX 280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT 171 Dallas-FT Worth, TX 292 Fresno, CA 181 Denver, CO 293 Eugene-Springfld, OR 190. Los Angeles, CA 434 Saginaw, MI 191 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 464 Gardner, MA 194 Anaheim, CA 466 Decatur CO., IN 196 San Francisco, CA 470. Mower CO., MN 211 New Haven, CT 474 DeSoto Parish, LA 213 Manchester-Nashua NH 477 Chicot CO., AR 220. Buffalo, NY 480. Montgomery CO., VA 226 Atlantic City, NJ 482 EL Dorado CO., CA 000. Telephone Sample (RDD) (AREACODE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	156.17	167.88

107) Number of household unit [Codes 1-5 and: 9 NA, 0. Phone IW] (NUMHHUNI)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.64	0.97

108) Census region - interview location: 1 Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT; 2 North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI; 3 South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV; 4 WEST (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY (CENSUSRE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Northeast	316	17.5
2) North Central	450	24.9
3) South	657	36.4
4) West	384	21.3
Total	1807	100.0

109) Belt code - interview location: [1 Central Cities of the six largest (population over 4,500,000) consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas; 2 Central Cities of CMSAS and MSAS with fewer than 2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21); 3 Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAS; 4 Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAS; 5 Adjacent areas: Includes all territory beyond the outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50; 6 Outlying area: includes all territory more than 50 miles from the central business district of a central city 0. Telephone sample (RDD)] (BELTCODE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Telephone sample	801	44.3
1) Central City	99	5.5
2) City less than 2 Million	185	10.2
3) Large Suburbs	168	9.3
4) Suburbs	241	13.3
5) Adjacent	264	14.6
6) Outlying	49	2.7
Total	1807	100.0

110) Population in 1000S - interview location. (POPULATI)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4,593.99	4,889.09

111) Census size of place - interview location (SIZE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	19.29	19.48

112) Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked) (TRACT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.00	0.00

113) 2000 Sampling error code (SECODE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	299.49	176.18

114) 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location [See note 9 in summary] (NECMASMS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6,279.06	3,983.05

115) 2000 CMSA - interview location [07 Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH 10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY 14 Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI** 28 Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 31 Dallas-FT Worth TX (since Dallas and Ft Worth were made separate PMSAS in 1990, this new CMSA was added 34 Denver-Boulder CO) (since Denver and Boulder were made separate PMSAS in 1990, this new CMSA was added in) 35 Detroit-Ann Arbor MI** 42 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX 49 Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA** 56 Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 63 Milwaukee-Racine WI 70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT** 77 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD** 78 Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 84 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA** 91 Seattle-Tacoma WA 96 Telephone Sample (RDD 00. INAP, location not in CMSA.) This includes old code 32 (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are combined in a single MSA in 1990] (CMSA)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	51.96	44.28

116) Pre section timing - Section A (SECTATIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9.78	57.27

117) Pre section timing - Section B (SECTBTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.63	57.47

118) Pre section timing - section C (SECTCTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.55	57.37

119) Pre section timing - section D (SECTDTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.77	57.42

120) Pre section timing - section E (SECTETIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.80	57.52

121) Pre section timing - section F (SECTFTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.12	57.48

122) Pre section timing - section G (SECTGTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.50	57.43

123) Pre section timing - section H (SECTHTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.56	57.42

124) Pre section timing - section K (SECTKTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.88	57.36

125) Pre section timing - section L (SECTLTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.78	57.38

126) Pre section timing - section M (SECTMTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.45	57.29

127) Pre section timing - section N (SECTNTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.38	57.44

128) Pre section timing - section P (SECTPTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.68	57.33

129) Pre section timing - section Q (SECTQTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.99	57.41

130) Pre section timing - section R (SECTRTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.71	57.47

131) Pre section timing - section S (SECTSTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.71	57.47

132) Pre section timing - section X (SECTXTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.61	57.48

133) Pre section timing - section Y (SECTYTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	10.48	57.23

134) Pre section timing - section Z (SECTZTIM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.48	77.71

135) Post: mode of interview (PAINTMOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post IW	252	13.9
1) Personal	693	38.4
5) Telephone	857	47.4
7) Administered wrong mode: FTF re-assigned to telephone but administered as personal interview	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

136) Post - mode switch (PAFLAGS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Assigned FTF, not switched to phone mode	805	44.5
2) Assigned phone	802	44.4
3) Assigned FTF, switched to phone mode	200	11.1
Total	1807	100.0

137) Post: Form - section H administered in post (PAFORMDS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Section H not administered in post	790	43.7
1) Section H administered in post	765	42.3
9) No post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

138) Post: Form - K2 format (PAFDSCFM)

	TOTAL	%
0) Administered without probes	1025	56.7
1) Administered with probes	530	29.3
9) No post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

139) Post: Month of interview (PAIWMNTH)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post IW	252	13.9
11) November	1147	63.5
12) December	408	22.6
Total	1807	100.0

140) Post: Day of interview - coded 1-31 and 0 No post interview (PAIWDAY)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.00	9.20

141) Post: Month and day (MMDD) (PAMNTHDA)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	983.18	397.62

142) Post: Number of days after election (96 INAP, No post IW; 99 NA) (DAYSPELE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	28.14	29.02

143) Post: Interview taken before or after Gore concession: December 13, 2000 (IWGORECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) Before	1462	80.9
1) Day of concession (Dec. 13)	16	0.9
2) After	77	4.3
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

144) Post: Interview length (999.99 NA; partial IW 000.00 No post IW) (PAIWLNGT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	57.97	61.17

145) Post: Interview number (99. NA; 00. INAP; no post interview) (PAIWNO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	9.80	8.62

146) Post: Date of beginning VQ file (PAVQBEGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post IW	252	13.9
1) 11/7	140	7.7
2) 11/10	351	19.4
3) 11/16 (1)	13	0.7
4) 11/16 (2)	201	11.1
5) 11/18	282	15.6
6) 11/27	568	31.4
Total	1807	100.0

147) Post: Date of ending VQ file (PAVQEND)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, partial IW; no post IW	256	14.2
1) 11/7	105	5.8
2) 11/10	352	19.5
3) 11/16	13	0.7
4) 11/16	158	8.7
5) 11/18	318	17.6
6) 11/27	605	33.5
Total	1807	100.0

148) Post: Flag - change in VQ (PAFLGVQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) No change	1429	79.1
1) Change in VQ	122	6.8
9) INAP, partial IW; no post IW	256	14.2
Total	1807	100.0

149) POST: RELEASE (PARELEAS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Release 1 - November 7	1147	63.5
2) Release 2 - November 15	319	17.7
3) Release 3 - November 21	340	18.8
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

150) Post: Payment to R - amount (PAPAYAMN)

	TOTAL	%
0) R requested no payment	4	0.2
20) Twenty dollars	1525	84.4
96) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
99) NA	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

151) Interviewer incentive - beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each completed interview. (PAINTVIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) Post interview date not in incentive period	1236	68.4
1) Post interview date in incentive period.	319	17.7
9) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

152) Post: Payment to R - mode (PAPAYMOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) R Requested no payment	4	0.2
1) Check	1511	83.6
2) Cash	14	0.8
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	278	15.4
Total	1807	100.0

153) Post: Payment to R - date (MMDD - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA.) (PAPAYDAY)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1,068.85	1,168.47

154) Post: Tape recorded? (PARECORD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
1) Yes	78	4.3
5) No	1477	81.7
Total	1807	100.0

155) Post: Verification (PAVERIFY)

	TOTAL	%
0) Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification	1332	73.7
1) Flagged for verification	55	3.0
2) Verified OK	142	7.9
3) Verified with some discrepancies	18	1.0
5) Unable to verify	4	0.2
6) Verification limit met	2	0.1
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	254	14.1
Total	1807	100.0

156) Post: Evaluation (PAEVALU)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not evaluated	1477	81.7
1) Flagged	1	0.1
2) Evaluated	77	4.3
9) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

157) Post: Refusal conversion indicator (PACONIND)

	TOTAL	%
0) Not a refusal conversion situation	1529	84.6
1) Refusal conversion situation indicated	26	1.4
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

158) Post: Persuasion letter - flag (PAPERSLT)

	TOTAL	%
0) No persuasion letter sent	1517	84.0
1) Persuasion letter sent	95	5.3
9) NA; INAP, no post IW	195	10.8
Total	1807	100.0

159) Post: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or no letter requested;'9999' indicates NA.) (PADATERE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	339.88	1,751.70

160) Post: Date persuasion letter sent - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or no letter requested;'9999' indicates NA. (PADATSN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	339.97	1,751.75

161) Post: Type of persuasion letter (PALTRTYP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, no post IW	1712	94.7
1) Too busy	9	0.5
3) Not interested	28	1.5
5) Evasive	51	2.8
9) NA	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

162) Post: Number of telephone calls (99 NA; INAP, no post IW) (PATELCAL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	17.58	33.02

163) Post: Number of face-to-face calls (99 NA; INAP, no post IW) (PAFTFCAL)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.42	34.07

164) Post: Final result code (PAFINRES)

	TOTAL	%
1) IW complete	1551	85.8
5) IW partial	4	0.2
51) Refusal by R	99	5.5
52) Refusal by person other than R	5	0.3
54) Initial refusal, not reached for conversion	20	1.1
61) No contact	23	1.3
63) Noninterview, permanent reason	5	0.3
66) Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete	1	0.1
67) Noninterview, other reason	79	4.4
68) Could not locate R	20	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

165) Post: Result date (post non-interviews '0000' is used for cases with post IW; '9999' indicates NA.) (PARESDAT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	174.31	479.77

166) Post: Flag - pre/post mode switch (PAFLGMS)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, no post IW	252	13.9
1) Pre FTF and post FTF	698	38.6
2) Pre phone and post phone	693	38.4
3) Pre FTF and post phone	164	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

167) Post: Language of interview (All interviews were conducted entirely in English) (PAINTLAN)

	TOTAL	%
1) English	1807	100.0
Total	1807	100.0

168) Flag- missing CS (POFLAGMC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Coversheet not missing	1780	98.5
1) Coversheet missing	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

169) Color of coversheet (POCCSHEE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Blue	936	51.8
2) Yellow	831	46.0
3) Pink	13	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

170) Does (name still live here? - R still live at sample address) (RESATADD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Yes	1512	83.7
5) No	41	2.3
9) NA	227	12.6
Total	1807	100.0

171) If phone mode: If R does not still live at sample address: New phone number available (NEWPHONE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1793	99.2
1) Available	8	0.4
2) Not available	2	0.1
9) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

172) If face-to-face mode: If R does not still live at sample address: Address is: Status of new address (ADDRSTAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1780	98.5
1) Out of range	1	0.1
3) Within range	17	0.9
5) Can't find	7	0.4
9) NA	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

173) If face-to-face mode: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent lives (PSTRUCTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	926	51.2
1) Mobile home	26	1.4
2) Detached single family	501	27.7
3) Multi-family	31	1.7
4) Apartment house	106	5.9
5) Condo complex	35	1.9
7) Other (specify)	24	1.3
9) NA	158	8.7
Total	1807	100.0

174) If face-to-face mode: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? (PFTFGTKE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	898	49.7
1) Yes	58	3.2
2) No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked	21	1.2
5) No	637	35.3
9) NA	193	10.7
Total	1807	100.0

175) If face-to-face mode: If gatekeeper/guard/manager/locked access: Check the box below which best describes the situation [1 Building manager or other gatekeeper must let you in the building (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2 Building manager/other gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7 Other (specify 9 NA 0. INAP,] (PFTFTGKE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.30	1.52

176) Contact description was there resistance from any contact person? (PCNTCTR1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Yes	222	12.3
5) No	1454	80.5
9) NA	104	5.8
Total	1807	100.0

177) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (PCNTCTR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	10	0.6
5) Not marked	202	11.2
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

178) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - content too personal (PCNTCTR3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	2	0.1
5) Not marked	210	11.6
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

179) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - confidentiality (PCNTCTR4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	1	0.1
5) Not marked	211	11.7
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

180) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - not interested in politics (PCNTCTR5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	20	1.1
5) Not marked	192	10.6
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

181) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - too busy (PCNTCTR6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	91	5.0
5) Not marked	122	6.8
9) NA	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

182) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - poor health (PCNTCTR7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	16	0.9
5) Not marked	196	10.8
9) NA	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

183) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - other (specify) (PCNTCTR8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Marked	111	6.1
5) Not marked	107	5.9
9) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

184) Post - coversheet did R refuse initially? (PRREFUSD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	27	1.5
1) Yes	98	5.4
5) No	1573	87.1
9) NA	109	6.0
Total	1807	100.0

185) Post - coversheet did respondent break any appointments (PRBRKAPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	1444	79.9
1) One	273	15.1
2) Two or more	90	5.0
Total	1807	100.0

186) Post - coversheet if contact persons resisted, was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? (PRCNTCR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1585	87.7
1) Yes	152	8.4
5) No	15	0.8
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

187) Summary: Did R resist (PRRESIS1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	131	7.2
1) Yes, some resistance identified	152	8.4
5) No resistance identified	1454	80.5
9) NA	70	3.9
Total	1807	100.0

188) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (PRRESIS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

189) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description item resistance from R - too personal (PRRESIS3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

190) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description item resistance from R - confidentiality (PRRESIS4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

191) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description resistance from R - not interested in politics (PRRESIS5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

192) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - too busy (PRRESIS6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

193) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - poor health (PRRESIS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

194) If R was not the contact person contact description item: Resistance from R - other (PRRESIS8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1792	99.2
9) NA	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

195) Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this housing unit? (PEVCNTCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	12	0.7
1) Yes	1760	97.4
5) No	35	1.9
Total	1807	100.0

196) Did you ever have any contact with the respondent? (PEVCNTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	12	0.7
1) Yes	1722	95.3
5) No	70	3.9
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

197) What was the reason for no contact? [1 Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be obtained; 2 All occupants away during entire study period (i.e., long vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc.; 3 Nobody answered door but think someone in household unit [FTF: When visits made]; 4 Could not obtain access to HU; 7 Other (specify; 9 NA; 0. INAP) (NCREASON)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.10	0.80

198) If FTF mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation what is the estimated income of R's household? (PESTINC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, phone mode	801	44.3
1) Under $10,000	98	5.4
2) $10,000-25,000	201	11.1
3) $25,000-50,000	263	14.6
4) $50,000-105,000	247	13.7
5) $105,000 and above	72	4.0
8) DK	49	2.7
9) NA	76	4.2
Total	1807	100.0

199) If FTF mode: CSMS Interviewer evaluation what is the race of R's household? (PESTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, phone mode	801	44.3
1) White	759	42.0
2) Black	133	7.4
3) American Indian	4	0.2
4) Asian	17	0.9
7) Other	36	2.0
8) DK	2	0.1
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

200) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified race of household: CSMS interviewer evaluation is this definite or probable? (PCRTRACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	858	47.5
1) Definite	912	50.5
5) Probable	31	1.7
9) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

201) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: is R or R's household of Hispanic origin? (PHISPHH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP, phone mode	801	44.3
1) Yes	85	4.7
5) No	860	47.6
8) DK	6	0.3
9) NA	55	3.0
Total	1807	100.0

202) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified Hispanic status of R/R's household: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is this definite or probable? (PCERTHHH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	862	47.7
1) Definite	908	50.2
5) Probable	33	1.8
9) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

203) Post: Interviewer of record ID 9999 NA (PINTVREC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,209.41	2,218.62

204) Post: Supervisor ID 9999. NA (PSPVSR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5,944.96	1,527.92

205) Post: Interviewer gender (PINTGEND)

	TOTAL	%
1) Male	200	11.1
2) Female	1606	88.9
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

206) Post: Interviewer education (PINTVEDU)

	TOTAL	%
3) High school graduate	385	21.3
4) Some college	596	33.0
5) College degree	533	29.5
6) Master's degree	254	14.1
9) NA	39	2.2
Total	1807	100.0

207) Post: Interviewer race (PINTVRAC)

	TOTAL	%
1) White	1733	95.9
2) Black	46	2.5
7) Other	28	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

208) Post: Interviewer ethnicity (PINTVETH)

	TOTAL	%
0) No ethnic identity coded	1577	87.3
1) Hispanic	67	3.7
7) Other	163	9.0
Total	1807	100.0

209) Post: Interviewer languages this variable is not available in 2000. (PINTVLAN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.00	0.00

210) Post: Years interviewer experience interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA; INAP, no post IW (PINTEXPN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.47	4.47

211) Post: Interviewer age (PINTAGE)

	TOTAL	%
1) 18-34 Years	114	6.3
2) 35-40 Years	187	10.3
3) 41-45 Years	260	14.4
4) 46-50 Years	297	16.4
5) 51-55 Years	255	14.1
6) 56-60 Years	311	17.2
7) 51-64 Years	142	7.9
8) 65-79 Years	240	13.3
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

212) House race type: [Democratic incumbent running 12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers Republican incumbent running 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers other incumbent running 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands 57 DEM incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed 63 Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands 96 1 in post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases 99 NA; 00 Washington DC) (PCHRTYPE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	21.97	14.98

213) Retiring House representative name (RETRNAME)
214) Retiring House representative code [41 Democratic representative--retiring (district with open race; 42 Republican representative--retiring (district with open race; 96 1 in post-summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases); 99. NA; 00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC] (RETRCODE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.31	13.19

215) Retiring House representative gender (RETRGNDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) No retiring House representative; Washington DC	1626	90.0
1) Male	141	7.8
2) Female	36	2.0
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

216) Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of interview (HEWINNER)

	TOTAL	%
0) Washington, D.C.	4	0.2
31) Democratic candidate in open race	42	2.3
32) Republican candidate in open race	135	7.5
33) Democratic incumbent	753	41.7
34) Republican incumbent	823	45.5
35) Democratic challenger	37	2.0
36) Republican challenger	5	0.3
39) Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate	4	0.2
99) NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-sample. 1)	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

217) Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of interview - [09 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -incumbent; 10 Third party or Independent Senate candidate - nonincumbent; 08 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -- 2nd nonincumbent; 11 Democratic candidate in open Senate race; 12 Republican candidate in open Senate race; 13 Democratic Senate incumbent; 14 Republican Senate incumbent; 15 Democratic Senate challenger; 16 Republican Senate challenger; 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-sample); 00. No race in state; Washington CD] (SENWINN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	11.02	8.02

218) Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's district 1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning margin of the elected candidate. (CDCOMPET)

	TOTAL	%
1) Least competitive	375	20.8
2) 2	300	16.6
3) 3	361	20.0
4) 4	362	20.0
5) Most competitive	401	22.2
9) NA	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

219) Open seat in R's district in 1998? (SEATOP98)

	TOTAL	%
0) No	1697	93.9
1) Yes	102	5.6
9) NA	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

220) House Democratic candidate name (HDCANNAM)
221) House Democratic candidate code (HDCANCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Democratic candidate; Washington DC	140	7.7
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	180	10.0
33) Democratic House incumbent	758	41.9
35) Democratic House challenger	725	40.1
96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

222) House Democratic candidate gender (HDCANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC	140	7.7
1) Male	1367	75.7
2) Female	296	16.4
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

223) House Republican candidate name (HRCANNAM)
224) House Republican candidate code (HRCANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Republican House candidate; Washington DC	121	6.7
32) Republican candidate in open House race	178	9.9
34) Republican House incumbent	860	47.6
36) Republican House challenger	644	35.6
96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

225) House Republican candidate gender (HRCANGND)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Republican House candidate; Washington DC	121	6.7
1) Male	1574	87.1
2) Female	108	6.0
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

226) House Independent/third party candidate name (HICANNA)
227) House Independent/third party candidate code (HICANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC	1767	97.8
30) Third party or Independent House candidate--nonincumbent	32	1.8
39) Third party or Independent House candidate--incumbent	4	0.2
96) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

228) House Independent/third party candidate party (HICANPR)
229) House Independent/third party candidate gender (HICANGND)

	TOTAL	%
0) No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC	1767	97.8
1) Male	36	2.0
8) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

230) Senate race type: [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican CANDS; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands no race in state; 81 Democratic incumbents, no race in state; 82 Republican incumbents, no race in state; 85 Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state; 96 code 1 in post-summary; 99 NA; 00 Washington DC (SENRACT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	39.37	28.23

231) Senate Democratic candidate name (SDCANNAM)
232) Senate Democratic candidate code (SDCANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington	452	25.0
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race	256	14.2
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	511	28.3
15) Democratic Senate challenger	584	32.3
96) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

233) Senate Democratic candidate gender (SDCANGD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington	452	25.0
1) Male	924	51.1
2) Female	427	23.6
8) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

234) Senate Republican candidate name (SRCANNAM)
235) Senate Republican candidate code (SRCANCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington	417	23.1
12) Republican candidate in open Senate race	256	14.2
14) Republican Senate incumbent	619	34.3
16) Republican Senate challenger	511	28.3
96) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

236) Senate Republican candidate gender (SRCANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington	417	23.1
1) Male	1245	68.9
2) Female	141	7.8
8) Error in CD identification	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

237) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate name (SICANNAM)
238) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate code (SICANCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1443	79.9
10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent	360	19.9
96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

239) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate party (SICANPRT)
240) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate gender (SICANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1443	79.9
1) Male	109	6.0
2) Female	251	13.9
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

241) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate name (SI2CANN)
242) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate code (SI2CANCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1612	89.2
8) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent	191	10.6
96) 1 In post-summary	3	0.2
99) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

243) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate party (SI2CANPR)
244) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate gender (SI2CANGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate	1612	89.2
2) Female	191	10.6
8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases)	3	0.2
9) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

245) House Democratic candidate name - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMNAM)
246) House Democratic candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0,8,9 In presample (VOTEOUTC)	1785	98.8
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	3	0.2
33) Democratic House incumbent	9	0.5
35) Democratic House challenger	2	0.1
99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

247) House Democratic candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMGND)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
1) Male	11	0.6
2) Female	3	0.2
9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

248) House Republican candidate name - vote outside CD of IW (OHREPNAM)
249) House Republican candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHREPCO)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0,8,9 In presample 7.(VOTEOUTC)	1785	98.8
32) Republican candidate in open House race	3	0.2
34) Republican House incumbent	2	0.1
36) Republican House challenger	9	0.5
99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

250) House Republican candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHRPGNDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
1) Male	11	0.6
2) Female	3	0.2
9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

251) House Independent/third party candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHINDCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
96) NO Independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD	14	0.8
99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

252) House Independent/third party candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHINDGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1785	98.8
8) No Independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD	14	0.8
9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

253) House race type - vote outside state of IW [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not RUNNING -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 96 Washington DC; 99. Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state. 00. INAP)] (OHRACET)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.62	7.11

254) Senate race type - vote outside state of IW [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- Other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other Challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem Incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not RUNNING -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, Other cands; 81 Democratic incumbents, no race in state; 82 Republican incumbents, no race in state; 85 Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state; 96 Washington DC; 99. R vote in another district but not another state; 00. INAP] (OSRACET)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.90	8.95

255) Senate Democratic candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSDNME)
256) Senate Democratic candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSDEMCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC	1785	98.8
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race	1	0.1
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	3	0.2
15) Democratic Senate challenger	3	0.2
96) No race in state; no Democratic candidate	3	0.2
99) R voted in another district but not another state	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

257) Senate Democratic candidate gender - vote outside state of IW (OSDEMGR)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district	1797	99.4
1) Male	4	0.2
2) Female	3	0.2
9) No race in state; no Democratic candidate	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

258) Senate Republican candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSREPNM)
259) Senate Republican candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSREPCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC	1785	98.8
12) Republican candidate in open Senate race	1	0.1
14) Republican Senate incumbent	3	0.2
16) Republican Senate challenger	3	0.2
96) No race in state; no Republican candidate	3	0.2
99) R voted in another district but not another state	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

260) Senate Republican candidate gender - vote outside state of IW (OSREPGN)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district	1797	99.4
1) Male	7	0.4
9) No race in state; no Democratic candidate	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

261) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSINM1)
262) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSINDCD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC	1785	98.8
10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent	2	0.1
96) No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate	8	0.4
99) R voted in another district but not another state	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

263) Senate independent/third party 1 - candidate gender - vote outside state of IW [9 - No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate. 0 - R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC] (OSINDGD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1797	99.4
1) Male	1	0.1
2) Female	1	0.1
9) No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

264) Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSINM2)
265) Senate Independent/third party 2 - Candidate code - vote outside state of IW - 08 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -- 2nd nonincumbent; 96 No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate; no second Independent/3rd party candidate; 99. R voted in another district but not another state; 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC (OSINDCD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.14	10.48

266) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate gender - vote outside state of IW [9 - No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate; no second Independent/3rd party candidate. 0 - R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC] (OSINDG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0	1797	99.4
2) Female	1	0.1
9) 9	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

267) Post section timing - section A - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSATIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.45	46.96

268) Post section timing - section B - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSBTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.59	46.92

269) Post section timing - section C - 999.99 NA - 000.00 No post IW (PSCTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.81	46.97

270) Post section timing - section D - 999.99 NA - 000.00 No post IW (PSDTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.77	46.92

271) Post section timing - section E - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSETIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.83	46.99

272) Post section timing - section F - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSFTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.47	46.96

273) Post section timing - section G - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSGTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.15	46.96

274) Post section timing - section H - 999.99 NA; 000.00 Administered in pre; no post IW (PSHTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.71	47.00

275) Post section timing - section J - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSJTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.61	46.89

276) Post section timing - section K - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSKTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	10.51	47.39

277) Post section timing - section L - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSLTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.83	46.95

278) Post section timing - section M - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSMTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.44	46.96

279) Post section timing - section N - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSNTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.77	46.95

280) Post section timing - section P - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSPTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.48	46.96

281) Post section timing - section Q - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSQTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.05	46.91

282) Post section timing - section R - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSRTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.45	46.88

283) Post section timing - section S - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSSTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.33	46.93

284) Post section timing - section T - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSTTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.59	46.96

285) Post section timing - section V - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSVTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.03	46.98

286) Post section timing - section Y - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSYTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.49	46.96

287) Post section timing - section Z - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSZTIME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.03	57.45

288) Post: Wrong CD administered (preloaded) (PSWRNGCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No misidentification of CD	1553	85.9
1) Wrong CD identified	3	0.2
9) No post IW	251	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

289) Post: Type of error in preload (TEPRLOAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) No error in preload	1550	85.8
1) Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases)	3	0.2
2) Wrong CD	3	0.2
9) No post IW	251	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

290) Post: Flag - randomization failure in post admin (FPRNFAIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) No post randomization failure	1051	58.2
1) Post randomization failure in at least a portion of the interview	504	27.9
9) No post IW	252	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

291) Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been very much interested, somewhat interested or not much interested in the political campaigns so far this year? (ATTNCAMP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Very much interested	525	29.1
3) Somewhat interested	886	49.0
5) Not much interested	396	21.9
Total	1807	100.0

292) Generally speaking, would you say that you personally care a good deal who wins the presidential election this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins? (CAREPLEC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Care a good deal	1402	77.6
3) Don't care very much	397	22.0
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

293) In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as an Independent candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? (VOTEN96)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes, voted	1264	70.0
5) No, didn't vote	530	29.3
8) Don't know	12	0.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

294) (If voted in 1996) Which one did you vote for? (WHOIN96)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	543	30.0
1) Bill Clinton	665	36.8
3) Bob Dole	408	22.6
5) Ross Perot	138	7.6
7) Other (specify)	27	1.5
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

295) Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (LIKEGORE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	912	50.5
5) No	878	48.6
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

296) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 1 - Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	384.52	841.52

297) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 2- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	228.14	369.25

298) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 3- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	152.34	324.14

299) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 4- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	84.65	252.81

300) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 5- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	47.40	194.99

301) Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (DLIKGORE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	860	47.6
5) No	934	51.7
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

302) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 1 - Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	367.89	989.14

303) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 2- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	183.58	322.34

304) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 3- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	101.30	260.43

305) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 4- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	53.06	200.50

306) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 5- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	24.96	137.23

307) Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (LIKEBUSH)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	822	45.5
5) No	970	53.7
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

308) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 1 - Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	342.14	789.58

309) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 2- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	198.86	342.68

310) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 3- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	116.29	285.42

311) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 4- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	65.37	220.95

312) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 5- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	38.41	174.81

313) Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (DLIKBUSH)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	885	49.0
5) No	899	49.8
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

314) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 1 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	354.86	782.64

315) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 2 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	209.68	365.43

316) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 3 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	125.93	306.14

317) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 4 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	67.53	236.16

318) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 5 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	33.97	165.77

319) How many days in the past week did you watch the national network news on TV? (DAYSNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	483	26.7
1) One day	165	9.1
2) Two days	201	11.1
3) Three days	179	9.9
4) Four days	99	5.5
5) Five days	135	7.5
6) Six days	27	1.5
7) Every day	515	28.5
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

320) How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President - a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTNNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	486	26.9
1) A great deal	235	13.0
2) Quite a bit	364	20.1
3) Some	513	28.4
4) Very little	190	10.5
5) None	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

321) How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows such as Eyewitness News or Action News in the late afternoon or early-evening? (EARLNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	562	31.1
1) One day	110	6.1
2) Two days	176	9.7
3) Three days	140	7.7
4) Four days	115	6.4
5) Five days	163	9.0
6) Six days	22	1.2
7) Every day	519	28.7
Total	1807	100.0

322) How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows in the late evening? (LATENEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	727	40.2
1) One day	130	7.2
2) Two days	182	10.1
3) Three days	157	8.7
4) Four days	106	5.9
5) Five days	127	7.0
6) Six days	39	2.2
7) Every day	338	18.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

323) How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTLNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	327	18.1
1) A great deal	192	10.6
2) Quite a bit	316	17.5
3) Some	558	30.9
4) Very little	347	19.2
5) None	67	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

324) Do you have either cable or satellite television? (CABSATLL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1418	78.5
5) No	389	21.5
Total	1807	100.0

325) How many days in the past week did you read a daily newspaper? (READPAPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	468	25.9
1) One day	216	12.0
2) Two days	181	10.0
3) Three days	130	7.2
4) Four days	74	4.1
5) Five days	92	5.1
6) Six days	36	2.0
7) Every day	610	33.8
Total	1807	100.0

326) Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper? (READCAMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	468	25.9
1) Yes	790	43.7
5) No	548	30.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

327) How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President - a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTNEWSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1017	56.3
1) A great deal	121	6.7
2) Quite a bit	202	11.2
3) Some	352	19.5
4) Very little	107	5.9
5) None	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

328) Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates on television this fall? (TVADS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1377	76.2
5) No	427	23.6
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

329) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President? (CLINAP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1177	65.1
5) Disapprove	565	31.3
8) Don't know	55	3.0
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

330) Strength of R's approval/disapproval for the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President (CLINTST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	65	3.6
1) Strongly	1145	63.4
5) Not strongly	587	32.5
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

331) Summary approval/disapproval for the way Bill Clinton is handling his job (CLINTSD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	745	41.2
2) Approve not strongly	425	23.5
4) Disapprove not strongly	162	9.0
5) Disapprove strongly	400	22.1
8) Don't know	63	3.5
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

332) As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all? (HSECARE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Very much	501	27.7
2) Pretty much	669	37.0
3) Not very much	475	26.3
4) Not at all	155	8.6
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

333) Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? (HSECAN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	526	29.1
5) No	1277	70.7
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

334) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 1st Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34 Republican incumbent; 35 Democratic challenger; 36 Republican challenger; 97 Name not on candidate list.] (HCNAME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	18.52	33.59

335) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of first recalled candidate (HCPARTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1281	70.9
1) Democrat	245	13.6
2) Republican	238	13.2
7) Other party	20	1.1
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

336) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? Actual party - 1st recalled candidate (HCPARTYA)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1281	70.9
1) Democrat	118	6.5
2) Republican	159	8.8
7) Other party	234	12.9
8) Don't know	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

337) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1st recall accuracy; [0 INAP; 1 Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5. Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6. No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7. No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HCPARAC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1281	70.9
1) +NM, +PTY	241	13.3
2) +NM, -PTY	25	1.4
3) +NM, Don't know PT	11	0.6
4) -NM, PTY	222	12.3
5) -NM, Don't know PT	12	0.7
6) No candidate	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

338) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 2nd Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34. Republican incumbent; 35. Democratic challenger; 36. Republican challenger; 97. Name not on candidate list.] (HSECAN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	12.70	31.32

339) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of second recalled candidate (HCPARTY2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1521	84.2
1) Democrat	121	6.7
2) Republican	120	6.6
7) Other party	35	1.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

340) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? Actual party - 2nd recalled candidate (HCPARR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1520	84.1
1) Democrat	45	2.5
2) Republican	34	1.9
7) Other party	141	7.8
8) Don't know	67	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

341) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2nd Recall accuracy; [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5. Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6. No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7. No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9. No answer] (HCPARAC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1520	84.1
1) +NM, +PTY	68	3.8
2) +NM, -PTY	9	0.5
3) +NM, Don't know PT	2	0.1
4) -NM, PTY	132	7.3
5) -NM, Don't know PT	9	0.5
6) No candidate	67	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

342) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 3rd Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34. Republican incumbent; 35. Democratic challenger; 36. Republican challenger; 97. Name not on candidate list.] (HSECAN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.98	19.04

343) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of third recalled candidate (HCPART3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1732	95.8
1) Democrat	28	1.5
2) Republican	14	0.8
7) Other party	31	1.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

344) IF R recalls names of House candidates: who were they? Actual party - 3rd recalled candidate (HCPARTR3)

	TOTAL	%
0) Know name and DK/NA party; NA/RF	1728	95.6
1) Democratic candidate	2	0.1
2) Republican candidate	6	0.3
7) Name given not on candidate list	38	2.1
8) Don't know name but know party	33	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

345) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3rd Recall accuracy; [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4 Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5 Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6 No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7 No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HCPARTC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1728	95.6
1) +NM, +PTY	7	0.4
2) +NM, -PTY	1	0.1
4) -NM, PTY	32	1.8
5) -NM, Don't know PT	6	0.3
6) No candidate	33	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

346) Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? (CONGJAPP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	933	51.6
5) Disapprove	617	34.1
8) Don't know	246	13.6
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

347) R's strength of approval/disapproval of the way Congress has been handling its job (CONGJSAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	257	14.2
1) Strongly	603	33.4
5) Not strongly	947	52.4
Total	1807	100.0

348) Summary of R's approval/disapproval of the way Congress has been handling its job (CONGAPSU)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	285	15.8
2) Approve not strongly	648	35.9
4) Disapprove not strongly	299	16.5
5) Disapprove not strongly	318	17.6
8) Don't know	246	13.6
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

349) Thermometer rating: Bill Clinton [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (CLINTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	62.26	85.01

350) Thermometer rating: Al Gore [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (GORETHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	74.74	128.49

351) Thermometer rating: George W. Bush [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BUSHTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	80.12	150.41

352) Thermometer rating: Pat Buchanan [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BUCHTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	209.63	366.93

353) Thermometer rating: Ralph Nader [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (NADRTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	306.75	419.56

354) Thermometer rating: John McCain [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (MCCNTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	256.56	382.87

355) Thermometer rating: Bill Bradley [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BRDLTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	318.15	422.95

356) Thermometer rating: Joseph Lieberman [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't Know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (LBRMTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	312.36	418.44

357) Thermometer rating: Dick Cheney [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (CHNYTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	282.44	402.61

358) Thermometer rating: Hillary Clinton [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (HLRYTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	66.77	122.74

359) Thermometer rating: Democratic Party [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (DEMSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	89.59	168.75

360) Thermometer rating: Republican Party[997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (REPTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	88.16	178.70

361) Thermometer rating: Reform Party[997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (REFTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	288.65	417.91

362) Thermometer rating: Political parties in general [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (PRTYTHER)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	107.94	221.89

363) Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic Party? (DEMLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1018	56.3
5) No	766	42.4
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

364) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 1 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	505.55	717.16

365) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 2 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	309.47	467.97

366) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 3 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	166.41	367.59

367) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 4 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	85.90	279.13

368) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 5 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	38.16	191.85

369) Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic Party? (DEMDLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	782	43.3
5) No	996	55.1
8) Don't know	25	1.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

370) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 1 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	330.16	693.50

371) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 2 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	195.67	375.67

372) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 3 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	97.34	287.46

373) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 4 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	40.44	185.01

374) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 5 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	23.47	148.28

375) Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican Party? (REPLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	808	44.7
5) No	975	54.0
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

376) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 1 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	393.02	807.65

377) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 2 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	235.14	450.29

378) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 3 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	127.92	320.20

379) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 4 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	67.21	329.08

380) (What is that?) if R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 5 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	27.94	160.30

381) Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican Party? (REPDLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	915	50.6
5) No	867	48.0
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

382) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 1 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	454.47	775.08

383) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 2 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	270.60	452.19

384) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 3 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	135.86	346.20

385) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 4 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	69.83	259.35

386) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 5 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	30.16	171.15

387) Do you think it is better when one party controls both the presidency and Congress, better when control is split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't it matter? (DIVGOVPR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Better when one party controls both	420	23.2
3) Better when control is split	926	51.2
5) It doesn't matter	420	23.2
8) Don't know	38	2.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

388) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (LYRHOW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Better	312	17.3
3) Worse	130	7.2
5) The same	482	26.7
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

389) (Much better or somewhat better?) If R says R is better off financially now than a year ago (LYRBTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1495	82.7
1) Much better	117	6.5
5) Somewhat better	194	10.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

390) (Much worse or somewhat worse?) If R says R is worse off financially now than a year ago (LYRWRSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1677	92.8
1) Much worse	41	2.3
5) Somewhat worse	89	4.9
Total	1807	100.0

391) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (ECONSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	880	48.7
1) Much better	117	6.5
2) Somewhat better	194	10.7
3) Same	482	26.7
4) Somewhat worse	89	4.9
5) Much worse	41	2.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

392) In the past year did you (or anyone in your family) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? (MEDDELAY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Yes	278	15.4
5) No	649	35.9
Total	1807	100.0

393) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (EXPECT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Better	369	20.4
3) Worse	53	2.9
5) The same	479	26.5
8) Don't know	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

394) (Much better or somewhat better?) If R says R expects to be better off financially one year from now (HOWBTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1438	79.6
1) Much better	117	6.5
5) Somewhat better	251	13.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

395) (Much worse or somewhat worse?) If R says R expects to be worse off financially one year FROM NOW (HOWWORSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1754	97.1
1) Much worse	18	1.0
5) Somewhat worse	33	1.8
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

396) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (ECONNYR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	906	50.1
1) Much better	117	6.5
2) Somewhat better	251	13.9
3) Same	479	26.5
4) Somewhat worse	33	1.8
5) Much worse	18	1.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

397) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (GOREANG)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	524	29.0
5) No	1272	70.4
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

398) (If yes, Gore has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREANG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1283	71.0
1) Very often	94	5.2
2) Fairly often	102	5.6
3) Occasionally	221	12.2
4) Rarely	107	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

399) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (GOREHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	853	47.2
5) No	934	51.7
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) REFUSED	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

400) (If yes, Gore has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREHOP2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	954	52.8
1) Very often	141	7.8
2) Fairly often	254	14.1
3) Occasionally	379	21.0
4) Rarely	77	4.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

401) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (GOREAFR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	333	18.4
5) No	1462	80.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

402) (If yes, Gore has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREAFR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1474	81.6
1) Very often	73	4.0
2) Fairly often	74	4.1
3) Occasionally	134	7.4
4) Rarely	52	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

403) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (GOREPRD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	608	33.6
5) No	1174	65.0
8) Don't know	23	1.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

404) (If yes, Gore has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREPRD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1199	66.4
1) Very often	111	6.1
2) Fairly often	198	11.0
3) Occasionally	250	13.8
4) Rarely	48	2.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

405) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (BUSHANG)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	487	27.0
5) No	1303	72.1
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

406) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHANG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1320	73.0
1) Very often	79	4.4
2) Fairly often	97	5.4
3) Occasionally	209	11.6
4) Rarely	101	5.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

407) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (BUSHHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	774	42.8
5) No	1014	56.1
8) Don't know	17	0.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

408) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHHOP2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1033	57.2
1) Very often	124	6.9
2) Fairly often	227	12.6
3) Occasionally	348	19.3
4) Rarely	74	4.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

409) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (BUSHAFR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	418	23.1
5) No	1374	76.0
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

410) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHAFR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1389	76.9
1) Very often	73	4.0
2) Fairly often	93	5.1
3) Occasionally	176	9.7
4) Rarely	75	4.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

411) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (BUSHPRD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	542	30.0
5) No	1239	68.6
8) Don't know	24	1.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

412) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHPRD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1265	70.0
1) Very often	96	5.3
2) Fairly often	148	8.2
3) Occasionally	250	13.8
4) Rarely	46	2.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

413) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (BUCHANG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	197	10.9
5) No	505	27.9
8) Don't know	67	3.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

414) (If yes, Buchanan has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHANG2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1610	89.1
1) Very often	53	2.9
2) Fairly often	40	2.2
3) Occasionally	82	4.5
4) Rarely	22	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

415) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (BUCHHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	114	6.3
5) No	588	32.5
8) Don't know	67	3.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

416) (If yes, Buchanan has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHHPE2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1693	93.7
1) Very often	10	0.6
2) Fairly often	17	0.9
3) Occasionally	61	3.4
4) Rarely	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

417) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (BUCHAFR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	153	8.5
5) No	551	30.5
8) Don't know	65	3.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

418) (If yes, Buchanan has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHAFR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1654	91.5
1) Very often	46	2.5
2) Fairly often	34	1.9
3) Occasionally	51	2.8
4) Rarely	22	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

419) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (BUCHPRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1037	57.4
1) Yes	78	4.3
5) No	623	34.5
8) Don't know	68	3.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

420) (If yes, Buchanan has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHPRD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1729	95.7
1) Very often	8	0.4
2) Fairly often	23	1.3
3) Occasionally	33	1.8
4) Rarely	14	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

421) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 1 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	146.77	244.48

422) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 2 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	106.26	203.20

423) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 3 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	83.47	190.79

424) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 4 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary ] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	54.48	158.02

425) Interviewer checkpoint: Number of important problems mentioned by R [if unsure whether one problem or more than one problem code more than 1] (MNTCHECK)

	TOTAL	%
0) R has not mentioned any problems	31	1.7
1) R has mentioned only one problem	167	9.2
2) R has mentioned 2or more problems	707	39.1
9) Refused	902	49.9
Total	1807	100.0

426) (If R has mentioned 2 or more problems) Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the single most important problem the country faces? (MIPCHOIC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	134.82	223.45

427) (If R has mentioned any problem) How good a job is the government in Washington doing in dealing with this problem - a good job, only fair, or a poor job? (MIPGVTPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	944	52.2
1) A good job	84	4.6
3) Only fair	358	19.8
5) A poor job	411	22.7
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

428) (If R has mentioned any problem) Which political party do you think would be most likely to get the government to do a better job in dealing with this problem - the Republicans, the Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? (MIPPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	944	52.2
1) Republicans	201	11.1
3) Democrats	237	13.1
5) There wouldn't be much difference between them	382	21.1
7) Neither party	26	1.4
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

429) We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [Interview self placement on liberal conservative scale] (POLVIEW)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	107	5.9
1) Extremely liberal	9	0.5
2) Liberal	29	1.6
3) Slightly liberal	48	2.7
4) Moderate; middle of the road	125	6.9
5) Slightly conservative	65	3.6
6) Conservative	68	3.8
7) Extremely conservative	11	0.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused, NA, INAP	1341	74.2
Total	1807	100.0

430) When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? (POLVWPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	77	4.3
1) Extremely liberal	8	0.4
2) Liberal	48	2.7
3) Slightly liberal	37	2.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	90	5.0
5) Slightly conservative	48	2.7
6) Conservative	72	4.0
7) Extremely conservative	15	0.8
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused, NA, INAP	1407	77.9
Total	1807	100.0

431) Liberal/conservative self placement summary [combines both telephone and face to face interview variables] (POLVWTO)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	184	10.2
1) Extremely liberal	17	0.9
2) Liberal	77	4.3
3) Slightly liberal	85	4.7
4) Moderate; middle of the road	215	11.9
5) Slightly conservative	113	6.3
6) Conservative	140	7.7
7) Extremely conservative	26	1.4
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused, NA, INAP	941	52.1
Total	1807	100.0

432) (If R is moderate, don't know or haven't thought on the liberal-conservative self-placement scale) If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? (POLVWHC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1399	77.4
1) Liberal	123	6.8
3) Conservative	174	9.6
5) Moderate	51	2.8
7) R refuses to choose	52	2.9
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

433) Liberal/conservative self placement summary [combines both telephone and face to face interview variables and collapses 7pt lib/con scale into a 3category self-placement scale] (POLVWCO)

	TOTAL	%
1) Liberal	302	16.7
3) Moderate	51	2.8
5) Conservative	453	25.1
7) Refused to choose	52	2.9
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) NA/Refused	941	52.1
Total	1807	100.0

434) Self-placement on liberal-conservative branching [R selected for branching version of lib-con series] (LIBCONBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	314	17.4
1) A Liberal	146	8.1
3) A conservative	229	12.7
5) A moderate	216	12.0
7) Neither	29	1.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	869	48.1
Total	1807	100.0

435) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is don't know/neither/moderate/no thought (LIBCOBR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1244	68.8
1) Liberal	143	7.9
3) Conservative	241	13.3
5) Moderate	58	3.2
7) Refuses to choose	111	6.1
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

436) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is liberal (LIBERAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1661	91.9
1) Strong liberal	65	3.6
5) Not very strong liberal	79	4.4
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

437) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is conservative (CONSERV)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1578	87.3
1) Strong conservative	119	6.6
5) Not very strong conservative	105	5.8
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

438) Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (SPLIBCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1	0.1
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	82	4.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal	158	8.7
3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: had to choose liberal	351	19.4
4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: had to choose moderate	109	6.0
5) Scale 5 had to choose conserv/branching: had to choose conservative	528	29.2
6) Scale 6 branching: not strong conservative	250	13.8
7) Scale 7 branching: strong conservative	145	8.0
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) Refuses to choose	165	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

439) If FTF mode: Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCNFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	801	44.3
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	51	2.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal	77	4.3
3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: Had to choose liberal	212	11.7
4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: Had to choose moderate	57	3.2
5) Scale 5 had to choose conservative/branching: Had to choose conservative	314	17.4
6) Scale 6 branching: Not strong conservative	129	7.1
7) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative	77	4.3
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refuses to choose	80	4.4
Total	1807	100.0

440) If in phone mode: Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCONPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1007	55.7
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	31	1.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal	81	4.5
3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: Had to choose liberal	139	7.7
4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: Had to choose moderate	52	2.9
5) Scale 5 had to choose conserv/branching: Had to choose conservative	214	11.8
6) Scale 6 branching: Not strong conservative	121	6.7
7) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative	68	3.8
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refuses to choose	85	4.7
Total	1807	100.0

441) Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCONSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1	0.1
1) Liberal	591	32.7
3) Moderate	109	6.0
5) Conservative	923	51.1
7) Refused to choose	165	9.1
8) Don't know	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

442) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: FTF interview] WHERE WOULD you Place Bill Clinton on this scale? (CLINSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	78	4.3
2) Liberal	120	6.6
3) Slightly liberal	91	5.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	85	4.7
5) Slightly conservative	30	1.7
6) Conservative	31	1.7
7) Extremely conservative	4	0.2
8) Don't know	29	1.6
Total	1807	100.0

443) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: Telephone interview] What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? (CLINSC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	76	4.2
2) Liberal	106	5.9
3) Slightly liberal	55	3.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	85	4.7
5) Slightly conservative	10	0.6
6) Conservative	24	1.3
7) Extremely conservative	4	0.2
8) Don't know	38	2.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

444) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: Combined FTF/telephone interview] where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? (CLINSC3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.59	2.15

445) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series] IS Bill Clinton a liberal, conservative, or a moderate? (CLINLCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	434	24.0
2) Conservative	78	4.3
3) Moderate	285	15.8
8) Don't know	139	7.7
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

446) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series and if R says Clinton is a liberal] would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or not a very strong liberal? (CLINLIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1373	76.0
1) Strong liberal	280	15.5
5) Not very strong liberal	150	8.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

447) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series and if R says Clinton is a conservative] would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a not VERY strong conservative? (CLINCON)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1729	95.7
1) Strong conservative	45	2.5
5) Not very strong conservative	32	1.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

448) [If R is selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series: summary] (CLINSUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	280	15.5
2) Not very strong liberal	154	8.5
3) Moderate	285	15.8
4) Not very strong conservative	33	1.8
5) Strong conservative	45	2.5
8) Don't know	139	7.7
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

449) [Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series: Summary] 7-point scale FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? 7-Point scale phone: What bout Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? Branching (FTF and phone): What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? (CLINSUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	434	24.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	380	21.0
3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate	641	35.5
4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative	88	4.9
5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative	53	2.9
8) Don't know	206	11.4
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

450) IF R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? (GORESC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA, INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	40	2.2
2) Liberal	131	7.2
3) Slightly liberal	98	5.4
4) Moderate; middle of the road	94	5.2
5) Slightly conservative	40	2.2
6) Conservative	25	1.4
7) Extremely conservative	8	0.4
8) Don't know	32	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

451) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: telephone: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (GORESC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	35	1.9
2) Liberal	98	5.4
3) Slightly liberal	68	3.8
4) Moderate; middle of the road	86	4.8
5) Slightly conservative	19	1.1
6) Conservative	32	1.8
7) Extremely conservative	5	0.3
8) Don't know	54	3.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

452) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con Gore placement (GORESC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA, INAP	939	52.0
1) Extremely liberal	75	4.2
2) Liberal	229	12.7
3) Slightly liberal	166	9.2
4) Moderate; middle of the road	180	10.0
5) Slightly conservative	59	3.3
6) Conservative	57	3.2
7) Extremely conservative	13	0.7
8) Don't know	86	4.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

453) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1371	75.9
1) Very certain	92	5.1
3) Pretty certain	210	11.6
5) Not very certain	134	7.4
Total	1807	100.0

454) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1464	81.0
1) Very certain	90	5.0
3) Pretty certain	190	10.5
5) Not very certain	63	3.5
Total	1807	100.0

455) Combined FTF/telephone 7pt scale certainty-Gore placement (GORELCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA, INAP	1028	56.9
1) Very certain	182	10.1
3) Pretty certain	400	22.1
5) Not very certain	197	10.9
Total	1807	100.0

456) If R: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (GOREBRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	386	21.4
2) Conservative	150	8.3
3) Moderate	254	14.1
8) Don't know	149	8.2
Total	1807	100.0

457) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is liberal: Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (GORELIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1421	78.6
1) Strong liberal	250	13.8
5) Not very strong liberal	130	7.2
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

458) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is conservative: Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (GORECONS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1657	91.7
1) Strong conservative	89	4.9
5) Not very strong conservative	58	3.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

459) Summary: 5pt lib-con Gore placement from branching series (GORESUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	250	13.8
2) Not very strong liberal	136	7.5
3) Moderate	254	14.1
4) Not very strong conservative	61	3.4
5) Strong conservative	89	4.9
8) Don't know	149	8.2
Total	1807	100.0

460) Combined 5-point lib-con Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GORESUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	325	18.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	365	20.2
3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate	659	36.5
4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative	118	6.5
5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative	102	5.6
8) Don't know	235	13.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

461) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1026	56.8
1) Very certain	224	12.4
3) Pretty certain	373	20.6
5) Not very certain	183	10.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

462) Combined lib-con certainty - Gore placement from 7pt/branching (GOREBS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	247	13.7
1) Very certain	406	22.5
3) Pretty certain	773	42.8
5) Not very certain	380	21.0
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

463) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? (BUSHSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	8	0.4
2) Liberal	23	1.3
3) Slightly liberal	37	2.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	58	3.2
5) Slightly conservative	105	5.8
6) Conservative	164	9.1
7) Extremely conservative	36	2.0
8) Don't know	35	1.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

464) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: Telephone: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (BUSHSC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	6	0.3
2) Liberal	32	1.8
3) Slightly liberal	18	1.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	49	2.7
5) Slightly conservative	61	3.4
6) Conservative	146	8.1
7) Extremely conservative	35	1.9
8) Don't know	51	2.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

465) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con GW Bush placement (BUSHSC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	939	52.0
1) Extremely liberal	14	0.8
2) Liberal	55	3.0
3) Slightly liberal	55	3.0
4) Moderate; middle of the road	107	5.9
5) Slightly conservative	166	9.2
6) Conservative	310	17.2
7) Extremely conservative	71	3.9
8) Don't know	86	4.8
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

466) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1376	76.1
1) Very certain	93	5.1
3) Pretty certain	208	11.5
5) Not very certain	129	7.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

467) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1460	80.8
1) Very certain	101	5.6
3) Pretty certain	175	9.7
5) Not very certain	71	3.9
Total	1807	100.0

468) Combined FTF/phone 7pt scale certainty - GW Bush placement (BUSHLCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1029	56.9
1) Very certain	194	10.7
3) Pretty certain	383	21.2
5) Not very certain	200	11.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

469) IF R selected for branching version of lib-con series: What about George W. Bush?(Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (BUSHBRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	113	6.3
2) Conservative	464	25.7
3) Moderate	209	11.6
8) Don't know	151	8.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

470) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is liberal: Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (BUSHLIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1694	93.7
1) STRONG LIBERAL	70	3.9
5) NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

471) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is conservative: Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (BUSHCONS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1343	74.3
1) Strong conservative	287	15.9
5) Not very strong conservative	162	9.0
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

472) Summary: 5pt lib-con GW Bush placement from branching series (BUSHSUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	70	3.9
2) Not very strong liberal	43	2.4
3) Moderate	209	11.6
4) Not very strong conservative	177	9.8
5) Strong conservative	287	15.9
8) Don't know	151	8.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

473) Combined 5-point lib-con GW Bush placement from 7pt scale /branch (BUSHSUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	84	4.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	98	5.4
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Moderate	537	29.7
4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative	487	27.0
5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative	358	19.8
8) Don't know	237	13.1
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

474) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1036	57.3
1) Very certain	198	11.0
3) Pretty certain	376	20.8
5) Not very certain	196	10.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

475) Combined lib-con certainty - GW Bush placement from 7pt/branching (BUSHBS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	258	14.3
1) Very certain	392	21.7
3) Pretty certain	759	42.0
5) Not very certain	396	21.9
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

476) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? (BUCHSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1339	74.1
1) Extremely liberal	14	0.8
2) Liberal	15	0.8
3) Slightly liberal	26	1.4
4) Moderate; middle of the road	57	3.2
5) Slightly conservative	38	2.1
6) Conservative	55	3.0
7) Extremely conservative	115	6.4
8) Don't know	145	8.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

477) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: Telephone: What about Pat Buchanan?(Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (BUCHSC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1407	77.9
1) Extremely liberal	3	0.2
2) Liberal	17	0.9
3) Slightly liberal	8	0.4
4) Moderate; middle of the road	35	1.9
5) Slightly conservative	10	0.6
6) Conservative	61	3.4
7) Extremely conservative	108	6.0
8) Don't know	154	8.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

478) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con Buchanan placement (BUCHSC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	939	52.0
1) Extremely liberal	17	0.9
2) Liberal	32	1.8
3) Slightly liberal	34	1.9
4) Moderate; middle of the road	92	5.1
5) Slightly conservative	48	2.7
6) Conservative	116	6.4
7) Extremely conservative	223	12.3
8) Don't know	299	16.5
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

479) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1487	82.3
1) Very certain	100	5.5
3) Pretty certain	113	6.3
5) Not very certain	107	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

480) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1565	86.6
1) Very certain	93	5.1
3) Pretty certain	89	4.9
5) Not very certain	60	3.3
Total	1807	100.0

481) Combined FTF/phone 7pt scale certainty - Buchanan placement (BUCHLCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1245	68.9
1) Very certain	193	10.7
3) Pretty certain	202	11.2
5) Not very certain	167	9.2
Total	1807	100.0

482) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: What about Pat Buchanan?(Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (BUCHBRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Liberal	65	3.6
2) Conservative	389	21.5
3) Moderate	107	5.9
8) Don't know	372	20.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

483) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is liberal: would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (BUCHLIB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1742	96.4
1) Strong liberal	38	2.1
5) Not very strong liberal	24	1.3
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

484) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is conservative: would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (BUCHCONS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1418	78.5
1) Strong conservative	325	18.0
5) Not very strong conservative	61	3.4
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

485) Summary: 5pt lib-con Buchanan placement from branching series (BUCHSUM5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	868	48.0
1) Strong liberal	38	2.1
2) Not very strong liberal	27	1.5
3) Moderate	107	5.9
4) Not very strong conservative	64	3.5
5) Strong conservative	325	18.0
8) Don't know	372	20.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

486) Combined 5pt lib-con Buchanan placement from 7pt scale /branch (BUCHSUM7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal	55	3.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal	59	3.3
3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate	281	15.6
4) Scale 6 branching: Not very strong conservative	180	10.0
5) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative	548	30.3
8) Don't know	671	37.1
9) Refused	13	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

487) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1252	69.3
1) Very certain	225	12.5
3) Pretty certain	181	10.0
5) Not very certain	149	8.2
Total	1807	100.0

488) Combined lib-con certainty - Buchanan placement from 7pt/branching (BUCHBS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	690	38.2
1) Very certain	418	23.1
3) Pretty certain	383	21.2
5) Not very certain	316	17.5
Total	1807	100.0

489) Who do you think will be elected President in November? (THNKELEC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Al Gore	848	46.9
2) George W. Bush	783	43.3
3) Pat Buchanan	5	0.3
4) Ralph Nader	3	0.2
7) Other	39	2.2
8) Don't know	126	7.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

490) [If R gives name of who they think will win the election] Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will [NAME GIVEN] win by quite a bit? (CLELEC1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	129	7.1
1) Will be close	1449	80.2
5) Win by quite a bit	213	11.8
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

491) If R says he/she doesn't know who will win the Pres. Election: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will one candidate win by quite a bit? (CLELEC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1678	92.9
1) Will be close	108	6.0
5) Win by quite a bit	8	0.4
8) Don't know	13	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

492) If R selected for standard version: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (ECONCND1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	899	49.8
1) Gotten better	369	20.4
3) Stayed about the same	380	21.0
5) Gotten worse	147	8.1
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

493) If R selected for experimental version: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? (ECONCND2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	908	50.2
1) Gotten worse	155	8.6
3) Stayed about the same	405	22.4
5) Gotten better	331	18.3
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

494) If R thinks economy will be better in the next year: Much better or somewhat better? (ECONCND3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1107	61.3
1) Much better	251	13.9
5) Somewhat better	448	24.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

495) If R thinks economy will be worse in the next year: Much worse or somewhat worse? (ECONCND4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1505	83.3
1) SOMEWHAT WORSE	232	12.8
5) MUCH WORSE	70	3.9
Total	1807	100.0

496) Combined version summary: Economy in next year (ECONCND5)

	TOTAL	%
1) Much better	251	13.9
2) Somewhat better	448	24.8
3) Stayed about the same	785	43.4
4) Somewhat worse	70	3.9
5) Much worse	232	12.8
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

497) If R selected for standard version: would you say that over the past year, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? (EMPCON1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	906	50.1
1) Gotten harder	125	6.9
3) Stayed the same	313	17.3
5) Gotten easier	447	24.7
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

498) If R selected for experimental version: would you say that over the past year, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? (EMPCON2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	901	49.9
1) Gotten easier	454	25.1
3) About the same	300	16.6
5) Gotten harder	129	7.1
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

499) If R says it has gotten harder to find work in the last year: Much harder or a little harder? (EMPCON3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1553	85.9
1) Much harder	123	6.8
5) A little harder	131	7.2
Total	1807	100.0

500) If R says it has gotten easier to find work in the last year: Much easier or a little easier? (EMPCON4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	906	50.1
1) Much easier	493	27.3
5) A little easier	404	22.4
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

501) Combined version summary: Employment opportunities in last year (EMPCON5)

	TOTAL	%
1) Much harder	123	6.8
2) Somewhat harder	131	7.2
3) Stayed about the same	613	33.9
4) Somewhat easier	404	22.4
5) Much easier	493	27.3
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

502) If R selected for standard version: what about the next 12months? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? (ECNCOND1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	896	49.6
1) Get better	181	10.0
3) Stay about the same	535	29.6
5) Get worse	163	9.0
8) Don't know	29	1.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

503) If R selected for experimental version: what about the next 12 months? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? (ECNCOND2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	911	50.4
1) Get worse	166	9.2
3) About the same	499	27.6
5) Better	196	10.8
8) Don't know	34	1.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

504) If R expects economy to get better in the next 12 months: Much better or somewhat better? (ECNCOND3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1430	79.1
1) Much better	113	6.3
5) Somewhat better	264	14.6
Total	1807	100.0

505) If R expects economy to get worse in the next 12 months: Much worse or somewhat worse? (ECNCOND4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1478	81.8
1) Much worse	69	3.8
5) Somewhat worse	260	14.4
Total	1807	100.0

506) Summary: Economy in next 12 months (ECNCOND5)

	TOTAL	%
1) Much better	113	6.3
2) Somewhat better	264	14.6
3) Stayed about the same	1034	57.2
4) Somewhat worse	260	14.4
5) Much worse	69	3.8
8) Don't know	63	3.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

507) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? (CLINECON)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1304	72.2
5) Disapprove	387	21.4
8) Don't know	106	5.9
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

508) If R approves of Clinton's handling of economy: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (CLINECNA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	503	27.8
1) Strongly	783	43.3
5) Not strongly	516	28.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

509) If R disapproves of Clinton's handling of economy: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (CLINECND)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1420	78.6
1) Strongly	237	13.1
5) Not strongly	150	8.3
Total	1807	100.0

510) Summary: Approval of Clinton's handling of the economy (CLINECNS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	783	43.3
2) Approve not strongly	516	28.6
4) Disapprove not strongly	150	8.3
5) Disapprove strongly	237	13.1
8) Don't know	110	6.1
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

511) Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now --either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? (OWNSTOCK)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes	1004	55.6
5) No	780	43.2
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

512) Which party do you think would do a better job of handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? (ECONPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrats	527	29.2
3) Republicans	406	22.5
5) Wouldn't be much difference between them/no difference	794	43.9
7) Neither party [Vol]	28	1.5
8) Don't know	50	2.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

513) Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by both? (PEACPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrats	373	20.6
3) Republicans	324	17.9
5) About the same by both	1043	57.7
7) Neither party [Vol]	24	1.3
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

514) Turning to some other types of issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger? (USGLOBAL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Weaker	500	27.7
3) Stayed about the same	874	48.4
5) Stronger	403	22.3
8) Don't know	28	1.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

515) Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? (IMMIGRT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	172	9.5
3) Decreased	785	43.4
5) Left the same as it is now	785	43.4
8) Don't know	60	3.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

516) If R Thinks number of immigrants should be increased/If R thinks number of immigrants should be decreased: A little or a lot? (IMMIGRT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	850	47.0
1) A little	360	19.9
5) A lot	588	32.5
8) Don't know	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

517) SUmmary: Immigration level (IMMIGRT3)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased a lot	68	3.8
2) Increased a little	100	5.5
3) Left the same	785	43.4
4) Decreased a little	260	14.4
5) Decreased a lot	520	28.8
8) Don't know	69	3.8
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

518) If R selected for standard version: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? (IMPORTSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	897	49.6
1) Favor	245	13.6
5) Oppose	263	14.6
7) Haven't thought much about this	385	21.3
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

519) If R selected for experimental version: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? (IMPORTSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	910	50.4
1) Favor	390	21.6
5) Oppose	408	22.6
8) Don't know	95	5.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

520) Combined version summary: Import limits (IMPORTSC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Favor	635	35.1
5) Oppose	671	37.1
7) Haven't thought much	385	21.3
8) Don't know	112	6.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

521) If R selected for standard version: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. (ISOLATS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	916	50.7
1) Agree	235	13.0
5) Disagree	640	35.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

522) If R selected for experimental version: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? (ISOLATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Better off if we just stayed home	267	14.8
5) Better off trying to solve some problems	601	33.3
8) Don't know	44	2.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

523) Combined version summary: Isolationism (ISOLATC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Agree/better off to stay home	502	27.8
5) Disagree/better off trying to solve problems	1241	68.7
8) Don't know	59	3.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

524) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? (CLINTFRN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1161	64.3
5) Disapprove	534	29.6
8) Don't know	102	5.6
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

525) If R approves Clinton's handling of foreign relations: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (CLINTFN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	646	35.7
1) Strongly	605	33.5
5) Not strongly	553	30.6
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

526) If R disapproves Clinton's handling of foreign relations: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (CLINT_FN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1273	70.4
1) Strongly	328	18.2
5) Not strongly	202	11.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

527) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? Summary: Clinton handling of foreign affairs (CLINTFNS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	605	33.5
2) Approve not strongly	553	30.6
4) Disapprove not strongly	202	11.2
5) Disapprove strongly	328	18.2
8) Don't know	108	6.0
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

528) Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? (PARTAFIL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrat	620	34.3
2) Republican	451	25.0
3) Independent	496	27.4
4) Party [specify]	27	1.5
5) No preference	204	11.3
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

529) If R considers self a Democrat: Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat? (STDEMO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1187	65.7
1) Strong	346	19.1
5) Not very strong	273	15.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

530) If R considers self a Republican: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? (STREPUB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1356	75.0
1) Strong	236	13.1
5) Not very strong	214	11.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

531) If R's party preference is Independent, no preference, other, don't know: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic Party? (PRTYCLSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1075	59.5
1) Closer to Republican	230	12.7
3) Neither [Vol]	224	12.4
5) Closer to Democratic	269	14.9
8) Don't know	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

532) Summary: Party ID (PARTIDSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) Strong Democrat	346	19.1
1) Weak Democrat	274	15.2
2) Independent-Democrat	269	14.9
3) Independent-Independent	206	11.4
4) Independent-Republican	230	12.7
5) Weak Republican	215	11.9
6) Strong Republican	236	13.1
7) Other; minor party; Refuses to say	9	0.5
8) Apolitical	17	0.9
9) NA	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

533) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (GOREMORL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	423	23.4
2) Quite well	820	45.4
3) Not too well	287	15.9
4) Not well at all	133	7.4
8) Don't know	143	7.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

534) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (GORECARS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	277	15.3
2) Quite well	713	39.5
3) Not too well	464	25.7
4) Not well at all	232	12.8
8) Don't know	119	6.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

535) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (GOREKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	461	25.5
2) Quite well	997	55.2
3) Not too well	212	11.7
4) Not well at all	59	3.3
8) Don't know	77	4.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

536) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (GORELEAD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	258	14.3
2) Quite well	728	40.3
3) Not too well	522	28.9
4) Not well at all	185	10.2
8) Don't know	113	6.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

537) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (GORELIAR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	133	7.4
2) Quite well	312	17.3
3) Not too well	629	34.8
4) Not well at all	557	30.8
8) Don't know	173	9.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

538) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ....... 'describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (GORESMRT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	494	27.3
2) Quite well	995	55.1
3) Not too well	182	10.1
4) Not well at all	65	3.6
8) Don't know	69	3.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

539) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (GORENOCL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	136	7.5
2) Quite well	495	27.4
3) Not too well	641	35.5
4) Not well at all	419	23.2
8) Don't know	113	6.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

540) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .....' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (BUSHMORL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	340	18.8
2) Quite well	841	46.5
3) Not too well	330	18.3
4) Not well at all	98	5.4
8) Don't know	196	10.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

541) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (BUSHCARS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	155	8.6
2) Quite well	625	34.6
3) Not too well	562	31.1
4) Not well at all	342	18.9
8) Don't know	122	6.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

542) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (BUSHKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	274	15.2
2) Quite well	933	51.6
3) Not too well	379	21.0
4) Not well at all	133	7.4
8) Don't know	87	4.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

543) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (BUSHLEAD)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	266	14.7
2) Quite well	842	46.6
3) Not too well	407	22.5
4) Not well at all	166	9.2
8) Don't know	125	6.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

544) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (BUSHLIAR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	70	3.9
2) Quite well	288	15.9
3) Not too well	653	36.1
4) Not well at all	574	31.8
8) Don't know	220	12.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

545) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (BUSHSMRT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	329	18.2
2) Quite well	967	53.5
3) Not too well	306	16.9
4) Not well at all	110	6.1
8) Don't know	94	5.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

546) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (BUSHNOCL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Extremely well	207	11.5
2) Quite well	495	27.4
3) Not too well	638	35.3
4) Not well at all	348	19.3
8) Don't know	118	6.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

547) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .....' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (BUCHMORL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	94	5.2
2) Quite well	240	13.3
3) Not too well	120	6.6
4) Not well at all	47	2.6
8) Don't know	268	14.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

548) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (BUCHCARS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	31	1.7
2) Quite well	137	7.6
3) Not too well	197	10.9
4) Not well at all	150	8.3
8) Don't know	254	14.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

549) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (BUCHKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	50	2.8
2) Quite well	304	16.8
3) Not too well	139	7.7
4) Not well at all	41	2.3
8) Don't know	235	13.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

550) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (BUCHLEAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	23	1.3
2) Quite well	136	7.5
3) Not too well	227	12.6
4) Not well at all	138	7.6
8) Don't know	245	13.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

551) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (BUCHLIAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	17	0.9
2) Quite well	65	3.6
3) Not too well	224	12.4
4) Not well at all	175	9.7
8) Don't know	287	15.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

552) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (BUCHSMRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	82	4.5
2) Quite well	323	17.9
3) Not too well	98	5.4
4) Not well at all	37	2.0
8) Don't know	229	12.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

553) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (BUCHNOCL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	1037	57.4
1) Extremely well	85	4.7
2) Quite well	183	10.1
3) Not too well	177	9.8
4) Not well at all	79	4.4
8) Don't know	244	13.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

554) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (GOVTSRVF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	142	7.9
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	46	2.5
2) 2	60	3.3
3) 3	102	5.6
4) 4	251	13.9
5) 5	184	10.2
6) 6	115	6.4
7) Gov't should provide many more services	98	5.4
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused	802	44.4
Total	1807	100.0

555) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R Self-placement on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOVTSRVP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	141	7.8
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	179	9.9
5) More services; increase spending	378	20.9
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	93	5.1
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1009	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

556) If R thinks the government should reduce services and spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (RDUCAMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1628	90.1
1) A great deal	74	4.1
5) Only some	105	5.8
Total	1807	100.0

557) If R thinks the government should increase services and spending: Telephone: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (INCSAMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1429	79.1
1) A great deal	141	7.8
5) Only some	233	12.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

558) Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? [Summary: 5pt serv/spend self-placement from branching series] (SPSUM5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	74	4.1
2) Reduce spending and services only some	105	5.8
3) Stay same as now	93	5.1
4) Increase spending and services only some	233	12.9
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	141	7.8
7) Haven't thought much	141	7.8
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

559) Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? [Combined 5pt serv/spend self-placement from 7pt scale /branch] (SPSUM7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	283	15.7
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	120	6.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	165	9.1
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	630	34.9
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	348	19.3
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	239	13.2
8) Don't know	17	0.9
9) Refused; NA; INAP	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

560) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? [R placement of Clinton on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (CLINTGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	20	1.1
2) 2	23	1.3
3) 3	73	4.0
4) 4	149	8.2
5) 5	255	14.1
6) 6	240	13.3
7) Gov't should provide many more services	152	8.4
8) Don't know	92	5.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

561) What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Clinton on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (CLINTGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	108	6.0
5) More services; increase spending	522	28.9
7) Should stay the same as it is now	59	3.3
8) Don't know	109	6.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

562) If R thinks Clinton would like to reduce services and spending: telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (CLINRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1699	94.0
1) A great deal	33	1.8
5) Only some	74	4.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

563) If R thinks Clinton would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (CLINIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1285	71.1
1) A great deal	246	13.6
5) Only some	275	15.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

564) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Clinton placement from branching series (CLING5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	33	1.8
2) Reduce spending and services only some	74	4.1
3) Stay same as now	59	3.3
4) Increase spending and services only some	275	15.2
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	246	13.6
8) Don't know	111	6.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

565) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Clinton placement from 7pt scale/branch (CLING7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	53	2.9
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	97	5.4
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	536	29.7
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	515	28.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	398	22.0
8) Don't know	203	11.2
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

566) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (GOREGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	9	0.5
2) 2	27	1.5
3) 3	62	3.4
4) 4	154	8.5
5) 5	262	14.5
6) 6	251	13.9
7) Gov't should provide many more services	129	7.1
8) Don't know	111	6.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

567) What about Al Gore? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Gore on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOREGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	91	5.0
5) More services; increase spending	553	30.6
7) Should stay the same as it is now	41	2.3
8) Don't know	114	6.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

568) If R thinks Gore would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (GORERGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1716	95.0
1) A great deal	35	1.9
5) Only some	56	3.1
Total	1807	100.0

569) If R thinks Gore would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (GOREIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1254	69.4
1) A great deal	264	14.6
5) Only some	286	15.8
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

570) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Gore placement from branching series (GOREG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	35	1.9
2) Reduce spending and services only some	56	3.1
3) Stay same as now	41	2.3
4) Increase spending and services only some	286	15.8
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	264	14.6
8) Don't know	117	6.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

571) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	44	2.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	83	4.6
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	519	28.7
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	537	29.7
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	393	21.7
8) Don't know	228	12.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

572) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (BUSHGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	58	3.2
2) 2	145	8.0
3) 3	253	14.0
4) 4	213	11.8
5) 5	115	6.4
6) 6	73	4.0
7) Gov't should provide many more services	23	1.3
8) Don't know	124	6.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

573) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Bush on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	410	22.7
5) More services; increase spending	223	12.3
7) Should stay the same as it is now	38	2.1
8) Don't know	128	7.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

574) If R thinks Bush would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (BUSHRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1397	77.3
1) A great deal	208	11.5
5) Only some	200	11.1
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

575) If R thinks Bush would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (BUSHIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1584	87.7
1) A great deal	69	3.8
5) Only some	153	8.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

576) Summary: 5 pt serv/spend Bush placement from branching series (BUSHG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	208	11.5
2) Reduce spending and services only some	200	11.1
3) Stay same as now	38	2.1
4) Increase spending and services only some	153	8.5
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	69	3.8
8) Don't know	131	7.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

577) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	266	14.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	345	19.1
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	619	34.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	226	12.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	92	5.1
8) Don't know	255	14.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

578) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democrats on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (DEMSGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	15	0.8
2) 2	14	0.8
3) 3	51	2.8
4) 4	143	7.9
5) 5	267	14.8
6) 6	266	14.7
7) Gov't should provide many more services	142	7.9
8) Don't know	106	5.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

579) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Democrats on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	84	4.6
5) More services; increase spending	556	30.8
7) Should stay the same as it is now	46	2.5
8) Don't know	115	6.4
Total	1807	100.0

580) If R thinks the Democrats would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (DEMSRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1723	95.4
1) A great deal	31	1.7
5) Only some	53	2.9
Total	1807	100.0

581) If R thinks the Democrats would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (DEMSIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1251	69.2
1) A great deal	291	16.1
5) Only some	264	14.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

582) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Democrats placement from branching series (DEMSG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	31	1.7
2) Reduce spending and services only some	53	2.9
3) Stay same as now	46	2.5
4) Increase spending and services only some	264	14.6
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	291	16.1
8) Don't know	116	6.4
Total	1807	100.0

583) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Democrats placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	46	2.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	67	3.7
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	507	28.1
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	530	29.3
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	433	24.0
8) Don't know	222	12.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

584) Where would you place the Republicans on this issue? [R placement of Republicans on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (REPSGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should provide many fewer services	86	4.8
2) 2	182	10.1
3) 3	226	12.5
4) 4	208	11.5
5) 5	110	6.1
6) 6	52	2.9
7) Gov't should provide many more services	20	1.1
8) Don't know	121	6.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

585) What about the Republicans? Do you think THEY would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Republicans on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (REPSGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Fewer services; reduce spending	451	25.0
5) More services; increase spending	185	10.2
7) Should stay the same as it is now	37	2.0
8) Don't know	128	7.1
Total	1807	100.0

586) If R thinks the Republicans would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (REPSRGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1356	75.0
1) A Great deal	229	12.7
5) Only some	221	12.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

587) If R thinks the Republicans would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (REPSIGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1622	89.8
1) A great deal	54	3.0
5) Only some	131	7.2
Total	1807	100.0

588) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Republicans placement from branching series (REPSG5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Reduce spending and services a great deal	229	12.7
2) Reduce spending and services only some	221	12.2
3) Stay same as now	37	2.0
4) Increase spending and services only some	131	7.2
5) Increase spending and services a great deal	54	3.0
8) Don't know	129	7.1
Total	1807	100.0

589) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Republicans placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSG7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal	315	17.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some	403	22.3
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now	581	32.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some	183	10.1
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal	74	4.1
8) Don't know	250	13.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

590) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (DFNSFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	161	8.9
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	35	1.9
2) 2	33	1.8
3) 3	72	4.0
4) 4	238	13.2
5) 5	229	12.7
6) 6	144	8.0
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	85	4.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	802	44.4
Total	1807	100.0

591) Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? (DFNSPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Yes, have an opinion	589	32.6
5) No, no opinion (haven't thought much)	207	11.5
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

592) If R does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: Telephone: Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? (DFNSAMTP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1213	67.1
1) Decrease defense spending	110	6.1
3) Increase defense spending	331	18.3
5) About the right amount	146	8.1
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

593) If R says does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: If R says the government should reduce defense spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce defense spending a lot or a little? (DFNSRP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1697	93.9
1) A lot	54	3.0
5) A little	56	3.1
Total	1807	100.0

594) If R says does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: If R says the government should increase defense spending: Telephone: Should the government increase defense spending a lot or a little? (DFNSIP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1476	81.7
1) A lot	188	10.4
5) A little	141	7.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

595) Summary: 5pt defense spending self-placement from branching series (DFNS5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	54	3.0
2) Decrease defense spending a little	56	3.1
3) About the right amount	146	8.1
4) Increase defense spending a little	141	7.8
5) Increase defense spending a lot	188	10.4
7) Haven't thought much	207	11.5
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

596) Summary: 5pt defense spending self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (DFNS7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	368	20.4
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	89	4.9
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	89	4.9
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	685	37.9
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	285	15.8
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	273	15.1
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

597) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (GOREDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	29	1.6
2) 2	72	4.0
3) 3	169	9.4
4) 4	239	13.2
5) 5	186	10.3
6) 6	83	4.6
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	32	1.8
8) Don't know	195	10.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

598) What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of Gore on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOREDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	157	8.7
3) Increase defense spending	167	9.2
5) About the right amount	273	15.1
8) Don't know	203	11.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

599) If R says Gore wants to reduce defense spending/if R says Gore wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (GOREDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1483	82.1
1) A lot	137	7.6
5) A little	183	10.1
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

600) Summary: 5pt defense spending Gore placement from branching series (GOREDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	78	4.3
2) Decrease defense spending a little	76	4.2
3) About the right amount	273	15.1
4) Increase defense spending a little	107	5.9
5) Increase defense spending a lot	59	3.3
8) Don't know	207	11.5
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

601) Summary: 5pt defense spending Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	107	5.9
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	148	8.2
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	867	48.0
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	190	10.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	91	5.0
8) Don't know	402	22.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

602) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (BUSHDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	12	0.7
2) 2	26	1.4
3) 3	60	3.3
4) 4	164	9.1
5) 5	247	13.7
6) 6	221	12.2
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	97	5.4
8) Don't know	179	9.9
Total	1807	100.0

603) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of Bush on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	48	2.7
3) Increase defense spending	452	25.0
5) About the right amount	111	6.1
8) Don't know	189	10.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

604) If R says Bush wants to reduce defense spending/if R says Bush wants to increase defense spending: telephone: A lot or a little? (BUSHDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1307	72.3
1) A lot	304	16.8
5) A little	186	10.3
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

605) Summary: 5pt defense spending Bush placement from branching series (BUSHDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	29	1.6
2) Decrease defense spending a little	18	1.0
3) About the right amount	111	6.1
4) Increase defense spending a little	168	9.3
5) Increase defense spending a lot	275	15.2
8) Don't know	199	11.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

606) Summary: 5pt defense spending Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	41	2.3
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	44	2.4
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	582	32.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	389	21.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	372	20.6
8) Don't know	378	20.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

607) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of the Democratic Party on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (DEMSDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	26	1.4
2) 2	107	5.9
3) 3	180	10.0
4) 4	240	13.3
5) 5	168	9.3
6) 6	85	4.7
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	39	2.2
8) Don't know	160	8.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

608) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of the Democratic Party on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	197	10.9
3) Increase defense spending	171	9.5
5) About the right amount	248	13.7
8) Don't know	185	10.2
Total	1807	100.0

609) If R says the Democratic Party wants to reduce defense spending/If R says the Democratic Party wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (DEMSDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1439	79.6
1) A lot	151	8.4
5) A little	212	11.7
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

610) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	90	5.0
2) Decrease defense spending a little	103	5.7
3) About the right amount	248	13.7
4) Increase defense spending a little	109	6.0
5) Increase defense spending a lot	61	3.4
8) Don't know	190	10.5
Total	1807	100.0

611) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	116	6.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	210	11.6
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	836	46.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	194	10.7
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	100	5.5
8) Don't know	350	19.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

612) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of the Republican Party on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (REPSDFI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should decrease defense spending	12	0.7
2) 2	25	1.4
3) 3	77	4.3
4) 4	169	9.4
5) 5	238	13.2
6) 6	234	12.9
7) Gov't should increase defense spending	86	4.8
8) Don't know	165	9.1
Total	1807	100.0

613) What about the Republican Party? Do you think THEY believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of the Republican Party on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (REPSDFP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending	68	3.8
3) Increase defense spending	441	24.4
5) About the right amount	106	5.9
8) Don't know	186	10.3
Total	1807	100.0

614) If R says the Republican Party wants to reduce defense spending/If R says the Republican Party wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (REPSDFCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1298	71.8
1) A lot	288	15.9
5) A little	217	12.0
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

615) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSDF5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Decrease defense spending a lot	36	2.0
2) Decrease defense spending a little	32	1.8
3) About the right amount	106	5.9
4) Increase defense spending a little	185	10.2
5) Increase defense spending a lot	252	13.9
8) Don't know	190	10.5
Total	1807	100.0

616) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSDF7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot	48	2.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little	57	3.2
3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount	590	32.7
4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little	419	23.2
5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot	338	18.7
8) Don't know	355	19.6
Total	1807	100.0

617) Checkpoint: Mode and version for gov't/private medical insurance self-placement (MINSRGXP)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard version	515	28.5
2) FTF experimental version	491	27.2
3) Phone version 1	376	20.8
4) Phone version 2	425	23.5
Total	1807	100.0

618) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for standard version: FTF] (MINSSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	25	1.4
1) Gov't insurance plan	74	4.1
2) 2	42	2.3
3) 3	83	4.6
4) 4	105	5.8
5) 5	72	4.0
6) 6	46	2.5
7) Private insurance plan	59	3.3
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1292	71.5
Total	1807	100.0

619) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for experimental version: FTF (MINSSPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	35	1.9
1) Private insurance plan	41	2.3
2) 2	48	2.7
3) 3	62	3.4
4) 4	89	4.9
5) 5	74	4.1
6) 6	57	3.2
7) Gov't insurance plan	83	4.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1316	72.8
Total	1807	100.0

620) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? Combined FTF: Standard/experimental 7pt medical insurance (MINSSPS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	60	3.3
1) Gov't insurance plan	157	8.7
2) 2	99	5.5
3) 3	157	8.7
4) 4	194	10.7
5) 5	134	7.4
6) 6	94	5.2
7) Private insurance plan	100	5.5
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	801	44.3
Total	1807	100.0

621) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for version 1: Telephone: (MINSSPPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	44	2.4
1) Should be a gov't insurance plan	149	8.2
5) Individuals should pay medical expenses through private insurance	155	8.6
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	20	1.1
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1431	79.2
Total	1807	100.0

622) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for version 2: Telephone: (MINSPEPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	47	2.6
1) Should be a gov't insurance plan	146	8.1
5) Individuals should pay medical expenses through private insurance	188	10.4
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	30	1.7
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1382	76.5
Total	1807	100.0

623) Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Combined phone version 1/version 2- medical insurance (MINSCOMB)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	91	5.0
1) Should be a gov't insurance plan	337	18.6
5) INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSU	301	16.7
7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol]	50	2.8
8) Don't know	22	1.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1006	55.7
Total	1807	100.0

624) Both telephone versions: If R feels there should be government insurance plan/if R feels individuals should pay through private insurance plan: (MINSFEEL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1169	64.7
1) Strongly	507	28.1
5) Not strongly	127	7.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

625) Summary: 5pt medical insurance self-placement from branching series (MINSFEE5)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	91	5.0
1) Strongly - government insurance plan	282	15.6
2) Not strongly - government insurance plan	54	3.0
3) Stay the same as it is now	50	2.8
4) Not strongly - individual insurance	73	4.0
5) Strongly - individual insurance	225	12.5
8) Don't know	25	1.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1007	55.7
Total	1807	100.0

626) Summary: 5pt medical insurance self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (MINSFEE7)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	151	8.4
1) Scale: 1 branching: Strongly - gov't insurance plan	439	24.3
2) Scale: 2 Branching: Not strongly - gov't insurance plan	153	8.5
3) Scale: 3,4,5; branching: Stay the same as it is now	535	29.6
4) Scale: 6 Branching: Not strongly - individual insurance	167	9.2
5) Scale: 7 Branching: Strongly - Individual insurance	325	18.0
8) Don't know	36	2.0
9) Refused; NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

627) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview (SRELYFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	93	5.1
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	74	4.1
2) 2	48	2.7
3) 3	93	5.1
4) 4	173	9.6
5) 5	189	10.5
6) 6	195	10.8
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	137	7.6
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	801	44.3
Total	1807	100.0

628) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview (SRELYPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	108	6.0
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	193	10.7
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	439	24.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	55	3.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1009	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

629) If R thinks government should see to jobs and standard of living: Telephone: Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? (GOVINTJO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1614	89.3
1) Strongly	152	8.4
5) Not strongly	40	2.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

630) If R thinks government should let each get ahead on their own: Telephone: Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? (GOVNIJO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1368	75.7
1) Strongly	346	19.1
5) Not strongly	93	5.1
Total	1807	100.0

631) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs self-placement from branching series (GOVGJS5)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	108	6.0
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & std living	152	8.4
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & std living	40	2.2
3) Other/depends/neither	55	3.0
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	93	5.1
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	346	19.1
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1009	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

632) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOVGJS7)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	201	11.1
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	226	12.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	88	4.9
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	510	28.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	288	15.9
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	483	26.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

633) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (GOREJSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	74	4.1
2) 2	128	7.1
3) 3	206	11.4
4) 4	208	11.5
5) 5	110	6.1
6) 6	58	3.2
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	38	2.1
8) Don't know	182	10.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

634) What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Gore on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (GOREJBSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	434	24.0
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	180	10.0
7) Other/it depends/neither	20	1.1
8) Don't know	165	9.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

635) If R says Gore thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Gore thinks gov't should let each on own: telephone (GOREJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1193	66.0
1) Strongly	444	24.6
5) Not strongly	162	9.0
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

636) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Gore placement from branching series (GOREJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	338	18.7
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	94	5.2
3) Other/depends/neither	20	1.1
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	68	3.8
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	106	5.9
8) Don't know	173	9.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

637) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	412	22.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	222	12.3
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	544	30.1
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	126	7.0
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	144	8.0
8) Don't know	355	19.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

638) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (BUSHJBSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	23	1.3
2) 2	22	1.2
3) 3	80	4.4
4) 4	169	9.4
5) 5	205	11.3
6) 6	220	12.2
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	98	5.4
8) Don't know	187	10.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

639) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Bush on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHJOP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	122	6.8
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	494	27.3
7) Other/it depends/neither	15	0.8
8) Don't know	168	9.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

640) If R says Bush thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/if R says Bush thinks gov't should let each on own: telephone (BUSHJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1191	65.9
1) Strongly	463	25.6
5) Not strongly	143	7.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

641) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Bush placement from branching series (BUSHJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	80	4.4
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	40	2.2
3) Other/depends/neither	15	0.8
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	103	5.7
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	383	21.2
8) Don't know	178	9.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

642) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	103	5.7
2) Scale 2 branching: not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	62	3.4
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither	469	26.0
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	323	17.9
5) Scale 7 branching: strongly - gov't leave people on own	481	26.6
8) Don't know	365	20.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

643) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democratic Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (DEMSJBSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	82	4.5
2) 2	163	9.0
3) 3	217	12.0
4) 4	180	10.0
5) 5	108	6.0
6) 6	51	2.8
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	43	2.4
8) Don't know	161	8.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

644) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Democratic Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSJBSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	450	24.9
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	161	8.9
7) Other/it depends/neither	22	1.2
8) Don't know	167	9.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

645) If R says Democratic Party thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Democratic Party thinks gov't should let each on own: Telephone (DEMSJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1196	66.2
1) Strongly	436	24.1
5) Not strongly	173	9.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

646) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard living	347	19.2
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard living	101	5.6
3) Other/depends/neither	22	1.2
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	72	4.0
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	89	4.9
8) Don't know	169	9.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

647) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	429	23.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	264	14.6
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	527	29.2
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	123	6.8
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	132	7.3
8) Don't know	330	18.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

648) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of Republican Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (REPSJBSF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	13	0.7
2) 2	24	1.3
3) 3	65	3.6
4) 4	167	9.2
5) 5	204	11.3
6) 6	228	12.6
7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	130	7.2
8) Don't know	174	9.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

649) What about the Republican Party? Do you think THEY feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Republican Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (REPSJBSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living	96	5.3
5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own	502	27.8
7) Other/it depends/neither	21	1.2
8) Don't know	181	10.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

650) If R says Republican Party thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Republican Party thinks gov't should let each on own: Telephone (REPSJSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1209	66.9
1) Strongly	427	23.6
5) Not strongly	167	9.2
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

651) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSJ5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	66	3.7
2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	30	1.7
3) Other/depends/neither	21	1.2
4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	137	7.6
5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own	361	20.0
8) Don't know	185	10.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

652) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSJ7PS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	79	4.4
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living	54	3.0
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	457	25.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own	365	20.2
5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own	491	27.2
8) Don't know	359	19.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

653) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (BLKADFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	69	3.8
1) Gov't should help blacks	52	2.9
2) 2	40	2.2
3) 3	79	4.4
4) 4	250	13.8
5) 5	150	8.3
6) 6	160	8.9
7) Blacks should help themselves	193	10.7
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	810	44.8
Total	1807	100.0

654) Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (BLKADPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	151	8.4
1) Gov't should help blacks	196	10.8
5) Blacks should help themselves	339	18.8
7) It depends, neither	104	5.8
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1015	56.2
Total	1807	100.0

655) If R thinks government should help blacks/If R thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone: (BLKASTS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1272	70.4
1) Great extent	342	18.9
5) Only some	191	10.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

656) Summary: 5pt aid blacks self-placement from branching series (BLKA5DPS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	151	8.4
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	86	4.8
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	110	6.1
3) Other/neither/depends	104	5.8
4) Should help themselves to some extent	81	4.5
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	256	14.2
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1015	56.2
Total	1807	100.0

657) Summary: 5pt aid blacks self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (BLKAD7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	220	12.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	138	7.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	150	8.3
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	583	32.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	241	13.3
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	449	24.8
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

658) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? [R placement of Clinton on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (CLINBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	108	6.0
2) 2	153	8.5
3) 3	205	11.3
4) 4	202	11.2
5) 5	88	4.9
6) 6	46	2.5
7) Blacks should help themselves	31	1.7
8) Don't know	168	9.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

659) What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Clinton on aid to blacks scale: telephone interview] (CLINBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	446	24.7
5) Blacks should help themselves	111	6.1
7) Other/it depends/neither	46	2.5
8) Don't know	192	10.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

660) If R says Clinton thinks government should help blacks/If R says Clinton thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (CLINBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1250	69.2
1) Great extent	317	17.5
5) Only some	237	13.1
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

661) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Clinton placement from branching series (CLINBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	267	14.8
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	176	9.7
3) Other/neither/depends	46	2.5
4) Should help themselves to some extent	61	3.4
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	50	2.8
8) Don't know	195	10.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

662) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Clinton placement from 7pt scale/branching (CLINBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	375	20.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	329	18.2
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	541	29.9
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	107	5.9
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	81	4.5
8) Don't know	363	20.1
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

663) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on aid to blacks scale: FTF INTERVIEW] (GOREBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	96	5.3
2) 2	135	7.5
3) 3	189	10.5
4) 4	224	12.4
5) 5	68	3.8
6) 6	58	3.2
7) Blacks should help themselves	27	1.5
8) Don't know	204	11.3
9) REFUSED	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

664) What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Gore on aid to blacks scale: telephone interview] (GOREBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	420	23.2
5) Blacks should help themselves	110	6.1
7) Other/it depends/neither	33	1.8
8) Don't know	232	12.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

665) If R says Gore thinks government should help blacks/If R says Gore thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (GOREBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1277	70.7
1) Great extent	284	15.7
5) Only some	245	13.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

666) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Gore placement from branching series (GOREBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	234	12.9
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	185	10.2
3) Other/neither/depends	33	1.8
4) Should help themselves to some extent	60	3.3
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	50	2.8
8) Don't know	233	12.9
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

667) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	330	18.3
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	320	17.7
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	514	28.4
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	118	6.5
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	77	4.3
8) Don't know	437	24.2
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

668) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (BUSHBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	19	1.1
2) 2	22	1.2
3) 3	69	3.8
4) 4	209	11.6
5) 5	226	12.5
6) 6	143	7.9
7) Blacks should help themselves	102	5.6
8) Don't know	212	11.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

669) What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Bush on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	151	8.4
5) Blacks should help themselves	351	19.4
7) Other/it depends/neither	44	2.4
8) Don't know	247	13.7
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

670) If R says Bush thinks government should help blacks/If R says Bush thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (BUSHBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.2
1) Great extent	255	14.1
5) Only some	245	13.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

671) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Bush placement from branching series (BUSHBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	45	2.5
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	106	5.9
3) Other/neither/depends	44	2.4
4) Should help themselves to some extent	139	7.7
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	210	11.6
8) Don't know	249	13.8
9) REFUSED	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

672) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	64	3.5
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	128	7.1
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	548	30.3
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	282	15.6
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	312	17.3
8) Don't know	461	25.5
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

673) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democratic Party on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (DEMSBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	106	5.9
2) 2	164	9.1
3) 3	214	11.8
4) 4	198	11.0
5) 5	70	3.9
6) 6	45	2.5
7) Blacks should help themselves	29	1.6
8) Don't know	176	9.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

674) What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think THEY feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Democratic Party on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	437	24.2
5) Blacks should help themselves	112	6.2
7) Other/it depends/neither	26	1.4
8) Don't know	220	12.2
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

675) If R says Democratic Party thinks government should help blacks/if R says Democratic Party thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (DEMSBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1258	69.6
1) Great extent	301	16.7
5) Only some	247	13.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

676) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	256	14.2
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	181	10.0
3) Other/neither/depends	26	1.4
4) Should help themselves to some extent	66	3.7
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	45	2.5
8) Don't know	221	12.2
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

677) Summary: 5pt Aid blacks Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branching (DEMSBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	362	20.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	345	19.1
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	508	28.1
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	111	6.1
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	74	4.1
8) Don't know	397	22.0
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

678) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of Republican Party on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (REPSBAF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	801	44.3
1) Gov't should help blacks	15	0.8
2) 2	19	1.1
3) 3	66	3.7
4) 4	186	10.3
5) 5	218	12.1
6) 6	196	10.8
7) Blacks should help themselves	116	6.4
8) Don't know	186	10.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

679) What about the Republican Party? (Do you think THEY feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Republican Party on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (REPSBAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't should help blacks	151	8.4
5) Blacks should help themselves	369	20.4
7) Other/it depends/neither	43	2.4
8) Don't know	232	12.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

680) If R says Republican Party thinks government should help blacks/If R says Republican Party thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (REPSBAS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1287	71.2
1) Great extent	271	15.0
5) Only some	249	13.8
Total	1807	100.0

681) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSBA5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1006	55.7
1) Gov't help blacks to great extent	44	2.4
2) Gov't help blacks to some extent	107	5.9
3) Other/neither/depends	43	2.4
4) Should help themselves to some extent	142	7.9
5) Should help themselves to a great extent	227	12.6
8) Don't know	232	12.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

682) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branching (REPSBA7P)

	TOTAL	%
1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent	59	3.3
2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent	126	7.0
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends	513	28.4
4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent	338	18.7
5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent	343	19.0
8) Don't know	418	23.1
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

683) If R selected for standard version: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? (AFFIRMS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	927	51.3
1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action	431	23.9
5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action	338	18.7
7) Other (specify)	59	3.3
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

684) If R selected for experimental version: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? (AFFIRME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	880	48.7
1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action	397	22.0
5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action	429	23.7
7) Other (specify)	50	2.8
8) Don't know	43	2.4
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

685) If R says companies should have to have affirmative action: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should have to have affirmative action)? (AFFIRMSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	979	54.2
1) Strongly	601	33.3
5) Not strongly	221	12.2
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

686) If R says companies should not have to have affirmative action: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? (AFFIRMOP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1040	57.6
1) Strongly	560	31.0
5) Not strongly	204	11.3
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

687) Combined affirmative action (standard/experimental) (AFFIRMSM)

	TOTAL	%
1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action	828	45.8
5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action	767	42.4
7) Other	109	6.0
8) Don't know	85	4.7
9) Refused	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

688) Summary - affirmative action (standard/experimental) (AFFIRMAL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Strongly - should have to have affirmative action	601	33.3
2) Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action	221	12.2
4) Not strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action	204	11.3
5) Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action	560	31.0
7) Other	109	6.0
8) Don't know	93	5.1
9) Refused	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

689) Building and repairing highways (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on building and repairing highways be increased decreased or kept about the same?) (HIGHWAY)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	677	37.5
3) Decreased	135	7.5
5) Kept about the same	969	53.6
7) Cut out entirely	6	0.3
8) Don't know	20	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

690) What about welfare programs? (Should federal spending on welfare programs be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (WELFARE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	302	16.7
3) Decreased	669	37.0
5) Kept about the same	782	43.3
7) Cut out entirely	22	1.2
8) Don't know	30	1.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

691) What about spending on aids research? (Should federal spending on spending on aids research be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (AIDS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	911	50.4
3) Decreased	151	8.4
5) Kept about the same	697	38.6
7) Cut out entirely	11	0.6
8) Don't know	37	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

692) What about foreign aid? (Should federal spending on foreign aid be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (FOREIGN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	162	9.0
3) Decreased	787	43.6
5) Kept about the same	792	43.8
7) Cut out entirely	22	1.2
8) Don't know	42	2.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

693) What about food stamps? (Should federal spending on food stamps be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (FOODSTMP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	285	15.8
3) Decreased	549	30.4
5) Kept about the same	890	49.3
7) Cut out entirely	32	1.8
8) Don't know	49	2.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

694) What about aid to poor people? (Should federal spending on aid to poor people be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (AIDPOOR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	916	50.7
3) Decreased	154	8.5
5) Kept about the same	693	38.4
7) Cut out entirely	9	0.5
8) Don't know	29	1.6
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

695) What about social security? (Should federal spending on social security be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (SOCSEC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1120	62.0
3) Decreased	66	3.7
5) Kept about the same	572	31.7
7) Cut out entirely	11	0.6
8) Don't know	38	2.1
Total	1807	100.0

696) What about environmental protection? (Should federal spending on environmental protection be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (ENVIRON)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	913	50.5
3) Decreased	164	9.1
5) Kept about the same	694	38.4
7) Cut out entirely	2	0.1
8) Don't know	33	1.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

697) What about public schools? (Should federal spending on public schools be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (SCHOOLS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1368	75.7
3) Decreased	87	4.8
5) Kept about the same	330	18.3
7) Cut out entirely	13	0.7
8) Don't know	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

698) What about dealing with crime? (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (CRIME)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1180	65.3
3) Decreased	89	4.9
5) Kept about the same	514	28.4
7) Cut out entirely	7	0.4
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

699) What about child care? (Should federal spending on child care be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (CHILDCAR)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	1108	61.3
3) Decreased	128	7.1
5) Kept about the same	515	28.5
7) Cut out entirely	16	0.9
8) Don't know	39	2.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

700) What about tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration? (Should federal spending on tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (IMMIGRAT)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	931	51.5
3) Decreased	173	9.6
5) Kept about the same	641	35.5
7) Cut out entirely	11	0.6
8) Don't know	47	2.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

701) What about aid to blacks? (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (BLACKS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Increased	293	16.2
3) Decreased	415	23.0
5) Kept about the same	971	53.7
7) Cut out entirely	39	2.2
8) Don't know	75	4.2
9) Refused	14	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

702) Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to spend the extra money the federal government is likely to have in the near future. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? (TAXCUTS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1111	61.5
5) Disapprove	637	35.3
8) Don't know	56	3.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

703) If R approves using federal budget surplus to cut taxes/If R disapproves using federal budget surplus to cut taxes: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? (TAXCUTAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	59	3.3
1) Strongly	1216	67.3
5) Not strongly	529	29.3
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

704) Summary: Tax cut from surplus (TAXCUTSP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	811	44.9
2) Approve not strongly	298	16.5
4) Disapprove not strongly	231	12.8
5) Disapprove strongly	405	22.4
8) Don't know	59	3.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

705) Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? (SOCSECSP)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve	1453	80.4
5) Disapprove	312	17.3
8) Don't know	39	2.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

706) If R approves using surplus for social security & medicare/If R disapproves using surplus for social security & medicare: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? (SOCSCSSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	42	2.3
1) Strongly	1309	72.4
5) Not strongly	454	25.1
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

707) Summary: Use surplus to protect social security (SOCSECSM)

	TOTAL	%
1) Approve strongly	1153	63.8
2) Approve not strongly	298	16.5
4) Disapprove not strongly	156	8.6
5) Disapprove strongly	156	8.6
8) Don't know	41	2.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

708) There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (ABORTION)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.	215	11.9
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	525	29.1
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established	265	14.7
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	753	41.7
7) Other (specify)	28	1.5
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

709) All abortion respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (ABORTIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Not at all important	76	4.2
2) Not too important	193	10.7
3) Somewhat important	499	27.6
4) Very important	640	35.4
5) Extremely important	389	21.5
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

710) Where would you place Al Gore on abortion? (GOREABTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.	84	4.6
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	228	12.6
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established	253	14.0
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	762	42.2
7) Other (specify)	21	1.2
8) Don't know	450	24.9
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

711) If Gore's position on abortion is not DON'T KNOW/REF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GOREABP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	459	25.4
1) Very certain	426	23.6
3) Pretty certain	540	29.9
5) Not very certain	380	21.0
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

712) Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)? (BUSHABTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted.	285	15.8
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	655	36.2
3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established	227	12.6
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	119	6.6
7) Other (specify)	23	1.3
8) Don't know	488	27.0
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

713) If George W. Bush's position on abortion is not DON'T KNOW/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHABP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	498	27.6
1) Very certain	315	17.4
3) Pretty certain	560	31.0
5) Not very certain	433	24.0
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

714) Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? (ABRTPRNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1395	77.2
5) Oppose	353	19.5
8) Don't know	44	2.4
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

715) If R favors abortion law requiring minors' parental permission/If R opposes abortion law requiring minors' parental permission: Strongly or not strongly? (ABRTSPRN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	59	3.3
1) Strongly	1461	80.9
5) Not strongly	286	15.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

716) Summary: Parental consent for abortions (ABRTSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor strongly	1233	68.2
2) Favor not strongly	162	9.0
4) Oppose not strongly	124	6.9
5) Oppose strongly	228	12.6
8) Don't know	45	2.5
9) Refused	12	0.7
Total	1807	100.0

717) There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBRTHSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1236	68.4
5) Oppose	444	24.6
8) Don't know	108	6.0
9) Refused	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

718) If R favors ban on late-term abortions/If R opposes ban on late-term abortions: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBRTHSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	127	7.0
1) Strongly	1386	76.7
5) Not strongly	289	16.0
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

719) Summary: Ban on late-term abortions (PBRTHSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor strongly	1097	60.7
2) Favor not strongly	137	7.6
4) Oppose not strongly	152	8.4
5) Oppose strongly	289	16.0
8) Don't know	113	6.3
9) REFUSED	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

720) Checkpoint: Mode and version for environment versus jobs self-placement [FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without haven't thought much about it option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the 'haven't thought much about it' option.] (CKPTEJSP)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard version	502	27.8
2) FTF experimental version	504	27.9
3) Phone version 1	373	20.6
4) Phone version 2	428	23.7
Total	1807	100.0

721) [Environment versus jobs scale self placement] If R selected for standard version: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (JOBENVF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	66	3.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	66	3.7
2) 2	66	3.7
3) 3	70	3.9
4) 4	131	7.2
5) 5	60	3.3
6) 6	26	1.4
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	16	0.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1305	72.2
Total	1807	100.0

722) If R selected for experimental version: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? (JOBENVE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.2
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	44	2.4
2) 2	62	3.4
3) 3	92	5.1
4) 4	160	8.9
5) 5	70	3.9
6) 6	41	2.3
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	18	1.0
8) Don't know	13	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

723) Combined FTF standard/experimental - 7pt jobs vs. environment (JOBNVC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	66	3.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	110	6.1
2) 2	128	7.1
3) 3	162	9.0
4) 4	291	16.1
5) 5	130	7.2
6) 6	67	3.7
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	34	1.9
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	805	44.5
Total	1807	100.0

724) If R selected for version 1: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (JOBENVP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	110	6.1
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	177	9.8
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	52	2.9
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	29	1.6
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1434	79.4
Total	1807	100.0

725) If R selected for version 2: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel? (JOBENVPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1380	76.4
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	245	13.6
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	102	5.6
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	46	2.5
8) Don't know	28	1.5
9) Refused	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

726) Combined telephone versions - environment vs. jobs (JOBENVC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	110	6.1
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	422	23.4
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	154	8.5
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	75	4.2
8) Don't know	33	1.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1013	56.1
Total	1807	100.0

727) Both telephone versions: If protecting environment is more important/If maintaining jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (JOBVSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1231	68.1
1) Much more important	336	18.6
5) Only somewhat more important	240	13.3
Total	1807	100.0

728) Summary: 5pt env/jobs self-placement from branching series (JOBENV5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	110	6.1
1) Environment much more important	270	14.9
2) Environment somewhat more important	152	8.4
3) Other/depends/neither	75	4.2
4) Jobs somewhat more important	88	4.9
5) Jobs much more important	66	3.7
8) Don't know	33	1.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1013	56.1
Total	1807	100.0

729) Summary: 5pt env/jobs self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (JOBENV7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	176	9.7
1) Scale 1 branching: Environment much more important	380	21.0
2) Scale 2 branching: Environment somewhat more important	280	15.5
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	658	36.4
4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important	155	8.6
5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important	100	5.5
8) Don't know	47	2.6
9) Refused; NA	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

730) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue (jobs/environment scale)? [FTF interview] (GOREJEF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	132	7.3
2) 2	161	8.9
3) 3	171	9.5
4) 4	178	9.9
5) 5	79	4.4
6) 6	45	2.5
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	22	1.2
8) Don't know	213	11.8
9) REFUSED	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

731) What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? [Telephone interview] (GOREJEP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	461	25.5
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	101	5.6
7) Other, it depends, neither	21	1.2
8) Don't know	215	11.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

732) If R says Gore thinks protecting environment is more important/If R says Gore thinks jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (GORESJE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1245	68.9
1) Much more important	324	17.9
5) Somewhat more important	234	12.9
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

733) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Gore placement from branching series (GOREJE5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Environment much more important	298	16.5
2) Environment somewhat more important	161	8.9
3) Other/depends/neither	21	1.2
4) Jobs somewhat more important	73	4.0
5) Jobs much more important	26	1.4
8) Don't know	219	12.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

734) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREJE7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Environment much more important	430	23.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Environment somewhat more important	322	17.8
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	449	24.8
4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important	118	6.5
5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important	48	2.7
8) Don't know	432	23.9
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

735) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue (jobs/environment scale)? [FTF interview] (BUSHJEF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	23	1.3
2) 2	18	1.0
3) 3	73	4.0
4) 4	199	11.0
5) 5	209	11.6
6) 6	168	9.3
7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	63	3.5
8) Don't know	249	13.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

736) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? [Telephone interview] (BUSHJEP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living	194	10.7
5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment	327	18.1
7) Other, it depends, neither	39	2.2
8) Don't know	237	13.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

737) If R says Bush thinks protecting environment is more important/If R says Bush thinks jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (BUSHSJE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1286	71.2
1) Much more important	242	13.4
5) Somewhat more important	273	15.1
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

738) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Bush placement from branching series (BUSHJE5P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Environment much more important	78	4.3
2) Environment somewhat more important	114	6.3
3) Other/depends/neither	39	2.2
4) Jobs somewhat more important	159	8.8
5) Jobs much more important	164	9.1
8) Don't know	243	13.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

739) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHJE7P)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: environment much more important	101	5.6
2) Scale 2 branching: environment somewhat more important	132	7.3
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	520	28.8
4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important	327	18.1
5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important	227	12.6
8) Don't know	492	27.2
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

740) Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? (GAYMLSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Homosexuals should be allowed to serve	1285	71.1
5) Homosexuals should not be allowed to serve	414	22.9
8) Don't know	86	4.8
9) Refused	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

741) If R says allow homosexuals to serve in armed forces: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? (GAYMLFAV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	522	28.9
1) Strongly	871	48.2
5) Not strongly	410	22.7
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

742) If R says do not allow homosexuals to serve in armed forces: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? (GAYMLOPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1393	77.1
1) Strongly	322	17.8
5) Not strongly	89	4.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

743) Summary: Homosexuals in armed forces (GAYMLSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Strongly - Should be allowed to serve	871	48.2
2) Not strongly - Should be allowed to serve	410	22.7
4) Not strongly - Should not be allowed to serve	89	4.9
5) Strongly - Should not be allowed to serve	322	17.8
8) Don't know	93	5.1
9) Refused	19	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

744) Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (GUNSSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) More difficult	1060	58.7
3) Make it easier	75	4.2
5) Keep these rules about the same	659	36.5
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

745) If R says gov't should make it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (GUNSCRTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	747	41.3
1) A lot more difficult	861	47.6
5) Somewhat more difficult	199	11.0
Total	1807	100.0

746) If R says Gov't should make it easier to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier? (GUNFREE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.8
1) A lot easier	39	2.2
5) Somewhat easier	36	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

747) Summary: R position on gun restrictions (GUNSSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) A lot more difficult	861	47.6
2) Somewhat more difficult	199	11.0
3) Keep rules about the same	659	36.5
4) Somewhat easier	36	2.0
5) A lot easier	39	2.2
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

748) All gun restriction respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (GUNSIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Not at all important	37	2.0
2) Not too important	139	7.7
3) Somewhat important	461	25.5
4) Very important	716	39.6
5) Extremely important	448	24.8
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

749) Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (GOREGUNS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) More difficult	1139	63.0
3) Make it easier	19	1.1
5) Keep these rules about the same	350	19.4
8) Don't know	294	16.3
9) REFUSED	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

750) If R thinks Gore would like it easier to buy a gun/If R thinks Gore would like it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier?/A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (GOREGCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	649	35.9
1) A lot	718	39.7
5) Somewhat	437	24.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

751) Summary: Gore position on gun restrictions (GOREGCTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) A lot more difficult	709	39.2
2) Somewhat more difficult	427	23.6
3) Keep rules about the same	350	19.4
4) Somewhat easier	10	0.6
5) A lot easier	9	0.5
8) Don't know	297	16.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

752) If R says Gore wants more difficult/easier to buy gun: If strength of Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GOREGCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	652	36.1
1) Very certain	393	21.7
3) Pretty certain	542	30.0
5) Not very certain	219	12.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

753) Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (BUSHGUNS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) More difficult	375	20.8
3) Make it easier	315	17.4
5) Keep these rules about the same	806	44.6
8) Don't know	306	16.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

754) If R thinks G.W. Bush would like it easier to buy a gun/If R thinks G.W. Bush would like it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier? A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (BUSHGCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1117	61.8
1) A lot	318	17.6
5) Somewhat	370	20.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

755) Summary: GW Bush position on gun restrictions (BUSHGCTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) A lot more difficult	182	10.1
2) Somewhat more difficult	193	10.7
3) Keep rules about the same	806	44.6
4) Somewhat easier	177	9.8
5) A lot easier	136	7.5
8) Don't know	308	17.0
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

756) If R says GW Bush wants more difficult/easier to buy gun: If strength of GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHGCPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1119	61.9
1) Very certain	190	10.5
3) Pretty certain	318	17.6
5) Not very certain	180	10.0
Total	1807	100.0

757) If R selected for standard version: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? (SCHVCHRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	925	51.2
1) Favor school voucher program	424	23.5
5) Oppose school voucher program	394	21.8
8) Don't know	62	3.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

758) If R selected for experimental version: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? (SCHVCHRE)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	317	17.5
1) Favor school voucher program	332	18.4
5) Oppose school voucher program	259	14.3
8) Don't know	12	0.7
9) Refused; NA; INAP	887	49.1
Total	1807	100.0

759) Combined versions - school vouchers (SCHVCHRC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	317	17.5
1) Favor school voucher program	756	41.8
5) Oppose school voucher program	653	36.1
8) Don't know	74	4.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

760) If R favors school voucher program/If R opposes school voucher program: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? (SCHVCHRH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1216	67.3
1) Strongly	439	24.3
5) Not strongly	152	8.4
Total	1807	100.0

761) Summary: R position on school vouchers (SCHVCHRU)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	317	17.5
1) Favor strongly	245	13.6
2) Favor not strongly	87	4.8
4) Oppose not strongly	65	3.6
5) Oppose strongly	194	10.7
8) Don't know	12	0.7
9) Refused; NA; INAP	887	49.1
Total	1807	100.0

762) Do you favor a law making English the official language of the United States, meaning government business would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose such a law? (ENGLOFFC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1202	66.5
3) Neither favor nor oppose [Vol]	130	7.2
5) Oppose	446	24.7
8) Don't know	24	1.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

763) Some people say that the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools. Others claim that this is not the government's business. Have you been interested enough in this question to favor one side over the other? (SCHLINTG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes	1195	66.1
5) No	580	32.1
8) Don't know	27	1.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

764) If R has opinion whether gov't see to black/white kids in same schools: Do you think the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools or stay out of this area as it is not the government's business? (SCHLINTO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	612	33.9
1) See to it that white and black children go to the same school	596	33.0
5) Stay out of this area as it is not the government's business	531	29.4
7) Other; depends	56	3.1
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

765) Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words, homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt children? (GAYADOPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes	747	41.3
5) No	909	50.3
8) Don't know	126	7.0
9) Refused	22	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

766) Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? (DTHPSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor	1240	68.6
5) Oppose	462	25.6
8) Don't know	87	4.8
9) Refused	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

767) If R favors death penalty for persons convicted of murder:(Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? (DTHPSTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	567	31.4
1) Strongly	925	51.2
5) Not strongly	314	17.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

768) If R opposes death penalty for persons convicted of murder:(Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? (DTHOPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1345	74.4
1) Strongly	283	15.7
5) Not strongly	177	9.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

769) Summary: R position on death penalty (DTHPSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Favor strongly	925	51.2
2) Favor not strongly	314	17.4
4) Oppose not strongly	177	9.8
5) Oppose strongly	283	15.7
8) Don't know	89	4.9
9) Refused	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

770) Checkpoint: Mode and version for women's equal role self-placement (CKPTWOM)

	TOTAL	%
1) FTF standard	520	28.8
2) FTF experimental	486	26.9
3) Phone version 1	382	21.1
4) Phone version 2	419	23.2
Total	1807	100.0

771) [If R selected for standard version: FTF: R self placement on equal role scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (FMQLFTF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	18	1.0
1) Women and men should have equal roles	296	16.4
2) 2	80	4.4
3) 3	31	1.7
4) 4	44	2.4
5) 5	20	1.1
6) 6	14	0.8
7) A woman's place is in the home	16	0.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1287	71.2
Total	1807	100.0

772) [If R selected for experimental version: FTF: R self placement on equal role scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale? (FMQLFTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1323	73.2
1) Women and men should have equal roles	276	15.3
2) 2	62	3.4
3) 3	39	2.2
4) 4	60	3.3
5) 5	18	1.0
6) 6	9	0.5
7) A woman's place is in the home	13	0.7
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

773) Combined FTF standard/experimental versions - women's role (FMQLFTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	18	1.0
1) Women and men should have equal roles	572	31.7
2) 2	142	7.9
3) 3	70	3.9
4) 4	104	5.8
5) 5	38	2.1
6) 6	23	1.3
7) A woman's place is in the home	29	1.6
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	804	44.5
Total	1807	100.0

774) Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. If R selected for version 1:Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (FMQLST)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	19	1.1
1) Women and men should have equal roles	328	18.2
5) A woman's place is in the home	18	1.0
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	14	0.8
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1425	78.9
Total	1807	100.0

775) Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. If R selected for version 2: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel? (FMQLBRE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1389	76.9
1) Women and men should have equal roles	367	20.3
5) A woman's place is in the home	23	1.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	24	1.3
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

776) Combined telephone versions - women's role (FMQLCPH)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	19	1.1
1) Women and men should have equal roles	695	38.5
5) A woman's place is in the home	41	2.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	38	2.1
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1008	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

777) Both telephone versions: If R says men and women should have equal roles/If R says a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (FMQLSUP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1071	59.3
1) Strongly	680	37.6
5) Not strongly	55	3.0
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

778) Summary: 5pt womens role self-placement from branching series (FMQL5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	19	1.1
1) Strongly - women equal role	652	36.1
2) Not strongly - equal role	42	2.3
3) Other/depends/neither	38	2.1
4) Not strongly - place is in the home	13	0.7
5) Strongly - place is in the home	28	1.5
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1008	55.8
Total	1807	100.0

779) Summary: 5pt womens role self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (FMQL7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	37	2.0
1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - women equal role	1224	67.7
2) Scale 2 branching: not strongly - equal role	184	10.2
3) Scale 3 branching: other/depends/neither	250	13.8
4) Scale 4 branching: not strongly - place is in the home	36	2.0
5) Scale 5 branching: strongly - place is in the home	57	3.2
8) Don't know	14	0.8
9) Refused; NA; INAP	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

780) Gore-equal role scale FTF Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? (GOREFEQF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Women and men should have equal roles	273	15.1
2) 2	185	10.2
3) 3	145	8.0
4) 4	127	7.0
5) 5	36	2.0
6) 6	24	1.3
7) A woman's place is in the home	19	1.1
8) Don't know	193	10.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

781) Telephone: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, or that a woman's place is in the home? (GOREFEQP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Women and men should have equal roles	552	30.5
5) A woman's place is in the home	40	2.2
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	19	1.1
8) Don't know	187	10.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

782) If R thinks Gore feels men and women should have equal roles/If R thinks Gore feels that a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role?/Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (GOREFEQS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1215	67.2
1) Strongly	506	28.0
5) Not strongly	78	4.3
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

783) Summary: 5pt womens role Gore placement from branching series (GORE5FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Strongly - women equal role	480	26.6
2) Not strongly - equal role	64	3.5
3) Other/depends/neither	19	1.1
4) Not strongly - place is in the home	14	0.8
5) Strongly - place is in the home	26	1.4
8) Don't know	195	10.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

784) Summary: 5pt womens role Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GORE7FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - women equal role	753	41.7
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - equal role	249	13.8
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	327	18.1
4) Scale 4 branching: Not strongly - place is in the home	38	2.1
5) Scale 5 branching: strongly - place is in the home	45	2.5
8) Don't know	388	21.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

785) Bush-equal role scale FTF Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? (BUSHFEQF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Women and men should have equal roles	154	8.5
2) 2	99	5.5
3) 3	153	8.5
4) 4	172	9.5
5) 5	114	6.3
6) 6	60	3.3
7) A woman's place is in the home	30	1.7
8) Don't know	220	12.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

786) Telephone: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? (BUSHFEQP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Women and men should have equal roles	440	24.3
5) A woman's place is in the home	112	6.2
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	30	1.7
8) Don't know	216	12.0
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

787) If R thinks GW Bush feels men and women should have equal roles/If R thinks GW Bush feels that a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (BUSHFEQS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1255	69.5
1) Strongly	412	22.8
5) Not strongly	133	7.4
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

788) Summary: 5pt womens role Bush placement from branching series (BUSH5FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; FTF mode	1007	55.7
1) Strongly - women equal role	344	19.0
2) Not strongly - equal role	90	5.0
3) Other/depends/neither	30	1.7
4) Not strongly - place is in the home	43	2.4
5) Strongly - place is in the home	68	3.8
8) Don't know	223	12.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

789) Summary: 5pt womens role Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSH7FEQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - women equal role	498	27.6
2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - equal role	189	10.5
3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither	469	26.0
4) Scale 4 branching: Not strongly - place is in the home	103	5.7
5) Scale 5 branching: Strongly - place is in the home	98	5.4
8) Don't know	443	24.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

790) [FTF interview: R self placement on environmental regulation scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (ENVREGSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	192	10.6
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	172	9.5
2) 2	149	8.2
3) 3	159	8.8
4) 4	167	9.2
5) 5	76	4.2
6) 6	48	2.7
7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	36	2.0
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	803	44.4
Total	1807	100.0

791) Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. Telephone interview: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (ENVRGBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	243	13.4
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	337	18.6
5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	132	7.3
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	73	4.0
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1011	55.9
Total	1807	100.0

792) If R thinks tougher regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (ENVRGINC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1470	81.4
1) A lot	217	12.0
5) Somewhat	120	6.6
Total	1807	100.0

793) If R thinks regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (ENVRGBRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1675	92.7
1) Way too much	58	3.2
5) Somewhat	74	4.1
Total	1807	100.0

794) Summary: 5pt environment regulation self-placement from branching series (ENVRG5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	243	13.4
1) Toughen regulations a lot	217	12.0
2) Toughen regulations a little	120	6.6
3) Other/depends/neither	73	4.0
4) Regulations somewhat of a burden	74	4.1
5) Regulations way too much burden	58	3.2
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1011	55.9
Total	1807	100.0

795) Summary: 5pt environment regulation self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (ENVRG7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about it	435	24.1
1) Scale 1 branching: toughen regulations a lot	389	21.5
2) Scale 2 branching: toughen regulations a little	269	14.9
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither	475	26.3
4) Scale 6 branching: regulations somewhat of a burden	122	6.8
5) Scale 7 branching: regulations way too much burden	94	5.2
8) Don't know	16	0.9
9) Refused; NA	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

796) All environmental regulation respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (ENVRGIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Not at all important	129	7.1
2) Not too important	223	12.3
3) Somewhat important	648	35.9
4) Very important	563	31.2
5) Extremely important	219	12.1
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

797) [Gore placement-environmental regulation scale] Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? (GOREENV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	153	8.5
2) 2	232	12.8
3) 3	178	9.9
4) 4	138	7.6
5) 5	45	2.5
6) 6	24	1.3
7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	10	0.6
8) Don't know	223	12.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

798) Telephone: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? (GOREENVB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	483	26.7
5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	71	3.9
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	19	1.1
8) Don't know	225	12.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

799) If R thinks Gore feels tougher environmental regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (GOREERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1324	73.3
1) A lot	331	18.3
5) Somewhat	151	8.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

800) If R thinks Gore feels environment regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (GOREERB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1736	96.1
1) Way too much	7	0.4
5) Somewhat	64	3.5
Total	1807	100.0

801) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Gore placement from branching series (GOREE5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Toughen regulations a lot	331	18.3
2) Toughen regulations a little	151	8.4
3) Other/depends/neither	19	1.1
4) Regulations somewhat of a burden	64	3.5
5) Regulations way too much burden	7	0.4
8) Don't know	226	12.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

802) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREE7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Toughen regulations a lot	484	26.8
2) Scale 2 branching: Toughen regulations a little	383	21.2
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither	380	21.0
4) Scale 6 branching: regulations somewhat of a burden	88	4.9
5) Scale 7 branching: regulations way too much burden	17	0.9
8) Don't know	449	24.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

803) If R's placement of Gore is not DON'T KNOW or OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GORECRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	473	26.2
1) Very certain	420	23.2
3) Pretty certain	548	30.3
5) Not very certain	364	20.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

804) (Bush placement-environmental regulation scale) FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? (BUSHENV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.4
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	26	1.4
2) 2	40	2.2
3) 3	93	5.1
4) 4	203	11.2
5) 5	182	10.1
6) 6	148	8.2
7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	63	3.5
8) Don't know	248	13.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

805) Telephone: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, or that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? (BUSHENVB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment	159	8.8
5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden	355	19.6
7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol]	43	2.4
8) Don't know	241	13.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

806) If R thinks GW Bush feels tougher environment regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (BUSHERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1648	91.2
1) A lot	68	3.8
5) Somewhat	91	5.0
Total	1807	100.0

807) If R thinks GW Bush feels environment regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (BUSHERB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1452	80.4
1) Way too much	136	7.5
5) Somewhat	216	12.0
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

808) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Bush placement from branching series (BUSHE5PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1007	55.7
1) Toughen regulations a lot	68	3.8
2) Toughen regulations a little	91	5.0
3) Other/depends/neither	43	2.4
4) Regulations somewhat of a burden	216	12.0
5) Regulations way too much burden	136	7.5
8) Don't know	244	13.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

809) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHE7PS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Scale 1 branching: Toughen regulations a lot	94	5.2
2) Scale 2 branching: Toughen regulations a little	131	7.2
3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither	521	28.8
4) Scale 6 branching: Regulations somewhat of a burden	364	20.1
5) Scale 7 branching: Regulations way too much burden	199	11.0
8) Don't know	492	27.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

810) If R's placement of GW Bush is not DON'T KNOW or OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHECRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	541	29.9
1) Very certain	255	14.1
3) Pretty certain	570	31.5
5) Not very certain	440	24.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

811) So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the national elections this coming November or not? (WILLVOTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes	1547	85.6
5) No	230	12.7
8) Don't know	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

812) If R expects to vote in November election: Who do you think you will vote for in the election for President? (WHOVOTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	260	14.4
1) Al Gore	740	41.0
2) George W. Bush	604	33.4
3) Pat Buchanan	5	0.3
4) Ralph Nader	41	2.3
5) None (if voter, will not vote for President)	3	0.2
7) Other	70	3.9
8) Don't know	63	3.5
9) Refused	21	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

813) If R expects to vote in November election: If intended presidential vote is not NONE or DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: Would you say that your preference for [Gore/Bush/Buchanan/other] is strong or not strong? (CANDPREF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	347	19.2
1) Strong	1114	61.6
5) Not strong	339	18.8
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

814) If Turnout intent is will not/don't know if will vote in November/if vote intent is to vote but not for President: If you were going to vote, who do you think you would vote for in the election for President? (WHOVOTEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1547	85.6
1) Al Gore	89	4.9
2) George W. Bush	104	5.8
3) Pat Buchanan	2	0.1
4) Ralph Nader	4	0.2
5) None (if voter, will not vote for President) [Vol]	33	1.8
7) Other	6	0.3
8) Don't know	19	1.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

815) If turnout intent is WILL NOT/DON'T KNOW if will vote in November/if vote intent is to vote but not for President: If R names presidential candidate he would vote for if voting: Would you say that your preference for [CANDIDATE NAMED] is strong or not strong? (CANDPRFN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1602	88.7
1) Strong	105	5.8
5) Not strong	97	5.4
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

816) After the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. House of Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats? (PARTYHSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Republicans	815	45.1
5) Democrats	604	33.4
8) Don't know	384	21.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

817) Again, after the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate, -- the Republicans or the Democrats? (PARTYSEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Republicans	814	45.0
5) Democrats	557	30.8
8) Don't know	430	23.8
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

818) Some people feel that if black people are not getting fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington ought to see to it that they do. Others feel that this is not the federal government's business. Have you had enough interest in this question to favor one side over the other? (JOBINTST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	3	0.2
1) Yes, have interest in question	1192	66.0
5) No, haven't had interest	585	32.4
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) Refused	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

819) If R has had interest in issue of fair treatment in jobs: How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs or is this not the federal government's business? (BLEQUAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	615	34.0
1) Government in Washington should see to it that black people	625	34.6
5) This is not the federal government's business	519	28.7
7) Other	46	2.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

820) If R has had interest in issue of fair treatment in jobs: If R's position is to see to fair treatment/if R's position is not the federal government's business: Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? (BLFEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	663	36.7
1) Strongly	951	52.6
5) Not strongly	192	10.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

821) Summary: R position on fair treatment in jobs (BLFEMPS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	588	32.5
1) Strongly - Gov't should see to fair treatment	524	29.0
2) Not strongly - Gov't should see to fair treatment	100	5.5
4) Not strongly - Not the government's business	92	5.1
5) Strongly - Not the government's business	427	23.6
7) Other	46	2.5
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

822) Some people say that because of past discrimination, blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks advantages they haven't earned. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? (BLAFFIRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	4	0.2
1) For preferential hiring and promotion of blacks	262	14.5
5) Against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks	1366	75.6
7) Other	94	5.2
8) Don't know	66	3.7
9) Refused	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

823) If R favors preference in hiring and promotion of blacks: Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? (BLAFFRMS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1545	85.5
1) Strongly	174	9.6
5) Not strongly	87	4.8
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

824) If R opposes preference in hiring and promotion of blacks: Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? (BLAFFRMA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	441	24.4
1) Strongly	1021	56.5
5) Not strongly	342	18.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

825) Summary: R position on affirmative action in jobs (BLAFFRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	4	0.2
1) Favor strongly	174	9.6
2) Favor not strongly	87	4.8
4) Oppose not strongly	342	18.9
5) Oppose strongly	1021	56.5
7) Other	94	5.2
8) Don't know	70	3.9
9) Refused	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

826) As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (DEFICT92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Gotten smaller	496	27.4
3) Gotten larger	126	7.0
5) Stayed about the same	203	11.2
8) Don't know	61	3.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

827) If R says the budget deficit is smaller than in 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (DEFICTSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1311	72.6
1) Much smaller	240	13.3
5) Somewhat smaller	248	13.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

828) If R says the budget deficit is larger than in 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? (DEFICTLG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1681	93.0
1) Much larger	44	2.4
5) Somewhat larger	78	4.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

829) Summary: Budget deficit since 1992 (DEFICSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much smaller	240	13.3
2) Somewhat smaller	248	13.7
3) About the same	203	11.2
4) Somewhat larger	78	4.3
5) Much larger	44	2.4
8) Don't know	73	4.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

830) Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? (POOR92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Increased	339	18.8
3) Decreased	158	8.7
5) Stayed about the same	275	15.2
8) Don't know	114	6.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

831) If R says spending on poor has decreased since 1992/If R says spending on poor has increased since 1992: A lot or somewhat? (POORSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1310	72.5
1) A lot	130	7.2
5) Somewhat	362	20.0
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

832) Summary: Federal assistance to the poor (POORSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Increases a lot	81	4.5
2) Increased somewhat	256	14.2
3) Stayed about the same	275	15.2
4) Decreased somewhat	106	5.9
5) Decreased a lot	49	2.7
8) Don't know	119	6.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

833) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (ECON92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	633	35.0
3) Worse	59	3.3
5) The same	185	10.2
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

834) If R says nation's economy is better since 1992:(Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (ECONBTTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1174	65.0
1) Much better	372	20.6
5) Somewhat better	261	14.4
Total	1807	100.0

835) If R says nation's economy is worse since 1992:(Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (ECONWRSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.7
1) Much worse	22	1.2
5) Somewhat worse	37	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

836) Summary: Economy since 1992 (ECONSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	372	20.6
2) Somewhat better	261	14.4
3) About the same	185	10.2
4) Somewhat worse	37	2.0
5) Much worse	22	1.2
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

837) Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? (CLINECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Made the economy better	502	27.8
3) Made the economy worse	41	2.3
5) No effect	321	17.8
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

838) If R says Clinton has made economy better since 1992: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINECO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.2
1) Much better	242	13.4
5) Somewhat better	260	14.4
Total	1807	100.0

839) If R says Clinton has made economy worse since 1992: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1766	97.7
1) Much worse	15	0.8
5) Somewhat worse	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

840) Summary: Clinton effect on economy (CLINECSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	242	13.4
2) Somewhat better	260	14.4
3) No effect	321	17.8
4) Somewhat worse	26	1.4
5) Much worse	15	0.8
8) Don't know	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

841) Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? (CLINPERS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Helped	189	10.5
3) Hurt	75	4.2
5) Not affected	608	33.6
8) Don't know	15	0.8
Total	1807	100.0

842) Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (SECURE92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) More secure	215	11.9
3) Less secure	261	14.4
5) No change	379	21.0
8) Don't know	32	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

843) If R says U.S. more secure from enemies since 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? (SECURP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1592	88.1
1) Much more secure	71	3.9
5) Somewhat more secure	144	8.0
Total	1807	100.0

844) If R says U.S. less secure from enemies since 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? (SECURN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1546	85.6
1) Much less secure	107	5.9
5) Somewhat less secure	153	8.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

845) Summary: U.S. security from foreign enemies (SECURSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much more secure	71	3.9
2) Somewhat more secure	144	8.0
3) Not changed very much	379	21.0
4) Somewhat less secure	153	8.5
5) Much less secure	107	5.9
8) Don't know	33	1.8
Total	1807	100.0

846) Would you say that Clinton Administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) More secure	192	10.6
3) Less secure	218	12.1
5) No change	449	24.8
8) Don't know	28	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

847) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. more secure: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? (CLINPSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1615	89.4
1) Much more secure	73	4.0
5) Somewhat more secure	119	6.6
Total	1807	100.0

848) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. less secure: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? (CLINNSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1589	87.9
1) Much less secure	99	5.5
5) Somewhat less secure	119	6.6
Total	1807	100.0

849) Summary: Clinton Administration effect on U.S. security (CLINSCSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much more secure	73	4.0
2) Somewhat more secure	119	6.6
3) Hasn't made much difference	449	24.8
4) Somewhat less secure	119	6.6
5) Much less secure	99	5.5
8) Don't know	28	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

850) Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (CRIMRATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	327	18.1
3) Worse	276	15.3
5) The same	260	14.4
8) Don't know	24	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

851) If R says U.S. crime rate has gotten better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (CRIMEP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1480	81.9
1) Much better	82	4.5
5) Somewhat better	244	13.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

852) If R says U.S. crime rate has gotten worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (CRIMEN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1531	84.7
1) Much worse	138	7.6
5) Somewhat worse	138	7.6
Total	1807	100.0

853) Summary: U.S. crime rate since 1992 (CRIMSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	82	4.5
2) Somewhat better	244	13.5
3) Stayed about the same	260	14.4
4) Somewhat worse	138	7.6
5) Much worse	138	7.6
8) Don't know	25	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

854) Would you say that Clinton Administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINCRIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	234	12.9
3) Worse	72	4.0
5) No difference	543	30.0
8) Don't know	38	2.1
Total	1807	100.0

855) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate better: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINPCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1573	87.1
1) Much better	72	4.0
5) Somewhat better	161	8.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

856) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINNCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1735	96.0
1) Much worse	36	2.0
5) Somewhat worse	36	2.0
Total	1807	100.0

857) Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on crime rate (CLINCRSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	72	4.0
2) Somewhat better	161	8.9
3) Hasn't made much difference	543	30.0
4) Somewhat worse	36	2.0
5) Much worse	36	2.0
8) Don't know	39	2.2
Total	1807	100.0

858) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (MORLCLIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	87	4.8
3) Worse	470	26.0
5) The same	314	17.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

859) If R says moral climate is better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (MORALP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1720	95.2
1) Much better	28	1.5
5) Somewhat better	59	3.3
Total	1807	100.0

860) If R says moral climate is worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (MORALN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1337	74.0
1) Much worse	260	14.4
5) Somewhat worse	209	11.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

861) Summary: U.S. moral climate since 1992 (MORALSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	28	1.5
2) Somewhat better	59	3.3
3) Stayed about the same	314	17.4
4) Somewhat worse	209	11.6
5) Much worse	260	14.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

862) Has the Clinton Administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINMORL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Better	65	3.6
3) Worse	373	20.6
5) No difference	425	23.5
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

863) If R says Clinton Administration made moral climate better: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINPMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1742	96.4
1) Much better	23	1.3
5) Somewhat better	42	2.3
Total	1807	100.0

864) If R says Clinton Administration made moral climate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINNMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1434	79.4
1) Much worse	214	11.8
5) Somewhat worse	159	8.8
Total	1807	100.0

865) Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on moral climate (CLINMORU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	920	50.9
1) Much better	23	1.3
2) Somewhat better	42	2.3
3) Hasn't made much difference	425	23.5
4) Somewhat worse	159	8.8
5) Much worse	214	11.8
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

866) Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel: Angry (CLINANGY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	617	34.1
5) No	297	16.4
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

867) If R says Clinton has made R angry: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINANGF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1190	65.9
1) Very often	138	7.6
2) Fairly often	143	7.9
3) Occasionally	263	14.6
4) Rarely	73	4.0
Total	1807	100.0

868) Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel: Hopeful (CLINHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	469	26.0
5) No	444	24.6
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

869) If R says Clinton has made R hopeful: How often would you say you've felt hopeful - very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINHOPF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1338	74.0
1) Very often	90	5.0
2) Fairly often	135	7.5
3) Occasionally	203	11.2
4) Rarely	41	2.3
Total	1807	100.0

870) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Afraid (CLINFEAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	232	12.8
5) No	682	37.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

871) If R says Clinton has made R afraid: How often would you say you've felt afraid - very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINFERO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1575	87.2
1) Very often	40	2.2
2) Fairly often	55	3.0
3) Occasionally	96	5.3
4) Rarely	41	2.3
Total	1807	100.0

872) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Proud (CLINPRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Yes	367	20.3
5) No	544	30.1
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

873) If R says Clinton has made R afraid: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (CLINPRDF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1440	79.7
1) Very often	80	4.4
2) Fairly often	101	5.6
3) Occasionally	150	8.3
4) Rarely	35	1.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

874) (What about [TRAIT] [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) moral (CLINTMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	34	1.9
2) Quite well	111	6.1
3) Not too well	293	16.2
4) Not well at all	456	25.2
8) Don't know	20	1.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

875) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Really cares about people like you (CLINCARS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	128	7.1
2) Quite well	316	17.5
3) Not too well	280	15.5
4) Not well at all	165	9.1
8) Don't know	26	1.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

876) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Knowledgeable (CLINKNLG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	330	18.3
2) Quite well	462	25.6
3) Not too well	90	5.0
4) Not well at all	18	1.0
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

877) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Provides strong leadership (CLINLEAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	207	11.5
2) Quite well	374	20.7
3) Not too well	213	11.8
4) Not well at all	106	5.9
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

878) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Dishonest (CLINLIAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	284	15.7
2) Quite well	304	16.8
3) Not too well	223	12.3
4) Not well at all	76	4.2
8) Don't know	26	1.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

879) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Intelligent (CLINSMRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	376	20.8
2) Quite well	412	22.8
3) Not too well	88	4.9
4) Not well at all	30	1.7
8) Don't know	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

880) (What about [TRAIT]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Out of touch with ordinary people (CLINNOCL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	891	49.3
1) Extremely well	107	5.9
2) Quite well	245	13.6
3) Not too well	351	19.4
4) Not well at all	183	10.1
8) Don't know	29	1.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

881) Some people have opinions about almost everything; other people have opinions about just some things; and still other people have very few opinions. What about you? Would you say you have opinions about almost everything, about many things, about some things, or about very few things? (OPINTED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Almost everything	348	19.3
2) Many things	633	35.0
3) Some things	693	38.4
4) Very few things	124	6.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

882) Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? (OPINAVG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Fewer opinions	244	13.5
3) About the same number of opinions	969	53.6
5) More opinions	558	30.9
8) Don't know	27	1.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

883) If R says he/she has more opinions than the average person: Would you say that you have a lot more opinions or just somewhat more opinions? (OPINPAVG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1249	69.1
1) A lot more opinions	255	14.1
5) Somewhat more opinions	303	16.8
Total	1807	100.0

884) If R says he/she has fewer opinions than the average person: Would you say that you have a lot fewer opinions or just somewhat fewer opinions? (OPINNAVG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1563	86.5
1) A lot fewer opinions	58	3.2
5) Somewhat fewer opinions	186	10.3
Total	1807	100.0

885) Summary: Degree R opinionated (OPINSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) A lot fewer	58	3.2
2) Somewhat fewer	186	10.3
3) About the same	969	53.6
4) Somewhat more	303	16.8
5) A lot more	255	14.1
8) Don't know	27	1.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

886) Some people like to have responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, and other people don't like to have responsibility for situations like that. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? (THNKRESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Like	1068	59.1
3) Dislike	243	13.4
5) Neither like or dislike	485	26.8
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

887) If R says R likes situations requiring a lot of thinking: Do you like it a lot or just somewhat? (THNKPRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	739	40.9
1) A lot	707	39.1
5) Somewhat	360	19.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

888) If R says R dislikes situations requiring a lot of thinking: Do you dislike it a lot or just somewhat? (THNKNRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1564	86.6
1) Dislike it a lot	74	4.1
5) Dislike it somewhat	169	9.4
Total	1807	100.0

889) Summary: R like/dislike for intensive thought (THNKSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Like it a lot	707	39.1
2) Like it somewhat	360	19.9
3) Neither like it nor dislike it	485	26.8
4) Dislike it somewhat	169	9.4
5) Dislike it a lot	74	4.1
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

890) Some people prefer to solve simple problems instead of complex ones, whereas other people prefer to solve more complex problems. Which type of problem do you prefer to solve: simple or complex? (PROBSOLV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Simple	889	49.2
5) Complex	872	48.3
8) Don't know	34	1.9
9) Refused	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

891) Do you consider religion to be an important part of your life, or not? (RELGIMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Important	1373	76.0
5) Not important	426	23.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

892) If R says that religion is important: Would you say your religion provides some guidance in your day-to-day living, quite a bit of guidance, or a great deal of guidance in your day-to-day life? (RELGGUID)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	434	24.0
1) Some	292	16.2
3) Quite a bit	395	21.9
5) A great deal	685	37.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

893) People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? (PRAYOFT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Several times a day	567	31.4
2) Once a day	402	22.2
3) A few times a week	312	17.3
4) Once a week or less	284	15.7
5) Never	192	10.6
7) Other	27	1.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

894) Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? (BIBLREAD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Several times a day	64	3.5
2) Once a day	187	10.3
3) A few times a week	245	13.6
4) Once a week or less	556	30.8
5) Never	690	38.2
7) Other	48	2.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

895) I am going to read you a short list of statements. Please tell me which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of the statement you choose. (BIBLLIT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) The Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally	600	33.2
2) The Bible is the word of God but not everything in it should taken literally	869	48.1
3) The Bible is a book written by men and is not the word of god	247	13.7
7) Other (specify)	44	2.4
8) Don't know	21	1.2
9) Refused	21	1.2
Total	1807	100.0

896) Lots of things come up that keep people from attending religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms or funerals? (CHRCHATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Yes	1249	69.1
5) No	545	30.2
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

897) If R does not attend religious services: Regardless of whether you now attend any religious services do you ever think of yourself as part of a particular church or denomination? (CHRCHMBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1262	69.8
1) Yes	294	16.3
5) No	251	13.9
Total	1807	100.0

898) If R attends religious services: Do you go to religious services every week, almost every week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or never? (ATTNDFRQ)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	558	30.9
1) Every week	479	26.5
2) Almost every week	205	11.3
3) Once or twice a month	270	14.9
4) A few times a year	282	15.6
5) Never	8	0.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

899) If R says attends religious services 'every week': Would you say you go to religious services once a week or more often than once a week? (CHRCHWK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1328	73.5
1) Once a week	270	14.9
2) More often than once a week	209	11.6
Total	1807	100.0

900) If R attends church/If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination: Checkpoint: Church attendance (CKPTCHCH)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	5	0.3
1) Yes	1240	68.6
5) No	554	30.7
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

901) If R attends religious services: Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? (RELAFATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	567	31.4
1) Protestant	543	30.0
2) Catholic	359	19.9
3) Jewish	28	1.5
7) Other	303	16.8
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

902) If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination: Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? (RELAFFIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1504	83.2
1) Protestant	123	6.8
2) Catholic	100	5.5
3) Jewish	15	0.8
7) Other	62	3.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

903) If R attends church and attends as Protestant or 'other'/If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination and considers self Protestant or 'other': What church or denomination is that? 90 Other, 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused (OTHDENOM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.18	19.42

904) If R attends church and attends as Protestant or 'other'/If R does not attend church but thinks of self as part of church or denomination and considers self Protestant or 'other': If R denomination is Baptist: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an Independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? (BAPTIST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1500	83.0
1) Baptist Convention	160	8.9
2) American Baptist Churches in USA	19	1.1
3) American Baptist Association	18	1.0
4) Independent Baptist	49	2.7
7) Other (specify)	44	2.4
8) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

905) If R Denomination is Baptist: If R's church is Independent Baptist: Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? (INDBAPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1758	97.3
1) Larger Baptist group [specify]	3	0.2
2) Local	46	2.5
Total	1807	100.0

906) If R denomination is Lutheran: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? (LUTHERAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1706	94.4
1) Evangelical Lutheran Church	52	2.9
2) Missouri Synod	27	1.5
7) Other [specify]	15	0.8
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

907) If R denomination is Methodist: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? (METHODST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1696	93.9
1) United Methodist Church	96	5.3
2) African Methodist Episcopal	8	0.4
7) Other [specify]	5	0.3
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

908) If R denomination is Presbyterian: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? (PRESBYT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.8
1) Presbyterian Church USA (formerly United Presbyterian Church)	63	3.5
7) Other [specify]	10	0.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

909) If R denomination is reformed: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? (REFORMED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
1) Christian Reformed Church	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

910) If R denomination is Brethren: Is this the Church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what? (BRETHREN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1806	99.9
2) The Plymouth Brethren	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

911) If R says denomination is 'Christian': When you say Christian does that mean the denomination called the Christian Church Disciples of Christ, or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say I am just a Christian? (CHRISTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1744	96.5
1) Disciples of Christ	12	0.7
2) I am just a Christian	37	2.0
7) Other [specify]	12	0.7
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

912) If R Denomination is Church of Christ: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? (COFCHRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1790	99.1
1) Church of Christ	16	0.9
2) United Church of Christ	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

913) If R denomination is Church of God: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? (COFGOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1795	99.3
1) Anderson, Indiana	4	0.2
2) Cleveland, Tennessee	3	0.2
3) Church of God in Christ	1	0.1
7) Other [specify]	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

914) If R denomination 'other': Is that group Christian? (OTHCHRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1722	95.3
1) Yes	77	4.3
5) No	7	0.4
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

915) If R attends Religious services and is Jewish: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what? (JEWSHGRP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1779	98.5
1) Orthodox	6	0.3
2) Conservative	11	0.6
3) Reform	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

916) If R does not attend religious services but thinks of self as part of church or denomination and considers self Jewish: Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? (JEWSHDEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1792	99.2
2) Conservative	2	0.1
3) Reform	9	0.5
7) Other [specify]	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

917) If R attends religious services/If R does not attend religious services but thinks of self as part of church or denomination: Are you officially a member of a parish, congregation, temple or other place of worship? (MBRWPLAC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	264	14.6
1) Yes	1030	57.0
5) No	509	28.2
8) Don't know	2	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

918) If R attends religious services/If R does not attend religious services but thinks of self as part of a church or denomination: If R identifies a Christian religion: Would you call yourself a born-again Christian, that is, have you personally had a conversion experience related to Jesus Christ? (BRNAGAIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	336	18.6
1) Yes	594	32.9
5) No	865	47.9
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

919) Religion summary: [See note 4] Codes 010-990 and: 995 NA 998 Don't know 999 Refused 000 INAP, no religious identification or preference (and R does not attend religious services) (RELGSUMM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	238.21	188.15

920) Month of birth (BRTHMNTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	8.16	12.67

921) Year of birth (BRTHYEAR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2,058.75	946.46

922) Summary - respondent age (AGE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	46.97	17.24

923) Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife)-- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never married? (MARITAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	5	0.3
1) Married	935	51.7
2) Widowed	168	9.3
3) Divorced	238	13.2
4) Separated	55	3.0
5) Never married	348	19.3
6) Partnered, not married [Vol]	49	2.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

924) What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? 17 17+ Years; 98 Don't Know; 99 Refused; NA (EDUCTION)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	14.04	6.54

925) If highest grade of education is 0-12 Years or Don't know: Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? (DIPLOMA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1107	61.3
1) Yes	519	28.7
5) No	180	10.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

926) If highest grade of education is 13+ years: What is the highest degree that you have earned? (DEGREE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	705	39.0
1) Bachelor's degree	373	20.6
2) Master's degree	139	7.7
3) PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD	27	1.5
4) LLB, JD	7	0.4
5) MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO	8	0.4
6) JDC, STD, THD	2	0.1
7) Associate degree (AA)	168	9.3
96) No degree earned	377	20.9
99) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

927) Summary: R education (EDUCSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
1) 8 Grades or less and no diploma or equivalency	64	3.5
2) 9-11 Grades, no further schooling (Incl. 12 years without Diploma or equivalency)	116	6.4
3) High school diploma or equivalency test	519	28.7
4) More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree	377	20.9
5) Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees)	168	9.3
6) BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree	373	20.6
7) Advanced degree, including LLB	183	10.1
9) NA	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

928) If married or partnered: What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? 17 17+ Years; 98 Don't know; 99 Refused, NA INAP (SPEDUC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	53.00	42.54

929) If highest grade of spouse/partner is 0-12 Years or Don't know: Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? (SPDIPLOM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1421	78.6
1) Yes	297	16.4
5) No	82	4.5
8) Don't know	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

930) If highest grade of spouse/partner education is 13+ years: What is the highest degree that (he/she) has earned? 96 No degree earned, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused (SPDEGREE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1209	66.9
1) Bachelor's degree	218	12.1
2) Master's degree	88	4.9
3) PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD	17	0.9
4) LLB, JD	1	0.1
5) MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO	10	0.6
6) JDC, STD, THD	1	0.1
7) Associate degree (AA)	85	4.7
96) No degree earned	174	9.6
98) Don't know	2	0.1
99) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

931) Summary: Spouse/partner education (SPEDUCSM)

	TOTAL	%
1) 8 Grades or less and no diploma or equivalency	29	1.6
2) 9-11 Grades, no further schooling (Incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency)	56	3.1
3) High school diploma or equivalency test	297	16.4
4) More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree	174	9.6
5) Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees)	85	4.7
6) BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree	218	12.1
7) Advanced degree, including LLB	117	6.5
8) Don't know	6	0.3
9) NA	825	45.7
Total	1807	100.0

932) We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? (EMPSTAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) Assigned working now series - working now	1035	57.3
2) Assigned working now series - temporarily laid off	17	0.9
3) Assigned unemployed series	59	3.3
4) Assigned retired series	336	18.6
5) Assigned permanently disabled series	74	4.1
6) Assigned homemaker series	183	10.1
7) Assigned student series	96	5.3
Total	1807	100.0

933) We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Employment status 2 digit summary (EMPSTAT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
10) Working now only	1035	57.3
15) Working now and retired (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week	18	1.0
16) Working now and permanently disabled, currently working 20 or more hours per week	2	0.1
17) Working now and homemaker (R volunteers), currently working	55	3.0
18) Working now and student (R volunteers), currently working 20	51	2.8
20) Temporarily laid off	17	0.9
40) Unemployed	59	3.3
50) Retired, no other occupation	300	16.6
51) Retired and working now (R volunteers), currently working Fewer than 20 hours per week	18	1.0
60) Permanently disabled, not working	72	4.0
70) Homemaker, no other occupation	114	6.3
71) Homemaker and working now (R volunteers), currently working	14	0.8
75) Homemaker and student (R volunteers), no other occupation	2	0.1
80) Student, no other occupation	25	1.4
81) Student and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewerthan 20 hours per week	18	1.0
Total	1807	100.0

934) We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Employment status 1 digit summary (SMPSTAT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) R Working now (working now or working 20 hours or more per week)	1161	64.3
2) R temporarily laid off	17	0.9
4) R unemployed	59	3.3
5) R retired, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	318	17.6
6) R permanently disabled, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	72	4.0
7) R homemaker, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	130	7.2
8) R Student, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

935) (If unemployed is highest Y6CATEGORY) [See note 5 in summary ] Have you ever done any work for pay? (UNEMPWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.7
1) Yes	58	3.2
5) No	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

936) [R unemployed: 2 Digit occupation code] [See note 5 in summary] if unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? 95 NA; 98 Don't know; 99 Refused; 00 INAP (UNEMPWK2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.94	6.32

937) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? Unemployed: Collapsed census occupation code 95 NA; 98 Don't know; 99 Refused (UNEMPWK4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1749	96.8
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	9	0.5
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	7	0.4
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	10	0.6
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	7	0.4
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	2	0.1
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	9	0.5
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	3	0.2
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	2	0.1
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	5	0.3
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	2	0.1
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

938) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of business or industry was that? [See note 5 in summary] R occupation - CENSUS INDUSTRY See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995 NA 998 Don't know 999 Refused 000 INAP (UNEMPPND)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	19.19	115.83

939) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (UNEMPSMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1749	96.8
1) Someone else	48	2.7
3) Both self and someone else	4	0.2
5) Self-employed	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

940) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: If was not self-employed only: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? (UNEMPGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1755	97.1
1) Yes	5	0.3
5) No	47	2.6
Total	1807	100.0

941) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: Have you had a job in the last six months? (UNEMP6MO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1749	96.8
1) Yes	28	1.5
5) No	30	1.7
Total	1807	100.0

942) If unemployed is highest category: If has ever done work for pay: If has had a job in the last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (UNEMPH6M)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	981.20	118.02

943) If unemployed is highest category: Are you looking for work at the present time? (UNEMPSCH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.7
1) Yes	36	2.0
5) No	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

944) If unemployed is highest category: If looking for work at present: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (UNEMPWRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1771	98.0
1) A lot	8	0.4
3) Somewhat	11	0.6
5) Not much at all	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

945) If retired: When did you retire (month)? 96 INAP, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 NA (RETIRMN)

	TOTAL	%
1) January	53	2.9
2) February	15	0.8
3) March	22	1.2
4) April	47	2.6
5) May	16	0.9
6) June	42	2.3
7) July	27	1.5
8) August	25	1.4
9) September	19	1.1
10) October	17	0.9
11) November	6	0.3
12) December	30	1.7
96) INAP	1471	81.4
98) Don't know	17	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

946) If retired: When did you retire (year)? 9996 INAP, 9998 Don't know, 9999 Refused, 0000 NA (RETIRYR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	369.52	773.40

947) R retired: 2 Digit occupation code [See note 5 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (RETIRD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	5.07	14.30

948) R retired: Collapsed census occupation code (OCCPSUM1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1471	81.4
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	59	3.3
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	58	3.2
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	9	0.5
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	27	1.5
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	54	3.0
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	3	0.2
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	8	0.4
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	34	1.9
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	4	0.2
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	31	1.7
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	24	1.3
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	14	0.8
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	5	0.3
14) Member of armed forces (Census category 903-905)	2	0.1
95) NA	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

949) If retired: What kind of business or industry was that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (RETINDCD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	109.08	259.07

950) If retired: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (RETSELFM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1471	81.4
1) Someone else	281	15.6
3) Both self and someone else	9	0.5
5) Self-employed	45	2.5
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

951) If retired: If was not self-employed only: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (RETGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1517	84.0
1) Yes	87	4.8
5) No	202	11.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

952) If retired: Have you had a job in the last six months? (RETWK6MO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1471	81.4
1) Yes	46	2.5
5) No	290	16.0
Total	1807	100.0

953) If retired: If has had a job in last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP,998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (RETHW6MO)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	971.52	151.56

954) IF RETIRED: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? (RETWRKM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1471	81.4
1) Yes	36	2.0
5) No	300	16.6
Total	1807	100.0

955) If retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: Are you looking for work at the present time? (RETJSRCH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1507	83.4
1) Yes	8	0.4
5) No	292	16.2
Total	1807	100.0

956) If retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R is looking for work: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (RETJBWRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1799	99.6
5) Not much at all	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

957) If disabled and not also retired: Have you ever done any work for pay? (DISBWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1733	95.9
1) Yes	68	3.8
5) No	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

958) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (DISAB2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.38	8.09

959) If disabled: And not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R disabled: Collapsed census occupation code [See note 6 in summary] (DISAB1)

	TOTAL	%
0) 0	1739	96.2
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	7	0.4
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	5	0.3
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	5	0.3
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	7	0.4
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	1	0.1
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	1	0.1
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	21	1.2
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	1	0.1
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	6	0.3
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	3	0.2
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	5	0.3
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	5	0.3
95) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

960) If disabled: And not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: What kind of business or industry was that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (DISINDCD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	20.84	120.31

961) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (DISSELFM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1739	96.2
1) Someone else	57	3.2
3) Both self and someone else	3	0.2
5) Self-employed	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

962) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: If was not self-employed only: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? (DISGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1747	96.7
1) Yes	11	0.6
5) No	47	2.6
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

963) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: Have you had a job in the last six months? (DISWRK6M)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1739	96.2
1) Yes	6	0.3
5) No	62	3.4
Total	1807	100.0

964) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: If has had a job in the last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (DISHW6M)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	992.78	55.90

965) If disabled and not also retired: If has ever done work for pay: If has had a job in the last 6 months: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? (DISWRKM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1801	99.7
1) Yes	2	0.1
5) No	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

966) If disabled and not also retired: If R has never worked for pay/If R has ever worked for pay but not in last 6 months./If R has worked in last 6 months but is not working now: Are you looking for work at the present time? (DISJBSR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1735	96.0
1) Yes	6	0.3
5) No	66	3.7
Total	1807	100.0

967) If disabled and not also retired: If R has never worked for pay/If R has ever worked for pay but not in last 6 months./If R has worked in last 6 months but is not working now: If looking for work at present: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (DISJBWRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1801	99.7
1) A lot	4	0.2
3) Somewhat	1	0.1
5) Not much at all	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

968) If homemaker/student and not also retired: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? (HMSTDEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1528	84.6
1) Yes	138	7.6
5) No	141	7.8
Total	1807	100.0

969) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: In the last six months, did you do any work for pay? (HMSTDW6)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1666	92.2
1) Yes	35	1.9
5) No	106	5.9
Total	1807	100.0

970) If homemaker/student not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 mos.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R homemaker/student: 2 Digit occupation code [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (HMSTD2A)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	0.61	5.20

971) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R homemaker/student: Collapsed census occupation code (HMSTD1A)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1772	98.1
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	2	0.1
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	5	0.3
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	1	0.1
4) Sales occupation (census categories 236-285)	5	0.3
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	7	0.4
6) Private household (census categories 403-407)	1	0.1
7) Protective service (census categories 408-427)	2	0.1
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	7	0.4
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	2	0.1
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	2	0.1
95) NA	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

972) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: What kind of business or industry was that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (HMSTDIND)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	13.75	101.34

973) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? (HMSTSEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1772	98.1
1) Someone else	33	1.8
5) Self-employed	1	0.1
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

974) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: If R was not self-employed only: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? (HMSTGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
1) Yes	7	0.4
5) No	26	1.4
Total	1807	100.0

975) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R has worked for pay in last 6 months: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP,998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (HMSTDW6M)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	977.88	130.88

976) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: Are you looking for work at the present time? (HMSTJBSR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1666	92.2
1) Yes	19	1.1
5) No	122	6.8
Total	1807	100.0

977) If homemaker/student and not also retired: If R is not doing any work for pay at present: If R is looking for work: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (HMSTJWRR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1788	98.9
1) A lot	8	0.4
3) Somewhat	7	0.4
5) Not much at all	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

978) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R working now/TLO: 2 Digit occupation code [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (HMSTD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	16.62	20.16

979) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R working now/TLO: Collapsed census occupation code (HMSTD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	579	32.0
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	172	9.5
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	295	16.3
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	57	3.2
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	146	8.1
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	169	9.4
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	4	0.2
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	21	1.2
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	117	6.5
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	15	0.8
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	114	6.3
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	38	2.1
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	40	2.2
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	29	1.6
14) Member of armed forces (Census category 903-905)	5	0.3
95) NA	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

980) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: What kind of (business/industry) is that? R occupation - census industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (WKINDCD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	420.03	362.52

981) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/Student but also working: Do you work for someone else, are you self-employed or what? (WKSEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	579	32.0
1) Someone else	1041	57.6
3) Both self and someone else	28	1.5
5) Self-employed	158	8.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

982) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: If not self-employed only: Are you employed by a federal, state or local government? (WKGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	738	40.8
1) Yes	211	11.7
5) No	853	47.2
8) Don't know	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

983) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: About how many hours do you work on your job in the average week? 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 NA (WKHOURS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	351.41	446.86

984) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: If number of hours worked is not DON'T KNOW/REF: Is that more hours than you want to work, fewer hours than you want to work, or generally about right? (WKHRSRG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	586	32.4
1) More	363	20.1
3) Fewer	86	4.8
5) About right	772	42.7
Total	1807	100.0

985) If working now/TLO if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: How worried are you about losing your job in the near future: a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? (WKWORRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	579	32.0
1) A lot	78	4.3
3) Somewhat	153	8.5
5) Not much at all	995	55.1
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

986) If working now if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: Were you out of work or laid off at any time during the last six months? (WKUE6M)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	597	33.0
1) Yes	108	6.0
5) No	1102	61.0
Total	1807	100.0

987) If working now if retired or disabled or homemaker/student but also working: During the last six months, have you had a reduction in your work hours or had to take a cut in pay at any time for reasons other than illness or personal choice? (WKPAYRED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	597	33.0
1) Yes	97	5.4
5) No	1113	61.6
Total	1807	100.0

988) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? Stacked - 2digit occupation code [See note 6 in summary] 95 NA, 98 Don't know, 99 Refused, 00 INAP (STACKED2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	23.54	21.18

989) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? Stacked - collapsed census occupation code (STACKED1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	155	8.6
1) Executive, administrative and managerial (Census categories 001-039)	239	13.2
2) Professional specialty occupations (Census categories 040-199)	357	19.8
3) Technicians and related support occupations (Census categories 200-235)	65	3.6
4) Sales occupation (Census categories 236-285)	185	10.2
5) Administrative support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389)	231	12.8
6) Private household (Census categories 403-407)	8	0.4
7) Protective service (Census categories 408-427)	31	1.7
8) Service except protective and household (Census categories 428-469)	178	9.9
9) Farming, forestry and fishing occupations (Census categories 470-499)	22	1.2
10) Precision production, craft and repair occupations (Census categories 500-699)	148	8.2
11) Machine operators, assemblers and inspectors (Census categories 700-799)	69	3.8
12) Transportation and material moving occupations (Census categories 800-859)	60	3.3
13) Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers and laborers (Census categories 860-890)	41	2.3
14) Member of armed forces (Census category 903-905)	7	0.4
95) NA	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

990) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: What do/did they make or do where you work/ed? What kind of a business or industry is/was that? Stacked - occupation industry [See note 6 in summary] 995 NA, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000 INAP (STACKIND)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	555.53	310.95

991) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired:/If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: Do/did you work for someone else, are/were you self- employed, or what? Stacked - work for self (STACKSMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	155	8.6
1) Someone else	1403	77.6
3) Both self and someone else	44	2.4
5) Self-employed	203	11.2
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

992) If R worked not exclusively for self and: If R is working now or TLO/ :If R Is retired: /If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay: /If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: Are/were you employed by a federal, state or local government? Stacked - employed by government (STACKGVT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	360	19.9
1) Yes	312	17.3
5) No	1127	62.4
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

993) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired but has worked in past 6months: /If R is unemployed but has worked in past 6months: /If R is disabled but has worked in past 6months: About how many hours do/did you work on your job in the average week? Stacked - hours working/worked per week 996 INAP, 998 Don't know, 999 Refused, 000NA (STACKHRS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	329.38	437.80

994) If R is working now or TLO/If R is retired and not currently working: /If R is unemployed:/If R is disabled and not currently working: How worried are you about losing your job/ not being able to find a job in the near future: A lot, somewhat, or not much at all? Stacked - worried about losing/finding job (STCKJLOS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	529	29.3
1) A lot	90	5.0
3) Somewhat	165	9.1
5) Not much at all	1021	56.5
8) Don't know	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

995) If R is unemployed and has ever worked for pay/If R is retired/If R is disabled and has ever worked for pay: Have you had a job in the past 6 months? Stacked - job in past 6months (STCKJ6MO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1345	74.4
1) Yes	80	4.4
5) No	382	21.1
Total	1807	100.0

996) If R is retired and not currently working:/If R is unemployed:/If R is disabled and not working now: Are you looking for work at the present time? Stacked - looking for work (STCKJSRC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1376	76.1
1) Yes	50	2.8
5) No	381	21.1
Total	1807	100.0

997) If R is unemployed:/If R is disabled: Have you ever done any work for pay? Stacked - ever work for pay (STACKWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1674	92.6
1) Yes	126	7.0
5) No	7	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

998) Do you or anyone else in this household belong to a labor union? (UNION)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	250	13.8
5) No	1545	85.5
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

999) If someone in household belongs to labor union: Who is it that belongs? Mention 1 (WHOUNIN1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1557	86.2
1) Respondent	150	8.3
2) R's wife or female partner	30	1.7
3) R's husband or male partner	49	2.7
4) Someone else	19	1.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1000) If someone in household belongs to labor union: Who is it that belongs? Mention 2 (WHOUNIN2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1789	99.0
2) R's wife or female partner	6	0.3
3) R's husband or male partner	8	0.4
4) Someone else	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1001) If someone in household belongs to labor union: Who is it that belongs? Mention 3 (WHOUNIN3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1806	99.9
4) Someone else	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1002) Interviewer checkpoint: is R the only household member age 14 or older? (CKPTAG14)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	6	0.3
1) Yes, R is only HH member 14+	491	27.2
5) No, there are other HH members 14+	1310	72.5
Total	1807	100.0

1003) If no, R is not only member age 14+: HH income (HHINC14)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	39.82	43.25

1004) If yes, R is only household member age 14+: Summary: Household income (HHINCOME)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	17.63	30.33

1005) If no, R is not only household member age 14+: Self (R's) income (INCOME)

	TOTAL	%
1) A. None or less than $4,999	140	7.7
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	101	5.6
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	116	6.4
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	175	9.7
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	210	11.6
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	169	9.4
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	94	5.2
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	43	2.4
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	37	2.0
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	21	1.2
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	15	0.8
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	5	0.3
13) P. $115,000-$124,999	10	0.6
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	1	0.1
15) R. $135,000-$144,999	4	0.2
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	5	0.3
17) T. $155,000-$164,999	4	0.2
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	1	0.1
21) X. $195,000-$199,999	2	0.1
22) Y. $200,000 and over	7	0.4
96) INAP	497	27.5
98) Don't know	37	2.0
99) Refused	113	6.3
Total	1807	100.0

1006) If yes, R is only household member age 14+: Self (R's) income (INCOME14)

	TOTAL	%
1) A. None or less than $4,999	38	2.1
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	55	3.0
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	54	3.0
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	74	4.1
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	65	3.6
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	71	3.9
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	36	2.0
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	13	0.7
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	4	0.2
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	5	0.3
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	7	0.4
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	1	0.1
13) P. $115,000-$124,999	1	0.1
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	4	0.2
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	1	0.1
17) T. $155,000-$164,999	2	0.1
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	1	0.1
22) Y. $200,000and over	3	0.2
96) INAP	1316	72.8
98) Don't know	13	0.7
99) Refused	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

1007) Summary: All households self (R's) income (TOTINCME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) A. None or less than $4,999	178	9.9
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	156	8.6
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	170	9.4
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	249	13.8
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	275	15.2
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	240	13.3
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	130	7.2
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	56	3.1
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	41	2.3
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	26	1.4
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	22	1.2
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	6	0.3
13) P. $115,000-$124,999	11	0.6
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	5	0.3
15) R. $135,000-$144,999	4	0.2
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	6	0.3
17) T. $155,000-$164,999	6	0.3
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	2	0.1
21) X. $195,000-$199,999	2	0.1
22) Y. $200,000and over	10	0.6
98) Don't know	50	2.8
99) Refused	156	8.6
Total	1807	100.0

1008) There's been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? (CLASS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	1230	68.1
5) No	557	30.8
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1009) If R considers self member of middle or working class: Which one? (CLASS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	577	31.9
1) Middle class	710	39.3
5) Working class	497	27.5
7) Other (specify)	23	1.3
Total	1807	100.0

1010) If R doesn't consider self middle or working class: Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call yourself middle class or working class? (CHCLASS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1213	67.1
1) Middle class	218	12.1
5) Working class	286	15.8
7) Other (specify)	57	3.2
8) Don't know	22	1.2
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1011) If R considers self middle class: Would you say that you are about average middle class or that you are in the upper part of the middle class? (MDLCLASS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	879	48.6
1) Average middle	660	36.5
5) Upper middle	256	14.2
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1012) If R considers self middle class: Would you say you feel pretty close to middle class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? (MDLCLSS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	879	48.6
1) Close	585	32.4
5) Not close	322	17.8
8) Don't know	18	1.0
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1013) If R considers self working class: Would you say that you are about average working class or that you are in the upper part of the working class? (WKCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1024	56.7
1) Average working	624	34.5
5) Upper working	145	8.0
8) Don't know	11	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1014) If R considers self working class: Would you say you feel pretty close to working class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? (WKCLSS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1024	56.7
1) Close	508	28.1
5) Not close	250	13.8
8) Don't know	24	1.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1015) Summary: R social class (SOCCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Average working class	624	34.5
2) Working class -- NA if average or upper	14	0.8
3) Upper working class	145	8.0
4) Average middle class	660	36.5
5) Middle class - NA if average or upper	12	0.7
6) Upper middle class	256	14.2
7) Other	57	3.2
8) Don't know	22	1.2
9) Refused	11	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1016) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 1 - racial/ethnic group (RACE1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
10) Black	208	11.5
20) Asian	32	1.8
30) Native American	20	1.1
40) Hispanic or Latino	93	5.1
50) White	1393	77.1
60) Other specify - Misc.	9	0.5
75) Other specify - East Indian	4	0.2
76) Other specify - Pacific Islander	4	0.2
79) Other specify - more than 3 major groups	3	0.2
80) Other specify - 'American'	14	0.8
90) Other specify - 'None'; 'Doesn't matter etc.	8	0.4
98) Don't know	3	0.2
99) Refused	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1017) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 2- racial/ethnic group (RACE2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1757	97.2
10) Black	6	0.3
20) Asian	2	0.1
30) Native American	11	0.6
40) Hispanic or Latino	4	0.2
50) White	24	1.3
60) Other specify - Misc.	2	0.1
80) Other specify - 'American'	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1018) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 3- racial/ethnic group (RACE3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1799	99.6
20) Asian	2	0.1
30) Native American	1	0.1
40) Hispanic or Latino	2	0.1
60) Other specify - Misc.	1	0.1
76) Other specify - Pacific Islander	1	0.1
80) Other specify - 'American'	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1019) Were both of your parents born in this country? (PARNTCTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	1528	84.6
5) No	269	14.9
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1020) In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? Mention 1 - ethnic or nationality group [See note 7 in summary] 90 None/96 'American'/97 Other group/ 98 Don't know/ 99 Refused/00 NA (ETHNIC1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	50.17	31.18

1021) In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? Mention 2 - ethnic or nationality group [See note 7 in summary] 90 None/96 'American'/97 Other group/98 Don't know/99 Refused/00 NA (ETHNIC2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.83	16.37

1022) Interviewer checkpoint: Number of nationality or ethnic groups (CKPTETH2)

	TOTAL	%
0) No nationality/group mentioned	124	6.9
1) One nationality or ethnic group mentioned	1230	68.1
2) Two or more nationality/groups mentioned	397	22.0
9) Respondent Refused or Don't know/NA answer to nationality or	56	3.1
Total	1807	100.0

1023) Number of nationality or ethnic groups mentioned by R 96 Ethnicity question NA/98 R responded DON'T KNOW to ethnicity question/99 R refused ethnicity question (NUMETHNC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.23	16.76

1024) If more than 1 nationality/ethnic group identified: With which of these groups do you most closely identify? Choice - ethnic or nationality group [See note 7 in summary ] 90 None; neither/95 Both/all of them/96 'American'/97 Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere/98 Don't know/99 Refused/00 NA (ETHCHOIC)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	44.04	33.24

1025) Interviewer checkpoint: Is Spanish or Hispanic group mentioned as main group? (HISPANIC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	132	7.3
5) No	1659	91.8
8) Don't Know	7	0.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1026) If R mentioned Spanish or Hispanic group if R says he/she has Spanish or Hispanic descent: Would you describe your Hispanic origin as Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Latin American, Central American, or Spanish? (HISPCAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1675	92.7
1) Mexican	52	2.9
2) Puerto Rican	16	0.9
3) Cuban	6	0.3
4) Latin American	12	0.7
5) Central American	11	0.6
6) Spanish	27	1.5
7) Other (specify)	8	0.4
Total	1807	100.0

1027) Where was it that you grew up? (If United States: Which state or states?) 998 Don't know/999 Refused/000 NA (LOCRAISD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	149.44	87.77

1028) FTF interview: Looking at this list, please tell me where you were mostly brought up? (GRURBANF)

	TOTAL	%
0) Refused; NA	804	44.5
1) On a farm	123	6.8
2) In the country, not on a farm	114	6.3
3) In a small city or town (under 50,000 people)	282	15.6
4) In a medium-sized city (50,000-100,000)	134	7.4
5) In a large city (100,000-500,000)	147	8.1
6) In a suburb of a large city	98	5.4
7) In a very large city (over 500,000)	71	3.9
8) In a suburb of a very large city	33	1.8
9) Don't know	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1029) Telephone: I am going to read you a list of categories. Please tell me which category best describes where you were mostly brought up? (LRAISED1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1009	55.8
1) On a farm	119	6.6
3) In the country, not on a farm	136	7.5
5) In a city	299	16.5
7) Or, in a suburb of a city	240	13.3
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1030) If R brought up in a city: Telephone: Were you mostly brought up in... (LRAISED2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1508	83.5
1) In a small city or town under 50,000 people	104	5.8
3) In a medium-sized city 50,000-100,000	62	3.4
5) In a large city, 100,000-500,000	73	4.0
7) Or, in a very large city, over 500,000	57	3.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1031) If R brought up in a suburb of a city: Telephone: Were you mostly brought up in. (LRAISED3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1567	86.7
1) In a suburb of a large city (100,000 to 500,000 people)	172	9.5
5) Or in a suburb of a very large city (over 500,000 people)	62	3.4
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

1032) Summary: Size of place where R grew up (LRAISSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	9	0.5
1) On a farm	242	13.4
2) In the country, not on a farm	250	13.8
3) In a small city or town (under 50,000 people)	386	21.4
4) In a medium-sized city (50,000- 100,000)	196	10.8
5) In a large city (100,000- 500,000)	220	12.2
6) In a suburb of a large city	270	14.9
7) In a very large city (over 500,000)	128	7.1
8) In a suburb of a very large city	105	5.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1033) How long have you lived in your present (city/town/township/county)?--Months 96 All my life/97 NA/98 Don't know/99 Refused (LIVEMNTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	11.18	29.87

1034) How long have you lived in your present (city/town/township/county)?--Years 995 INAP/997 NA/998 Don't know/999 Refused (LIVEYEAR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	125.29	304.76

1035) Summary: Length of residence in community (LIVESUMM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	27.29	28.97

1036) How long have you lived in your current home?--Months 96 All my life/97 NA/98 Don't know/99 Refused (HOMEMNTH)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.99	13.26

1037) How long have you lived in your current home?--Years 995 INAP/997 NA/998 Don't know/999 Refused (HOMEYEAR)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	27.90	130.49

1038) Summary: length of residence in (HOMESUMM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	12.00	16.44

1039) (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or what? (OWNHOME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Own house	1205	66.7
5) Pay rent	531	29.4
7) Other (specify)	56	3.1
9) Refused	9	0.5
Total	1807	100.0

1040) Does R have children (CHILDREN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	6	0.3
1) Yes	1306	72.3
3) Yes, stepchildren/adopted [Vol]	19	1.1
5) No	475	26.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1041) How many children do you have under 18? 95 NA/96 INAP/98 Don't know/99 Refused (NUMCHILD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	26.05	41.61

1042) If R has children under 18 years old: How many of them live with you at least half of the time? 95 NA/96 INAP/98 Don't know/99 Refused (RESCHILD)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	61.30	44.81

1043) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 1 95 INAP/98 Don't know/99 Refused (CHILD1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	64.12	41.51

1044) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 2 (CHILD2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	77.06	34.96

1045) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 3 (CHILD3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	89.00	21.97

1046) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 4 (CHILD4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	93.02	12.99

1047) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 5 (CHILD5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	94.41	7.23

1048) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 6 (CHILD6)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	94.66	5.52

1049) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 7 (CHILD7)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	94.85	3.67

1050) If R has children under 18 years old: What are the ages of your children? Mention 8 (CHILD8)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	94.95	2.00

1051) About how many miles do you drive in a typical day? 997 and more/998 Don't know/999 NA (DRIVMILE)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	32.42	72.89

1052) Education estimate if missed in IW (EDUCEST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1806	99.9
1) Low - probably less than high school diploma	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1053) Interviewer observation: R gender (IOGENDER)

	TOTAL	%
1) Male	790	43.7
2) Female	1017	56.3
Total	1807	100.0

1054) Interviewer observation: R race (IORACE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	804	44.5
1) White	863	47.8
2) Black	137	7.6
8) Don't know	1	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1055) Others present at time of interview: Mention 1 (OTHPRES1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	590	32.7
1) Children under 6	125	6.9
2) Older children	71	3.9
3) Spouse	124	6.9
4) Other relatives	33	1.8
5) Other adults	60	3.3
9) Refused; NA; INAP	804	44.5
Total	1807	100.0

1056) Others present at time of interview: Mention 2 (OTHPRES2)

	TOTAL	%
1) Children under 6	4	0.2
2) Older children	26	1.4
3) Spouse	42	2.3
4) Other relatives	11	0.6
5) Other adults	16	0.9
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1708	94.5
Total	1807	100.0

1057) Others present at time of interview: Mention 3 (OTHPRES3)

	TOTAL	%
1) Children under 6	1	0.1
2) Older children	1	0.1
3) Spouse	12	0.7
4) Other relatives	3	0.2
5) Other adults	10	0.6
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1780	98.5
Total	1807	100.0

1058) Others present at time of interview: Mention 4 (OTHPRES4)

	TOTAL	%
2) Older children	1	0.1
5) Other adults	2	0.1
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1804	99.8
Total	1807	100.0

1059) Others present at time of interview: Mention 5 (OTHPRES5)

	TOTAL	%
9) Refused; NA; INAP	1807	100.0
Total	1807	100.0

1060) Interviewer observation: R's cooperation was: (IOCOOP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) Very good	1168	64.6
2) Good	492	27.2
3) Fair	117	6.5
4) Poor	18	1.0
5) Very poor	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

1061) Interviewer observation: R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: (IOPOLINF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) Very high	325	18.0
2) Fairly high	450	24.9
3) Average	586	32.4
4) Fairly low	334	18.5
5) Very low	105	5.8
Total	1807	100.0

1062) Interviewer observation: R's apparent intelligence: (IOSMART)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	23	1.3
1) Very high	404	22.4
2) Fairly high	601	33.3
3) Average	671	37.1
4) Fairly low	98	5.4
5) Very low	10	0.6
Total	1807	100.0

1063) Interviewer observation: How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview?: (IOSUSPIC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) Not at all suspicious	1417	80.8
3) Very suspicious	330	18.8
Missing	53
Total	1754	100.0

1064) Interviewer observation: Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? (IOINTER)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	7	0.4
1) Very high	515	28.5
2) Fairly high	604	33.4
3) Average	537	29.7
4) Fairly low	124	6.9
5) Very low	20	1.1
Total	1807	100.0

1065) Interviewer observation: How sincere did R seem in his/her answers? (IOSINCE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	8	0.4
1) Complete sincere	1584	87.7
3) Usually sincere	185	10.2
5) Often seemed to be insincere	30	1.7
Total	1807	100.0

1066) Interviewer observation: Do you feel R reported income accurately? (IOINCREP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	44	2.4
1) Yes, think R reported income correctly	1550	85.8
2) No, think R reported income incorrectly	26	1.4
3) No, think R reported income dishonestly	5	0.3
4) R Refused income Q's	182	10.1
Total	1807	100.0

1067) If R did not report income or interviewer suspects did nor report correctly: If possible, give a reasonable estimate of what R's family income is (before taxes in 1999). (IOESTINC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1701	94.1
1) A. None or less than $4,999	1	0.1
2) B. $5,000-$9,999	4	0.2
3) C. $10,000-$14,999	7	0.4
4) D. $15,000-$24,999	10	0.6
5) E. $25,000-$34,999	10	0.6
6) F. $35,000-$49,999	6	0.3
7) G. $50,000-$64,999	12	0.7
8) H. $65,000-$74,999	5	0.3
9) J. $75,000-$84,999	6	0.3
10) K. $85,000-$94,999	3	0.2
11) M. $95,000-$104,999	3	0.2
12) N. $105,000-$114,999	2	0.1
14) Q. $125,000-$134,999	1	0.1
15) R. $135,000-$144,999	1	0.1
16) S. $145,000-$154,999	1	0.1
18) U. $165,000-$174,999	2	0.1
19) V. $175,000-$184,999	1	0.1
22) Y. $200,000and over	4	0.2
98) Impossible to estimate	27	1.5
Total	1807	100.0

1068) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 1 (IOREACT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	8	0.4
10) Negative - general	25	1.4
11) Negative - too long	79	4.4
12) Negative - too complicated	7	0.4
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	11	0.6
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	15	0.8
20) R complained and/or IWR observed R was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight, etc... IW was hard for R	20	1.1
22) R complained and/or IWR observed R was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	48	2.7
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	78	4.3
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	184	10.2
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	6	0.3
41) R became angry at interview content	5	0.3
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	20	1.1
50) R could not read respondent booklet (FTF only)	4	0.2
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/interested/pleasant)	1050	58.1
80) Neutral or no feedback	247	13.7
Total	1807	100.0

1069) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 2 (IOREACT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1432	79.2
11) Negative - too long	9	0.5
12) Negative - too complicated	7	0.4
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	9	0.5
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	9	0.5
20) R complained and/or IWR observed R was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc... IW was hard for R	3	0.2
22) R complained and/or IWR observed R was confused by Q's, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	16	0.9
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	28	1.5
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	66	3.7
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	6	0.3
41) R became angry at interview content	4	0.2
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	16	0.9
50) R could not read respondent booklet	2	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/interested/pleasant)	157	8.7
80) Neutral or no feedback	43	2.4
Total	1807	100.0

1070) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 3 (IOREACT3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1686	93.3
11) Negative - too long	2	0.1
12) Negative - too complicated	2	0.1
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	6	0.3
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	3	0.2
20) R complained and/or IWR observed R was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc.. IW was hard for R	2	0.1
22) R complained and/or IWR observed R was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	5	0.3
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	10	0.6
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	22	1.2
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	6	0.3
41) R became angry at interview content	3	0.2
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	4	0.2
50) R could not read respondent booklet	2	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/interested/pleasant)	38	2.1
80) Neutral or no feedback	16	0.9
Total	1807	100.0

1071) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 4 (IOREACT4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1765	97.7
12) Negative - too complicated	1	0.1
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	1	0.1
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	2	0.1
22) R complained and/or IWR observed R was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	1	0.1
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	2	0.1
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	9	0.5
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	2	0.1
41) R became angry at interview content	1	0.1
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	3	0.2
50) R could not read respondent booklet	2	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/interested/pleasant)	14	0.8
80) Neutral or no feedback	4	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1072) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 5 (IOREACT5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1794	99.3
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	1	0.1
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	1	0.1
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	2	0.1
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	4	0.2
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	1	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/interested/pleasant)	2	0.1
80) Neutral or no feedback	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1073) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 6 (IOREACT6)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1803	99.8
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. after starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	1	0.1
22) R complained and/or IWR observed R was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	1	0.1
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	2	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1074) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 7 (IOREACT7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1804	99.8
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	1	0.1
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	1	0.1
80) Neutral or no feedback	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1075) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 8 (IOREACT8)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1806	99.9
41) R became angry at interview content	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1076) Interviewer observation: R's reaction to IW: Mention 9 (IOREACT9)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; no further mention	1806	99.9
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	1	0.1
Total	1807	100.0

1077) Order of Gore and Bush in Pre likes/dislikes (PRAND1)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore first	915	50.6
2) GW Bush first	887	49.1
9) NA	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

1078) Position of Gore in Pre Thermometers [Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9 NA] (PRAND2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.48	1.10

1079) Position of GW Bush in Pre Thermometers [Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9 NA] (PRAND3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.48	1.10

1080) Position of Buchanan in Pre Thermometers [Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9 NA] (PRAND4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.51	1.13

1081) Position of Nader in Pre Thermometers [Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9 NA] (PRAND5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.53	1.14

1082) Position of McCain and Bradley in Pre Thermometers (PRAND6)

	TOTAL	%
1) McCain 6th name, Bradley 7th name	901	49.9
2) Bradley 6th name, McCain 7th name	906	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

1083) Position of Lieberman and Cheney in Pre Thermometers (PRAND7)

	TOTAL	%
1) Lieberman 8th name, Cheney 9th name	901	49.9
2) Cheney 8th name, Lieberman 9th name	906	50.1
Total	1807	100.0

1084) Order of 3 major parties in Pre Thermometers (PRAND8)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic 1st, Republican 2nd, Reform 3rd	284	15.7
2) Democratic 1st, Reform 2nd, Republican 3rd	305	16.9
3) Republican 1st, Democratic 2nd, Reform 3rd	310	17.2
4) Republican 1st, Reform 2nd, Democratic 3rd	290	16.0
5) Reform 1st, Democratic 2nd, Republican 3rd	310	17.2
6) Reform 1st, Republican 2nd, Democratic 3rd	308	17.0
Total	1807	100.0

1085) Order of 2 major parties in Pre 'likes-dislikes' (PRAND9)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic Party first (D1-D2), Republican Party 2nd	897	49.6
2) Republican Party first (D1-D2), Democratic Party 2nd	905	50.1
9) NA	5	0.3
Total	1807	100.0

1086) Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Affects series (PRAND10)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd	284	15.7
2) Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd	316	17.5
3) GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd	277	15.3
4) GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd	326	18.0
5) Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd	285	15.8
6) Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd	290	16.0
9) NA	29	1.6
Total	1807	100.0

1087) Pre: Position of angry among Gore affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND11)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.55	1.11

1088) Pre: Position of hopeful among Gore affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND12)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.44	1.12

1089) Pre: Position of afraid among Gore affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND13)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.50	1.12

1090) Pre: Position of proud among Gore affects [Codes 1-4 and:9 NA] (PRAND14)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.51	1.13

1091) Pre: Position of angry among GW Bush affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND15)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.53	1.11

1092) Pre: Position of hopeful among GW Bush affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND16)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.52	1.11

1093) Pre: Position of afraid among GW Bush affects [Codes 1-4 and:9 NA] (PRAND17)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.49	1.11

1094) Pre: Position of proud among GW Bush affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND18)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.47	1.14

1095) Pre: Position of angry among Buchanan affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND19)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.59	1.34

1096) Pre: Position of hopeful among Buchanan affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND20)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.54	1.33

1097) Pre: Position of afraid among Buchanan affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND21)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.59	1.33

1098) Pre: Position of proud among Buchanan affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND22)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.63	1.34

1099) Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Liberal-Conservative placements (PRAND23)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.55	2.61

1100) Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Liberal-Conservative placements (PRAND24)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th	166	9.2
2) Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th	138	7.6
3) GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th	163	9.0
4) GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th	165	9.1
5) Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th	156	8.6
6) Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th	151	8.4
9) NA	868	48.0
Total	1807	100.0

1101) Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Traits series (PRAND25)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd	138	7.6
2) Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd	122	6.8
3) GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd	134	7.4
4) GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd	121	6.7
5) Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd	136	7.5
6) Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd	119	6.6
9) NA	1037	57.4
Total	1807	100.0

1102) Pre: Order of Moral among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND26)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.94	1.99

1103) Pre: Order of Really Cares among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND27)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.00	2.01

1104) Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND28)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.02	2.00

1105) Pre: Order of Leadership among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND29)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.09	1.98

1106) Pre: Order of Dishonest among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND30)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.01	2.02

1107) Pre: Order of Intelligent among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND31)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.99	2.00

1108) Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Gore traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND32)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.95	2.00

1109) Pre: Order of Moral among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND33)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.03	2.00

1110) Pre: Order of Really Cares among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND34)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.03	2.00

1111) Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND35)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.95	1.97

1112) Pre: Order of Leadership among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7and:9 NA] (PRAND36)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	3.92	2.03

1113) Pre: Order of Dishonest among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND37)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.02	2.04

1114) Pre: Order of Intelligent among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND38)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.02	1.99

1115) Pre: Order of Out of Touch among GW Bush traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND39)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	4.03	1.97

1116) Pre: Order of Moral among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND40)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.89	2.78

1117) Pre: Order of Really Cares among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND41)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.89	2.78

1118) Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND42)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.82	2.85

1119) Pre: Order of Leadership among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND43)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.84	2.81

1120) Pre: Order of Dishonest among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND44)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.86	2.81

1121) Pre: Order of Intelligent among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND45)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.85	2.80

1122) Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Buchanan traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND46)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	6.94	2.74

1123) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Services/Spending placements (Clinton's name was always first) (PRAND47)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name	880	48.7
2) GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

1124) Pre: Order of major parties among services/spending placements (Clinton's name was always first) (PRAND48)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic Party 4th name; Republican Party 5th	880	48.7
2) Republican Party 4th name; Democratic Party 5th	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

1125) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among defense spending placements (PRAND49)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	910	50.4
2) GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	897	49.6
Total	1807	100.0

1126) Pre: Order of major parties among defense spending placements (PRAND50)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th	910	50.4
2) Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th	897	49.6
Total	1807	100.0

1127) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among guaranteed Jobs placements (PRAND51)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	886	49.0
2) Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	921	51.0
Total	1807	100.0

1128) Pre: Order of major parties among guaranteed jobs placements (PRAND52)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th	886	49.0
2) Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th	921	51.0
Total	1807	100.0

1129) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among aid to blacks placements (Clinton's name was always first) (PRAND53)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name	880	48.7
2) GW BUSH 2ND NAME; GORE 3RD NAME	927	51.3
Total	1807	100.0

1130) Pre Order of Major parties among aid to blacks placements (Clinton's name was always first) (PRAND54)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic Party 4th name; Republican Party 5th	927	51.3
2) Republican Party 4th name; Democratic Party 5th	880	48.7
Total	1807	100.0

1131) Order of Welfare among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND55)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.48	3.52

1132) Order of AIDS research among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND56)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.46	3.41

1133) Order of Foreign Aid among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND57)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.40	3.45

1134) Order of Food Stamps among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND58)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.53	3.39

1135) Order of Aid to poor among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND59)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.44	3.47

1136) Order of Social Security among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND60)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.63	3.54

1137) Order of Environmental protection among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND61)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.53	3.42

1138) Order of Public schools among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways' was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND62)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.51	3.36

1139) Order of Deal with crime among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND63)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.58	3.42

1140) Order of Child Care among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND64)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.43	3.49

1141) Order of Border security among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND65)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.52	3.47

1142) Order of Aid to blacks among pre federal spending items [Repairing the highways was always first. Codes 2-13 and: 9 NA] (PRAND66)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	7.48	3.47

1143) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among abortion placements (PRAND67)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	921	51.0
2) GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	883	48.9
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1144) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among environment-jobs placements (PRAND68)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	920	50.9
2) GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	884	48.9
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1145) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush for gun restriction placement (PRAND69)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	926	51.2
2) GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	878	48.6
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1146) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among women's role placements (PRAND70)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	888	49.1
2) GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	916	50.7
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1147) Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among environmental regulation placements (PRAND71)

	TOTAL	%
1) Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name	905	50.1
2) GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name	899	49.8
9) NA	3	0.2
Total	1807	100.0

1148) Pre: Order of Angry among Clinton affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND72)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.26	1.48

1149) Pre: Order of Hopeful among Clinton affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND73)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.30	1.51

1150) Pre: Order of Afraid among Clinton affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND74)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.25	1.47

1151) Pre: Order of Proud among Clinton affects [Codes 1-4 and: 9 NA] (PRAND75)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.26	1.47

1152) Pre: Order of Moral among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND76)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.01	2.46

1153) Pre: Order of Really Cares among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND77)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.01	2.44

1154) Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND78)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.06	2.48

1155) Pre: Order of Leadership among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND79)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.00	2.43

1156) Pre: Order of Dishonest among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND80)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.08	2.50

1157) Pre: Order of Intelligent among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND81)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	2.03	2.46

1158) Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Clinton traits [Codes 1-7 and: 9 NA] (PRAND82)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1807	1.99	2.42

1159) Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you were very much interested, somewhat interested, or not much interested in following the political campaigns this year? (CMPGNINT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP, no post interview	251	13.9
1) Very much interested	643	35.6
3) Somewhat interested	687	38.0
5) Not much interested	225	12.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1160) Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television? (CMPGNTV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA;INAP, no post interview	251	13.9
1) Yes	1287	71.3
5) No	268	14.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1161) If R watched programs about campaign: Would you say you watched a good many, several, or just one or two? (CMPGNTV2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA;INAP	519	28.7
1) A good many	387	21.4
3) Several	565	31.3
5) Just one or two	333	18.4
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1162) Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends? (POLDISC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA;INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	1258	69.7
5) No	297	16.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1163) If R discusses politics: How many days in the past week did you talk about politics with family or friends? (POLDISOF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	548	30.3
1) 1	63	3.5
2) 2	149	8.3
3) 3	145	8.0
4) 4	97	5.4
5) 5	110	6.1
6) 6	23	1.3
7) 7	648	35.9
96) None (no days)	21	1.2
98) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1164) If not Washington D.C.: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? (HSECNAME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Yes, remember	673	37.3
5) No, don't remember	877	48.6
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1165) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 1st recalled name - candidate code [0. NA; INAP, R says he/she does not recall names, Washington D.C.; 30. Third party or Independent House candidate non-incumbent; 31. Democratic candidate in open House race; 32. Republican candidate in open House race; 33. Democratic House incumbent; 34. Republican House incumbent; 35. Democratic House challenger; 36. Republican House challenger; 38. Third party or Independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent; 39. Third party or Independent House candidate-incumbent; 97. Name not on candidate list for this race; 98. DK; 99. RF] (HSECNCD1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1133	62.7
31) Democratic candidate in open race	12	0.7
32) Republican candidate in open race	25	1.4
33) Democratic House incumbent	164	9.1
34) Republican House incumbent	182	10.1
35) Democratic House challenger	17	0.9
36) Republican House challenger	12	0.7
39) Third party or Independent candidate	1	0.1
97) Name not on candidate list	250	13.8
98) DK	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1166) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1st recalled name - recalled party (HSEPRTY1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1133	62.7
1) Democrat	322	17.8
5) Republican	319	17.7
7) Other (specify)	4	0.2
8) DK	26	1.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1167) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 1st recalled name - actual party of candidate (HSEACTU1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1393	77.1
1) Democrat	193	10.7
5) Republican	219	12.1
7) OTHER	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1168) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1st recalled name - accuracy [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, DON'T KNOW or NA for party associated with name; 4 Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5 Invalid candidate name given with DON'T KNOW or NA for party associated with name; 6 No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7 No candidate name given (Don't know) -- DON'T KNOW or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HSEACC1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1133	62.7
1) +NM, +PTY	382	21.2
2) +NM, -PTY	21	1.2
3) +NM, Don't know PT	10	0.6
4) -NM, PTY	240	13.3
5) -NM, Don't know PT	10	0.6
6) No candidate	2	0.1
7) No NM/Don't know PT	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1169) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 2nd Recalled name - candidate code [30. Third party or Independent House candidate -nonincumbent; 31. Democratic candidate in open House race; 32. Republican candidate in open House race; 33. Democratic House incumbent; 34. Republican House incumbent; 35. Democratic House challenger; 36. Republican House challenger; 38. Third party or; Independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent; 39. Third party or Independent House candidate-incumbent; 97. Name not on candidate list for this race; 98. DK; 99. RF; 0 NA, INAP, no Post interview, R says he/she does not recall names, Washington D.C., no further mention] (HSECNCD2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1468	81.3
31) Democratic candidate in open race	17	0.9
32) Republican candidate in open race	9	0.5
33) Democratic House incumbent	16	0.9
34) Republican House incumbent	27	1.5
35) Democratic House challenger	43	2.4
36) Republican House challenger	30	1.7
39) Third party or Independent House candidate	1	0.1
97) Name not on candidate list	191	10.6
98) DK	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1170) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2nd recalled name - recalled party (HSEPRTY2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1468	81.3
1) Democrat	154	8.5
5) Republican	166	9.2
7) Other (specify)	12	0.7
8) DK	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1171) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 2nd recalled name - actual party of candidate (HSEACTU2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1663	92.1
1) Democrat	76	4.2
5) Republican	66	3.7
7) Other	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1172) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2nd recalled name - accuracy [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, DON'T KNOW or NA for party associated with name; 4 Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5 Invalid candidate name given with DON'T KNOW or NA for party associated with name; 6 No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7 No candidate name given (Don't know) -- DON'T KNOW or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HSEACC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1468	81.3
1) +NM, +PTY	129	7.1
2) +NM, -PTY	14	0.8
4) -NM, PTY	185	10.2
5) -NM, Don't know PT	6	0.3
6) No candidate	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1173) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 3rd recalled name - candidate code [30. Third party or Independent House candidate -nonincumbent; 31. Democratic candidate in open House race; 32. Republican candidate in open House race; 33. Democratic House incumbent; 34. Republican House incumbent; 35. Democratic House challenger; 36. Republican House challenger; 38. Third party or; Independent House candidate--2nd non-incumbent; 39. Third party or Independent House candidate-incumbent; 97. Name not on candidate list for this race; 98. DK; 99. RF; 0 NA, INAP, no Post interview, R says he/she does not recall names, Washington D.C., no further mention] (HSECNCD3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1754	97.1
32) Republican candidate in open race	1	0.1
33) Democratic House incumbent	2	0.1
34) Republican House incumbent	3	0.2
35) Democratic House challenger	1	0.1
36) Republican House challenger	1	0.1
97) Name not on candidate list	41	2.3
98) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1174) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3rd recalled name - recalled party (HSEPRTY3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1754	97.1
1) Democrat	14	0.8
5) Republican	24	1.3
7) Other (specify)	9	0.5
8) DK	3	0.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1175) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 3rd recalled name - actual party of candidate (HSEACTU3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1798	99.6
1) Democrat	3	0.2
5) Republican	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1176) If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she recalls names of House candidates: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3rd recalled name - accuracy [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, DON'T KNOW or NA for party associated with name; 4 Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5 Invalid candidate name given with DON'T KNOW or NA for party associated with name; 6 No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7 No candidate name given (Don't know) -- DON'T KNOW or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HSEACC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1754	97.1
1) +NM, +PTY	7	0.4
3) +NM, Don't know PT	1	0.1
4) -NM, PTY	37	2.0
5) -NM, Don't know PT	4	0.2
6) No candidate	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1177) As you know, the political parties try to talk to as many people as they can to get them to vote for their candidate. Did anyone from one of the political parties call you up or come around and talk to you about the campaign this year? (PRTYTALK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	587	32.5
5) No	966	53.5
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1178) If someone from party spoke to R about campaign: Which party was that? (WPRTTALK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1219	67.5
1) Democrats	153	8.5
5) Republicans	199	11.0
6) Both	199	11.0
7) Other (specify)	16	0.9
8) DK	19	1.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1179) Other than someone from the two major parties, did anyone (else) call you up or come around and talk to you about supporting specific candidates in this last election? (OTHTALK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	175	9.7
5) No	1378	76.3
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1180) Did anyone from one of the political parties send you mail about the campaign this year? (CAMPMAIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	1003	55.5
5) No	546	30.2
8) DK	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1181) If political party sent mail: Which party was that? (PRTYMAIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	803	44.5
1) Democrats	158	8.7
5) Republicans	197	10.9
6) Both	560	31.0
7) Other (specify)	28	1.6
8) DK	60	3.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1182) Other than someone from the two major parties, did anyone (else) send you mail about supporting specific candidates in this last election? (OTHMAIL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	400	22.1
5) No	1138	63.0
8) DK	17	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1183) We would like to find out about some of the things people do to help a party or a candidate win an election. During the campaign, did you talk to any people and try to show them why they should vote for or against one of the parties or candidates? (INFOTHR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	546	30.2
5) No	1009	55.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1184) Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker on your car, or place a sign in your window or in front of your house? (BUTTON)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	156	8.6
5) No	1398	77.4
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1185) Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches, dinners, or things like that in support of a particular candidate? (MEETING)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	85	4.7
5) No	1470	81.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1186) Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or candidates? (CPGWORK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	43	2.4
5) No	1512	83.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1187) During an election year people are often asked to make a contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to an individual candidate running for public office? (CONTRBUT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	103	5.7
5) No	1450	80.3
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1188) If R gave money to individual candidate: Which party did that candidate belong to? (CONTCNDP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1703	94.3
1) Democrats	33	1.8
3) Republicans	54	3.0
5) Other (specify)	9	0.5
6) Both Democratic candidate and Republican candidate	5	0.3
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1189) Did you give money to a political party during this election year? (CONTPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	99	5.5
5) No	1456	80.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1190) If R gave money to political party: To which party did you give money? (CONTPRTW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1707	94.5
1) Democrats	34	1.9
3) Republicans	51	2.8
5) Other (specify)	8	0.4
6) Both Democrats and Republicans	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1191) Did you give any money to any other group that supported or opposed candidates? (CONTIGRP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	69	3.8
5) No	1486	82.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1192) During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you about registering to vote or getting out to vote? (REGTALK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes, someone did	672	37.2
5) No, no one did	882	48.8
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1193) Were there any groups concerned with moral or religious issues that tried to encourage you to vote in a particular way? (MORLTALK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes, there were groups	252	14.0
5) No, no groups tried to encourage	1300	72.0
8) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1194) Was information about candidates, parties, or political issues made available in your place of worship before the election? (CLRGINFO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	191	10.6
5) No, no information available	1125	62.3
7) No, don't go to church [Vol]	218	12.1
8) DK	19	1.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1195) Did the clergy or other church leaders at your place of worship encourage you to vote for a particular candidate or party? (CLRGINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	490	27.1
1) Yes	84	4.7
5) No	1228	68.0
8) DK	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1196) If clergy/church endorsed candidate/party: Which candidate? Mention 1 - candidate code (CLRGEND1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1722	95.3
1) Democratic presidential candidate	20	1.1
2) Republican presidential candidate	30	1.7
5) Anti-Democratic presidential candidate	2	0.1
11) Democratic Senate candidate in state	1	0.1
12) Republican Senate candidate in state	1	0.1
33) Democratic House incumbent candidate	1	0.1
71) Democratic candidate(s)	1	0.1
81) Democratic Party	5	0.3
82) Republican Party	4	0.2
90) Vote on particular issue	7	0.4
91) 'Just to vote'	1	0.1
94) Nonpartisan/judicial candidate	1	0.1
95) Other candidate(s) for state/local office	2	0.1
98) DK	4	0.2
99) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1197) If clergy/church endorsed candidate/party: Which candidate? Mention 2 - candidate code (CLRGEND2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1794	99.3
1) Democratic presidential candidate	1	0.1
12) Republican Senate candidate in state	1	0.1
34) Republican House incumbent candidate	1	0.1
74) Other Republican candidate--any office	1	0.1
81) Democratic Party	2	0.1
90) Vote on particular issue	4	0.2
96) Other groups or individuals	1	0.1
97) Candidate name given but party/office NA	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1198) If clergy/church endorsed candidate/party: Which candidate? Mention 3 - candidate code (CLRGEND3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
82) Republican Party	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1199) In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. Which of the following statements best describes you: One, I did not vote (in the election this November); Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't; Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or Four, I am sure I voted? (VOTED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) I Did not vote	185	10.2
2) I thought about voting this time	103	5.7
3) I usually vote, but didn't this time	84	4.7
4) I am sure I voted	1182	65.4
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1200) If R did not vote: Were you registered to vote in this election? (REGSTRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1433	79.3
1) Yes	154	8.5
5) No	210	11.6
6) Vol: not required to register in R's	2	0.1
8) DK	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1201) If R is registered/ If R voted: Your residence is located in [NAME'S] County. Are you registered to vote in [NAME'S] County? / Your residence is located in Washington D.C. Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.? (REGLINT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	470	26.0
1) Yes, registered in (preload county)	1269	70.3
5) Np, registered in other county	67	3.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1202) If R not registered in county/in Washington D.C.: In what county and state are you registered? State of registration (REGSTATE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1740	96.3
5) 5	1	0.1
12) 12	1	0.1
13) 13	2	0.1
14) 14	4	0.2
21) 21	4	0.2
22) 22	4	0.2
23) 23	4	0.2
25) 25	1	0.1
40) 40	4	0.2
41) 41	2	0.1
42) 42	1	0.1
43) 43	7	0.4
44) 44	3	0.2
45) 45	1	0.1
49) 49	7	0.4
54) 54	4	0.2
62) 62	2	0.1
65) 65	1	0.1
67) 67	1	0.1
71) 71	7	0.4
72) 72	3	0.2
73) 73	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1203) If R voted: Did you vote on election day -- that is, November 7th 2000, or did you vote at some time before this? (VOTEWHEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	624	34.6
1) Election day	1000	55.4
5) Some time before this	182	10.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1204) If R voted prior to election day: How long before November 7th did you vote? (ELECPRR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1625	90.0
1) Less than one week, 1-6 days	58	3.2
2) One week/7 days	41	2.3
3) 1-2 Weeks/8-14 days	53	2.9
4) 2-3 Weeks/15-21 days	4	0.2
5) 3-4 Weeks/22-28 days	2	0.1
6) One month/29-31 days	2	0.1
11) A few days, a couple of days	8	0.4
12) A few weeks, a couple of weeks	9	0.5
91) More than a few days	3	0.2
98) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1205) If R voted prior to election day: Did you vote in person or by absentee ballot? (ABSENTEE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1624	89.9
1) In person	61	3.4
5) Absentee ballot	102	5.6
7) R volunteers: By mail [Oregon only]	19	1.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1206) If R voted: How about the election for President? Did you vote for a candidate for President? (PRESVOTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	624	34.6
1) Yes, voted for president	1178	65.2
5) No, didn't vote for president	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1207) If R voted for President: Who did you vote for? (PRESVOT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	628	34.8
1) Al Gore	590	32.7
3) George W. Bush	530	29.3
5) Pat Buchanan	3	0.2
6) Ralph Nader	33	1.8
7) Other (specify)	9	0.5
8) DK	3	0.2
9) Refused	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1208) If presidential vote cast is not DK/REF: Would you say that your preference for (If name given: [candidate name]) was strong or not strong? (PRESSUPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	641	35.5
1) Strong	876	48.5
5) Not strong	286	15.8
8) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1209) If presidential vote cast is not DK/REF: How long before the election did you decide that you were going to vote the way you did? [01. Knew all along/from the first; always vote for the same party; before the convention/nomination (no mention of Gore/Bush/Buchanan/Nader); before the primaries; 9 months or more 02. Before the convention because of Gore's/Bush's/Buchanan's/Nader's candidacy; as soon as Gore/Bush/Buchanan/Nader said he would run; 'months before'; 'early on'; 'long time/quite a bit before the election' 03. At the time of the Republican convention/ when Bush was nominated; just after the Republican convention; 3 months; July; 'a few months';'2-3 months' 04. During the Democratic convention when Gore was nominated; just after the Democratic convention; 4 months; August 05. After the convention(s); during the campaign (NFS); 2 months; 'a couple of months'; September 06. Five to seven weeks before the election 07. One month; three weeks; October; after the Presidential debates 08. About two weeks before the election; 'ten days' 09. In the last few days of the campaign; the last part of it 10. On election day 11. During/after the primaries (not codeable in 02); 'several months'; 5-8 months 12. After the vice-presidential debate 97. Other 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP] (PRESDECT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	644	35.7
1) Knew all along/from the first	147	8.1
2) Before the convention	257	14.2
3) At the time of the Republican convention	87	4.8
4) During the Democratic convention	21	1.2
5) After the convention(s)	108	6.0
6) Five to seven weeks before the election	44	2.4
7) One month, three weeks	102	5.6
8) About two weeks before the election	76	4.2
9) In the last few days of the campaign	126	7.0
10) On election day	57	3.2
11) During/after the primaries	134	7.4
97) Other	1	0.1
98) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1210) If presidential vote cast is not DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? Mention 1 (IFGTVOT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	641	35.5
1) AL GORE	33	1.8
3) George W Bush	29	1.6
5) Pat Buchanan	45	2.5
6) Ralph Nader	159	8.8
7) Other (specify)	105	5.8
8) No other candidate (Vol)	792	43.9
98) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1211) If presidential vote cast is not DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? Mention 2 (IFGTVOT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1797	99.5
5) Pat Buchanan	4	0.2
6) Ralph Nader	2	0.1
7) Other (specify)	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1212) If presidential vote cast is not DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? Mention 3 (IFGTVOT3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	0.00	0.00

1213) Checkpoint: Vote in county of interview (CKPTCNTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) R Voted within county of interview	1130	62.6
2) R Voted outside county of interview	48	2.7
3) R did not vote (and DK if voted)	373	20.7
4) WASHINGTON, D.C.	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1214) If R voted: Checkpoint: Random order of Democratic/Republican candidate names (CKPTORDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	628	34.8
1) Democratic names first	406	22.5
2) Republican names first	772	42.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1215) How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? (HINCNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	676	37.4
1) Yes, voted for House	952	52.7
5) No, didn't vote for House	154	8.5
8) DK	24	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1216) If R voted: If voted in county of residence: If not Washington d.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? (HINCNTE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	855	47.3
1) Preload Democratic candidate name	454	25.1
3) Preload ind/3rd-party incumbent name	1	0.1
5) Preload Republican candidate name	425	23.5
6) R provided name from another district	8	0.4
7) Other (specify)	36	2.0
8) DK	21	1.2
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1217) If R voted: If voted in county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? (HINCANC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	855	47.3
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	40	2.2
32) Republican candidate in open House race	45	2.5
33) Democratic House incumbent	291	16.1
34) Republican House incumbent	296	16.4
35) Democratic House challenger	128	7.1
36) Republican House challenger	87	4.8
39) Third party or Independent House candidate--incumbent	1	0.1
97) Name not on candidate list for this race	36	2.0
98) DK	21	1.2
99) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1218) If R voted: If voted in county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? (HINCANP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	855	47.3
1) Democratic	459	25.4
2) Republican	428	23.7
3) Other (3rd party or Independent candidate)	1	0.1
7) Name not on candidate list for this race	36	2.0
8) DK	21	1.2
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1219) If R voted: If voted outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? (HOUTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1758	97.3
1) Yes, voted for House	32	1.8
5) No, didn't vote for House	16	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1220) If R voted: If voted outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? (HOUTCC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
32) Candidate within district	2	0.1
34) Candidate within district	4	0.2
36) Candidate within district	1	0.1
81) Democratic candidate	1	0.1
82) Republican candidate	1	0.1
83) Democratic incumbent	2	0.1
84) Republican incumbent	1	0.1
86) Republican challenger	1	0.1
91) Democrat--no name given	5	0.3
92) Republican--no name given	6	0.3
97) Name not on candidate list	2	0.1
98) DK	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1221) If R voted: If registered outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? Out-of-county: House vote - party summary (HOUTP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
1) Democrat	8	0.4
2) Republican	16	0.9
7) Name not on candidate list	2	0.1
8) DK	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1222) If R voted: If registered outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Which party was that? Party associated by respondent with House vote (out of county) (HOUTPV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
1) Democrat	12	0.7
5) Republican	19	1.1
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1223) If R voted: If voted in/outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? (HVOTCAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	823	45.6
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	40	2.2
32) Republican candidate in open House race	47	2.6
33) Democratic House incumbent	291	16.1
34) Republican House incumbent	300	16.6
35) Democratic House challenger	128	7.1
36) Republican House challenger	88	4.9
39) Third party or Independent House candidate	1	0.1
81) Democratic candidate	1	0.1
82) Republican candidate	1	0.1
83) Democratic incumbent	2	0.1
84) Republican incumbent	1	0.1
86) Republican challenger	1	0.1
91) Democrat--no name given	5	0.3
92) Republican--no name given	6	0.3
97) Name not on candidate list	38	2.1
98) DK	27	1.5
99) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1224) If R voted: If voted in/outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Congress: Who did you vote for? (HVOTEPRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	823	45.6
1) Democratic	467	25.9
2) Republican	444	24.6
3) Other (third party or Independent candidate)	1	0.1
7) Name not on candidate list	38	2.1
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1225) If R voted: Senate checkpoint: Race in state of interview (CKPTSEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	628	34.8
1) Race in state of interview	900	49.8
2) No race in state of interview	278	15.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1226) Senate checkpoint: R voted in/outside county of interview (CKPTPRTO)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) R voted within county of interview	1130	62.6
2) R voted outside county of interview	48	2.7
3) R did not vote/dk if voted	373	20.7
4) Washington, D.C.	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1227) If R voted: If Senate election in state: If R voted in county of residence: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? (SINCVOT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	948	52.5
1) Yes, voted for Senate	775	42.9
5) No, didn't vote for Senate	78	4.3
8) DK	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1228) IF R VOTED: If Senate election in state: If R voted in county of residence: If voted for Senate: Who did you vote for? (SINVCAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1031	57.1
1) Preload Democratic candidate name	403	22.3
3) Preload 1st ind/3rd-party candidate name	6	0.3
4) Preload 2nd ind/3rd-party candidate name	4	0.2
5) Preload Republican candidate name	331	18.3
7) Other (specify)	16	0.9
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1229) If R voted: If Senate election in state: If R voted in county of residence: If voted for Senate: Who did you vote for? (SINVCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1031	57.1
8) Third party or Independent Senate candidate	4	0.2
10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate	6	0.3
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race	80	4.4
12) Republican candidate in open Senate race	55	3.0
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	196	10.9
14) Republican Senate incumbent	185	10.2
15) Democratic Senate challenger	127	7.0
16) Republican Senate challenger	91	5.0
97) Name not on candidate list for this race	16	0.9
98) DK	9	0.5
99) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1230) If R voted: If Senate election in state: If R voted in county of residence: If voted for Senate: Who did you vote for? (SINVPRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1031	57.1
1) Democrat	403	22.3
2) Republican	331	18.3
3) Other (third party or Independent candidate)	10	0.6
7) Name not on candidate list	16	0.9
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1231) If R voted: If R voted outside county of residence: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? (SOUTVOT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1764	97.7
1) Yes, voted for senate	32	1.8
5) No, didn't vote for senate	8	0.4
7) R volunteers: No race in state	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1232) If R voted: If R voted outside county of residence: If R voted for senate: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? [Out-of county: Senate vote - candidate code] (SOUTCAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
11) 11	1	0.1
12) 12	3	0.2
13) 13	4	0.2
14) 14	4	0.2
91) Democrat--no name given	4	0.2
92) Republican--no name given	2	0.1
97) Name not on candidate list	5	0.3
98) DK	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1233) If R voted: If R voted outside county of residence: If R voted for Senate: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? [Out-of county: Senate vote - party summary] (SOUTCOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
1) Democrat	9	0.5
2) Republican	9	0.5
7) Name not on candidate list	5	0.3
8) DK	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1234) If R voted: If R voted outside county of residence: If R voted for Senate: Which party was that? [Party associated by respondent with Senate vote (out of county)] (SOUTPRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1774	98.2
1) Democrat	14	0.8
5) Republican	15	0.8
7) Other	2	0.1
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1235) If R voted: If voted in/outside county of residence: If R voted for Senate: Summary: Senate vote - Candidate code (SVOTCAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	999	55.3
8) Third party or Independent Senate candidate	4	0.2
10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate	6	0.3
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate	81	4.5
12) Republican candidate in open Senate	58	3.2
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	200	11.1
14) Republican Senate incumbent	189	10.5
15) Democratic Senate challenger	127	7.0
16) Republican Senate challenger	91	5.0
91) Democrat - no name given	4	0.2
92) Republican - no name given	2	0.1
97) Name given not on candidate list	21	1.2
98) DK	18	1.0
99) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1236) If R voted: If voted in/outside county of residence: If not Washington D.C.: If R voted for Senate: Summary: Senate vote - party summary (SVOTPRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	999	55.3
1) Democrat	412	22.8
2) Republican	340	18.8
3) Other (third party or Independent candidate)	10	0.6
7) Name not on candidate list	21	1.2
8) DK	18	1.0
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1237) If R did not vote: How about the election for President? Did you prefer one of the candidates for President? (NVPPRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1433	79.3
1) Yes	260	14.4
5) No	110	6.1
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1238) If R did not vote: If R says he/she preferred a candidate for President: Who did you prefer? (NVPPRES2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1546	85.6
1) Al Gore	129	7.1
3) George W. Bush	117	6.5
5) Pat Buchanan	1	0.1
6) Ralph Nader	8	0.4
7) Other	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1239) If R did not vote: If R says he/she preferred a candidate for President: If named preference is not DK/RF: Would you say your preference for this candidate was strong or not strong? (NVSPPRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1547	85.7
1) Strong	163	9.0
5) Not strong	95	5.3
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1240) If R did not vote: If not Washington D.C.: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives? (NVHSECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1433	79.3
1) Yes	74	4.1
5) No	292	16.2
8) DK	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1241) If R did not vote: If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she preferred one of the House candidates: Which candidate did you prefer? (NVPHSECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.9
1) Preload Democratic candidate name	39	2.2
5) Preload Republican candidate name	28	1.6
7) Other - specify	5	0.3
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1242) If R did not vote: If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she preferred one of the House candidates: Which candidate did you prefer? (NVPHSECD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.9
31) Democratic candidate in open House race	2	0.1
32) Republican candidate in open House race	6	0.3
33) Democratic House incumbent	30	1.7
34) Republican House incumbent	18	1.0
35) Democratic House challenger	7	0.4
36) Republican House challenger	4	0.2
97) Name not on candidate list	5	0.3
98) DK	1	0.1
99) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1243) If R did not vote: If not Washington D.C.: If R says he/she preferred one of the House candidates: Which candidate did you prefer? [Nonvoter: House preference - party summary] (NVHSPTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1732	95.9
1) Democrat	39	2.2
2) Republican	28	1.6
7) Name not on candidate list	5	0.3
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1244) If R did not vote: If Senate election in state: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate? (NVSENCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1517	84.0
1) Yes	90	5.0
5) No	195	10.8
8) DK	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1245) If R did not vote: If Senate election in state: If R says he/she preferred a Senate candidate: Which candidate did you prefer? (NVPSENCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1716	95.0
1) Preload Democratic candidate name	45	2.5
4) Preload 2nd Independent/3rd party candidate name	1	0.1
5) Preload Republican candidate name	41	2.3
7) Other, specify	1	0.1
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1246) If R did not vote: If Senate election in state: If R says he/she preferred a Senate candidate: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? [Nonvoter: House preference - candidate code] (NVPSENCD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1716	95.0
8) Third party or Independent Senate candidate	1	0.1
11) Democratic candidate in open Senate	14	0.8
12) Republican candidate in open Senate	9	0.5
13) Democratic Senate incumbent	22	1.2
14) Republican Senate incumbent	27	1.5
15) Democratic Senate challenger	9	0.5
16) Republican Senate challenger	5	0.3
97) Name not on candidate list for this	1	0.1
98) DK	1	0.1
99) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1247) If R did not vote: If Senate election in state: If R says he/she preferred a Senate candidate: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer [Nonvoter: House preference - party summary] (NVPSNPTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1716	95.0
1) Democrat	45	2.5
2) Republican	41	2.3
3) Other (third party or Independent candidate)	1	0.1
7) Name not on candidate list	1	0.1
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1248) Please continue thinking about the November election. In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted fairly. In other countries, people believe that their elections are conducted unfairly. Thinking of the presidential election we've just had, do you believe it was very fair, somewhat fair, neither fair nor unfair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair? (ELECFAIR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	356	19.7
1) Very fair	322	17.8
2) Somewhat fair	415	23.0
3) Neither fair nor unfair	155	8.6
4) Somewhat unfair	309	17.1
5) Very unfair	217	12.0
8) DK	28	1.6
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1249) Thermometer - Bill Clinton (CLINTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	192.01	334.68

1250) Thermometer - Al Gore (GORETHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	195.25	336.87

1251) Thermometer - George W. Bush (BUSHTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	195.63	335.18

1252) Thermometer - Ralph Nader (NADRTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	312.63	426.22

1253) Thermometer - Jesse Jackson (JJACTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	222.68	374.21

1254) Thermometer - former President, George Bush (GHWBTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	215.73	348.47

1255) Thermometer - Democratic House candidate (DHCTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	517.50	469.21

1256) Thermometer - Republican House candidate (RHCTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	521.32	469.63

1257) Thermometer - retiring House representative (RHRTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	943.59	215.58

1258) Checkpoint: Is retiring House representative also the Senate Democratic or Republican candidate? (CKTPHSEN)

	TOTAL	%
0) House retiree is not also Senate candidate	1535	85.0
1) House retiree is also the Senate Democratic candidate	11	0.6
2) House retiree is also the Senate Republican candidate	5	0.3
9) Washington D.C.; no post interview	255	14.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1259) Thermometer - Democratic Senate candidate (DSCTHERM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	535.80	469.21

1260) Thermometer - Republican Senate candidate (RSCTHERM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	526.87	470.46

1261) Thermometer - Independent House incumbent candidate (IHCTHERM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	993.63	37.08

1262) Checkpoint: VT01 or VA05 (CKPTVTVA)

	TOTAL	%
0) CD of interview is neither VT01 NOR VA05	1547	85.7
1) CD of interview is VT01	1	0.1
2) CD of interview is VA05	3	0.2
9) Washington D.C., no post interview	255	14.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1263) Thermometer - the supreme court (CORTTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	231.27	356.93

1264) Thermometer - Congress (CONGTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	221.59	357.30

1265) Thermometer - the military (MILTTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	220.45	339.23

1266) Thermometer - the Federal Government in Washington (FEDGTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	216.28	355.68

1267) Thermometer - blacks (BLCKTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	249.61	369.43

1268) Thermometer - whites (WHITTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	250.61	364.31

1269) Thermometer - conservatives (CONSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	249.26	377.95

1270) Thermometer - liberals (LIBSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	247.73	380.73

1271) Thermometer - labor unions (LABRTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	231.55	367.76

1272) Thermometer - big business (CORPTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	217.45	355.85

1273) Thermometer - poor people (POORTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	255.21	370.48

1274) Thermometer - people on welfare (WLFRTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	240.20	378.00

1275) Thermometer - Hispanics (Hispanic-Americans) (HISPTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	254.30	376.11

1276) Thermometer - Christian Fundamentalists (FUNDTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	322.99	428.55

1277) Thermometer - the women's movement (WLIBTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	233.27	361.50

1278) Thermometer - older people (the elderly) (AGEDTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	230.36	338.91

1279) Thermometer - environmentalists (ENVRTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	230.50	357.40

1280) Thermometer - gay men and lesbians, that is, homosexuals (GAYSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	235.66	379.28

1281) Thermometer - the Christian Coalition (CHRSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	335.31	433.25

1282) Thermometer - Catholics (CATHTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	253.25	372.13

1283) Thermometer - Jews (JEWSTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	266.15	382.04

1284) Thermometer - Protestants (PROTTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	276.14	389.18

1285) Thermometer - Feminists (FEMTHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	252.19	384.25

1286) Thermometer - Asian-Americans (ASIATHRM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	266.07	383.33

1287) Was there anything in particular that you liked about [NAME], the Democratic candidate (VT01: [Independent candidate]) for the U.S. House of Representatives? (DHCLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	369	20.4
1) Yes	395	21.9
5) No	551	30.5
7) R volunteers: I don't know anything	470	26.0
8) DK	12	0.7
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1288) If R liked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 1 - Democratic House candidate 'likes' (DHCP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	129.26	474.15

1289) If R liked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 2 - Democratic House candidate 'likes' (DHCP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	70.73	208.60

1290) If R liked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 3 - Democratic House candidate 'likes' (DHCP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	41.37	166.39

1291) If R liked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 4 - Democratic House candidate 'likes' (DHCP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	18.97	119.35

1292) If R liked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 5 - Democratic House candidate 'likes' (DHCP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	9.23	80.77

1293) If Democratic candidate in House race/IF VTO1: Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about [Name], the Democratic candidate (VT01: [Independent candidate]) for the U.S. House of Representatives? (DHCDLIK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	842	46.6
1) YES, R names something disliked	182	10.1
5) No, nothing disliked	760	42.1
8) DK	14	0.8
9) Refused	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1294) If R disliked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: (What was that?) Mention 1 - Democratic House candidate 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] [8999. Other miscellaneous; 9001. R has been influenced by spouse; 9002. R has been influenced by someone else; 9995. NA; 9998. DK; 9999. Refused to say; 0000. INAP/no Post IW] (DHCN1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	70.83	443.65

1295) If R disliked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 2 - Democratic House candidate 'dislikes' (DHCN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	24.85	130.34

1296) If R disliked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 3 - Democratic House candidate 'dislikes' (DHCN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	10.17	82.29

1297) If R disliked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 4 - Democratic House candidate 'dislikes' (DHCN4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	2.88	48.29

1298) If R disliked something about Democratic/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 5 - Democratic House candidate 'dislikes' (DHCN5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	1.15	34.67

1299) If Republican candidate in House race/IF VA05: Was there anything in particular that you liked about [NAME], the Republican candidate (VA05: [Independent candidate]) for the U.S. House of Representatives? (RHCLIKE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	356	19.7
1) YES, R names something liked	381	21.1
5) No, nothing liked	573	31.7
7) R volunteers: I don't know anything	474	26.2
8) DK	12	0.7
9) Refused	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1300) If R liked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 1 - Republican House candidate 'likes' (RHCP1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	122.36	457.12

1301) If R liked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 2 - Republican House candidate 'likes' (RHCP2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	65.72	204.70

1302) If R liked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 3 - Republican House candidate 'likes' (RHCP3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	35.49	156.77

1303) If R liked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 4 - Republican House candidate 'likes' (RHCP4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	15.80	110.64

1304) If R liked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 5 - Republican House candidate 'likes' (RHCP5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	7.03	69.13

1305) If Republican candidate in House race/if VA05: Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about [NAME], the Republican candidate (VA05: [Independent candidate]) for the U.S. House of Representatives? (RHCDLKE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	830	46.0
1) YES, R names something disliked	194	10.7
5) No, nothing disliked	762	42.2
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1306) If R disliked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 1 - Republican House candidate 'dislikes' (RHCN1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	78.45	452.14

1307) If R disliked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 2 - Republican House candidate 'dislikes' (RHCN2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	28.68	153.19

1308) If R disliked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 3 - Republican House candidate 'dislikes' (RHCN3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	12.04	101.65

1309) If R disliked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 4 - Republican House candidate 'dislikes' (RHCN4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	5.55	62.12

1310) If R disliked something about Republican/Independent House candidate: [See note 1 in summary] (What was that?) Mention 5 - Republican House candidate 'dislikes' (RHCN5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	3.33	56.26

1311) Checkpoint: Number of House candidates (CKPTHCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) One House candidate in candidate list	215	11.9
2) Two or more House candidates in candidate list	1336	74.0
9) Washington D.C.	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1312) If 2 or more candidates in House race: Do you happen to know if either of these candidates was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? (HSEIN2A)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	470	26.0
1) Yes, Democratic	368	20.4
2) Yes, Republican	399	22.1
3) Yes Independent	3	0.2
4) Both [Vol]	17	0.9
5) No, neither was [Vol]	57	3.2
7) Don't know, not sure [Vol]	491	27.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1313) If 2 or more candidates in House race: Do you happen to know if either of these candidates was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? [Incumbent House candidate code - 2 candidate race] (HSEIN2B)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1019	56.4
31) Democratic candidate in open race	11	0.6
32) Republican candidate in open race	18	1.0
33) Democratic incumbent candidate	348	19.3
34) Republican incumbent candidate	374	20.7
35) Democratic challenger	9	0.5
36) Republican challenger	7	0.4
39) Nonincumbent Independent/3rd party candidate	3	0.2
90) Both	17	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1314) If only 1 candidate in House race: Do you happen to know if [Name of Democratic or Republican candidate] was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? (HSEINC2C)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1591	88.1
1) Yes	120	6.6
5) No	20	1.1
7) Don't know, not sure [Vol]	75	4.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1315) If only 1 candidate in House race: Do you happen to know if [Name of Democratic or Republican candidate] was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? [Incumbent House candidate code - 1 candidate race] (HSEINC2D)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1686	93.4
33) Democratic incumbent candidate	59	3.3
34) Republican incumbent candidate	61	3.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1316) Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the House of Representatives in Washington before the election (this/last) month? (HSECNTRL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) The Democrats	185	10.2
5) The Republicans	849	47.0
8) DK	521	28.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1317) Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the U.S. Senate before the election (this/last) month? (SENCNTRL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) The Democrats	148	8.2
5) The Republicans	776	43.0
8) DK	631	34.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1318) In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way Representative [running incumbent or retiring incumbent name] has been handling [his/her] job? (HSEINCAP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Approve	912	50.5
5) Disapprove	172	9.5
8) DK	455	25.2
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1319) If R approves retiring House representative: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (HSESAPP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	894	49.5
1) Approve stongly	481	26.6
5) Not strongly	426	23.6
8) DK	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1320) If R disapproves retiring House representative: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (HSESDIS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1634	90.5
1) Disapprove strongly	87	4.8
5) Not strongly	82	4.5
8) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1321) Summary: Approve retiring House representative (HSESUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	255	14.1
1) Approve strongly	481	26.6
2) Approve not strongly	426	23.6
4) Disapprove not strongly	82	4.5
5) Disapprove strongly	87	4.8
8) DK	463	25.6
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1322) Do you happen to remember anything special that Representative [Running incumbent or retiring incumbent name] has done for the people in [his/her] district while [he/she] has been in Congress? (HINCSPEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Yes	297	16.4
5) No	1099	60.9
8) DK	152	8.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1323) Do you happen to know about how many years [HE/SHE] has been in the House of Representatives? (HINCNYRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Yes, R knows	532	29.5
5) No	901	49.9
8) DK	116	6.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1324) If R says knows how long retiring representative has been in office: (About how many?) (HINCNYR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1274	70.5
1) 1	2	0.1
2) 2	39	2.2
3) 3	4	0.2
4) 4	147	8.1
5) 5	7	0.4
6) 6	78	4.3
7) 7	2	0.1
8) 8	109	6.0
9) 9	1	0.1
10) 10	26	1.4
11) 11	1	0.1
12) 12	66	3.7
13) 13	1	0.1
14) 14	5	0.3
15) 15	10	0.6
16) 16	2	0.1
18) 18	4	0.2
20) 20	12	0.7
25) 25	3	0.2
26) 26	2	0.1
32) 32	1	0.1
98) DK	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1325) If R DK how long retiring representative has been in office: Would you say less than 12 years, about 12 years, or more than 12 years? (HINC12YR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	789	43.7
1) Less than 12 years	450	24.9
3) About 12 years	140	7.8
5) More than 12 years	55	3.0
8) DK	372	20.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1326) How good a job would you say U.S. Representative [NAME] does of keeping in touch with the people in your district -- does (he/she) do a very good job, fairly good, fairly poor, or a very poor job of keeping in touch with the people in this district? (HINCINTC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Very good	300	16.6
2) Fairly good	559	31.0
3) Fairly poor	236	13.1
4) Very poor	150	8.3
8) DK	302	16.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1327) Some people seem to follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there's an election going on or not. Others aren't that interested. Would you say you follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, some of the time, only now and then, or hardly at all? (POLWONK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Most of the time	339	18.8
2) Some of the time	569	31.5
3) Only now and then	423	23.4
4) Hardly at all	212	11.7
8) DK	11	0.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1328) When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? (PLIBCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	308	17.1
1) Extremely liberal	33	1.8
2) Liberal	169	9.4
3) Slightly liberal	139	7.7
4) Moderate middle of the road	386	21.4
5) Slightly conservative	197	10.9
6) Conservative	264	14.6
7) Extremely conservative	50	2.8
8) DK	6	0.3
9) RF; NA; INAP	254	14.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1329) If R lib-con self-placement is moderate/DK/haven't thought: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? (PLIBCN2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1103	61.1
1) Liberal	78	4.3
3) Conservative	109	6.0
5) Moderate [Vol]	413	22.9
7) R refuses to choose [Vol]	91	5.0
8) DK	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1330) 3-category lib-con summary (PLIBCNS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Liberal	419	23.2
3) Moderate	428	23.7
5) Conservative	620	34.3
7) Refused to choose	78	4.3
8) DK	10	0.6
9) NA/RF	251	13.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1331) What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? (PCLNSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	202	11.2
2) Liberal	487	27.0
3) Slightly liberal	286	15.8
4) Moderate middle of the road	259	14.3
5) Slightly conservative	68	3.8
6) Conservative	71	3.9
7) Extremely conservative	29	1.6
8) DK	150	8.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1332) What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (PGORESC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	162	9.0
2) Liberal	505	28.0
3) Slightly liberal	295	16.3
4) Moderate middle of the road	202	11.2
5) Slightly conservative	94	5.2
6) Conservative	99	5.5
7) Extremely conservative	29	1.6
8) DK	166	9.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1333) If lib-con placement of Gore is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (PGORLCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	420	23.3
1) Very certain	387	21.4
3) Pretty certain	685	37.9
5) Not very certain	313	17.3
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1334) What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (PBUSHSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	18	1.0
2) Liberal	94	5.2
3) Slightly liberal	75	4.2
4) Moderate middle of the road	165	9.1
5) Slightly conservative	273	15.1
6) Conservative	647	35.8
7) Extremely conservative	107	5.9
8) DK	173	9.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1335) If lib-con placement of GW Bush is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (PBSHLCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	427	23.6
1) Very certain	326	18.1
3) Pretty certain	735	40.7
5) Not very certain	318	17.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1336) What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (PBCHSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	24	1.3
2) Liberal	72	4.0
3) Slightly liberal	54	3.0
4) Moderate middle of the road	154	8.5
5) Slightly conservative	62	3.4
6) Conservative	211	11.7
7) Extremely conservative	471	26.1
8) DK	504	27.9
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1337) If lib-con placement of Buchanan is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (PBCHLCP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	758	42.0
1) Very certain	365	20.2
3) Pretty certain	395	21.9
5) Not very certain	288	15.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1338) Checkpoint: Number of candidates/ VT01 OR VA05 for liberal-conservative House candidate placements (CKPTNCAN)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic and Republican candidates in House race	1332	73.8
2) Democratic candidate only in House race	101	5.6
3) Republican candidate only in House race	114	6.3
4) Independent incumbent candidate; Republican challenger	1	0.1
5) Independent incumbent candidate; Democratic challenger	3	0.2
9) INAP	255	14.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1339) What about [Democratic House candidate]? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? (DHCSCALE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	647	35.8
1) Extremely liberal	24	1.3
2) Liberal	182	10.1
3) Slightly liberal	162	9.0
4) Moderate middle of the road	187	10.4
5) Slightly conservative	54	3.0
6) Conservative	56	3.1
7) Extremely conservative	9	0.5
8) DK	484	26.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1340) What about [Incumbent Independent House candidate]? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? (IHCSCAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
3) Slightly liberal	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1341) If Democratic candidate in House race: If lib-con placement of Democratic House candidate is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (DHCCERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1132	62.7
1) Very certain	135	7.5
3) Pretty certain	314	17.4
5) Not very certain	224	12.4
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1342) If VT01 (incumbent Independent candidate in House race): If lib-con placement of incumbent Ind. House candidate is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (IIHCCERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
3) Pretty certain	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1343) What about [Republican House candidate]? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (RHCSCALE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) Extremely liberal	11	0.6
2) Liberal	43	2.4
3) Slightly liberal	40	2.2
4) Moderate middle of the road	155	8.6
5) Slightly conservative	164	9.1
6) Conservative	250	13.8
7) Extremely conservative	24	1.3
8) DK	463	25.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1344) What about [Independent incumbent House candidate]? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (INC2SCAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1804	99.9
6) Conservative	1	0.1
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1345) If Republican candidate in House race: If lib-con placement of Republican candidate is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (RHCCERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1119	62.0
1) Very certain	136	7.5
3) Pretty certain	327	18.1
5) Not very certain	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1346) If VA05 (Incumbent Independent candidate in House race): If lib-con placement of incumbent Independent House candidate is not DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (IINC2CR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
3) Pretty certain	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1347) What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (PDEMSCAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	87	4.8
2) Liberal	602	33.3
3) Slightly liberal	301	16.7
4) Moderate middle of the road	196	10.9
5) Slightly conservative	65	3.6
6) Conservative	91	5.0
7) Extremely conservative	28	1.6
8) DK	183	10.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1348) What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (PREPSCAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	14	0.8
2) Liberal	84	4.7
3) Slightly liberal	70	3.9
4) Moderate middle of the road	152	8.4
5) Slightly conservative	271	15.0
6) Conservative	693	38.4
7) Extremely conservative	70	3.9
8) DK	199	11.0
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1349) What about the Reform Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (PREFSCAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Extremely liberal	42	2.3
2) Liberal	99	5.5
3) SLIGHTLY LIBERAL	80	4.4
4) Moderate middle of the road	264	14.6
5) Slightly conservative	85	4.7
6) Conservative	147	8.1
7) Extremely conservative	96	5.3
8) DK	737	40.8
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1350) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R placement-services/spend scale] (PSRVSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	73	4.0
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	21	1.2
2) 2	59	3.3
3) 3	98	5.4
4) 4	198	11.0
5) 5	151	8.4
6) 6	50	2.8
7) More services, increase spending	41	2.3
8) DK	4	0.2
9) RF; NA; INAP	1111	61.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1351) Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? [R placement-services/spend branch] (PSRVSPB)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	58	3.2
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	163	9.0
3) More services, increase spending	289	16.0
5) Continue at present level	340	18.8
8) DK	8	0.4
9) RF; NA; INAP	948	52.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1352) If R thinks gov't should reduce services and spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (PSSREDC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1643	91.0
1) A great deal	73	4.0
5) Only some	90	5.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1353) If R thinks gov't should increase services and spending: Telephone: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (PSSINCR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1517	84.0
1) A great deal	121	6.7
5) Only some	167	9.2
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1354) If R thinks services/spending should stay same/DK/haven't thought much: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? (PSSCHNG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1398	77.4
1) Increase	175	9.7
3) Decrease	139	7.7
5) R refuses to choose [Vol]	84	4.7
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1355) Branching summary: 7-point services/spending self-placement (PSSSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	20	1.1
1) Reduce a great deal	73	4.0
2) Reduce only some	90	5.0
3) Neither but slightly favor decrease	139	7.7
4) Stay the same	69	3.8
5) Neither but slightly favor increase	175	9.7
6) Increase only some	168	9.3
7) Increase a great deal	121	6.7
8) DK	4	0.2
9) RF; NA; INAP	947	52.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1356) Summary: 7-point services/spending self-placement (PSSUMM2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	93	5.1
1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce a great deal	94	5.2
2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce only some	149	8.3
3) Scale 3 branching: Neither but slightly decrease	237	13.1
4) Scale 4 branching: Stay the same	267	14.8
5) Scale 5 branching: Neither but slightly increase	326	18.1
6) Scale 6 branching: Increase only some	218	12.1
7) Scale 7 branching: Increase a great	162	9.0
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1357) Checkpoint: Number of candidates/VT01 or VA05 for services/spending House candidate placements (CKPTNCNS)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic and Republican candidates	1332	73.8
2) Democratic candidate only in House race	101	5.6
3) Republican candidate only in House race	114	6.3
4) VT01: Independent incumbent candidate	1	0.1
5) VA05: Independent incumbent candidate	3	0.2
9) INAP	255	14.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1358) Democratic House candidate on services/spending: Where would you place [Democratic House candidate] on this issue? (DHCSRVSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1257	69.6
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	2	0.1
2) 2	7	0.4
3) 3	30	1.7
4) 4	77	4.3
5) 5	114	6.3
6) 6	53	2.9
7) More services, increase spending	14	0.8
8) DK	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1359) Where would you place (VT01: [Independent incumbent House candidate]) on this issue? [#1 independent incumbent House candidate on services/spending] (IINCSRVS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	0.00	0.00

1360) What about [Democratic House candidate]? Do you think [he/she] would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (DHCSRVS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1196	66.2
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	36	2.0
3) More services, increase spending	182	10.1
5) Continue services at present	93	5.1
8) DK	298	16.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1361) What about (VT01: [Independent incumbent House candidate])? Do you think [he/she] would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IINCSRV2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
5) Continue services at present	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1362) If R thinks Democratic House candidate would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: Do you think [he/she] would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (DHCSSRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1770	98.0
1) A great deal	11	0.6
5) Only some	25	1.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1363) If R thinks VT01 Independent House candidate would like to reduce services/spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IINC2CRT)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	0.00	0.00

1364) If R thinks Democratic House candidate would like to increase services and spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (DHCINCMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1624	89.9
1) A great deal	77	4.3
5) Only some	104	5.8
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1365) If R thinks VT01 Independent House candidate would like to increase services/spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IINCINCM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	0.00	0.00

1366) If R thinks Democratic House candidate would like services/spending unchanged: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think [he/she] would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? (DHCINCDC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1713	94.9
1) Increase	57	3.2
3) Decrease	19	1.1
5) Neither	14	0.8
8) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1367) If R thinks VT01 Independent House candidate would like services/spending unchanged: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think [he/she] would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? (IINCINCE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
3) Decrease	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1368) Branching summary: 7pt services/spending Democratic House candidate placement (DEMSSSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1195	66.2
1) Reduce a great deal	11	0.6
2) Reduce only some	25	1.4
3) Neither but slightly favor decrease	20	1.1
4) Stay the same	17	0.9
5) Neither but slightly favor increase	57	3.2
6) Increase only some	105	5.8
7) Increase a great deal	77	4.3
8) DK	298	16.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1369) Summary: 7-point services/spending Democratic House cand placement (DEMSSM2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	646	35.8
1) Scale 1 branching reduce a great deal	13	0.7
2) Scale 2 branching reduce only some	32	1.8
3) Scale 3 branching neither but slightly favor decrease	50	2.8
4) Scale 4 branching stay the same	94	5.2
5) Scale 5 branching neither but slightly favor increase	171	9.5
6) Scale 6 branching increase only some	158	8.7
7) Scale 7 branching increase a great deal	91	5.0
8) DK	550	30.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1370) If not Washington D.C.: If Republican candidate in House race: If Rep candidate not coded 997 In thermometer: Where would you place [Republican House candidate] on this issue? [Republican House candidate on services/spending] (RHCSRVS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1294	71.7
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	6	0.3
2) 2	36	2.0
3) 3	98	5.4
4) 4	94	5.2
5) 5	49	2.7
6) 6	15	0.8
7) More services, increase spending	3	0.2
8) DK	211	11.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1371) Where would you place (VA05: [Independent incumbent House candidate]) on this issue? [#2 Independent incumbent House candidate on services/spending] (IINC2SRS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	0.00	0.00

1372) If not Washington D.C.: I Republican candidate in House race: If Rep candidate not coded 997 In thermometer: What about [Republican House candidate]? Do you think [he/she] would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (RHCSRSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1166	64.6
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	169	9.4
3) More services, increase spending	59	3.3
5) Continue services at present	114	6.3
8) DK	298	16.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1373) Do you think [he/she] would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? [#2 Independent incumbent House candidate on services/spending] (IINC2SRP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1804	99.9
1) Fewer services, reduce spending	1	0.1
5) Continue services at present	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1374) If R thinks Republican House candidate would like to reduce services/spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (RHCSRVRD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1637	90.6
1) A great deal	53	2.9
5) Only some	114	6.3
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1375) If R thinks VA05 House candidate would like to reduce services/spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IINC2SRR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
5) Only some	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1376) If R thinks Republican House candidate would like to increase services/spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (RHCSSINC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1747	96.7
1) A great deal	17	0.9
5) Only some	42	2.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1377) IF R thinks VA05 Independent House candidate would like to increase services/spending: Do you think [he/she] would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IINC2SSN)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	0.00	0.00

1378) If R thinks Republican House candidate would like services/spending unchanged: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think [he/she] would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? (RHCSSMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1692	93.7
1) Increase	32	1.8
3) Decrease	55	3.0
5) Neither	22	1.2
8) DK	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1379) If R thinks VA05 Independent House candidate would like services/spending unchanged: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think [he/she] would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? (IINC2SSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
3) DECREASE	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1380) Branching summary: 7pt services/spending Republican House candidate placement (RHCSSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1164	64.5
1) Reduce a great deal	53	2.9
2) Reduce only some	117	6.5
3) Neither but slightly favor decrease	56	3.1
4) Stay the same	27	1.5
5) Neither but slightly favor increase	32	1.8
6) Increase only some	42	2.3
7) Increase a great deal	17	0.9
8) DK	298	16.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1381) Summary: 7-point services/spending Republican House candidate placement (RHCSSM2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	652	36.1
1) Scale 1 branching reduce a great deal	59	3.3
2) Scale 2 branching reduce only some	153	8.5
3) Scale 3 branching neither but slightly favor decrease	154	8.5
4) Scale 4 branching stay the same	121	6.7
5) Scale 5 branching neither but slightly favor increase	81	4.5
6) Scale 6 branching increase only some	57	3.2
7) Scale 7 branching increase a great deal	20	1.1
8) DK	509	28.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1382) There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? (PABORT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted	172	9.5
2) Permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, life danger	458	25.4
3) Permit abortion for reason other than rape, incest, or danger	277	15.3
4) A woman should always be able to obtain an abortion	612	33.9
7) Other	24	1.3
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1383) All abortion respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (PABRTIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Not at all important	62	3.4
2) Not too important	173	9.6
3) Somewhat important	473	26.2
4) Very important	538	29.8
5) Extremely important	301	16.7
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1384) Checkpoint: Number of candidates/ VT01 or VA05 for abortion House candidate placements (CKPTNCND)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democratic and Republican candidates in House race	1332	73.8
2) Democratic candidate only in House race	101	5.6
3) Republican candidate only in House race	114	6.3
4) Independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate	1	0.1
5) Independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate	3	0.2
9) INAP	255	14.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1385) What about [Democratic House candidate] (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [his/her] views? (DHCBSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	647	35.8
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted	18	1.0
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	66	3.7
3) The law should permit abortion for reason other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established.	96	5.3
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice.	195	10.8
7) Other	1	0.1
8) DK	781	43.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1386) Telephone: What about [Independent incumbent House candidate] (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [his/her] views? (IIHCBC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
1) BY Law, abortion should never be permitted	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1387) If abortion placement of Democratic House candidate is not DK: How certain are you of [Democratic House candidate]'s position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (DHCABSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1430	79.2
1) Very certain	70	3.9
3) Pretty certain	151	8.4
5) Not very certain	154	8.5
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1388) If abortion placement of VT01 Independent incumbent candidate is not DK: How certain are you of [VT01 incumbent Independent House candidate]'s position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (IIHCBSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
1) Very certain	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1389) What about [Republican House candidate] (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [his/her] views? (RHCBSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) By law, abortion should never be permitted	70	3.9
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	196	10.9
3) The law should permit abortion for reason other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established.	74	4.1
4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice	46	2.5
7) Other	1	0.1
8) DK	763	42.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1390) What about (VA05: [Independent Incumbent House candidate]) (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [his/her] views? (IIHC2ASC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1804	99.9
2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger	1	0.1
3) The law should permit abortion for reason other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established.	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1391) If abortion placement of Republican House candidate is not DK: How certain are you of [Republican House candidate]'s position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (RHCABSCC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1419	78.6
1) Very certain	59	3.3
3) Pretty certain	158	8.7
5) Not very certain	169	9.4
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1392) If abortion placement of VA05 Independent incumbent candidate is not DK: How certain are you of [VA05 Independent House candidate]'s position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (IIHC2SCC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1804	99.9
1) Very certain	1	0.1
3) Pretty certain	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1393) Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat or Republican? (PREPCON)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Democrat	706	39.1
3) Republican	522	28.9
5) Neither [Vol]	253	14.0
7) Other [specify]	62	3.4
8) DK	10	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1394) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (LASTYRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1041	57.6
1) Better	247	13.7
3) Worse	79	4.4
5) The same	435	24.1
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1395) If R financial situation better in last year: Much better or somewhat better? (LSTYRPM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1559	86.3
1) Much better	66	3.7
5) Somewhat better	181	10.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1396) If R financial situation worse in last year: Much worse or somewhat worse? (LSTYRNM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1727	95.6
1) Much worse	23	1.3
5) Somewhat worse	56	3.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1397) Summary: R financial situation in past year (LSTYRSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1041	57.6
1) Much better	66	3.7
2) Somewhat better	181	10.0
3) The same	435	24.1
4) Somewhat worse	56	3.1
5) Much worse	23	1.3
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1398) Combined pre/post summary: R financial situation in past year (FINPREPO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	115	6.4
1) Much better	183	10.1
2) Somewhat better	375	20.8
3) The same	916	50.7
4) Somewhat worse	145	8.0
5) Much worse	64	3.5
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1399) In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? (MEDPUTOF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1041	57.6
1) Yes	179	9.9
5) No	585	32.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1400) Combined pre/post: Medical or dental treatment postponed (MEDPUTFX)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	115	6.4
1) Yes	457	25.3
5) No	1233	68.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1401) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (NYEXPECT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1041	57.6
1) Better	289	16.0
3) Worse	43	2.4
5) The same	414	22.9
8) DK	17	0.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1402) If R thinks financial situation will be better in next year: Much better off or somewhat better off? (NYPEXP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1517	84.0
1) Much better	87	4.8
5) Somewhat better	200	11.1
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1403) If R thinks financial situation will be worse in next year: Much worse off or somewhat worse off? (NYNEXP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1763	97.6
1) Much worse	6	0.3
5) Somewhat worse	37	2.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1404) Summary: R financial situation in next year (NYFNEXP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1041	57.6
1) Much better	87	4.8
2) Somewhat better	200	11.1
3) About the same	414	22.9
4) Somewhat worse	37	2.0
5) Much worse	6	0.3
8) DK	19	1.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1405) Pre/post summary: R financial situation in next year (NYFPRPO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	141	7.8
1) Much better	204	11.3
2) Somewhat better	451	25.0
3) About the same	892	49.4
4) Somewhat worse	70	3.9
5) Much worse	24	1.3
8) DK	22	1.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1406) How afraid are you that a member of your family, or a close friend, or you yourself might be the victim of an assault during the coming year? Would you say you are very afraid, somewhat afraid, a little bit afraid, or not afraid? (FEARASAU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1041	57.6
1) Very afraid	41	2.3
3) Somewhat afraid	142	7.9
5) A little bit afraid	244	13.5
7) Not afraid	338	18.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1407) If you were selected to serve on a jury, would you be happy to do it or would you rather not serve? (JURYATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Happy to do it	957	53.0
5) Rather not serve	585	32.4
8) DK	12	0.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1408) One, the less government, the better; or two, there are more things that government should be doing? (GOVAMNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) The less government the better	639	35.4
2) More things government should be doing	888	49.2
8) DK	25	1.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1409) One, we need a strong government to handle today's complex economic problems; OR TWO, the free market can handle these problems without government being involved. (GOVPROB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Need a strong gov't to handle complex	928	51.4
2) Free market can handle without gov't	575	31.8
8) DK	50	2.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1410) ONE, the main reason government has become bigger over the years is because it has gotten involved in things that people should do for themselves; or two, government has become bigger because the problems we face have become bigger. (GOVMEDD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Gov't bigger because it's involved in	671	37.2
2) Gov't bigger because problems bigger	854	47.3
8) DK	28	1.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1411) ONE, it is more important to be a cooperative person who works well with others; or two, it is more important to be a self-reliant person able to take care of oneself. (SRELNT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) More important to be cooperative	852	47.2
2) More important to be self-reliant	662	36.7
8) DK	34	1.9
9) Refused	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1412) Now I'd like to ask you a few short questions about television viewing, because what you watch often determines what political advertising you will see. How many times in the last week have you watched 'Jeopardy'? (JEOPARDY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	112	6.2
2) 2	83	4.6
3) 3	65	3.6
4) 4	27	1.5
5) 5	52	2.9
6) 6	6	0.3
7) 7	5	0.3
9) 9	3	0.2
10) 10	1	0.1
13) 13	1	0.1
95) Every day	42	2.3
96) Never, not at all	1122	62.1
97) R volunteers, never watches television	32	1.8
98) Don't know	3	0.2
99) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1413) How many times in the last week have you watched 'Wheel of Fortune'? (WHEELOF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	283	15.7
1) 1	105	5.8
2) 2	86	4.8
3) 3	57	3.2
4) 4	23	1.3
5) 5	61	3.4
6) 6	11	0.6
7) 7	8	0.4
9) 9	4	0.2
10) 10	1	0.1
95) Every day	68	3.8
96) Never, not at all	1097	60.7
98) Don't know	1	0.1
99) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1414) How many times in the last week have you watched morning news programs such as 'Today,' 'Good Morning America,' or 'The Early Show'? (AMNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	283	15.7
1) 1	122	6.8
2) 2	110	6.1
3) 3	123	6.8
4) 4	61	3.4
5) 5	181	10.0
6) 6	16	0.9
95) Every day	177	9.8
96) Never, not at all	729	40.4
98) Don't know	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1415) How many times in the last week have you watched daytime television talk shows such as 'Oprah Winfrey,' 'Rosie O'Donnell,' or 'Jerry Springer'? (TALKTV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	283	15.7
1) 1	141	7.8
2) 2	91	5.0
3) 3	70	3.9
4) 4	31	1.7
5) 5	61	3.4
6) 6	2	0.1
7) 7	5	0.3
9) 9	1	0.1
95) Every day	36	2.0
96) Never, not at all	1082	59.9
98) Don't know	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1416) Which of the network news programs do you watch most often - 'World News Tonight' on ABC, 'NBC Nightly News,' 'The CBS Evening News,' or some other network news program? (NETWNEWS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	283	15.7
1) ABC	307	17.0
3) NBC	362	20.0
5) CBS	264	14.6
6) Watch no network news program [Vol]	184	10.2
7) Other (specify)	394	21.8
8) Don't know	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1417) How much of the time do you think you can trust the media to report the news fairly? Just about always, most of the time, only some of the time, or almost never? (TRSTMDIA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Just about always	110	6.1
2) Most of the time	642	35.5
3) Only some of the time	669	37.0
4) Almost never [Vol]	132	7.3
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1418) There are a number of programs on radio in which people call in to voice their opinions about politics. Do you ever listen to political talk radio programs of this type? (TALKRDIO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes, listen	561	31.1
5) No, don't listen	994	55.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1419) If R listens to political talk radio: How often do you listen to those programs -- every day, most days, once or twice a week, or only occasionally? (TRADAMT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1245	68.9
1) Everyday	92	5.1
2) Most days	77	4.3
3) Once or twice a week	144	8.0
4) Only occasionally	248	13.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1420) If R listens to political talk radio: Some people listen carefully to these talk radio programs while others just keep them on in the background while they do other things. How about you? When you turn on a political talk radio program, would you say you pay very close attention, fairly close attention, occasional attention, or very little attention? (TRADCLS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1245	68.9
1) Very close attention	107	5.9
2) Fairly close attention	258	14.3
3) Occasional attention	145	8.0
4) Very little attention	51	2.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1421) Do you have access to the Internet or the World Wide Web? (WWWACCS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	973	53.9
5) No	581	32.2
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1422) If R has access to the internet: Have you seen any information about this election campaign on the (internet/web)? (WWWELNF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	833	46.1
1) Yes	464	25.7
5) No	509	28.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1423) Do you think there are any important differences in what the Republicans and Democrats stand for? (PRTYDFFS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes, differences	1066	59.0
5) No, no differences	457	25.3
8) DK	31	1.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1424) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: [See note 3 in summary] What are those differences? Mention 1 - difference (PRTYDIF1)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	248.91	311.39

1425) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: What are those differences? Mention 1 - party reference (PRTYREF1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	740	41.0
1) Democratic Party mention	350	19.4
2) Democratic presidential candidate	11	0.6
4) Republican presidential candidate	10	0.6
5) Republican Party mention	342	18.9
7) Unclear party reference	322	17.8
8) DK	31	1.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1426) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: [See note 3 in summary] What are those differences? Mention 2 - difference (PRTYDIF2)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	201.56	275.16

1427) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: What are those differences? Mention 2 - party reference (PRTYREF2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	885	49.0
1) Democratic Party mention	306	16.9
2) Democratic presidential candidate	17	0.9
4) Republican presidential candidate	21	1.2
5) Republican Party mention	360	19.9
6) Other party mentioned instead	1	0.1
7) Unclear party reference	216	12.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1428) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: [See note 3 in summary] What are those differences? Mention 3 - difference (PRTYDIF3)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	161.54	263.75

1429) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: What are those differences? Mention 3 - party reference (PRTYREF3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1136	62.9
1) Democratic Party mention	221	12.2
2) Democratic presidential candidate	16	0.9
4) Republican presidential candidate	24	1.3
5) Republican Party mention	245	13.6
6) Other party mentioned instead	1	0.1
7) Unclear party reference	163	9.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1430) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: [See note 3 in summary] What are those differences? Mention 4 - difference (PRTYDIF4)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	123.26	242.52

1431) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: What are those differences? Mention 4 - party reference (PRTYREF4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1301	72.0
1) Democratic Party mention	187	10.4
2) Democratic presidential candidate	13	0.7
4) Republican presidential candidate	22	1.2
5) Republican Party mention	189	10.5
6) Other party mentioned instead	1	0.1
7) Unclear party reference	93	5.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1432) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: [See note 3 in summary] What are those differences? Mention 5 - difference (PRTYDIF5)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	83.65	212.34

1433) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: What are those differences? Mention 5 - party reference (PRTYREF5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1489	82.4
1) Democratic Party mention	114	6.3
2) Democratic presidential candidate	10	0.6
4) Republican presidential candidate	15	0.8
5) Republican Party mention	118	6.5
6) Other party mentioned instead	1	0.1
7) Unclear party reference	59	3.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1434) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: [See note 3 in summary] What are those differences? Mention 6 - difference (PRTYDIF6)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	57.27	182.88

1435) If R says important differences between Democrats and Republicans: What are those differences? Mention 6 - party reference (PRTYREF6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1590	88.0
1) Democratic Party mention	90	5.0
2) Democratic presidential candidate	8	0.4
4) Republican presidential candidate	9	0.5
5) Republican Party mention	81	4.5
7) Unclear party reference	28	1.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1436) The first group is whites. Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence? (WHTINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	425	23.5
2) Just about the right amount	971	53.8
3) Too little influence	124	6.9
8) DK	21	1.2
9) Refused	14	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1437) What about blacks? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (BLKINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	310	17.2
2) Just about the right amount	575	31.8
3) Too little influence	623	34.5
8) DK	34	1.9
9) Refused	13	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1438) What about Hispanics (Hispanic-Americans)? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (HISPINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	121	6.7
2) Just about the right amount	502	27.8
3) Too little influence	849	47.0
8) DK	69	3.8
9) Refused	14	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1439) What about Asian Americans? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (ASIANINF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	85	4.7
2) Just about the right amount	586	32.4
3) Too little influence	771	42.7
8) DK	100	5.5
9) Refused	13	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1440) What about Jews? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (JEWSINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	223	12.3
2) Just about the right amount	854	47.3
3) Too little influence	351	19.4
8) DK	111	6.1
9) Refused	16	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1441) What about Protestants? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (PROTINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	135	7.5
2) Just about the right amount	1012	56.0
3) Too little influence	221	12.2
8) DK	171	9.5
9) Refused	16	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1442) What about Catholics? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (CATHINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	250	13.8
2) Just about the right amount	1050	58.1
3) Too little influence	143	7.9
8) DK	97	5.4
9) Refused	15	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1443) What about men? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (MENINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	830	46.0
2) Just about the right amount	608	33.7
3) Too little influence	81	4.5
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1444) And the last group is women. (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) (WOMINFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Too much influence	105	5.8
2) Just about the right amount	556	30.8
3) Too little influence	866	48.0
8) DK	19	1.1
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1445) If R selected for standard version of office recognition items: The first name is Trent Lott. What job or political office does he NOW hold? (LOTTIDS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	781	43.2
1) Correctly identifies Lott as Senate majority leader	85	4.7
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	260	14.4
8) R Makes no attempt to guess	680	37.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1446) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: The first name is Trent Lott. What job or political office does he now hold? (LOTTIDE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1276	70.7
1) Correctly identifies Lott as Senate majority leader	50	2.8
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	167	9.2
8) R makes no attempt to guess	311	17.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1447) The first name is Trent Lott. What job or political office does he now hold? Summary: Trent Lott office recognition (LOTTIDSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Correctly identifies Lott as Senate Majority Leader	135	7.5
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	427	23.6
8) R makes no attempt to guess	991	54.9
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1448) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: The first name is Trent Lott. What job or political office does he now hold? [Checkpoint: Lott - probe used?] (LOTTIDP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1278	70.8
1) Yes	241	13.3
5) No	287	15.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1449) If R selected for standard version of office recognition items: William Rehnquist [Pron: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he now hold?) (RHENIDS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	781	43.2
1) Correctly identifies Rehnquist as Chief Justice	98	5.4
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	297	16.4
8) R makes no attempt to guess	630	34.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1450) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: William Rehnquist [Pron: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he now hold?) (RHENIDE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1276	70.7
1) Correctly Identifies Rehnquist as Chief Justice	66	3.7
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	189	10.5
8) R makes no attempt to guess	274	15.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1451) Summary: Rehnquist office recognition (RHENIDSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Correctly Identifies Rehnquist as Chief Justice	164	9.1
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	486	26.9
8) R makes no attempt to guess	904	50.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1452) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: William Rehnquist [Pron: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he now hold?) Checkpoint: Probe used? (RHENIDP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1278	70.8
1) Yes	220	12.2
5) No	308	17.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1453) If R selected for standard version of office recognition items: Tony Blair (What job or political office does he now hold?) (BLAIRIDS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	781	43.2
1) Correctly identifies Blair as Prime Minister of England	347	19.2
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	73	4.0
8) R makes no attempt to guess	604	33.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1454) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: Tony Blair (What job or political office does he now hold?) (BLAIRIDE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1276	70.7
1) Correctly identifies Blair as Prime Minister of England	189	10.5
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	69	3.8
8) R makes no attempt to guess	271	15.0
9) REFUSED	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1455) Tony Blair (What job or political office does he now hold?) [Summary: Blair office recognition] (BLARIDSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Correctly Identifies Blair as Prime Minister of England	536	29.7
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	142	7.9
8) R makes no attempt to guess	875	48.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1456) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: Tony Blair (What job or political office does he now hold?) [Checkpoint: Probe used?] (BLAIRIDP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1277	70.7
1) Yes	218	12.1
5) No	311	17.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1457) If R selected for standard version of office recognition items: Janet Reno (What job or political office does she now hold?) (RENOIDS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	781	43.2
1) Correctly identifies Reno as Attorney General	561	31.1
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	165	9.1
8) R makes no attempt to guess	296	16.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1458) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: Janet Reno (What job or political office does she now hold?) (RENOIDE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1276	70.7
1) Correctly identifies Reno as Attorney General	296	16.4
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	108	6.0
8) R makes no attempt to guess	125	6.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1459) Janet Reno (What job or political office does she now hold?) [Summary: Reno office recognition] (RENOIDSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Correctly identifies Reno as Attorney General	857	47.5
5) Identification is incomplete or wrong	273	15.1
8) R makes no attempt to guess	421	23.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1460) If R selected for experimental version of office recognition items: Janet Reno (What job or political office does she now hold?) Checkpoint: Probe used? (RENOIDP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1277	70.7
1) Yes	130	7.2
5) No	399	22.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1461) What U.S. state does George W. Bush live in now? (BUSHRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Connecticut	2	0.1
2) Tennessee	17	0.9
3) Texas	1393	77.1
4) Wyoming	1	0.1
7) Other (specify)	36	2.0
8) DK	105	5.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1462) Checkpoint: Probe used? (BUSHRESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	145	8.0
5) No	1410	78.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1463) What is George W. Bush's religion? (BUSHRELG)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	15	0.8
1) Baptist	236	13.1
2) Methodist	125	6.9
3) Jewish	5	0.3
7) Other (specify)	621	34.4
8) DK	552	30.6
9) RF; NA; INAP	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1464) CHeckpoint: Probe used? (BUSHRLGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Yes	673	37.3
5) No	879	48.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1465) What U.S. state is Al Gore from originally? (GORERES)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Connecticut	19	1.1
2) Tennessee	1053	58.3
3) Texas	12	0.7
4) Wyoming	5	0.3
7) Other (specify)	194	10.7
8) DK	271	15.0
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1466) Checkpoint: Probe used? (GORERESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Yes	300	16.6
5) No	1254	69.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1467) What is Al Gore's religion? (GORERELG)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	14	0.8
1) Baptist	255	14.1
2) Methodist	102	5.6
3) Jewish	10	0.6
7) Other (specify)	575	31.8
8) DK	598	33.1
9) RF; NA; INAP	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1468) Checkpoint: Probe used? (GORRELGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	604	33.4
5) No	951	52.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1469) What U.S. state does Dick Cheney live in now? (CHNYRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Connecticut	21	1.2
2) Tennessee	7	0.4
3) Texas	145	8.0
4) Wyoming	288	15.9
7) Other (specify)	270	15.0
8) DK	823	45.6
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1470) Checkpoint: Probe used? (CHNYRESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Yes	751	41.6
5) No	803	44.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1471) What is Dick Cheney's religion? (CHNYRLG)

	TOTAL	%
0) None	16	0.9
1) Baptist	64	3.5
2) Methodist	59	3.3
3) Jewish	13	0.7
7) Other (specify)	503	27.9
8) DK	899	49.8
9) RF; NA; INAP	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1472) Checkpoint: Probe used? (CHNYRLGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	253	14.0
1) Yes	771	42.7
5) No	782	43.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1473) What U.S. state does Joseph Lieberman live in now? (LBRMRES)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Connecticut	473	26.2
2) Tennessee	16	0.9
3) Texas	11	0.6
4) Wyoming	5	0.3
7) Other (specify)	355	19.7
8) DK	694	38.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1474) Checkpoint: Probe used? (LBRMRESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	614	34.0
5) No	941	52.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1475) What is Joseph Lieberman's religion? (LBRMRELG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NONE	2	0.1
1) Baptist	18	1.0
2) Methodist	6	0.3
3) Jewish	1083	60.0
7) Other (specify)	87	4.8
8) DK	358	19.8
9) RF; NA; INAP	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1476) Checkpoint: Probe used? (LBRMRLGP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	319	17.7
5) No	1236	68.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1477) Many people say they have less time these days to do volunteer work. What about you, were you able to devote any time to volunteer work in the last 12 months or did you not do so? (VOLUNTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	665	36.8
5) No	890	49.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1478) Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people? (PTSTWTHY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Most people can be trusted	816	45.2
5) Can't be too careful	728	40.3
8) Don't know	9	0.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1479) Do you think most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance or would they try to be fair? (PUSEOTH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Take advantage	467	25.9
5) Try to be fair	1072	59.4
8) Don't know	15	0.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1480) Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful, or that they are just looking out for themselves? (PSELFISH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Try to be helpful	1002	55.5
5) Just looking out for themselves	537	29.7
8) Don't know	16	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1481) Recently there has been a lot of talk about job discrimination. Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination? (FEMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Favor	993	55.0
5) Oppose	480	26.6
8) DK	59	3.3
9) Refused	23	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1482) If R favors protecting homosexuals against job discrimination: Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly? (FAVPHOMO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	813	45.0
1) Favor strongly	597	33.1
5) Favor not strongly	394	21.8
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1483) If R opposes protecting homosexuals against job discrimination: Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly? (OPPPHOMO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1326	73.4
1) Oppose strongly	278	15.4
5) Oppose not strongly	200	11.1
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1484) Summary: Protecting homosexuals against job discrimination (HOMOPROT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Favor strongly	597	33.1
2) Favor not strongly	394	21.8
4) Disfavor not strongly	200	11.1
5) Disfavor strongly	278	15.4
8) DK	63	3.5
9) Refused	23	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1485) Some people say that the best way to reduce crime is to address the social problems that cause crime, like bad schools, poverty and joblessness. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Other people say the best way to reduce crime is to make sure that criminals are caught, convicted and punished. (Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7.) And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. Where would you place yourself on this scale or haven't you thought much about this? (SOCPROB1)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	39	2.2
1) Address social problems that cause crime	76	4.2
2) 2	70	3.9
3) 3	80	4.4
4) 4	146	8.1
5) 5	83	4.6
6) 6	64	3.5
7) Make sure criminals are caught, convicted, punished	134	7.4
8) DK	1	0.1
9) RF; NA; INAP	1113	61.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1486) How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? (SOCPROB2)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	40	2.2
1) Address social problems that cause crime	342	18.9
3) Make sure criminals are caught, convicted, punished	211	11.7
5) Do something in between	265	14.7
8) DK	2	0.1
9) RF; NA; INAP	946	52.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1487) If R's opinion is to address social problems: Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? (SOCROOT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1464	81.1
1) Much better	214	11.8
5) Somewhat better	127	7.0
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1488) If R's opinion is to make sure criminals are caught and punished: Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? (SOCCRIME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1595	88.3
1) Much better	106	5.9
5) Somewhat better	102	5.6
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1489) If R's opinion is 'something in between'/DK/haven't thought much: If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? (SOCDIFF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1499	83.0
1) Addressing social problems	156	8.6
5) Making sure criminals are caught, convicted, punished	107	5.9
7) R refuses to choose [Vol]	37	2.0
8) DK	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1490) Branching summary: Crime reduction self-placement (CREDUC1)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	9	0.5
1) Scale branching much better to address social problems	214	11.8
2) Scale somewhat better to address social problems	128	7.1
3) Scale neither but slightly favor addressing problems	156	8.6
4) Scale in-between	34	1.9
5) Scale neither but slightly favor punishing criminals	107	5.9
6) Scale somewhat better to punish criminals	105	5.8
7) Scale much better to punish criminals	106	5.9
8) DK	1	0.1
9) RF; NA; INAP	946	52.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1491) Summary: Crime reduction self-placement (CREDUC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much	48	2.7
1) Scale branching much better to address social problems	290	16.1
2) Scale somewhat better to address social problems	198	11.0
3) Scale neither but slightly favor addressing problems	236	13.1
4) Scale in-between	180	10.0
5) Scale neither but slightly favor punishing criminals	190	10.5
6) Scale somewhat better to punish criminals	169	9.4
7) Scale much better to punish criminals	240	13.3
8) DK	2	0.1
9) RF; NA; INAP	253	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1492) How worried are you about our country getting into a nuclear war at this time? Are you very worried, somewhat worried, or not worried at all? (NWARWRRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	946	52.4
1) Very worried	69	3.8
3) Somewhat worried	306	16.9
5) Not worried at all	484	26.8
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1493) How worried are you about our country getting into a conventional war at this time, one in which nuclear weapons are not used? Are you very worried, somewhat worried, or not worried at all? (WARWRRY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1111	61.5
1) Very worried	72	4.0
3) Somewhat worried	300	16.6
5) Not worried at all	322	17.8
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1494) (Regarding campaign finance reform) Which is closer to the way you think, or haven't you thought much about this? (CAMPFIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) Haven't thought much about this	561	31.1
1) Protect government from excessive influence by campaign contributors	740	41.0
5) Protecting the freedom of individuals	239	13.2
8) DK	14	0.8
9) RF; NA; INAP	252	14.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1495) In general, which of the following statements best represents what you feel about the way political campaigns are financed in this country: it needs to be completely overhauled, it needs major changes, it needs minor changes, or it is basically fine the way it is? (CAMPFING)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Completely overhauled	241	13.3
3) Major changes	626	34.7
5) Minor changes	413	22.9
7) Fine the way it is	214	11.8
8) DK	60	3.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1496) During the past 12 months, have you worked with other people to deal with some issue facing your community? (COMMISS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	407	22.5
5) No	1146	63.5
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1497) During the past twelve months, have you telephoned, written a letter to, or visited a government official to express your views on a public issue? (POFFCNCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	321	17.8
5) No	1232	68.2
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1498) During the past twelve months, did you attend a meeting about an issue facing your community or schools? (COMMMTG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	427	23.6
5) No	1127	62.4
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1499) Here is a list of some organizations people can belong to. There are labor unions, associations of people who do the same kinds of work, fraternal groups such as Lions or Kiwanis, hobby clubs or sports teams, groups working on political issues, community groups, and school groups. Of course, there are lots of other types of organizations, too. Not counting membership in a local church or synagogue, are you a member of any of these kinds of organizations? (ORGMBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	645	35.7
5) No	910	50.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1500) How many organizations are you currently a member of? (ORGNUMB)

	TOTAL	%
1) One organization	281	15.6
2) 2	193	10.7
3) 3	89	4.9
4) 4	38	2.1
5) 5	17	0.9
6) 6	12	0.7
7) 7	5	0.3
8) 8	3	0.2
10) 10	4	0.2
12) 12	1	0.1
15) 15	1	0.1
20) 20	1	0.1
99) RF; NA; INAP	1161	64.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1501) If R belongs to one organization only: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organizations? (ORGWKHRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1525	84.4
1) 1	147	8.1
2) 2	37	2.0
3) 3	16	0.9
4) 4	7	0.4
5) 5	10	0.6
6) 6	8	0.4
7) 7	2	0.1
8) 8	3	0.2
9) 9	1	0.1
10) 10	10	0.6
12) 12	3	0.2
15) 15	1	0.1
16) 16	1	0.1
20) 20	5	0.3
24) 24	1	0.1
40) 40	1	0.1
80) 80	1	0.1
96) None (no hours)	1	0.1
98) DK	24	1.3
99) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1502) If R belongs to one organization only: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence government? (ORGGVINF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1525	84.4
1) Yes	105	5.8
5) No	170	9.4
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1503) If R belongs to one organization only: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence schools? (ORGSCHNF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1525	84.4
1) Yes	92	5.1
5) No	184	10.2
8) Don't know	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1504) If R belongs to two or more organizations or DK how many: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organizations? (ORG2WKHS)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	3.45	15.89

1505) If R belongs to two or more organizations or DK how many: Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence government? (ORG2GVIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1442	79.8
1) Yes	217	12.0
5) No	147	8.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1506) If R belongs to two or more organizations or DK how many: Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence schools? (ORG2SCHN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1442	79.8
1) Yes	167	9.2
5) No	196	10.9
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1507) If R belongs to one or more organizations: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organization(s)? [Summary: Number of hours/week with organizations] (ORGHRSM)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	5.39	19.67

1508) If R belongs to one or more organizations: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence government?/Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence government? [Summary: organization influence government] (ORGSCHSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1161	64.3
1) Yes	322	17.8
5) No	317	17.6
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1509) If R belongs to one or more organizations: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence schools/Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence schools? Summary: organization influence schools (ORGGOVSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1161	64.3
1) Yes	259	14.3
5) No	380	21.0
8) Don't know	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1510) Many people are finding it more difficult to make contributions to church or charity as much as they used to. How about you -- were you able to contribute any money to church or charity in the last 12 months? (CHCONTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	1234	68.3
5) No	320	17.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1511) Aside from a strike against your employer, in the past twelve months, have you taken part in a protest, march, or demonstration on some national or local (PROTEST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	49	2.7
5) No	1506	83.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1512) If R taken part in protest, march or demonstration on local issue: About how many times was that -- once, two or three times, or four times or more? (PRTSTNBR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1757	97.3
1) Once	27	1.5
2) Two or three	19	1.1
4) Four times or more	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1513) 'Irish, Italians, Jewish and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (BLKCMPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	561	31.1
2) Agree somewhat	491	27.2
3) Neither agree nor disagree	188	10.4
4) Disagree somewhat	212	11.7
5) Disagree strongly	89	4.9
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1514) 'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than they deserve.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (BLKDSRVE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	112	6.2
2) Agree somewhat	348	19.3
3) Neither agree nor disagree	273	15.1
4) Disagree somewhat	452	25.0
5) Disagree strongly	346	19.2
8) DK	18	1.0
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1515) 'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (BLKEFFRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	351	19.4
2) Agree somewhat	427	23.6
3) Neither agree nor disagree	251	13.9
4) Disagree somewhat	331	18.3
5) Disagree strongly	172	9.5
8) DK	14	0.8
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1516) 'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower class.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (BLKPDISC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	170	9.4
2) Agree somewhat	447	24.8
3) Neither agree nor disagree	168	9.3
4) Disagree somewhat	384	21.3
5) Disagree strongly	365	20.2
8) DK	15	0.8
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1517) Now I'd like to ask you about your feelings toward the federal government. Some people are afraid the government in Washington is getting too powerful for the good of the country and the individual person. Others feel that the government in Washington is not getting too strong. Do you have an opinion on this or not? (FGOVOPIN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Yes	960	53.2
5) No	583	32.3
8) DK	10	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1518) If R has an opinion: What is your feeling, do you think the government is getting too powerful or do you think the government is not getting too strong? (FGOVPRFL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	846	46.8
1) Government too powerful	622	34.4
5) Government not getting too strong	293	16.2
7) Other depends (specify)	38	2.1
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1519) IF R thinks gov't not getting too strong: Do you think the government should become more powerful or should it stay the way it is? (FGOVIPWR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1513	83.8
1) Become more powerful	62	3.4
5) Stay the way it is	229	12.7
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1520) If R thinks gov't too powerful in N1a/ If R thinks gov't should become more powerful in N1a1: Which party do you think is more likely to favor a powerful government in Washington -- the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them on this? (FGOVPRTY)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1122	62.1
1) Democrats	324	17.9
3) Republicans	105	5.8
5) No difference	247	13.7
8) Don't know	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1521) 'I feel that I have a pretty good understanding of the important political issues facing our country.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (POLKNOW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	287	15.9
2) Agree somewhat	725	40.1
3) Neither agree nor disagree	200	11.1
4) Disagree somewhat	221	12.2
5) Disagree strongly	109	6.0
8) DK	11	0.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1522) 'I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (POLQUAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	205	11.4
2) Agree somewhat	379	21.0
3) Neither agree nor disagree	226	12.5
4) Disagree somewhat	393	21.8
5) Disagree strongly	346	19.2
8) DK	4	0.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1523) 'I feel that I could do as good a job in public office as most other people.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (POFFQUAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	191	10.6
2) Agree somewhat	322	17.8
3) Neither agree nor disagree	211	11.7
4) Disagree somewhat	421	23.3
5) Disagree strongly	404	22.4
8) DK	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1524) 'I think that I am better informed about politics and government than most people.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (INFORMED)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	251	13.9
1) Agree strongly	147	8.1
2) Agree somewhat	381	21.1
3) Neither agree nor disagree	299	16.6
4) Disagree somewhat	428	23.7
5) Disagree strongly	292	16.2
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1525) So many other people vote in the national election that it doesn't matter much to me whether I vote or not. (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (VOTECOUN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	356	19.7
1) Agree strongly	72	4.0
2) Agree somewhat	86	4.8
3) Neither agree nor disagree	79	4.4
4) Disagree somewhat	232	12.8
5) Disagree strongly	973	53.9
8) DK	4	0.2
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1526) 'Our society should do whatever is necessary to make sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (EQLSCIET)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	905	50.1
2) Agree somewhat	392	21.7
3) Neither agree nor disagree	91	5.0
4) Disagree somewhat	121	6.7
5) Disagree strongly	40	2.2
8) DK	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1527) 'We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (EQTOOFAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	209	11.6
2) Agree somewhat	385	21.3
3) Neither agree nor disagree	215	11.9
4) Disagree somewhat	420	23.3
5) Disagree strongly	318	17.6
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1528) 'One of the big problems in this country is that we don't give everyone an equal chance.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (EQTOOLTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	267	14.8
2) Agree somewhat	458	25.4
3) Neither agree nor disagree	174	9.6
4) Disagree somewhat	444	24.6
5) Disagree strongly	204	11.3
8) DK	5	0.3
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1529) 'This country would be better off if we worried less about how equal people are.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (EQWRYLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	248	13.7
2) Agree somewhat	428	23.7
3) Neither agree nor disagree	224	12.4
4) Disagree somewhat	393	21.8
5) Disagree strongly	243	13.5
8) DK	13	0.7
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1530) 'It is not really that big a problem if some people have more of a chance in life than others.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (NEQUALOK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	120	6.6
2) Agree somewhat	349	19.3
3) Neither agree nor disagree	255	14.1
4) Disagree somewhat	481	26.6
5) Disagree strongly	338	18.7
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1531) 'If people were treated more equally in this country we would have many fewer problems.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (EQLPROBS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	429	23.8
2) Agree somewhat	544	30.1
3) Neither agree nor disagree	176	9.7
4) Disagree somewhat	288	15.9
5) Disagree strongly	110	6.1
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1532) 'Public officials don't care much what people like me think.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (POFFNCAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	286	15.8
2) Agree somewhat	564	31.2
3) Neither agree nor disagree	163	9.0
4) Disagree somewhat	436	24.1
5) Disagree strongly	98	5.4
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1533) 'People like me don't have any say about what the government does.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (NOVOICE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	227	12.6
2) Agree somewhat	380	21.0
3) Neither agree nor disagree	129	7.1
4) Disagree somewhat	596	33.0
5) Disagree strongly	216	12.0
8) DK	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1534) 'Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (POLCOMPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	319	17.7
2) Agree somewhat	574	31.8
3) Neither agree nor disagree	108	6.0
4) Disagree somewhat	341	18.9
5) Disagree strongly	208	11.5
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1535) 'The newer lifestyles are contributing to the breakdown of our society.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (MORALS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	464	25.7
2) Agree somewhat	517	28.6
3) Neither agree nor disagree	202	11.2
4) Disagree somewhat	242	13.4
5) Disagree strongly	117	6.5
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1536) 'The world is always changing and we should adjust our view of moral behavior to those changes.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? (EMPNEW)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	211	11.7
2) Agree somewhat	410	22.7
3) Neither agree nor disagree	142	7.9
4) Disagree somewhat	361	20.0
5) Disagree strongly	424	23.5
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1537) 'This country would have many fewer problems if there were more emphasis on traditional family ties.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (EMPTRADI)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	866	48.0
2) Agree somewhat	466	25.8
3) Neither agree nor disagree	89	4.9
4) Disagree somewhat	89	4.9
5) Disagree strongly	38	2.1
8) DK	4	0.2
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1538) 'We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live according to their own moral standards, even if they are very different from our own.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) (TOLMORAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Agree strongly	361	20.0
2) Agree somewhat	605	33.5
3) Neither agree nor disagree	216	12.0
4) Disagree somewhat	225	12.5
5) Disagree strongly	138	7.6
8) DK	5	0.3
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1539) How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Washington to do what is right -- just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time? (GOVTRUST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Just about always	64	3.5
2) Most of the time	615	34.1
3) Only some of the time	850	47.1
4) Never [Vol]	16	0.9
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1540) Do you think that people in government waste a lot of the money we pay in taxes, waste some of it, or don't waste very much of it? (GTAXWAST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Waste a lot	922	51.1
3) Waste some	585	32.4
5) Don't waste very much	34	1.9
8) DK	12	0.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1541) Would you say the government is pretty much run by a few big interests looking out for themselves or that it is run for the benefit of all the people? (SPINTRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Gov't run by a few big interests	955	52.9
5) Gov't run for the benefit of all	518	28.7
8) DK	69	3.8
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1542) Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are crooked, not very many are, or do you think hardly any of them are crooked? (PUBCROOK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Quite a few are crooked	553	30.6
3) Not very many are crooked	772	42.7
5) Hardly any are crooked	198	11.0
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1543) How much do you feel that having elections makes the government pay attention to what the people think -- good deal, some, or not much? (ELECGOOD)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) A good deal	735	40.7
3) Some	613	33.9
5) Not much	196	10.9
8) DK	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1544) Over the years, how much attention do you feel the government pays to what people think when it decides what to do -- a good deal, some, or not much? (GOVPATTN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	253	14.0
1) A good deal	263	14.6
3) Some	978	54.2
5) Not much	301	16.7
8) DK	11	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1545) FTF: Whites close to group - whites (WHTCLSEI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by r	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1546) Telephone: What about whites? Do you feel particularly close to whites? (WHTCLSEP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	743	41.1
5) No	97	5.4
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1547) Summary: R feels close to whites (WHTCLSES)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1206	66.8
5) Not mentioned by R/no	329	18.2
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1548) FTF: Poor people close to group - poor people (POORCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1549) Telephone: (What about) poor people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (POORCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	530	29.3
5) No	310	17.2
8) DK	10	0.6
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1550) Summary: R feels close to poor people (POORCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	993	55.0
5) Not mentioned by R/no	542	30.0
8) DK	10	0.6
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1551) FTF: Asian Americans close to group - Asian Americans (ASIACLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1552) Telephone: (What about) Asian Americans (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (ASIACLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	269	14.9
5) No	558	30.9
8) DK	20	1.1
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1553) Summary - R feels close to Asian Americans (ASIACLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	732	40.5
5) Not mentioned by R/no	790	43.7
8) DK	20	1.1
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1554) FTF: Liberals close to group - liberals (LIBSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1555) Telephone: (What about) liberals (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (LIBSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	322	17.8
5) No	492	27.2
8) DK	37	2.0
9) Refused	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1556) Summary: R feels close to liberals (LIBSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	785	43.5
5) Not mentioned by R/no	724	40.1
8) DK	37	2.0
9) Refused	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1557) FTF: The elderly close to group - the elderly (ELDSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1558) Telephone: (What about) the elderly (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (ELDSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	671	37.2
5) No	172	9.5
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1559) Summary: R feels close to the elderly (ELDSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1134	62.8
5) Not mentioned by R/no	404	22.4
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1560) FTF: Blacks close to group - blacks (BLKSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1561) TELEPHONE: (What about) blacks (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (BLKSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	421	23.3
5) No	413	22.9
8) DK	13	0.7
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1562) Summary: R feels close to blacks (BLKSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	884	48.9
5) Not mentioned by R/no	645	35.7
8) DK	13	0.7
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1563) FTF: Labor unions close to group - labor unions (UNIOCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1564) Telephone: (What about) labor unions (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (UNIOCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	217	12.0
5) No	611	33.8
8) DK	20	1.1
9) REFUSED	11	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1565) Summary: R feels close to labor unions (UNIOCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	680	37.7
5) Not mentioned by R/no	843	46.7
8) DK	20	1.1
9) Refused	11	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1566) FTF: Feminists close to group - feminists (FEMCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1567) Telephone: (What about) feminists (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (FEMCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	245	13.6
5) No	577	31.9
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1568) Summary: R feels close to feminists (FEMCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	708	39.2
5) Not mentioned by R/no	809	44.8
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1569) FTF: Southerners close to group - southerners (STHRCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1570) Telephone: (What about) southerners (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (STHRCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	438	24.3
5) No	392	21.7
8) DK	17	0.9
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1571) Summary: R feels close to southerners (STHRCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	901	49.9
5) Not mentioned by R/no	624	34.6
8) DK	17	0.9
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1572) FTF: Business people close to group - business people (BSNSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1573) Telephone: (What about) business people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (BSNSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	521	28.8
5) No	323	17.9
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1574) Summary: R feels close to business people (BSNSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	984	54.5
5) Not mentioned by R/no	555	30.7
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1575) FTF: Young people close to group - young people (YNGCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1576) Telephone: (What about) young people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (YNGCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	695	38.5
5) No	148	8.2
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1577) Summary: R feels close to young people (YNGCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1158	64.1
5) Not mentioned by R/no	380	21.0
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1578) FTF: Conservatives close to group - conservatives (CONSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1579) Telephone: (What about) conservatives (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (CONSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	489	27.1
5) No	334	18.5
8) DK	30	1.7
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1580) Summary: R feels close to conservatives (CONSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	952	52.7
5) Not mentioned by R/no	566	31.3
8) DK	30	1.7
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1581) FTF: Hispanic-Americans close to group - Hispanic-Americans (HISPCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1582) Telephone: (What about) Hispanic-Americans (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (HISPCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	354	19.6
5) No	470	26.0
8) DK	23	1.3
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1583) Summary: R feels close to Hispanic-Americans (HISPCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	817	45.2
5) Not mentioned by R/no	702	38.9
8) DK	23	1.3
9) Refused	12	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1584) FTF: Women close to group - women (WMNCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1585) Telephone: (What about) women (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (WMNCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	750	41.5
5) No	95	5.3
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1586) SUMMARY: R feels close to women (WMNCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1213	67.2
5) Not mentioned by R/no	327	18.1
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1587) FTF: Working-class people close to people - working-class people (WCLSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1588) Telephone: (What about) working-class people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (WCLSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	799	44.2
5) No	48	2.7
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1589) Summary: R feels close to working-class people (WCLSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1262	69.9
5) Not mentioned by R/no	280	15.5
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1590) FTF: Middle-class people close to group - middle-class people (MCLSCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1591) Telephone: (What about) middle-class people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (MCLSCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	782	43.3
5) No	63	3.5
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1592) Summary: R feels close to middle-class people (MCLSCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1245	68.9
5) Not mentioned by R/no	295	16.3
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1593) FTF: Men close to group - men (MENCLSI)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1111	61.5
1) Mentioned by R	463	25.6
5) Not mentioned by R	232	12.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1594) Telephone: What about) men (Do you feel particularly close to them?) (MENCLSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	947	52.4
1) Yes	701	38.8
5) No	144	8.0
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1595) Summary: R feels close to men (MENCLSS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	252	14.0
1) Mentioned by R/yes	1164	64.5
5) Not mentioned by R/no	376	20.8
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1596) Where would you rate whites in general on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. [Hardworking rating - whites] (WHTHWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Hardworkng	193	10.7
2) 2	338	18.7
3) 3	329	18.2
4) 4	536	29.7
5) 5	76	4.2
6) 6	21	1.2
7) Lazy	13	0.7
8) DK	20	1.1
9) Refused	26	1.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1597) Hardworking rating - blacks (BLKHWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Hardworkng	64	3.5
2) 2	97	5.4
3) 3	241	13.3
4) 4	659	36.5
5) 5	278	15.4
6) 6	112	6.2
7) Lazy	50	2.8
8) DK	25	1.4
9) Refused	26	1.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1598) Hardworking rating - Hispanic-Americans (HSPHWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Hardworkng	131	7.3
2) 2	196	10.9
3) 3	311	17.2
4) 4	571	31.6
5) 5	166	9.2
6) 6	67	3.7
7) Lazy	32	1.8
8) DK	52	2.9
9) Refused	26	1.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1599) Hardworking rating - Asian-Americans (ASNHWRK)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Hardworkng	268	14.8
2) 2	393	21.8
3) 3	295	16.3
4) 4	363	20.1
5) 5	79	4.4
6) 6	39	2.2
7) Lazy	23	1.3
8) DK	64	3.5
9) Refused	28	1.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1600) Intelligent rating - whites (WHTINTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Intelligent	210	11.6
2) 2	345	19.1
3) 3	344	19.0
4) 4	528	29.2
5) 5	45	2.5
6) 6	17	0.9
7) Unintelligent	8	0.4
8) DK	23	1.3
9) Refused	32	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1601) Intelligent rating - blacks (BLKINTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Intelligent	89	4.9
2) 2	132	7.3
3) 3	275	15.2
4) 4	692	38.3
5) 5	207	11.5
6) 6	68	3.8
7) Unintelligent	32	1.8
8) DK	25	1.4
9) Refused	32	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1602) Intelligent rating - Hispanic-Americans (HSPINTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Intelligent	85	4.7
2) 2	117	6.5
3) 3	279	15.4
4) 4	701	38.8
5) 5	206	11.4
6) 6	59	3.3
7) Unintelligent	22	1.2
8) DK	49	2.7
9) Refused	34	1.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1603) Intelligent rating - Asian-Americans (ASNINTL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Intelligent	208	11.5
2) 2	337	18.7
3) 3	330	18.3
4) 4	469	26.0
5) 5	72	4.0
6) 6	28	1.6
7) Unintelligent	17	0.9
8) DK	57	3.2
9) Refused	34	1.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1604) Trustworthy rating - whites (WHTTRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Trustworthy	128	7.1
2) 2	283	15.7
3) 3	373	20.7
4) 4	594	32.9
5) 5	73	4.0
6) 6	30	1.7
7) Untrustworthy	13	0.7
8) DK	25	1.4
9) Refused	33	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1605) Trustworthy rating - blacks (BLKTRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Trustworthy	57	3.2
2) 2	114	6.3
3) 3	260	14.4
4) 4	713	39.5
5) 5	201	11.1
6) 6	93	5.1
7) Untrustworthy	47	2.6
8) DK	34	1.9
9) Refused	33	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1606) Trustworthy rating - Hispanic-Americans (HSPTRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Trustworthy	61	3.4
2) 2	130	7.2
3) 3	262	14.5
4) 4	726	40.2
5) 5	174	9.6
6) 6	63	3.5
7) Untrustworthy	46	2.5
8) DK	57	3.2
9) Refused	33	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1607) Trustworthy rating - Asian-Americans (ASNTRST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Trustworthy	84	4.7
2) 2	211	11.7
3) 3	308	17.1
4) 4	677	37.5
5) 5	105	5.8
6) 6	38	2.1
7) Untrustworthy	25	1.4
8) DK	70	3.9
9) Refused	34	1.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1608) (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) Independence or respect for elders (IND_RESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Independence	233	12.9
3) Both [Vol]	230	12.7
5) Respect for elders	1084	60.0
7) Neither [Vol]	1	0.1
8) DK	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1609) (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) Obedience or self-reliance (OB_SELR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Obedience	814	45.1
3) Both [Vol]	214	11.8
5) Self-reliance	516	28.6
7) Neither [Vol]	2	0.1
8) DK	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1610) (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) Curiosity or good manners (CUR_GMAN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Curiosity	446	24.7
3) Both [Vol]	269	14.9
5) Good manners	832	46.1
7) Neither [Vol]	3	0.2
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1611) (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) Being considerate or well behaved (CON_WELB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Being considerate	804	44.5
3) Both	355	19.7
5) Well behaved	389	21.5
7) Neither [Vol]	2	0.1
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1612) First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (PDEF92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Gotten smaller	487	27.0
3) Gotten larger	93	5.1
5) Stayed about the same	157	8.7
8) DK	54	3.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1613) If budget deficit smaller since 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (PDEFS92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1319	73.0
1) Much smaller	230	12.7
5) Somewhat smaller	254	14.1
8) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1614) If budget deficit larger since 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? (PDEFL92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1713	94.9
1) Much larger	31	1.7
5) Somewhat larger	60	3.3
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1615) Summary: Budget deficit since 1992 (PDEFSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much smaller	230	12.7
2) Somewhat smaller	254	14.1
3) About the same	157	8.7
4) Somewhat larger	60	3.3
5) Much stronger	31	1.7
8) DK	59	3.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1616) Comb summary: Budget deficit since 1992 (PPBDEF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much smaller	470	26.0
2) Somewhat smaller	502	27.8
3) About the same	360	19.9
4) Somewhat larger	138	7.6
5) Much stronger	75	4.2
8) DK	132	7.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1617) Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? (PPOOR92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Increased	288	15.9
3) Decreased	162	9.0
5) Stayed about the same	274	15.2
8) DK	67	3.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1618) If federal spending on the poor increased since 1992/if federal spending on the poor decreased since 1992: A lot or somewhat? (PPOORSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1356	75.1
1) A lot	101	5.6
5) Somewhat	347	19.2
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1619) Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A little or a lot? [Summary: Federal assistance to the poor] (PPOORSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Increased a lot	64	3.5
2) Increased somewhat	222	12.3
3) Stayed about the same	274	15.2
4) Decreased somewhat	125	6.9
5) Decreased a lot	37	2.0
8) DK	69	3.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1620) Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A little or a lot? Comb. [Summary: Federal assistance to the poor] (PPPOOR92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Increased a lot	145	8.0
2) Increased somewhat	478	26.5
3) Stayed about the same	549	30.4
4) Decreased somewhat	231	12.8
5) Decreased a lot	86	4.8
8) DK	188	10.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1621) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (PECON92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Better	563	31.2
3) Worse	40	2.2
5) The same	172	9.5
8) DK	16	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1622) If U.S. economy better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (PECONBTR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1243	68.8
1) Much better	310	17.2
5) Somewhat better	252	14.0
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1623) If U.S. economy worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (PECWRSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1766	97.8
1) Much worse	12	0.7
5) Somewhat worse	28	1.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1624) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? [Summary: Economy since 1992] (PECNSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much better	310	17.2
2) Somewhat better	252	14.0
3) About the same	172	9.5
4) Somewhat worse	28	1.6
5) Much worse	12	0.7
8) DK	17	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1625) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/(Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? [Comb. summary: Economy since 1992] (PPECON92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much better	682	37.8
2) Somewhat better	513	28.4
3) About the same	357	19.8
4) Somewhat worse	65	3.6
5) Much worse	34	1.9
8) DK	27	1.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1626) Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? (PCLNCON)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Made the economy better	419	23.2
3) Made the economy worse	21	1.2
5) No effect	327	18.1
8) DK	24	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1627) If Clinton Administration made U.S. economy better: Much better or somewhat better? (PCLINECO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1387	76.8
1) Much better	192	10.6
5) Somewhat better	227	12.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1628) IF Clinton Administration made U.S. economy worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (PCLINEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1785	98.8
1) Much worse	6	0.3
5) Somewhat worse	15	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1629) Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/Much worse or somewhat worse? [Summary: Clinton effect on economy] (PCLINECS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much better	192	10.6
2) Somewhat better	227	12.6
3) No effect	327	18.1
4) Somewhat worse	15	0.8
5) Much worse	6	0.3
8) DK	24	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1630) Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/Much worse or somewhat worse? [Comb. summary: Clinton effect on economy] (PPCLINEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much better	434	24.0
2) Somewhat better	487	27.0
3) No effect	648	35.9
4) Somewhat worse	41	2.3
5) Much worse	21	1.2
8) DK	47	2.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1631) Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? (PCLINPRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Helped	163	9.0
3) Hurt	61	3.4
5) Not affected	558	30.9
8) DK	9	0.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1632) Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? (PSECUR92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Helped	352	19.5
3) Hurt	136	7.5
5) Not affected	1166	64.6
8) DK	24	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1633) Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (PSECP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) More secure	202	11.2
3) Less secure	223	12.3
5) No change	346	19.2
8) DK	19	1.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1634) If U.S. more secure since 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? (PSECN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1604	88.8
1) Much more secure	61	3.4
5) Somewhat more secure	141	7.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1635) If U.S. less secure since 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? (PSECSM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1583	87.7
1) Much less secure	99	5.5
5) Somewhat less secure	124	6.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1636) Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? [Summary: U.S. security from foreign enemies] (PSECSUMM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much more secure	61	3.4
2) Somewhat more secure	141	7.8
3) No change	346	19.2
4) Somewhat less secure	124	6.9
5) Much less secure	99	5.5
8) DK	19	1.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1637) Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? [Comb. summary: U.S. security from foreign enemies] (PPSECSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much more secure	132	7.3
2) Somewhat more secure	285	15.8
3) No change	725	40.1
4) Somewhat less secure	277	15.3
5) Much less secure	206	11.4
8) DK	52	2.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1638) Would you say that the Clinton Administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (PCLINSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) More secure	185	10.2
3) Less secure	198	11.0
5) No change	382	21.2
8) DK	25	1.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1639) IF Clinton Administration made U.S. more secure: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? (PCLINSC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1621	89.8
1) Much more secure	63	3.5
5) Somewhat more secure	122	6.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1640) If Clinton Administration made U.S. less secure: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? (PCLINSE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1608	89.0
1) Much less secure	91	5.0
5) Somewhat less secure	107	5.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1641) Would you say that the Clinton Administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? [Summary: Clinton Administration effect on U.S. security] (PCLSECS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much more secure	63	3.5
2) Somewhat more secure	122	6.8
3) No change	382	21.2
4) Somewhat less secure	107	5.9
5) Much less secure	91	5.0
8) DK	25	1.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1642) Would you say that the Clinton Administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? [Comb. summary: Clinton Administration effect on U.S. security] (PPCLSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much more secure	136	7.5
2) Somewhat more secure	241	13.3
3) No change	831	46.0
4) Somewhat less secure	226	12.5
5) Much less secure	190	10.5
8) DK	53	2.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1643) Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (PCRIMERT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Better	294	16.3
3) Worse	220	12.2
5) The same	256	14.2
8) DK	21	1.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1644) If U.S. crime rate better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (PCRIMP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1512	83.7
1) Much better	79	4.4
5) Somewhat better	214	11.8
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1645) If U.S. crime rate worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (PCRIMN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1586	87.8
1) Much worse	82	4.5
5) Somewhat worse	138	7.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1646) Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? [Summary: U.S. crime rate since 1992] (CRIMESUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much better	79	4.4
2) Somewhat better	214	11.8
3) Stayed about the same	256	14.2
4) Somewhat worse	138	7.6
5) Much worse	82	4.5
8) DK	22	1.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1647) Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/(Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? [Comb. summary: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992] (PPCRIME)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much better	161	8.9
2) Somewhat better	458	25.4
3) Stayed about the same	516	28.6
4) Somewhat worse	276	15.3
5) Much worse	220	12.2
8) DK	47	2.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1648) Would you say that the Clinton Administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (PCLNCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Better	190	10.5
3) Worse	65	3.6
5) No difference	508	28.1
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1649) If Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate better: Much better or somewhat better? (PCLINCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1616	89.5
1) Much better	50	2.8
5) Somewhat better	140	7.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1650) If Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (PCLINCR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1741	96.4
1) Much worse	24	1.3
5) Somewhat worse	41	2.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1651) Would you say that the Clinton Administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/Much worse or somewhat worse? [Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on crime rate] (PCLINCRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much better	50	2.8
2) Somewhat better	140	7.8
3) No difference	508	28.1
4) Somewhat worse	41	2.3
5) Much worse	24	1.3
8) DK	27	1.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1652) Would you say that the Clinton Administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/Much worse or somewhat worse? [Comb. summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on crime rate] (PPCLCRIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much better	122	6.8
2) Somewhat better	301	16.7
3) No difference	1051	58.2
4) Somewhat worse	77	4.3
5) Much worse	60	3.3
8) DK	66	3.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1653) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (PMORALC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Better	58	3.2
3) Worse	412	22.8
5) The same	307	17.0
8) DK	14	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1654) If U.S. moral climate better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (PMORLP92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1748	96.8
1) Much better	11	0.6
5) Somewhat better	47	2.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1655) If U.S. moral climate worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (PMORLN92)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1394	77.2
1) Much worse	204	11.3
5) Somewhat worse	208	11.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1656) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? [Summary: U.S. moral climate since 1992] (PMORLSUM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much better	11	0.6
2) Somewhat better	47	2.6
3) Stayed about the same	307	17.0
4) Somewhat worse	208	11.5
5) Much worse	204	11.3
8) DK	14	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1657) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? [Comb. summary: U.S. moral climate since 1992] (PPMORCL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much better	39	2.2
2) Somewhat better	106	5.9
3) Stayed about the same	621	34.4
4) Somewhat worse	417	23.1
5) Much worse	464	25.7
8) DK	29	1.6
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1658) Has the Clinton Administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (PCLINMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Better	47	2.6
3) Worse	336	18.6
5) No difference	391	21.7
8) DK	15	0.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1659) If Clinton Administration made U.S. moral climate better: Much better or somewhat better? (PCLNPMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1759	97.4
1) Much better	13	0.7
5) Somewhat better	34	1.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1660) If Clinton Administration made u.s. moral climate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (PCLNNMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1470	81.4
1) Much worse	168	9.3
5) Somewhat worse	168	9.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1661) Has the Clinton Administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? [Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on moral climate] (PCLNMORS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1015	56.2
1) Much better	13	0.7
2) Somewhat better	34	1.9
3) No difference	391	21.7
4) Somewhat worse	168	9.3
5) Much worse	168	9.3
8) DK	15	0.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1662) Has the Clinton Administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? [Comb. summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on moral climate] (PPCLNMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Much better	36	2.0
2) Somewhat better	76	4.2
3) No difference	816	45.2
4) Somewhat worse	327	18.1
5) Much worse	382	21.2
8) DK	36	2.0
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1663) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY (PCLNANG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Yes	470	26.0
5) No	285	15.8
8) DK	7	0.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1664) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Angry comb.pre/post: Clinton affect - angry (PPCLNANG)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Yes	1086	60.1
5) No	582	32.2
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1665) If R says Clinton has made R angry: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (PCLNNGO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1336	74.0
1) Very often	72	4.0
2) Fairly often	100	5.5
3) Occasionally	218	12.1
4) Rarely	80	4.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1666) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? [Comb. pre/post: How often Clinton affect - angry] (PPCLNAO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	720	39.9
1) Very often	209	11.6
2) Fairly often	243	13.5
3) Occasionally	481	26.6
4) Rarely	153	8.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1667) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Hopeful (PCLNHOPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Yes	360	19.9
5) No	397	22.0
8) DK	3	0.2
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1668) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) [Hopeful comb. pre/post: Clinton affect - hopeful] (PPCLNHPE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Yes	828	45.8
5) No	841	46.6
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1669) If R says Clinton has made R hopeful: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (PCLINHO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1446	80.1
1) Very often	55	3.0
2) Fairly often	105	5.8
3) Occasionally	171	9.5
4) Rarely	29	1.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1670) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? [Comb. pre/post: How often Clinton affect - hopeful] (PPCLNHPO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	978	54.2
1) Very often	144	8.0
2) Fairly often	240	13.3
3) Occasionally	374	20.7
4) Rarely	70	3.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1671) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Afraid (PCLNFEAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Yes	146	8.1
5) No	612	33.9
8) DK	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1672) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Afraid [comb. pre/post: Clinton affect - afraid] (PPCLNFA)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Yes	378	20.9
5) No	1293	71.6
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1673) If R says Clinton has made R afraid: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (PCLINFRO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1660	91.9
1) Very often	36	2.0
2) Fairly often	29	1.6
3) Occasionally	57	3.2
4) Rarely	24	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1674) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? [Comb. pre/post: How often Clinton affect - afraid] (PPCLNFRO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1428	79.1
1) Very often	76	4.2
2) Fairly often	84	4.7
3) Occasionally	153	8.5
4) Rarely	65	3.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1675) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Proud (PCLINPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Yes	308	17.1
5) No	450	24.9
8) DK	4	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1676) (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) Proud [Comb. pre/post: Clinton affect - proud] (PPCLINPR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Yes	674	37.3
5) No	994	55.0
8) DK	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1677) If R says Clinton has made R afraid: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (PCLINPO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1498	82.9
1) Very often	37	2.0
2) Fairly often	90	5.0
3) Occasionally	158	8.7
4) Rarely	23	1.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1678) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? [Comb. pre/post: How often Clinton affect - proud] (PPCLINPO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1132	62.7
1) Very often	116	6.4
2) Fairly often	191	10.6
3) Occasionally	308	17.1
4) Rarely	58	3.2
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1679) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Moral (PCLNTMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	20	1.1
2) Quite well	104	5.8
3) Not too well	275	15.2
4) Not well at all	351	19.4
8) DK	10	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1680) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - moral] (PPCLNTMR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	54	3.0
2) Quite well	215	11.9
3) Not too well	568	31.5
4) Not well at all	806	44.6
8) DK	30	1.7
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1681) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Really cares about people like you (PCLNTCR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	96	5.3
2) Quite well	283	15.7
3) Not too well	238	13.2
4) Not well at all	129	7.1
8) DK	17	0.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1682) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - cares] (PPCLNTCR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	224	12.4
2) Quite well	598	33.1
3) Not too well	518	28.7
4) Not well at all	294	16.3
8) DK	43	2.4
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1683) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Knowledgeable (PCLNKNO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	290	16.1
2) Quite well	394	21.8
3) Not too well	53	2.9
4) Not well at all	13	0.7
8) DK	13	0.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1684) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - knowledgeable] (PPCLNKN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	619	34.3
2) Quite well	856	47.4
3) Not too well	143	7.9
4) Not well at all	31	1.7
8) DK	29	1.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1685) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Provides strong leadership (PCLNLDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	164	9.1
2) Quite well	333	18.4
3) Not too well	178	9.9
4) Not well at all	82	4.5
8) DK	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1686) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - leadership] (PPCLNLDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	371	20.5
2) Quite well	707	39.1
3) Not too well	391	21.7
4) Not well at all	187	10.4
8) DK	22	1.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1687) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Dishonest (PCLNLIR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	168	9.3
2) Quite well	250	13.8
3) Not too well	247	13.7
4) Not well at all	81	4.5
8) DK	15	0.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1688) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - dishonest] (PPCLNLIR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	452	25.0
2) Quite well	554	30.7
3) Not too well	470	26.0
4) Not well at all	156	8.6
8) DK	41	2.3
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1689) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Intelligent (PCLNSMR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	318	17.6
2) Quite well	367	20.3
3) Not too well	51	2.8
4) Not well at all	19	1.1
8) DK	8	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1690) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - intelligent] (PPCLNSMR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	694	38.4
2) Quite well	778	43.1
3) Not too well	139	7.7
4) Not well at all	49	2.7
8) DK	18	1.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1691) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Out of touch with ordinary people (PCLNCLU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1043	57.8
1) Extremely well	57	3.2
2) Quite well	226	12.5
3) Not too well	319	17.7
4) Not well at all	141	7.8
8) DK	20	1.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1692) What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) [Comb. pre/post: Clinton trait - out of touch] (PPCLNCLU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	128	7.1
1) Extremely well	164	9.1
2) Quite well	471	26.1
3) Not too well	669	37.0
4) Not well at all	324	17.9
8) DK	49	2.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1693) Did you watch a televised presidential debate between Al Gore and George W. Bush? (PRESDBT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Yes, watched	1069	59.2
5) No, didn't watch	480	26.6
8) DK	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1694) If R watched presidential debate: Did you watch an entire debate or just part of it? (WHLEDEB)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	737	40.8
1) Watched entire debate	455	25.2
5) Just part of it	614	34.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1695) Did you listen to any speeches or discussions about the campaign on the radio? (LISSPEEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) Yes	614	34.0
5) No	937	51.9
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1696) If R listened to radio campaign programs: Would you say you listened to a good many, several, or just one or two? (RADIOSP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1192	66.0
1) A good many	136	7.5
3) Several	244	13.5
5) Just one or two	234	13.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1697) In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (PCAMPATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) A great deal	296	16.4
2) Quite a bit	426	23.6
3) Some	560	31.0
4) Very little	224	12.4
5) None	45	2.5
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1698) In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is, the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (CONGATT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) A great deal	64	3.5
2) Quite a bit	127	7.0
3) Some	481	26.6
4) Very little	632	35.0
5) None	246	13.6
8) DK	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1699) Which one of the following outcomes regarding political parties best represents what you would like to see happen? one, a continuation of the two party system of Democrats and Republicans. two, elections in which candidates run as individuals without party labels or three, the growth of one or more parties that could effectively challenge the Democrats and Republicans? (PRTYFEEL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	254	14.1
1) A continuation of the two party system	572	31.7
2) Elections in which candidates run as individuals	423	23.4
3) The growth of one or more parties	509	28.2
8) DK	41	2.3
9) Refused	7	0.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1700) On the whole, are you satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in the United States? (DEMCSAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	359	19.9
1) SATISFIED	454	25.1
2) Fairly satisfied	688	38.1
3) Not very satisfied	216	12.0
4) Not at all satisfied	58	3.2
8) DK	26	1.4
9) Refused	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1701) As you will remember, former President George Bush (George W. Bush's father) was elected in November 1988. The next several questions ask you to think about his four years as President. Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? (GHWBECON)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Made the economy better	441	24.4
3) Made the economy worse	254	14.1
5) No effect	605	33.5
7) Don't know anything about Bush Sr. [Vol.]	220	12.2
8) DK	31	1.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1702) If former President Bush made economy better: Much better or somewhat better? (GHWBPCN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1365	75.6
1) Much better	113	6.3
5) Somewhat better	328	18.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1703) If former President Bush made economy worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (GHWBPECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1552	85.9
1) Much worse	71	3.9
5) Somewhat worse	183	10.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1704) Summary: Effect of former president Bush on 1988-1992 economy (GHWBECN)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Much better	113	6.3
2) Somewhat better	328	18.2
3) No effect	605	33.5
4) Somewhat worse	183	10.1
5) Much worse	71	3.9
8) DK	31	1.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1705) Would you say that the Bush Administration made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or didn't it make much difference either way? (GHWBSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) More secure	709	39.3
3) Less secure	96	5.3
5) No difference	492	27.2
8) DK	34	1.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1706) If former Bush Administration made U.S. more secure: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? (GHWBPSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1097	60.7
1) Much more secure	316	17.5
5) Somewhat more secure	393	21.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1707) If former Bush Administration made U.S. less secure: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? (GHWBNSEC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1710	94.7
1) Much less secure	27	1.5
5) Somewhat less secure	69	3.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1708) Summary: Effect of former President Bush on U.S. security 1988-1992 (GHWBSCSU)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Much more secure	316	17.5
2) Somewhat more secure	393	21.8
3) No difference	492	27.2
4) Somewhat less secure	69	3.8
5) Much less secure	27	1.5
8) DK	34	1.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1709) Would you say that the Bush Administration made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? (GHWBCRIM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Better	197	10.9
3) Worse	118	6.5
5) No difference	943	52.2
8) DK	73	4.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1710) If former Bush Administration made U.S. crime rate better: Much better or somewhat better? (GHWBPCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1609	89.1
1) Much better	55	3.0
5) Somewhat better	142	7.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1711) If former Bush Administration made U.S. crime rate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (GHWBNCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1688	93.5
1) Much worse	39	2.2
5) Somewhat worse	79	4.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1712) Summary: Effect of former President Bush on U.S. crime 1988-1992 (GHWBCRM)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Much better	55	3.0
2) Somewhat better	142	7.9
3) No difference	943	52.2
4) Somewhat worse	79	4.4
5) Much worse	39	2.2
8) DK	73	4.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1713) Did the Bush Administration make the nation's moral climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? (GHWBMORL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Better	367	20.3
3) Worse	53	2.9
5) No difference	878	48.6
8) DK	31	1.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1714) If former Bush Administration made U.S. moral climate better: Much better or somewhat better? (GHWBPMRL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1439	79.7
1) Much better	119	6.6
5) Somewhat better	247	13.7
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1715) If former Bush Administration made U.S. moral climate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (GHWBNMRL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1753	97.1
1) Much worse	20	1.1
5) Somewhat worse	33	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1716) Summary: Effect of former President Bush on moral climate 1988-1992 (GHWBMRAL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Much better	119	6.6
2) Somewhat better	247	13.7
3) No difference	878	48.6
4) Somewhat worse	33	1.8
5) Much worse	20	1.1
8) DK	32	1.8
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1717) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Moral (GHWBTMOR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	459	25.4
2) Quite well	689	38.2
3) Not too well	112	6.2
4) Not well at all	21	1.2
8) DK	50	2.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1718) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Really cares about people like you (GHWBTCAR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	123	6.8
2) Quite well	566	31.3
3) Not too well	437	24.2
4) Not well at all	158	8.7
8) DK	47	2.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1719) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Knowledgeable (GHWBTKNO)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	343	19.0
2) Quite well	811	44.9
3) Not too well	121	6.7
4) Not well at all	24	1.3
8) DK	32	1.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1720) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Provides strong leadership (GHWBTLDR)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	276	15.3
2) Quite well	679	37.6
3) Not too well	289	16.0
4) Not well at all	50	2.8
8) DK	37	2.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1721) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Dishonest (GHWBTDIS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	34	1.9
2) Quite well	126	7.0
3) Not too well	453	25.1
4) Not well at all	659	36.5
8) DK	56	3.1
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1722) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Intelligent (GHWBTINT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	381	21.1
2) Quite well	799	44.2
3) Not too well	104	5.8
4) Not well at all	16	0.9
8) DK	31	1.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1723) (What about [trait]? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) Out of touch (GHWBTNCL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	475	26.3
1) Extremely well	134	7.4
2) Quite well	382	21.2
3) Not too well	546	30.2
4) Not well at all	222	12.3
8) DK	47	2.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1724) Are you currently working? (CURREMP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Yes	1036	57.4
5) No	515	28.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1725) If R not currently working: We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Mention 1 (NOWORK1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1291	71.5
1) Temporarily laid off	10	0.6
2) Unemployed	31	1.7
3) Retired	279	15.4
4) Permanently disabled	63	3.5
5) Homemaker	111	6.1
6) Student	20	1.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1726) If R not currently working: We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Mention 2 (NOWORK2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1763	97.6
1) Temporarily laid off	1	0.1
2) Unemployed	2	0.1
3) Retired	3	0.2
4) Permanently disabled	13	0.7
5) Homemaker	20	1.1
6) Student	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1727) If R not currently working: We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? Mention 3 (NOWORK3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	1803	99.8
4) Permanently disabled	1	0.1
5) Homemaker	1	0.1
6) Student	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1728) If R currently working: On the whole, how satisfied are you with the work you do? Would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? (WORKSAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	770	42.6
1) Very satisfied	547	30.3
2) Somewhat satisfied	402	22.3
3) Somewhat dissatisfied	63	3.5
4) Very dissatisfied	23	1.3
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1729) If R currently working: In your current position, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? (WORKPPL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	770	42.6
1) With other people	896	49.6
5) Or by yourself	139	7.7
8) Don't know	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1730) If R currently working: I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (COWRKSLF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	770	42.6
1) All of the time	59	3.3
2) Most of the time	237	13.1
3) Some of the time	431	23.9
4) Hardly ever	231	12.8
5) Never	41	2.3
7) R insists [Vol]: Not appropriate	27	1.5
8) Don't know	7	0.4
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1731) If R currently working: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (COWRKADV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	797	44.1
1) All of the time	26	1.4
2) Most of the time	43	2.4
3) Some of the time	293	16.2
4) Hardly ever	492	27.2
5) Never	142	7.9
8) Don't know	10	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1732) If R currently working: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (COWRKTRT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	797	44.1
1) All of the time	169	9.4
2) Most of the time	569	31.5
3) Some of the time	230	12.7
4) Hardly ever	27	1.5
5) Never	5	0.3
8) DK	6	0.3
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1733) If R currently working: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (COWRHNST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	797	44.1
1) Extremely well	248	13.7
2) Quite well	626	34.7
3) Not too well	102	5.6
4) Not well at all	23	1.3
8) Don't know	8	0.4
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1734) If R currently working: Thinking about the diversity of your workplace, are the people who work where you work all white, mostly white, about half and half, mostly black, or all black? (COWRDIV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	797	44.1
1) All white	208	11.5
2) Mostly white	463	25.6
3) About half and half	187	10.4
4) Mostly black	37	2.0
5) All black	6	0.3
7) R volunteers: Other (specify)	102	5.6
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1735) If R temporarily laid off: When you are working, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? (LOFFCNCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1795	99.4
1) With other people	6	0.3
5) Or by yourself	5	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1736) If R temporarily laid off: I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (LOFFSLF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1795	99.4
1) All of the time	2	0.1
2) Most of the time	2	0.1
3) Some of the time	3	0.2
4) Hardly ever	2	0.1
7) R insists [Vol]: Was not appropriate	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1737) If R temporarily laid off: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (LOFFADV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1797	99.5
2) Most of the time	2	0.1
3) Some of the time	2	0.1
4) Hardly ever	4	0.2
5) Never	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1738) If R temporarily laid off: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (LOFFRSPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1797	99.5
1) All of the time	2	0.1
2) Most of the time	4	0.2
3) Some of the time	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1739) If R temporarily laid off: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (LOFFHNST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1797	99.5
1) Extremely well	1	0.1
2) Quite well	5	0.3
3) Not too well	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1740) If R is retired: Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during the day with other people or were you pretty much by yourself? (RETCNTCT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1524	84.4
1) With other people	254	14.1
5) Or by yourself	28	1.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1741) If R is retired: For these next few questions please continue thinking about your last job. I'm going to ask you about the people you saw regularly at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they were just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (RETSLF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1524	84.4
1) All of the time	15	0.8
2) Most of the time	50	2.8
3) Some of the time	100	5.5
4) Hardly ever	78	4.3
5) Never	24	1.3
7) R insists [Vol]: was not appropriate	12	0.7
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1742) If R is retired: Would you say those people you saw regularly at work tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (RETADV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1536	85.0
1) All of the time	7	0.4
2) Most of the time	10	0.6
3) Some of the time	61	3.4
4) Hardly ever	131	7.3
5) Never	57	3.2
8) Don't know	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1743) If R is retired: (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at work) Would you say that they treated others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (RETRSPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1535	85.0
1) All of the time	74	4.1
2) Most of the time	146	8.1
3) Some of the time	38	2.1
4) Hardly ever	9	0.5
5) Never	1	0.1
8) Don't know	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1744) If R is retired: Would you say that honest described the people you worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (RETHNST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1535	85.0
1) Extremely well	92	5.1
2) Quite well	150	8.3
3) Not too well	20	1.1
4) Not well at all	5	0.3
8) Don't know	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1745) If R currently working/If R temporarily laid off/If R is retired: In your current position, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? (SUMWOTH)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	477	26.4
1) With other people	1156	64.0
5) Or by yourself	172	9.5
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1746) If R currently working/If R temporarily laid off/If R is retired: In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? [Summary: Co-workers look out for selves] (SUMSLF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	477	26.4
1) All of the time	76	4.2
2) Most of the time	289	16.0
3) Some of the time	534	29.6
4) Hardly ever	311	17.2
5) Never	65	3.6
7) R insists [Vol]: Was not appropriate	41	2.3
8) DK	10	0.6
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1747) If R currently working/If R temporarily laid off/If R is retired: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? [Summary: Co-workers take advantage] (SUMADV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	518	28.7
1) All of the time	33	1.8
2) Most of the time	55	3.0
3) Some of the time	356	19.7
4) Hardly ever	627	34.7
5) Never	200	11.1
8) DK	13	0.7
9) Refused	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1748) If R currently working/If R temporarily laid off/If R is retired: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? [Summary: Co-workers treat others with respect] (SUMRSPT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	517	28.6
1) All of the time	245	13.6
2) Most of the time	719	39.8
3) Some of the time	271	15.0
4) Hardly ever	36	2.0
5) Never	6	0.3
8) DK	9	0.5
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1749) If R currently working /If R temporarily laid off /If R is retired: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? [Summary: co-workers honest] (SUMHNST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	517	28.6
1) Extremely well	341	18.9
2) Quite well	781	43.2
3) Not too well	125	6.9
4) Not well at all	28	1.6
8) DK	12	0.7
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1750) Now let's shift our attention to another area. From time to time, people discuss government, elections and politics with other people. I'd like to ask you about the people with whom you discuss these matters. These people might or might not be relatives. Can you think of anyone? [R identifies name 1] (POLDISC1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Yes	1152	63.8
5) No	399	22.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1751) Is there anyone else you talk with about these matters? [R identifies name 2] (POLDISC2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) Yes	861	47.7
5) No	290	16.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1752) Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)? [R identifies name 3] (POLDISC3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	945	52.3
1) Yes	550	30.5
5) No	311	17.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1753) Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)? [R identifies name 4] (POLDISC4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1256	69.5
1) Yes	327	18.1
5) No	223	12.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1754) Is [NAME 1] a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? (POLDREL1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) Spouse or partner	263	14.6
3) Other relative, or	266	14.7
5) Unrelated by blood or marriage	619	34.3
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1755) If necessary: Is [NAME 1] male or female? (POLDRMF1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) Male	678	37.5
5) Female	470	26.0
8) DK	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1756) If NAME 1 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Is [NAME 1] a co-worker? (POLDCW1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1183	65.5
1) Yes	311	17.2
5) No	309	17.1
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1757) If NAME 1 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Do you and [NAME 1] go to the same place of worship? (POLDCHU1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1183	65.5
1) Yes	76	4.2
5) No	544	30.1
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1758) If NAME 1 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Does [NAME 1] live in your neighborhood? (POLDNBR1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1183	65.5
1) Yes	178	9.9
5) No	442	24.5
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1759) When you talk with [NAME 1], do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? (POLDOFT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) Often	354	19.6
3) Sometimes	593	32.8
5) Rarely	195	10.8
7) NEVER	6	0.3
8) DK	2	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1760) Generally speaking, how much do you think [NAME 1] knows about politics? Would you say: (POLDKNO1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) A great deal	483	26.7
3) An average amount	557	30.8
5) Not much at all	104	5.8
8) DK - don't probe	7	0.4
9) RF - don't probe	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1761) I have another question about the first person you have named. How do you think [NAME 1] voted in the election? Do you think he/she voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think [NAME 1] didn't vote? (POLDAFF1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	654	36.2
1) Al Gore	442	24.5
3) George W Bush	479	26.5
5) Some other candidate (specify)	46	2.5
7) Didn't vote	103	5.7
8) Ineligible to vote [Vol]	16	0.9
98) DK - don't probe	62	3.4
99) RF - don't probe	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1762) Is [NAME 2] a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? (POLDREL2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	945	52.3
1) Spouse or partner	90	5.0
3) Other relative, or	270	15.0
5) Unrelated by blood or marriage	500	27.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1763) If necessary: Is [NAME 2] male or female? (POLDRMF2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	945	52.3
1) Male	478	26.5
5) Female	381	21.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1764) If name 2 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Is [NAME 2] a co-worker? (POLDCW2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.3
1) Yes	234	13.0
5) No	266	14.7
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1765) If NAME 2 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Do you and [NAME 2] go to the same place of worship? (POLDCHU2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.3
1) Yes	80	4.4
5) No	420	23.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1766) If NAME 2 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Does [NAME 2] live in your neighborhood? (POLDNBR2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1305	72.3
1) Yes	141	7.8
5) No	359	19.9
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1767) When you talk with [NAME 2], do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? (POLDOFT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	945	52.3
1) Often	186	10.3
3) Sometimes	483	26.7
5) Rarely	189	10.5
7) Never	2	0.1
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1768) Generally speaking, how much do you think [NAME 2] knows about politics? Would you say: (POLDKNO2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	945	52.3
1) A great deal	285	15.8
3) An average amount	478	26.5
5) Not much at all	94	5.2
8) DK - don't probe	3	0.2
9) RF - don't probe	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1769) Do you think [NAME 2] voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think he/she didn't vote?) (POLDAFF2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	945	52.3
1) Al Gore	336	18.6
3) George W Bush	342	18.9
5) Some other candidate (specify)	30	1.7
7) Didn't vote	75	4.2
8) Ineligible to vote [Vol]	10	0.6
98) DK - don't probe	66	3.7
99) RF - don't probe	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1770) Is [NAME 3] a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? (POLDREL3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1256	69.5
1) Spouse or partner	44	2.4
3) Other relative, or	187	10.4
5) Unrelated by blood or marriage	319	17.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1771) If necessary: Is [NAME 3] male or female? (POLDRMF3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1256	69.5
1) Male	312	17.3
5) Female	237	13.1
8) DK	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1772) If NAME 3 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Is [NAME 3] a co-worker? (POLDCW3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1487	82.3
1) Yes	153	8.5
5) No	166	9.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1773) If NAME 3 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Do you and [NAME 3] go to the same place of worship? (POLDCHU3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1487	82.3
1) Yes	44	2.4
5) No	275	15.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1774) If name 3 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Does [NAME 3] live in your neighborhood? (POLDNBR3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1487	82.3
1) Yes	78	4.3
5) No	241	13.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1775) When you talk with [NAME 3], do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? (POLDOFT3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1256	69.5
1) Often	104	5.8
3) Sometimes	295	16.3
5) Rarely	147	8.1
7) Never	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1776) Generally speaking, how much do you think [NAME 3] knows about politics? Would you say: (POLDKNO3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1256	69.5
1) A great deal	187	10.4
3) An average amount	292	16.2
5) Not much at all	69	3.8
8) DK - don't probe	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1777) Do you think [NAME 3] voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't vote?) (POLDAFF3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1256	69.5
1) Al Gore	201	11.1
3) George W Bush	230	12.7
5) Some other candidate (specify)	12	0.7
7) Didn't vote	43	2.4
8) Ineligible to vote [Vol]	9	0.5
98) DK - don't probe	55	3.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1778) Is [NAME 4] a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? (POLDREL4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1479	81.9
1) Spouse or partner	18	1.0
3) Other relative	109	6.0
5) Unrelated by blood or marriage	200	11.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1779) IF NECESSARY: Is [NAME 4] male or female? (POLDRMF4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1479	81.9
1) Male	178	9.9
5) Female	149	8.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1780) If NAME 4 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Is [NAME 4] a co-worker? (POLDCW4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1606	88.9
1) Yes	95	5.3
5) No	105	5.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1781) If NAME 4 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Do you and [NAME 4] go to the same place of worship? (POLDCHU4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1606	88.9
1) Yes	29	1.6
5) No	171	9.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1782) If NAME 4 is not spouse/partner or other relative: Does [NAME 4] live in your neighborhood? (POLDNBR4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1606	88.9
1) Yes	45	2.5
5) No	155	8.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1783) When you talk with [NAME 4], do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? (POLDOFT4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1479	81.9
1) Often	58	3.2
3) Sometimes	168	9.3
5) Rarely	97	5.4
7) Never	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1784) Generally speaking, how much do you think [NAME 4] knows about politics? Would you say: (POLDKNO4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1479	81.9
1) A great deal	108	6.0
3) An average amount	177	9.8
5) Not much at all	42	2.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1785) Do you think [NAME 4] voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't vote?) (POLDAFF4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1479	81.9
1) Al Gore	105	5.8
3) George W Bush	147	8.1
5) Some other candidate (specify)	6	0.3
7) Didn't vote	26	1.4
8) Ineligible to vote [Vol]	6	0.3
98) DK - don't probe	36	2.0
99) RF - don't probe	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1786) Now, I'd like to ask you a few questions about life in your neighborhood. During the past twelve months, have you worked with others from your neighborhood to deal with a common issue or problem? (COMISS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Yes	378	20.9
5) No	1173	65.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1787) On the whole, how satisfied are you with your neighborhood? Would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? (NBRSAT)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Very satisfied	844	46.7
2) Somewhat satisfied	528	29.2
3) Somewhat dissatisfied	120	6.6
4) Very dissatisfied	55	3.0
8) DK	3	0.2
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1788) I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see in your neighborhood. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (NBRSLF)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) All of the time	99	5.5
2) Most of the time	344	19.0
3) Some of the time	627	34.7
4) Hardly ever	324	17.9
5) Never	95	5.3
98) DK - don't probe	58	3.2
99) RF - don't probe	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1789) Would you say those people you see regularly in your neighborhood try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (NBRADV)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) All of the time	28	1.6
2) Most of the time	43	2.4
3) Some of the time	234	13.0
4) Hardly ever	852	47.2
5) Never	325	18.0
98) DK - don't probe	66	3.7
99) RF - don't probe	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1790) (Again, thinking about those people you see in your neighborhood) Would you say they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? (NBRRESP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) All of the time	398	22.0
2) Most of the time	820	45.4
3) Some of the time	223	12.3
4) Hardly ever	46	2.5
5) Never	17	0.9
98) DK - don't probe	43	2.4
99) RF - don't probe	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1791) Would you say that honest describes the people in your neighborhood extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (NBRHNST)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Extremely well	440	24.4
2) Quite well	873	48.3
3) Not too well	118	6.5
4) Not well at all	47	2.6
8) Don't know	70	3.9
9) Refused	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1792) Thinking about the diversity of your neighborhood, are the people who live where you live all white, mostly white, about half and half, mostly black, or all black? (NBRDIVRS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) All white	403	22.3
2) Mostly white	700	38.8
3) About half and half	238	13.2
4) Mostly black	70	3.9
5) All black	30	1.7
7) R voluneers: Other (specify)	104	5.8
8) Don't know	5	0.3
9) Refused	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1793) In general, how satisfying do you find the way you're spending your life these days? Would you call it completely satisfying, pretty satisfying, or not very satisfying? (LIFESATS)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	255	14.1
1) Completely satisfying	317	17.6
3) Pretty satisfying	1029	57.0
5) Not very satisfying	202	11.2
8) DK	1	0.1
9) Refused	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1794) Others present at time of interview: Mention 1 (OTHPRS1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	684	37.9
1) None	87	4.8
2) Children under 6	48	2.7
3) Older children/spouse	79	4.4
4) Other relatives	18	1.0
5) Other adults	33	1.8
7) Phone interview-could not tell	857	47.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1795) Others present at time of interview: Mention 2 (OTHPRS2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1731	95.8
1) None	8	0.4
2) Children under 6	15	0.8
3) Older children/spouse	28	1.6
4) Other relatives	14	0.8
5) Other adults	10	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1796) Others present at time of interview: Mention 3 (OTHPRS3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1788	99.0
2) Children under 6	3	0.2
3) Older children/spouse	6	0.3
4) Other relatives	3	0.2
5) Other adults	6	0.3
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1797) R's cooperation was: (RCOOP)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	256	14.2
1) Very good	978	54.2
2) Good	452	25.0
3) Fair	104	5.8
4) Poor	12	0.7
5) Very poor	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1798) R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: (RKNOWL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	256	14.2
1) Very high	187	10.4
2) Fairly high	400	22.1
3) Average	551	30.5
4) Fairly low	301	16.7
5) Very low	111	6.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1799) R's apparent intelligence: (RINTELL)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	271	15.0
1) Very high	243	13.5
2) Fairly high	543	30.1
3) Average	675	37.4
4) Fairly low	63	3.5
5) Very low	11	0.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1800) How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview? (RSUSPIC)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	256	14.2
1) Not at all suspicious	1483	82.1
3) Somewhat suspicious	63	3.5
5) Very suspicious	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1801) Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? (RINTER)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	256	14.2
1) Very high	425	23.5
2) Fairly high	519	28.7
3) Average	498	27.6
4) Fairly low	88	4.9
5) Very low	20	1.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1802) How sincere did R seem in his/her answers? (RSINCERE)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	256	14.2
1) Complete sincere	1438	79.6
3) Usually sincere	97	5.4
5) Often seemed to be insincere	15	0.8
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1803) R's reaction to interview: Mention 1 (IO2RCT1)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	256	14.2
10) Negative - general	12	0.7
11) Negative - too long	59	3.3
12) Negative - too complicated	6	0.3
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	15	0.8
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	1	0.1
20) R complained and/or was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc. IW was hard for R	17	0.9
22) R complained and/or was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	24	1.3
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	27	1.5
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	131	7.3
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	4	0.2
41) R became angry at interview content	13	0.7
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	11	0.6
50) R could not read respondent booklet	2	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (cooperative/interested/pleasant)	1023	56.6
80) Neutral or no feedback	205	11.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1804) R's reaction to interview: Mention 2 (IO2RCT2)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1547	85.7
10) Negative - general	1	0.1
11) Negative - too long	5	0.3
12) Negative - too complicated	4	0.2
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	6	0.3
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	6	0.3
20) R complained and/or was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc. IW was hard for R	2	0.1
22) R complained and/or was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	9	0.5
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	10	0.6
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	25	1.4
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	6	0.3
41) R became angry at interview content	7	0.4
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	7	0.4
50) R could not read respondent booklet	1	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (cooperative/interested/pleasant)	124	6.9
80) Neutral or no feedback	46	2.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1805) R's reaction to interview: Mention 3 (IO2RCT3)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1744	96.6
13) Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious	3	0.2
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	2	0.1
20) R complained and/or was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc. IW was hard for R	1	0.1
22) R complained and/or was confused by Qs, R was slow reader. IW was hard for R	2	0.1
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	3	0.2
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	12	0.7
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	3	0.2
41) R became angry at interview content	4	0.2
45) R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias	2	0.1
50) R could not read respondent booklet	1	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (cooperative/interested/pleasant)	26	1.4
80) Neutral or no feedback	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1806) R's reaction to interview: Mention 4 (IO2RCT4)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1788	99.0
15) R wanted to stop before IW completed. After starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets having agreed to do IW	2	0.1
30) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW	1	0.1
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	3	0.2
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	2	0.1
41) R became angry at interview content	2	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (cooperative/interested/pleasant)	5	0.3
80) Neutral or no feedback	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1807) R's reaction to interview: Mention 5 (IO2RCT5)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1800	99.7
31) R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over lack of political knowledge, candidate names, election issues, or own lack of political participation.	1	0.1
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	1	0.1
41) R became angry at interview content	2	0.1
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (cooperative/interested/pleasant)	2	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1808) R's reaction to interview: Mention 6 (IO2RCT6)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1804	99.9
40) R was agitated or stressed by interview process	1	0.1
41) R became angry at interview content	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1809) R's reaction to interview: Mention 7 (IO2RCT7)

	TOTAL	%
0) NA; INAP	1805	99.9
70) R appeared to enjoy the IW (cooperative/interested/pleasant)	1	0.1
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1810) Order of Democrat and Republican names in vote section (PPRAND1)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	628	34.8
1) Democratic names first	406	22.5
2) Republican names first	772	42.7
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1811) Order of Gore, GW Bush and Nader in post thermometers (PPRAND2)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Nader 4th	187	10.4
2) Gore 2nd, Nader 3rd, GW Bush 4th	162	9.0
3) GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Nader 4th	663	36.7
4) GW Bush 2nd, Nader 3rd, Gore 4th	167	9.2
5) Nader 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th	186	10.3
6) Nader 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th	190	10.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1812) Order of Democratic House candidate in post thermometers (PPRAND3)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
7) 7	156	8.6
8) 8	595	32.9
9) 9	182	10.1
10) 10	166	9.2
11) 11	185	10.2
12) 12	152	8.4
99) NA	119	6.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1813) Order of Republican House candidate in post thermometers (PPRAND4)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
7) 7	623	34.5
8) 8	149	8.3
9) 9	162	9.0
10) 10	156	8.6
11) 11	189	10.5
12) 12	168	9.3
99) NA	108	6.0
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1814) Order of retiring House Representative in post thermometers (PPRAND5)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
7) 7	14	0.8
8) 8	17	0.9
9) 9	47	2.6
10) 10	24	1.3
11) 11	15	0.8
12) 12	18	1.0
99) NA	1420	78.6
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1815) Order of Democratic Senate candidate in post (PPRAND6)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
7) 7	142	7.9
8) 8	154	8.5
9) 9	128	7.1
10) 10	137	7.6
11) 11	441	24.4
12) 12	131	7.3
99) NA	422	23.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1816) Order of Republican Senate candidate in post thermometers (PPRAND7)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
7) 7	108	6.0
8) 8	150	8.3
9) 9	148	8.2
10) 10	138	7.6
11) 11	133	7.4
12) 12	477	26.4
99) NA	401	22.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1817) Order of Independent incumbent House candidate in post thermometers (PPRAND8)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
7) 7	1	0.1
9) 9	1	0.1
10) 10	1	0.1
11) 11	1	0.1
99) NA	1551	85.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1818) Order of Supreme Court in post group thermometers (PPRAND9)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	9.76	6.87

1819) Order of Congress in post group thermometers (PPRAND10)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	8.62	7.35

1820) Order of the military in post group thermometers (PPRAND11)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	13.58	8.75

1821) Order of the Federal Government in post group thermometers (PPRAND12)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	13.67	9.26

1822) Order of blacks in post group thermometers (PPRAND13)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	9.04	6.79

1823) Order of whites in post group thermometers (PPRAND14)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	8.18	7.37

1824) Order of conservatives in post group thermometers (PPRAND15)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	8.96	6.94

1825) Order of liberals in post group thermometers (PPRAND16)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	7.69	7.86

1826) Order of labor unions in post group thermometers (PPRAND17)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	12.33	7.90

1827) Order of big business in post group thermometers (PPRAND18)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	10.62	6.82

1828) Order of poor people in post group thermometers (PPRAND19)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	11.76	7.32

1829) Order of people on welfare in post group thermometers (PPRAND20)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	10.23	6.86

1830) Order of Hispanics in post group thermometers (PPRAND21)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	12.32	7.69

1831) Order of Christian fund in post group thermometers (PPRAND22)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	10.58	6.77

1832) Order of Women's Movement in post group thermometers (PPRAND23)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	13.35	8.60

1833) Order of older people in post group thermometers (PPRAND24)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	9.53	6.86

1834) Order of environmentalists in post group thermometers (PPRAND25)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	13.17	8.34

1835) Order of homosexuals in post group thermometers (PPRAND26)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	10.75	6.81

1836) Order of Christian Coalition in post group thermometers (PPRAND27)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	12.74	8.03

1837) Order of Catholics in post group thermometers (PPRAND28)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	12.03	7.52

1838) Order of Jews in post group thermometers (PPRAND29)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	8.87	7.19

1839) Order of Protestants in post group thermometers (PPRAND30)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	8.07	7.69

1840) Order of feminists in post group thermometers (PPRAND31)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	11.02	7.04

1841) Order of Asian-Americans in post group thermometers (PPRAND32)

	N	Mean	Std. Deviation
Total	1806	11.44	7.16

1842) Post: Order of Democratic/Republican House candidates in 'likes-dislikes' (PPRAND33)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd	1017	56.3
2) Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd	534	29.6
9) NA	4	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1843) Post: Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Liberal- Conservative placements (PPRAND34)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th	181	10.0
2) Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th	172	9.5
3) GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th	659	36.5
4) GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th	184	10.2
5) Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th	180	10.0
6) Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th	179	9.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1844) Post: Order of Democratic and Republican House candidates in liberal-conservative placements (PPRAND35)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Democratic House candidate 5th, Republican House candidate 6th	716	39.6
2) Republican House candidate 5th, Democratic House candidate 6th	839	46.5
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1845) Post: Order of Democratic, Republican, and Reform Parties in liberal-conservative placements (PPRAND36)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Democratic Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Reform Party 9th	181	10.0
2) Democratic Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Republican Party 9th	172	9.5
3) Republican Party 7th, Democratic Party 8th, Reform Party 9th	659	36.5
4) Republican Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th	184	10.2
5) Reform Party 7th, Democratic Party 8th, Republican Party 9th	180	10.0
6) Reform Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th	179	9.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1846) Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in services-spending placements (PPRAND37)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd	1078	59.7
2) Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd	477	26.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1847) Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in abortion placements (PPRAND38)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd	1214	67.2
2) Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd	341	18.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1848) Post: Order of racial groups hardworking (PPRAND39)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th	190	10.5
2) Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th	671	37.2
3) Hispanic-Americans 2nd, blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th	180	10.0
4) Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, blacks 4th	177	9.8
5) Asian-Americans 2nd, blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th	166	9.2
6) Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, blacks 4th	168	9.3
9) NA	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1849) Post: Order of racial groups intelligent (PPRAND40)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th	185	10.2
2) Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th	164	9.1
3) Hispanic-Americans 2nd, blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th	179	9.9
4) Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, blacks 4th	174	9.6
5) Asian-Americans 2nd, blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th	651	36.0
6) Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, blacks 4th	199	11.0
9) NA	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1850) Post: Order of racial groups trustworthy (PPRAND41)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th	174	9.6
2) Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th	191	10.6
3) Hispanic-Americans 2nd, blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th	192	10.6
4) Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, blacks 4th	646	35.8
5) Asian-Americans 2nd, blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th	170	9.4
6) Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, blacks 4th	179	9.9
9) NA	3	0.2
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1851) Post: Order of angry in Clinton affects (PPRAND42)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	135	7.5
2) 2	130	7.2
3) 3	372	20.6
4) 4	126	7.0
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1852) Post: Order of hopeful Clinton affects (PPRAND43)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	131	7.3
2) 2	348	19.3
3) 3	138	7.6
4) 4	146	8.1
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1853) Post: Order of afraid Clinton affects (PPRAND44)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	359	19.9
2) 2	140	7.8
3) 3	138	7.6
4) 4	126	7.0
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1854) Post: Order of proud Clinton affects (PPRAND45)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	138	7.6
2) 2	145	8.0
3) 3	115	6.4
4) 4	365	20.2
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1855) Post: Order of moral in Clinton traits (PPRAND46)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	301	16.7
2) 2	84	4.7
3) 3	83	4.6
4) 4	81	4.5
5) 5	73	4.0
6) 6	74	4.1
7) 7	67	3.7
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1856) Post: Order of really cares in Clinton traits (PPRAND47)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	68	3.8
2) 2	78	4.3
3) 3	65	3.6
4) 4	87	4.8
5) 5	78	4.3
6) 6	308	17.1
7) 7	79	4.4
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1857) Post: Order of knowledgeable in Clinton traits (PPRAND48)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	76	4.2
2) 2	301	16.7
3) 3	81	4.5
4) 4	68	3.8
5) 5	83	4.6
6) 6	86	4.8
7) 7	68	3.8
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1858) Post: Order of leadership in Clinton traits (PPRAND49)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	82	4.5
2) 2	80	4.4
3) 3	66	3.7
4) 4	69	3.8
5) 5	76	4.2
6) 6	78	4.3
7) 7	312	17.3
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1859) Post: Order of dishonest in Clinton traits (PPRAND50)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	70	3.9
2) 2	60	3.3
3) 3	77	4.3
4) 4	72	4.0
5) 5	325	18.0
6) 6	75	4.2
7) 7	84	4.7
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1860) Post: Order of intelligent in Clinton traits (PPRAND51)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	81	4.5
2) 2	71	3.9
3) 3	80	4.4
4) 4	309	17.1
5) 5	68	3.8
6) 6	71	3.9
7) 7	83	4.6
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1861) Post: Order of out of touch in Clinton traits (PPRAND52)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	85	4.7
2) 2	89	4.9
3) 3	311	17.2
4) 4	77	4.3
5) 5	60	3.3
6) 6	71	3.9
7) 7	70	3.9
9) NA	792	43.9
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1862) Post: Order of moral in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND53)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	137	7.6
2) 2	139	7.7
3) 3	134	7.4
4) 4	130	7.2
5) 5	539	29.8
6) 6	118	6.5
7) 7	134	7.4
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1863) Post: Order of really cares in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND54)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	139	7.7
2) 2	140	7.8
3) 3	542	30.0
4) 4	128	7.1
5) 5	130	7.2
6) 6	124	6.9
7) 7	128	7.1
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1864) Post: Order of knowledgeable in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND55)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	140	7.8
2) 2	114	6.3
3) 3	129	7.1
4) 4	135	7.5
5) 5	116	6.4
6) 6	149	8.3
7) 7	548	30.3
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1865) Post: Order of leadership in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND56)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	545	30.2
2) 2	139	7.7
3) 3	132	7.3
4) 4	131	7.3
5) 5	130	7.2
6) 6	128	7.1
7) 7	126	7.0
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1866) Post: Order of dishonest in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND57)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	114	6.3
2) 2	127	7.0
3) 3	129	7.1
4) 4	137	7.6
5) 5	121	6.7
6) 6	567	31.4
7) 7	136	7.5
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1867) Post: Order of intelligent in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND58)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	135	7.5
2) 2	127	7.0
3) 3	129	7.1
4) 4	544	30.1
5) 5	133	7.4
6) 6	126	7.0
7) 7	137	7.6
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1868) Post: Order of out of touch in Bush Sr. traits (PPRAND59)

	TOTAL	%
0) INAP	251	13.9
1) 1	121	6.7
2) 2	545	30.2
3) 3	136	7.5
4) 4	126	7.0
5) 5	162	9.0
6) 6	119	6.6
7) 7	122	6.8
9) NA	224	12.4
Missing	1
Total	1806	100.0

1869) If R attends religious services: Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? (I-RELIGION)

	TOTAL	%
1) Protestant	543	44.0
2) Catholic	359	29.1
3) Jewish	28	2.3
4) Other	303	24.6
Missing	574
Total	1233	100.0

1870) Summary - respondent age (I-AGE)

	TOTAL	%
1) 18-35	493	27.4
2) 36-45	425	23.6
3) 46-64	565	31.4
4) 65+	315	17.5
Missing	9
Total	1798	100.0

1871) Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife)-- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never married? (I-MARITAL)

	TOTAL	%
1) Married/Partner	984	54.9
2) Widowed	168	9.4
3) Divorced/Separated	293	16.3
4) Never married	348	19.4
Missing	14
Total	1793	100.0

1872) Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? (I-PARTYID)

	TOTAL	%
1) Democrat	620	34.5
2) Republican	451	25.1
3) Independent/other	523	29.1
4) No preference	204	11.3
Missing	9
Total	1798	100.0

1873) Summary: R education (I-EDUC)

	TOTAL	%
1) Less than high school	180	10.0
2) High school	519	28.8
3) MTHS/Junior college	545	30.3
4) Bachelor's degree	373	20.7
5) Advanced degree	183	10.2
Missing	7
Total	1800	100.0

1874) Interviewer observation: R gender (I-SEX)

	TOTAL	%
1) Male	790	43.7
2) Female	1017	56.3
Total	1807	100.0

1875) What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Mention 1 - racial/ethnic group (I-RACE)

	TOTAL	%
1) Black	208	11.5
2) Asian	32	1.8
3) Hispanic	93	5.2
4) White	1393	77.3
5) Other	77	4.3
Missing	4
Total	1803	100.0