Democratizing access to the best data on religion since 1997
DATA ARCHIVE
DATA ARCHIVE

Archive Navigation

Summary
Codebook
Downloads
View Question Bank

Cross Tabulation Tables:


Archive Categories


Sort the above Archive Category by:



Browse Alphabetically
Browse All Categories
Browse Newest Additions

File Summaries


Search Data Archive


Carnegie Foundation National Survey of Higher Education, Faculty Sample (1975) - Analysis

AFIRMMRT (Weighted by WEIGHT)

Please indicate the extent of your agreement or disagreement with each of the following statements -- Affirmative action labels members of minority groups in such a way that they can never be judged on merit alone.
 FrequencyPercentCumulative Percent
1) Strongly agree341314.2%14.2%
2) Agree with reservations1006541.9%56.1%
3) Disagree with reservations758331.5%87.6%
4) Strongly disagree297412.4%100.0%
Missing945
Total Unweighted N = 24317





Sex (I-SEX)

 MaleFemaleMissingTotal
Strongly agree15.3%
2767
10.5%
592
5314.2%
3359
Agree with reservations44.1%
7961
34.9%
1972
12741.9%
9933
Disagree with reservations30.3%
5472
35.7%
2013
9231.6%
7485
Strongly disagree10.3%
1869
18.9%
1069
3612.4%
2938
Missing5772111253157
Total 100%
18069
100%
5646
   
23715

Race (I-RACE)

 WhiteBlackOtherMissingTotal
Strongly agree13.9%
3092
14.0%
101
18.8%
156
5914.1%
3349
Agree with reservations42.3%
9369
34.2%
246
39.9%
330
11541.9%
9945
Disagree with reservations31.8%
7057
26.7%
192
29.1%
241
8031.6%
7490
Strongly disagree12.0%
2653
25.0%
180
12.2%
101
3712.4%
2934
Missing70027521236166
Total 100%
22171
100%
719
100%
828
   
23718

Marital status (I-MARITAL)

 MarriedMarried twiceSingle, never marriedSingle, divorcedOtherMissingTotal
Strongly agree14.4%
2406
13.8%
267
14.3%
492
11.7%
134
14.3%
85
2814.2%
3384
Agree with reservations42.8%
7131
39.9%
771
39.8%
1372
42.2%
483
36.1%
215
8541.9%
9972
Disagree with reservations31.2%
5206
31.8%
615
32.5%
1123
31.3%
358
32.6%
194
6631.5%
7496
Strongly disagree11.5%
1920
14.5%
281
13.4%
464
14.8%
170
17.1%
102
3412.3%
2937
Missing5487112829151158154
Total 100%
16663
100%
1934
100%
3451
100%
1145
100%
596
   
23789

Religion (I-RELIGION)

 ProtestantCatholicJewishOther/NANoneMissingTotal
Strongly agree14.3%
1399
15.1%
539
18.2%
278
13.9%
378
12.6%
759
5914.2%
3353
Agree with reservations43.1%
4228
39.2%
1404
39.1%
598
42.4%
1149
42.4%
2557
13342.0%
9936
Disagree with reservations31.3%
3075
33.4%
1196
27.8%
426
32.0%
869
31.4%
1897
11731.5%
7463
Strongly disagree11.4%
1115
12.3%
441
14.9%
228
11.7%
317
13.6%
819
5012.3%
2920
Missing295109571141851304185
Total 100%
9817
100%
3580
100%
1530
100%
2713
100%
6032
   
23672

Political ideology (I-POLITICS)

 LeftLiberalMiddle of the roadModerately conservativeStrongly conservativeMissingTotal
Strongly agree10.9%
139
10.3%
862
13.6%
905
18.9%
1221
29.0%
212
8214.2%
3339
Agree with reservations31.1%
398
41.4%
3470
43.7%
2906
43.7%
2825
34.8%
255
19341.9%
9854
Disagree with reservations33.9%
434
34.6%
2898
32.1%
2133
27.6%
1788
22.5%
165
16831.6%
7418
Strongly disagree24.2%
310
13.7%
1149
10.5%
700
9.8%
635
13.7%
100
7712.3%
2894
Missing32257238200231465195
Total 100%
1281
100%
8379
100%
6644
100%
6469
100%
732
   
23505

Our Sponsors

Our Affiliates

US RELIGION
WORLD RELIGION
DATA ARCHIVE
RESEARCH
TEACHING
CONGREGATIONS
ABOUT
© 2023 The Association of Religion Data Archives. All rights reserved.